Spring Sale: Get 1 Year, Save 58%

Texas GOP passes abortion ban based on weaponizing lawsuits against providers

Legislation that would ban abortions after as early as six weeks — before many women know they are pregnant — and let virtually any private citizen sue abortion providers and others was given final approval by lawmakers Thursday and is headed to Gov. Greg Abbott, who has signaled he will sign it into law.

Senate Bill 8, a Republican priority measure, is similar to “heartbeat bills” passed in other states that have been mostly stopped by the courts. But proponents of the Texas legislation believe it’s structured in a way that makes it tougher to block.

The bill was denounced by hundreds of lawmakers and doctors — in letters circulated by opponents of the measure — who said its broad legal language could open the door to harassing or frivolous lawsuits that could have a “chilling effect” on abortion providers and leave rape crisis counselors, nurses and clinic staff “subject to tens of thousands of dollars in liability to total strangers.” Abortion rights advocates say it is among the most extreme restrictions nationwide.

The bill, which would take effect later this year, bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected without specifying a time frame. A legislative analysis and the bill’s proponents have said that can be as early as six weeks, though state Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, in a floor debate cited medical experts who say there is no fully developed heart at that gestational age and that the sound referred to as a heartbeat is actually “electrically induced flickering” of fetal tissue.

The bill makes an exception allowing for abortions in the case of a medical emergency but not for rape or incest.

It would be enforced by private citizens empowered to sue abortion providers and others who help someone get an abortion after six weeks, for example, by driving them to an abortion clinic.

Those private citizens would not need to have a connection to an abortion provider or a person seeking an abortion, and would not need to reside in Texas.

A person who impregnated someone through rape or incest could not sue.

The bill would not be enforced by public officials. Proponents hope that will prevent abortion rights advocates from suing the state to prevent the law from taking effect, though some legal experts have doubts about the strategy.

The anti-abortion Texas Right to Life organization, which supported the bill, said it lets citizens hold abortion providers “accountable through private lawsuits,” which has not been tried in any other state.

“The Texas Heartbeat Act is the strongest Pro-Life bill passed by the Legislature since Roe v. Wade,” said Rebecca Parma, the organization’s senior legislative associate.

Abortion rights advocates denounced the bill.

“With their lack of power at the federal level, anti-choice lawmakers across the country are ramping up their attacks on reproductive freedom at the state level, and cruelty appears to be the point,” said NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

Elise Stefanik cites “bizarre and ominous” pledge to Trump at press conference

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) used the occasion of her elevation to a Republican Party leadership position — in place of the ousted Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) — to announce her intention to work with “President Trump,” which set off a flurry of criticism reminding the GOP lawmaker that the one-term Trump is out of office and no longer part of the government.

Stefanik’s comment, made at a press conference, was noted by historian Michael Beschloss who tweeted, “Bizarre and ominous for Stefanik to feel compelled to announce, referring to House Republicans, “We are unified in working with President Trump.” Congress is co-equal branch and Trump no longer President, having been thrown out by US voters (as it should not need to be said).”

Many on Twitter joined in, accusing the lawmaker of being “purposefully disrespectful” to President Joe Biden while also noting Stefanik is apparently willing to take her marching orders from the ex-president.

According to one Stefanik critic, “We are heading into some bad territory.”

You can see more tweets like that below:

Escort seen at drug-fueled party with Matt Gaetz had ‘no show’ government job: report

New salacious details in the Matt Gaetz scandal were revealed in a bombshell new report by The Daily Beast.

“When Rep. Matt Gaetz attended a 2019 GOP fundraiser in Orlando, his date that night was someone he knew well: a paid escort and amateur Instagram model who led a cocaine-fueled party after the event, according to two witnesses. The Florida congressman’s one-time wingman, Joel Greenberg, will identify that escort to investigators as one of more than 15 young women Gaetz paid for sex, according to a source familiar with the investigation,” The Beast reported.

The woman was identified by The Beast.

“But what distinguishes this woman, Megan Zalonka, is that she turned her relationship with Greenberg into a taxpayer-funded no-show job that earned her an estimated $7,000 to $17,500, according to three sources and corresponding government records obtained by The Daily Beast. On Oct. 26, 2019, Gaetz attended the “Trump Defender Gala” fundraiser as the featured speaker at the Westgate Lake Resort in Orlando. Two witnesses present recalled friends reconvening at Gaetz’s hotel room for an after-party, where Zalonka prepared lines of cocaine on the bathroom counter. One of those witnesses distinctly remembers Zalonka pulling the drugs out of her makeup bag, rolling a bill of cash, and joining Gaetz in snorting the cocaine,” The Beast reported.

The hotel room was paid for by Gaetz’s campaign.

“While The Daily Beast could not confirm that Gaetz and Zalonka had sex that night, two sources said the pair had an ongoing financial relationship in exchange for sex. ‘She was just one of the many pieces of arm candy he had,’ said one source familiar with the encounters between Gaetz and Zalonka. The congressman—who has declared that he ‘never paid for sex’ —wrote off the stay at the hotel as a campaign expense, with his donors picking up the tab,” The Beast noted.

Demi Lovato is getting her own Peacock show where she hunts UFOs

One of the benefits of the streaming wars is that all of the platforms are looking for new content and that opens the door for fun and exciting shows like “Unidentified with Demi Lovato.” As the title suggests, the new docuseries on Peacock will follow singer and actress Lovato and her friends as they track UFOs and other cases of the unexplained.

SyFy Wire reports that the superstar is turning to the stars for a four-part series that follows her quest to “uncover the truth about UFO phenomena.” Lovato is fascinated by aliens and wants to learn more about UFOs with her sister Dallas and best friend Matthew in tow.

“While consulting with leading experts, Demi, Dallas and Matthew will investigate recent eyewitness encounters, uncover secret government reports, and conduct tests at known UFO hot spots” according to a Peacock release. The series will be filmed in a “immersive docu-follow” format.

Demi Lovato is a “true believer” when it comes to UFOs

Peacock is building its already robust library with new and innovative shows and programs, and it’s a bonus when celebrities join in the fun. Thanks to the ever-increasing demand for new content, there will always be room for shows that step outside the traditional boundaries of storytelling.

Unidentified with Demi Lovato is branded as a docu-series, but with its celebrity host, it also feels a bit like a reality show. That combination will make it an instant hit among fans and skeptics who tune in to see what secrets Lovato and her friends can uncover.

Lovato, who is an executive producer on the project, will meet with scientists and people who claim to have experienced abductions. Though the quest is one of discovery and understanding about extraterrestrials, Lovato also wants to “make peace with the aliens, and ultimately save ourselves.”

“Saved by the Bell” cast planning a tribute to Dustin Diamond in Season 2

When a reboot of “Saved by the Bell” landed on Peacock, almost the entire original cast came back for the new series but one person was conspicuously absent: Dustin Diamond. Though Diamond appeared in the original series and every other spin-off, he was not on the new series and after his tragic passing his friends are planning a special tribute to him in Season 2.

Diamond died in February 2021 at the age of 44 after battling an aggressive cancer that took his life within weeks of the announcement that he was sick. The news shocked the “Saved by the Bell” cast, especially because plans had been in place to have him appear in future seasons.

The reboot of the classic series features a new cast of students at Bayside High and many of the original members of the cast in their former roles, only now they’re the adults. Mario Lopez, Mark-Paul Gosselaar, Tiffani Thiessen, Lark Voorhies and Elizabeth Berkley are all signed on for the new show as older versions of their teenage selves.

Mario Lopez says “Saved by the Bell” will honor Dustin Diamond

Diamond, whose struggles with sobriety and run-ins with the law have presented challenges for him in the past, was not part of the first season of the reboot. His character, Screech, was said to be aboard the International Space Station, setting up the possibility of a return in future seasons if something could work out.

His former costar Mario Lopez said in a recent interview with Yahoo Entertainment that the cast is “planning something very special we haven’t gotten into yet,” as filming for Season 2 won’t begin until June.

Diamond’s passing was so quick and unexpected that it caught everyone off guard, so it’s no wonder that his friends are looking to honor him with a tribute in Season 2.

Fox News, after clamoring for weeks to end mask rules, calls new CDC guidance a “distraction”

After weeks of rabble-rousing coverage calling for new rules surrounding mask-wearing, Fox News abruptly shifted its tone on the matter Thursday — just hours after the Centers for Disease Control affirmed the network’s calls to announce it was safe for vaccinated individuals to shed their masks indoors. 

Now, the new masking guidance appears to be a “distraction,” according to a number of Fox News anchors and guests.

On shows across the board Thursday into Friday, hosts questioned the timing of the announcement. Jeanine Pirro went so far as to call the announcement “theater,” and listed off a number of so-called crises that the White House was supposedly looking to distract the public from.

Will Cain, who hosts “Fox & Friends” on Friday mornings, even said viewers should question “whether or not science was the guide here.”

It was a shocking turnaround for the network, which had for much of the previous year called mask mandates — and any COVID-19-related restrictions, really — a “permanent power grab” and evidence that Democrats “want [COVID-19] to continue indefinitely.”

But just minutes after CDC Director Rochelle Walensky held a press conference to announce the agency’s new guidance, host Dana Perino — who had herself repeatedly demanded Biden remove his mask in public settings — pointed to the news as a possible conspiracy to help the president’s approval rating: “I’m just saying they’re either extremely lucky or extremely skilled, and I admire it either way.”

Watch the video below via Media Matters for America:

“The Underground Railroad” is a relentlessly tough, yet gorgeously rendered television masterpiece

With “The Underground RailroadBarry Jenkins transforms Colson Whitehead‘s Pulitzer Prize-winning novel into a robust dialogue understood through multiple senses. The script is already potent before Jenkins layers in soundscapes: insects symphonies chittering and chirping in the fields suddenly falling silent, rumbling wheels on tracks in the dark, the cadent clang of a hammer on an anvil.

Now layer in the visuals, which is where the “Moonlight” director exerts absolute mastery. Employing the language of color and tone, light and darkness, he and cinematographer James Laxton can tell a million different stories with sunlight alone. Golden late afternoon rays wrap the beleaguered in relief while that same yellow, captured only a bit earlier in the day, runs hotter to amplify the misery of toiling in cotton fields.

The filmmaker does the same with shadow: the dark might hold questions or horrors. Sometimes it registers as blanket or shield. In one chilling scene meant to recall the crucifixion of Spartacus’ army on Rome’s Appian Way, the night obscures bodies hanging from trees.

Being aware of the intense experiential nature of this limited series is crucial because it’s a work that seeps in and stays with you. You’ll be grateful for its permanence, at least relative to other shows, because it’s the most worthwhile 10 episodes of TV given to us in a long while.

“The Underground Railroad” is also strenuous, brutal viewing not to be undertaken casually. Whitehead’s novel gives us a version of America where the Underground Railroad is real as a fire and brimstone forest, seamlessly merging elements of classic myth with history. In its heroine Cora Randall (Thuso Mbedu) we get a blend of Odysseus – with Orpheus, maybe, since he’s the one who descended to the underworld and escaped again – and Harriet Jacobs, whose autobiography “Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl” is a defining historical text.

Jenkins’ scene setting translates the railroad into a sort of purgatorial tunnel leading to many versions of hell and few rest stops. Watching Cora traveling through it makes the danger lurking at each stop palpable. Frightening and uncertain as these places may be, they’re better than the Georgia plantation she flees with Caesar (hauntingly portrayed by Aaron Pierre) after an excessively bone-chilling torture act hardens their resolve to run.

Long before that, though, a sadistic slavecatcher named Ridgeway (Joel Edgerton) sets his eye on Cora, and once she disappears recapturing her becomes his chief mission. Ridgeway’s vindictiveness is personal; Cora’s mother Mabel, who escaped years before, is the runaway he never caught. Mabel is a legend, but that glory marks Cora for life.

With Ridgeway a breath behind her Cora tumbles through an antebellum South that can be dreamlike and deceptive, where bucolic settings hide traps. A community South Carolina provides respite for a time, and its white leaders teach freed Black people how to read and learn a trade. They also employ her and others in museum displays reminiscent of P.T. Barnum’s racist sideshows, preaching lies about Africa and Black people to gawking white children.

North Carolina has outlawed Blackness entirely. In Indiana Cora finds a community of free Black folks working the land to make and sell wine. She isn’t entirely welcome there either, but has the support of a patient, kind freeborn man named Royal (William Jackson Harper, turning in an achingly sensitive performance).

Jenkins conveys the mythic nature of Cora’s journey through broad sweeps of the lens and in tight shots on faces to augment the humanity that is the soul of this piece, sowing pauses throughout “The Underground Railroad” that contain deeper meaning. Quiet wide shots of natural vistas or ramshackle quarters take on a dread, sometimes for reasons that aren’t immediately apparent. But they artfully embed themselves in our memory and pay off later on.

Exceeding this in power are the asides throughout the series when Jenkins steps away from the main plot to revisit people Cora left or left her through a long gaze. He places the actors in fields, standing and gazing into the camera unsmiling as it pans across, urging us us take in their number and strength. There’s a melancholy to these digressions, surpassed by the vast respect for legacy and ancestry Jenkins honors this way.

There are and will be people writing off “The Underground Railroad” despite all its critical praise, accusing it of selling Black pain as entertainment. I’m not one to begrudge that view considering where this country stands. Black pain circulates on video in a plentiful supply, with new episodes arriving nearly every day. A lot of us had our fill, and the truth is Jenkins does not shy away from traumatic imagery.

The premiere is a slow escalation from a grown white man beating children to a denigrating scene showing him forcing two people to have sex while he watches. This climaxes to a smoldering evil made more sinister by white men picnicking with guests and waltzing to a Black man’s agonized wails as he’s subjected to unimaginable anguish.

But there is a difference between Black trauma cheaply paraded for thrills and the kind portrayed as a basis upon which a people builds their resilience. Jenkins takes extreme care with his characters, even those moving in the background, and affords all of them the dignity they are due.

Black people are hunted, tortured and slaughtered – Cora is herself the survivor of multiple terrors – but the camera doesn’t leer on torn flesh or blood, largely choosing subtlety over explicit showings of physical or psychic injury. Most of the worst crimes happen out of frame, and it’s enough to hear the sound of them.

Outweighing these jagged shards is the bounty of community and intimacy Jenkins builds into his focus. “The Underground Railroad” begins, in fact, with musical celebration, a great light before darkness falls upon these people about whom we care proufoundly.

Cora’s treacherous passage isn’t meant to be easy viewing, and Mbedu brings her alive through an array of tempers, first among them anger – at her mother for leaving her, at her captors’ casual evil and at Ridgeway, for reminding Cora of her chains even when she’s free of them. In these moments Mbedu weights the corners of her frown with a heartbreaking pull.

That scowl is its own entity and merits a guest star credit, because when she can banish it, Cora’s joy is downright transporting. Mbedu and Jenkins make every morsel of happiness she seizes into a meaty portion. This is one of the many ways by which the director depicts Black joy as a constant, and frequently interrupted, but always waiting to break through some fissure. When it manages to do so, its beauty is staggering.

Set against this, Edgerton transforms Ridgeway into a kind of Old Testament demon in a meat suit, bellowing poisonous ash everywhere and commanding the sickening loyalty of the dapperly dressed Black boy who follows him, Homer (Chase W. Dillion). An episode that expands Ridgeway’s background does nothing to absolve him, but no one’s evil is excused or explained here, merely presented as a link in a toxic, supremacist system of chains only a shade removed from verifiable history and truth of America.

Amazon’s choice to release the entire series at once is puzzling. A lot of people will binge the entire series in a sitting or two, which is doable. Although most installments are about an hour long,the slightest, timewise, registers at under 20 minutes. The swelling crescendo of the penultimate episode clocks in at an hour and 18 minutes.

Sprinting through it all takes away from appreciating the delicacy of the show’s travels away from the main narrative. Even if you don’t pick up the small literary details in that shorter episode, it’s a solace from the madness contradicting the ferocity and meanness of Cora’s trials. Some installments’ pacing that might otherwise register as meditative verge on plodding when set directly against the breathless action dominating what comes before and after them.

“The Underground Railroad” is a massive accomplishment and a weighty one, and not to be rushed. Even if you absorb it all at once, parsing its pathways and traveling with it for time seems inevitable, and I suspect we’ll be talking about this for a while.

“The Underground Railroad” streams on Amazon starting Friday, May 14.

Matt Gaetz associate Joel Greenberg pleads guilty in sex trafficking case

Joel Greenberg, a long-time associate of Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, has pleaded guilty to sex trafficking of a minor and other federal crimes and agreed to cooperate with U.S. Department of Justice investigators — which, according to New York Times reporter Michael S. Schmidt, makes the former Seminole County, Florida tax collector “a potential key witness” if Gaetz is charged with any crimes.

The DOJ has been investigating allegations that Gaetz was sexually involved with a 17-year-old girl — an allegation that the far-right Republican congressman, a passionate supporter of former President Donald Trump, has flatly denied. Gaetz has even fundraised off the investigation, claiming that he is being persecuted by “the Deep State” for standing up for Trump’s agenda. In one of his fundraising e-mails, Gaetz sounded very Trump-like when he wrote, “I will not back down from the Fake News hacks that want to destroy me and America-First patriots like you. I am more determined than ever to shut down this HOAX, and I am glad to have President Trump on my side.”

Schmidt reports that Greenberg “did not implicate Mr. Gaetz by name in papers filed by prosecutors in Federal District Court in Orlando” but “admitted that he and unidentified others had paid a 17-year-old girl for sex and that he had provided her with drugs.” In the court papers, Greenberg admitted that he “introduced the minor to other adult men, who engaged in commercial sex acts.”

The Times has reported that according to sources, Gaetz asked Trump for a blanket pardon during his final weeks in the White House, but the outgoing president declined.

In the court papers filed on Friday, Greenberg, according to Schmidt, admitted to other crimes as well — including identify theft, stealing money from local taxpayers in Florida and defrauding the federal government.

Greenberg has been a target of DOJ investigators since 2020, and that investigation became a bigger story this year when Gaetz’s name appeared in connection with it in news reports.

Schmidt explains, “As the inquiry ensnared Mr. Gaetz and other influential Florida Republicans and burst into national news in recent weeks, reports have portrayed them as a freewheeling group that frequented parties, sometimes took the mood-altering drug ecstasy and, in some cases, paid women they had sex with. Mr. Gaetz has denied paying for sex and said that his generosity toward former girlfriends was being misconstrued.”

The Times reporter notes that Greenberg is “facing 12 years in prison” but could receive a shorter sentence “if his cooperation results in the prosecutions of others.”

“Prosecutors revealed in the documents that they have evidence they say corroborates Mr. Greenberg’s admissions — including a series of communications and transactions Mr. Greenberg had with the girl, and a list of dates of their sexual encounters,” Schmidt notes. “The inclusion of that material appeared designed to bolster the credibility of Mr. Greenberg as a witness whose truthfulness would likely be challenged by anyone who is charged based on anything he tells prosecutors.”

States, businesses react to CDC statement that fully vaccinated can go maskless

On Thursday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that fully vaccinated people no longer have to wear masks inside and outside.

“Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC’s director said. “If you are fully vaccinated, you can start doing the things that you had stopped doing because of the pandemic.”

The news signals a massive turning point in the pandemic, during which indoor and outdoor mask-wearing rules have become normal in most states. While the CDC has some stipulations (masks are still required in healthcare settings), the announcement marks over one year since federal health officials told Americans to cover their faces in public.

Yet there are nuances to the CDC’s guidelines — nuances which have resulted in different interpretations across the nation. Notably, the CDC’s new guidance isn’t a no-mask mandate, but rather a recommendation that somewhat shifts mask-wearing guidelines to local governments and the private sector.

Hours after the announcement, state and county governments reacted in a variety of ways. Demcoratic Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker said that he will revise executive orders to match the CDC’s new guidelines.

“I firmly believe in following the science, and will revise my executive orders in line with CDC guidelines lifting additional mitigations for vaccinated people,” Pritzker said. “The scientists’ message is clear: if you are vaccinated, you can safely do much more.”


Want more health and science stories in your inbox? Subscribe to Salon’s weekly newsletter The Vulgar Scientist.


Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear said the state will “immediately follow” the new rules, too.

“This is outstanding,” Beshear said. “It means that we are so close to normalcy, and we’re going to be changing Kentucky’s mask mandate to be the same with those CDC guidelines.”

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer announced that anyone fully vaccinated in Michigan will no longer need to wear a mask while indoors. People who are not fully vaccinated are required to keep wearing masks indoors. Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Washington and Pennsylvania also moved to make changes to their mask mandates to be more aligned with the CDC’s new guidelines.

At the moment, mask mandates appear to not be over for the fully vaccinated in states like California, New York, and North Carolina, as governors of these states and local jurisdictions are still considering what to do.

In many municipalities, the announcement has caused confusion on how to proceed, as some leaders aren’t convinced that people who aren’t fully vaccinated will still wear masks and social distance. For example, Quinton Lucas, who’s the democratic mayor of Kansas City. Missouri, first said the mask order wouldn’t change, then said he would think about it, and then finally said he’d lift the mask mandate altogether because it’s too difficult to decipher who’s been vaccinated and who hasn’t.

“While I understand the CDC’s theory that they could just create a rule that says vaccinated folks go anywhere without a mask, and everybody else who’s unvaccinated will follow it, I don’t know if that’s the type of rule that was written in coordination with anyone who has been a governor or a mayor over the last 14 months,” Lucas said, via The New York Times.

Indeed, Lucas’s concerns reflect the heart of the debate among Americans: can an honor system really work? And are private businesses willing to implement measures to check the vaccination status of their customers?

On Friday, Trader Joe’s updated it’s COVID-19 page, saying the company will “encourage customers to follow the guidance of health officials, including, as appropriate, CDC guidelines that advise customers who are fully vaccinated are not required to wear masks while shopping.” However, Target, Home Depot, CVS and Harris Teeter are among the chains that said they will continue to require masks inside their stores.

The United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), which represents 1.3 million essential food and retail workers, raised concerns about the new CDC guidance, calling it “confusing.”

“While we all share the desire to return to a mask-free normal, today’s CDC guidance is confusing and fails to consider how it will impact essential workers who face frequent exposure to individuals who are not vaccinated and refuse to wear masks,” UFCW International President Marc Perrone said in a statement. “Millions of Americans are doing the right thing and getting vaccinated, but essential workers are still forced to play mask police for shoppers who are unvaccinated and refuse to follow local COVID safety measures; are they now supposed to become the vaccination police?”

The guidance is also causing confusion among many parents, as the Washington Post reports, as very few children have been vaccinated. Vaccinated parents bringing unvaccinated children to public indoor places might create a stew of complicated rule-sorting regarding masks.

“Until younger children are eligible to be vaccinated for the COVID-19 vaccine, they should continue to wear face masks when they are in public and around other people,” said Yvonne Maldonado, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics committee on infectious diseases. “We’ve already seen how the masks have helped prevent the spread of respiratory infections within schools, camps and other community settings, particularly when everyone wears them, washes hands and follows other infection control guidance.”

Mass vaccination of children will soon begin in the U.S. This week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children between 12 and 15 years of age. Children under the age of 12 are expected to be eligible for emergency use of the vaccine by fall 2021.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene staffer confronts Rep. Eric Swalwell over wearing a mask inside Capitol

Just a day after freshman Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., accosted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. outside the House chamber, accusing the New York lawmaker of supporting antifa “terrorists,” Greene again made headlines when her senior aide pulled a similar stunt on Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. 

As The Hill’s Scott Wong first reported, Greene spokesperson Nick Dyer got into a “verbal altercation” on Friday morning with Swalwell over the Centers for Disease Control’s new health guidelines, which no longer recommend indoor mask-wearing for vaccinated individuals.

“Biden says you can take off your mask,” Dyer quipped to the Bay Area law maker. 

“You don’t tell me what to f**king do,” the Congressman shot back. 

Swalwell later confirmed that he did in fact cuss the aide out. 

“I had a mask on as I stepped off the Floor,” the representative tweeted. “An aide with @mtgreenee yelled at me to take my mask off. No one should be bullied for wearing a mask. So I told the bully what I thought of his order. Predictably, he went speechless. I regret I wasn’t more explicit.”

twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1393224914174369792

Of course, Greene refused to let Swalwell get the last word, claiming on Twitter that “he chased my staffer into the [sic] Captiol, cornered him and exploded in anger inches from his face.”

The tiff comes just as House Speaker Pelosi announced on Friday that the House would not be lifting its mask mandate despite the change in CDC guidelines. 

On Friday, more than 30 House Republicans wrote a letter to Pelosi demanding that she “immediately return to normal voting procedures and end mandatory mask requirements in the House of Representatives.” It was reported back in March that about a quarter of the House has not yet been vaccinated.

“Reckless” GOP Rep violated COVID rules, let son live in Capitol storage unit: lawsuit

Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., ignored coronavirus safety protocols, exposed his staff to the virus and flouted ethics rules, according to a lawsuit filed by a former staffer on Thursday.

Brandon Pope, a former Marine who worked as an adviser to Lamborn, claimed that he was fired in December “for seeking to protect employees from unsafe conditions in the workplace” in a complaint filed in a federal court in Washington, D.C.

The lawsuit, first reported by NBC Washington, alleges that Lamborn, an eight-term representative from Colorado Springs, took a “reckless” approach to the pandemic by ignoring safety rules even after his staff was infected. The complaint also claims that Lamborn flouted ethics rules by asking staff to run personal errands and allowing his son to live in a storage unit in the basement of the U.S. Capitol for weeks.

The suit alleges that Lamborn called the virus a “hoax” during staff meetings in April 2020 before testing positive himself in November. He mocked aides who wanted to wear masks, ignored staffer requests to work from home and urged employees to keep quiet about an outbreak at his Colorado and Washington offices last fall, Pope claimed, adding that he learned of the outbreak among his colleagues “from third parties.”

“Well, I don’t care about you guys getting it,” Lamborn allegedly told a staffer in October after learning of the outbreak. Pope himself tested positive in November.

“Lamborn did not require employees in the District Office to wear masks, claiming that he would not allow House Leadership to dictate how he ran his office, and he did not permit all employees to social distance,” the suit claims. “Worse, when Lamborn and other senior members of his staff became infected with COVID-19 in the fall of 2020, Lamborn refused to implement or follow reasonable and responsible COVID-19 protocols.”

Pope also claimed that Lamborn “consistently disregarded ethical rules and norms that apply to Members of Congress” and that staff “were compelled to give Christmas and birthday gifts to Representative Lamborn and his wife.”

At one point, Lamborn “gave his son the necessary access to live in a storage area in the basement of the U.S. Capitol for a period of weeks” after his son moved to Washington for work, according to the complaint. Staffers were also assigned to help Lamborn’s son look for jobs in the federal government and prepare him for interviews “by asking him mock interview questions and helping him craft his responses.”

Pope was ultimately fired on Dec. 7. He said he was told he was let go for “an alleged lack of professionalism and abrasiveness” but claims he was fired because of his “vocal opposition to Lamborn’s reckless approach to Covid-19.”

The suit alleges that Lamborn violated the Congressional Accountability Act, which includes workplace safety protections for congressional staff, and seeks unspecified damages.

Lamborn’s office denied the allegation.

“The workplace safety allegations made by Mr. Pope are unsubstantiated and did not result in the termination of his employment,” spokeswoman Cassandra Sebastian told NBC Washington. “Congressman Lamborn looks forward to full vindication as all facts come to light.”

Lamborn described Pope as a disgruntled employee to Colorado Public Radio and, insisted that he had “accommodated people’s concerns” during the pandemic, and denied any ethics violations. Lamborn acknowledged that “I gave my son temporary housing as my guest because the housing market in Washington, D.C., is very tight,” but did not say whether he allowed his son to live in a storage facility in the Capitol basement.

Emails obtained by the Denver Post corroborated Pope’s claim that staff were sent a Christmas gift email for Lamborn and his wife, urging each staffer to give $10 to buy them a gift certificate for the Kennedy Center. Another email showed that a staffer left the office last January to “run an errand for Mrs. Lamborn.”

Pope also alleged that staffers were asked to pick up mail, move furniture and help Lamborn’s wife “set up a video telecom system so that she could hold personal video calls with her family.” He also claimed that other staffers were fired for not attending events at Lamborn’s home.

The complaint also claims that congressional staffers were asked to perform campaign work during office time. House ethics rules prohibit lawmakers from using staff to run personal errands or using congressional resources to perform tasks for their campaigns.

“We’ve been very careful and have conducted a thorough investigation of the facts before we filed the lawsuit and we are very confident that we will be able to prove everything that we alleged, not simply with Mr. Pope’s testimony but with the testimony of numerous other witnesses,” Les Alderman, an attorney for Pope, told NBC Washington.

Alderman also disputed Lamborn’s characterization of his client.

“Brandon was a committed employee who cared deeply about his job and particularly caring for veterans,” he said. “The only way you could call him disgruntled is because Lamborn and his chief of staff bristled at Brandon standing up to do the right thing during a pandemic.”

Meghan McCain: Marjorie Taylor Greene makes Republicans look like “psychotic barbarians”

The View’s Meghan McCain was not happy to see the latest video of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) harassing a political opponent.

Reacting to a newly unearthed video from 2019 in which Greene is shown stalking Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) at her office, McCain wrote on Twitter that the QAnon-loving freshman Georgia lawmaker was making all Republicans look bad with her insane attention-seeking antics.

“You’re behaving like an animal — harassing AOC like this only gives Democrats what they want which is to paint all of us like we’re psychotic barbarians!” McCain wrote. “Aside from the fact that this is just abusive and abhorrent behavior from anyone, let alone a sitting member of Congress.”

Ocasio-Cortez on Friday shamed House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) for not doing more to discipline Greene, after noting that he’s disciplined lawmakers such as Reps. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and Justin Amash (R-MI) for speaking out against former President Donald Trump.

“The fact that Kevin McCarthy, the House GOP leader, stripped Justin Amash of all committee seats for criticizing Trump, but has worked to protect this person from consequences (including pretending he doesn’t see it) tells you this is happening with the support of GOP leadership,” she wrote.

Sebastian Gorka blames U.S. Army soldier with two moms for America’s “weakness”

Former Donald Trump aide turned right-wing radio host Sebastian Gorka launched into a strange homophobic monologue on Thursday night, targeting a U.S. Army soldier who opened up in a new recruiting ad to share her life story of having two mothers. 

On his afternoon radio program, in a segment now posted to Rumble with the caption “The U.S. Army goes lesbian,” Gorka went off the rails, claiming that the soldier with lesbian parents would be a reason for foreign adversaries to attack the United States. 

“It’s not a joke, so let me just dissect that, lesbian couples with daughters that join the Army,” Gorka began. “I heard a lot about her two moms. By the way, Ms. Emma Lord, you can’t have two mothers, OK? Don’t be a science denier. One woman can bear a child, and there is something that is missing if you want to have a baby and a woman can’t do it, O.K.?” 

Gorka proceeded to claim that the woman in the video who decided to serve in the U.S. Army is a “selfish little millennial,” although he did not appear to know anything about her. “It’s serving something outside of yourself, Emma!” said Gorka, who was born in England, spent his young adulthood in Hungary and has never served in the U.S. military.

“It’s about what the flag represents, not your rainbow posters!” Gorka stated before insinuating that the soldier who shared her personal story about having two mothers wasn’t a “real soldier.” 

“You’re a selfish, repugnant disgrace, and our real enemies are laughing at you and your little propaganda product, guarantee you that,” Gorka stated. “You are the reason that we will be attacked again and again and again because you have demonstrated your willingness to be a puppet in a message of weakness, which is antithetical to what America really represents.” 

Gorka didn’t return Salon’s request for comment on his monologue. 

Gorka is not the only conservative triggered by this new and allegedly “woke” U.S. Army recruiting ad, evidently designed to encourage other young people from diverse or unconventional backgrounds to enlist. 

“Compare the New Woke U.S. Army Ad to a Russian Army Ad and Pray for the West,” the right-wing blog RedState wrote on Thursday, claiming that “the left in America has infiltrated and introduced its rot to the U.S. military, and you can now see the infection in its recruitment ads.” 

You can watch Gorka’s monologue above via “America First” on the Salem Radio Network. 

“Those Who Wish Me Dead” wastes Angelina Jolie’s action chops in a film that’s more smoke than fire

The exhilaration of jumping out of a plane with a parachute is not quite the feeling viewers may have watching “Those Who Wish Me Dead” — even if they venture to see it in a cinema. This lame new thriller, which simultaneously releases in theaters and on HBO Max, contains only a modicum of thrills, which is disappointing for a survival story set in the world of smoke jumpers. 

The opening sequence promises excitement as Hannah (Angelina Jolie) jumps from a plane and into a fiery forest. But this is actually a nightmare; she is haunted by the death of three children she tried to save the year before. 

Cut to Fort Lauderdale, where brothers Jack (Aidan Gillen) and Patrick Blackwell (Nicholas Hoult) are posing as gas men. They deliberately blow up the house of some Florida man who has dirt on the Governor and Congressmen. When forensic accountant Casserly (Jake Weber) hears about the explosion on the news, he takes his pre-teen son Connor (Finn Little) and heads to Montana to see Ethan Sawyer (Jon Bernthal) to hide out. He has the incriminating evidence that the Blackwell brothers want. “Those Who Wish Me Dead” is pretty much an extended chase film in which the Blackwell brothers try to capture Casserly and Connor in the wilderness. 

The forest backdrop is meant to provide an interesting environment for the action to unfold, and the scenery is magnificent. However, director Taylor Sheridan (Oscar-nominated for writing “Hell or High Water“), one of three screenwriters adapting Michael Koryta’s novel, makes the characters so one dimensional that the trees have more depth. 

Hannah, the sole female smoke jumper, is relegated to a watch tower because she failed the psych exam after the tragedy last year. She is looking for redemption. She is also Ethan’s ex, an unnecessary contrivance; Ethan’s wife, Allison (Medina Senghore) is six months pregnant. But these relationships do not enhance or even complicate the plot. When the Blackwells come after each of them, they only want to survive and protect Connor (and Allison’s unborn baby).

The early scenes play out one person’s expected death and another’s escape. This happens around the same time Hannah’s lookout station gets zapped by lighting, which makes communication useless. “Those Who Wish Me Dead,” sets up all these plot points, but it does not build suspense. Then Jack sets fire to the land with some flares to distract the smoke jumpers while he hunts for the escapee. 

Alas, much of Sheridan’s film seems more foolhardy than clever. Sure, there are some nice visuals of raging fires, and there are atmospheric moments of ash swirling around various characters. There is even a pretty cool underwater shot. But viewers never quite feel the heat of the CGI flames illuminating Jolie’s chiseled cheekbones. 

One of the most horrific scenes in the film has the Blackwells paying a visit to Allison in the hope of learning one of Connor’s whereabouts. To coerce her to cooperate, they put a poker in the fire and threaten to brand her. That Allison is a Black woman makes this image especially troubling. At least her response to her predicament provides one of the film’s few satisfying moments. 

But much of “Those Who Wish Me Dead” is wrongheaded. A cameo by Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award winner, Tyler Perry, as Jack’s boss, seems superfluous. And it may be mildly amusing for Hannah to teach Connor the lyrics to the song, “Mother Pheasant Plucker,” but it just provides some calm before the storm. Viewers themselves may be just waiting for the action, which eventually comes as the plotlines converge. If Sheridan’s film is meant to convey the long stretches of boredom before brief moments of excitement, it succeeds.

Without giving too much away, there is gunfire, there is forest fire, and there’s Hannah wielding a weapon. The action set pieces are all competently rendered, but it raises the question: Why can’t they be better, or more intense? The narrative never feels propulsive. When the Blackwells employ Ethan to help them track Connor, Ethan dares them to shoot him, knowing that they need him to achieve their goal, which is to create a zero sum game. That seems to be the film’s goal too, dispatching some characters and redeeming others while viewers wait for the smoke to clear. 

Moreover, Jolie is overqualified to play Hannah. She spends far more of her screen time in mama bear mode than she does as an action hero. (There are few stunts, mostly falls.) Finn Little is admirable as Connor, but the reliable Jon Bernthal is not given enough to do here. Ethan’s moments with Allison are best, but that is because Medina Senghore steals her every scene. Watching her make good choices is the best thing about the film. In support, Nicholas Hoult offers some menace, however, Aidan Gillen seems to be phoning in his performance. 

“Those Who Wish Me Dead” is pretty much dead on arrival.

“Those Who Wish Me Dead” releases in theaters and on HBO Max on Friday, May 14.

Ewan McGregor dazzles in “Halston,” which neglects to understand the legend behind the fashions

When you’re everywhere, eventually people stop noticing you. When people stop noticing you, you disappear. You become nothing. Nobody.

Halston, the once-ubiquitous fashion brand, taught us this cautionary lesson alongside Halston, the man. Early on in the five-part limited series named for the designer, played by Ewan McGregor, Halston forlornly realizes that inventing the shirtwaist dress wasn’t paying the bills.

To do that he’d have to sell something bigger: the licensing rights to his name. Soon after an investor (Bill Pullman) purchases the rights to his moniker for millions of dollars.

This, he tells his creative partner Joe Eula (David Pittu), would give them freedom. Joe isn’t so certain, but Halston reassures him that he hasn’t actually sold his name – he’s sold his trademark. “Your trademark is your name,” Joe responds.

They have this exchange on a plane returning to New York from Paris, and as they sail above the clouds, breathing the rarest of air, Joe can’t help but admit that kind of money can buy all the orchids in Paris.

Getting swept up in the rush of Halston was always the easy part, and “Halston,” adapted from Stephen Gaines’ book “Simply Halston,” takes on a narcotic flow when it emphasizes that headiness, when the world was Halston’s and his sobriquet graced everything from luggage to sunglasses to sensibly chic dresses.

The shirtwaist dress made Halston famous, a largely forgotten credit along with many of his other ready-to-wear mass market designs. Indeed, most people know or remember little to nothing about the one-time most successful individual designer in the history of fashion largely because he sold away the one thing that matters.

“Halston” strides onto the Netflix runway attempting to reclaim some of that legacy, but never hits the mark. High on glamour and low on insight, we’re treated to eyefuls of elegance, McGregor’s prosaic impression of Halston’s silken fussiness and enough nose powder to make Donatella Versace dream of skiing.

But whatever poetry made Halston who he is remains left undiscovered and unspoken, and isn’t poetry the heart of fashion design? Isn’t that why you turn on a series about and named for someone, to attain some insight into the human behind the fabrication? You would think so.

Before Halston dressed everyone he specialized in made-to-order garments for everyone who was anyone. Listed among his friends and clients, other than Liza Minnelli, were Lauren Hutton, Bianca Jagger, Liz Taylor and Betty Ford.

Working with a veritable supergroup of creativity that started with fashion illustrator Joe Eula, Joel Schumacher (Rory Culkin), yes, the guy who brought us “The Lost Boys,” and Elsa Peretti (a sylph-like Rebecca Dayan), as in the jewelry designer who modernized Tiffany & Co, Halston forged himself into a living myth.

Halston’s life and career merged business and art in ways the fashion world had never seen, making director Daniel Minahan’s choice to structure most of the drama around the business highlights and markers of decline somewhat understandable. The designer’s failure on that front was public, spectacular and titillating.

Massive success came to him quickly. We see him in 1973, when he’s hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, ruefully complaining that he must be a real artist, “because I’m a terrible businessman.”  By 1984 he has his dear friend Martha Graham (Mary Beth Peil) marveling with no shortage of alarm, “You just managed to crowd, ‘I’m an artist, and all I care about is money,’ into a single sentence!”

Martha Graham was nothing if not an idealist, while early in his career Halston learned that an artist’s genius means little to nothing without endorsements from rich and famous.

Our first glimpse of Halston’s professional success is the aftermath of Jackie Kennedy dropping his name as the milliner who made her famous pillbox hat. Soon after he was dressing Liza (breezily played by Krysta Rodriguez), then Studio 54’s glitterati, and after that came the world.

Titans leave the curious an abundance of details to sort, and Halston’s workaholism and excess created his own hoard within a compressed amount of time – less than the two decades Minahan, a TV directing veteran, spent trying to make a film about him. Twenty years is plenty of time to theorize as to what inspired and drove Halston aside from dual addictions to orchids and cocaine.

Yet the writers, including fellow executive producer Ryan Murphy, who has a credit on four episodes, barely avail themselves of any creative license in that respect. Instead the story marches through the standard beats of American success stories with all the music of a Butterick dressmaker’s pattern, and with more than a few biographical details skimmed over or omitted. Humble beginnings beget ambition, leading to huge swings and grand failures; undeterred, he tries again, succeeds, hits the heights with all the party drugs, orgiastic sex and insane relationships he can’t handle, mainly with prostitute-turned-artist Victor Hugo (Gian Franco Rodriguez). Then comes the decline, demented rampages, late night sobbing and ignominy.

It may be worth wondering whether the narrative’s inability to believably breach Halston’s notorious psychological opacity is intentional choice on the part of Murphy and his script collaborators. Famous people are alike in many ways, one commonality being a devotion to shielding the parts that contradict one’s image. In that regard one can understand why Murphy and Minahan may have wanted to respect the mystery of what makes Halston tick. Murphy’s an established brand himself, attached to a network procedural, several FX titles and a flotilla of Netflix projects.

However, and again, you really can’t do that when the very point of watching this story is the name in the title. Sequined chic and cocaine-fueled disco fantasias create dazzling scenery, but hours’ worth of that it is only mesmerizing to a point.

A couple of glimpses from his boyhood in Evansville, Indiana, when he was Roy Halston Frowick, are provided as the seedbed from which his mania to succeed and accumulate spring. Using terrible childhood memories as the go-to explanation for an artist’s monstrosity or emotional difficulty is hackneyed at this point. Even if you don’t feel that way, such frames don’t reveal much about artistic process, the very details worth exploring in a dramatized profile of a man who reinvigorated American clothing design.

Cutting fabric to flow with the wearer is a Halston’s signature, and he emphasized the blending of freedom with fashion. How and why he claimed this angle isn’t explored; it simply happens at one point after he passes a couple of hippie girls on the street, but before he picks up a gigolo.

Purely from an aesthetics perspective, “Halston” is fabulous. Minahan, who directs every episode, saturates each frame in stylistic succulence, favoring rich colors and clean lines and all impeccably lit and staged as Halston might have demanded.

But when isn’t this the case with a Ryan Murphy production? Although I got the impression that Murphy’s touch is light relative to his other work, including his “American Crime Story” treatment of Gianni Versace, his presence makes itself known in dialogue like, “I get it. I got too much. I hate me!” and “The orchids are part of my process! You can’t put a budget on inspiration!”

Primarily this is McGregor’s showcase, and that’s works in its favor because the actor, like Halston, is handsome and cleans up nicely. He probably strikes a lot of people as an odd choice given his association these days with motorcycle travelogues and young Obi-Wan Kenobi; he’s also credited as an executive producer.

If you enjoy the man, he’s not hard to watch. He’ll get you through. Nevertheless I was left wishing for a thicker weaving of Halston’s relationships with Liza and Elsa. Minnelli remains one of Halston’s staunchest defenders to this day but in “Halston” she’s basically the hero who swoops in whenever he needs saving. When she does, you may appreciate Rodriguez’s choice to tread lightly with her impression of Broadway’s darling: She twinkles too emphatically at first but eases into the role as the series goes on. 

Dayan embodies Peretti’s effortless refinement and doesn’t do much additional work, but perhaps she doesn’t need to. Still, given Minnelli’s closeness to Halston and Peretti’s loyalty long after he ceased being reasonable, devoting more of the plot to their relationships with and to him could have provided more of that interiority we’re craving.

By the time Halston was ousted from his company in the 1980s, the clothes bearing his name were slumping on JC Penney’s racks. He died in 1990 but lost ownership of the moniker he created long before that, adding to the tragedy of the one-time giant’s fade into obscurity.

“Halston” brings him back, but only partway. And that’s a real shame. Halston reinvented women’s fashion, as one of his confidantes points out, by wrapping a woman “in a feeling, in your taste.”

Defining that feeling and imagining its source could have made “Halston” something extraordinary instead of common and comfortable.

“Halston” premieres Friday, May 14 on Netflix.

Liz Cheney calls out Fox News’ election lies in contentious interview with Bret Baier

In an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier on Thursday, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY),fresh off her removal from GOP House leadership for her criticism of former President Donald Trump, doubled down on her opposition to “big lie” conspiracy theories about the outcome of the 2020 presidential election — and told Baier that his own network had a responsibility to correct the record.

“Especially Fox News has a particular obligation to say that the election wasn’t stolen,” said Cheney.

Cheney was one of ten House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump for incitement to insurrection. She survived an initial challenge to her leadership, but after continuing to vocally oppose the former president’s attacks on democracy, was removed as House Republican Conference chair. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) is the frontrunner to take her place.

Watch below via Fox News:

Nancy Pelosi refuses to relax mask mandate until more Republicans in the House get vaccinated

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is requiring that all members in the House of Representatives continue wearing masks, despite new guidance from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that indoor mask-wearing is no longer necessary. 

The revelation came during a Thursday press conference when a CNN reporter asked whether the House would now lift its mask mandate in light of the CDC’s new guidelines.

“No. Are they all vaccinated?” Pelosi clapped back. 

Capitol Attending Physician Brian Monahan later confirmed the veracity of Pelosi’s statement in a memo, which revealed that “the present mask requirement and other guidelines” would “remain unchanged until all Members and floor staff are fully vaccinated.”

Back in March, Axios reported that about a quarter of the House had “either refused to be vaccinated, are avoiding it due to medical conditions or have not reported getting one.” In April, Pelosi said she wouldn’t be enforcing a vaccination mandate for members of the House.

“We cannot require someone to be vaccinated,” she told reporters at the time. “That’s just not what we can do, it is a matter of privacy to know who is or who isn’t. I can’t go to the Capitol physician and say, ‘Give me the names of people who aren’t vaccinated so I can go encourage them to,’ or make it known to others to encourage them to be vaccinated.”

Pelosi’s remarks sparked predictable outrage from several of her Republican colleagues.

“It’s about control,” House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., said in a Fox News interview on Thursday evening. “She wants to control the House.” 

On Friday, over 30 House Republicans penned an angry missive to Pelosi demanding that she “immediately return to normal voting procedures and end mandatory mask requirements in the House of Representatives.”

“CDC guidance states fully vaccinated people no longer need to wear a mask or physically distance in any setting except where required by governmental or workplace mandate,” they wrote. “It is time to update our own workplace regulations. Every member of Congress has had the opportunity to be vaccinated, and you have indicated about 75 percent have taken advantage of this opportunity.”

Rep. Bob Gibbs, R-Ohio, who led the charge against Pelosi, called her refusal to lift the mandate “Mask-erpiece Theater.”

“Based on sound science, the CDC says those who are vaccinated have an incredibly low risk of becoming infected with coronavirus,” Gibbs said in a statement. “With that data, there is no reason the House of Representatives should not be fully open and returned to normal operations.”

Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., echoed Gibbs on Fox News, complaining that’s Pelosi’s requirement is “a dumb rule to have.”

Several GOP members of the House, however, have publicly refused to get vaccinated.

Freshman Reps. Madison Cawthorn, R-N.C and Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., have both cited their own good health as reasons for not getting the shot.  

“I won’t be taking it,” Cawthorn told Axios back in December. “The survival rate is too high for me to want it.”

Greene’s spokesman, Nick Dyer, said: “[Greene] is a perfectly healthy woman and doesn’t see a reason to do so.”

Other Republicans have cited the vaccine’s supposed obsolescence after infection, as the Post noted, despite a lack of scientific consensus on how long natural immunity to Covid lasts. Polling data shows that Republicans exhibit a significantly higher amount of skepticism toward the Covid vaccine, specifically amongst men.  

According to a study conducted by Robb Willer, the director of Stanford’s Polarization and Social Change Lab, “unvaccinated Republicans reported 7 percent higher vaccination intentions after they were shown Republican elites’ endorsement of the vaccines,” as Vox noted. If Republicans leaders are to boost the vaccination rate within their own constituencies, Willer said, they may have to explicitly back pro-vaccine messaging campaigns.

Right wing goes nuts over gas shortage, invents elaborate reasons why it’s Biden’s fault

Republicans and their allies in right-wing media have found a new attack line against President Joe Biden’s administration, attempting to generate over the evolving nationwide fuel storage that resulted from the hack of Colonial Pipeline, a private company, which has sent Americans into long lines to top off their tanks at inflated prices. 

As tanks began to run dry at gas stations along the East Coast, right-wing pundits fired up the outrage machine and started blaming Biden and his administration. 

Fox News host Tucker Carlson, during his Tuesday opening monologue, tried to blame the shortage on Biden’s policies, suggesting that the administration “approves” of the short-term gas crisis, reportedly caused by a Russian dark internet operation called “Darkside” hacking into Colonial Pipeline’s data. 

“In case 2021 didn’t remind you enough of a grimmer version of the 1970s, we now have serious gas shortages in a country that just recently was energy-independent,” Carlson said. “All along the East Coast of the country today, people couldn’t fill up their cars. The footage looks like Venezuela.” Carlson further remarked, in skeptical tones, that “the official explanation is that some mysterious gang of cybercriminals hacked the software at a major American fuel supplier called Colonial Pipeline.”

“What is this about?” Carlson then posed to his audience. “Well, you know. On some level — let’s be honest about it — the White House approves of this disaster,” he continued, blaming the Biden administration’s policies of gradually moving away from fossil fuels. 

“Yes, some gas stations are closed tonight,” Carlson continued, before launching into a dystopian future fantasy. “But soon enough, the lunatics plan to close them all — every gas station in the entire United States, shuttered forever, to make way for some new, as-yet-undefined means of transportation that will magically replace the gasoline engines we’ve used for more than 100 years. This is a green revolution. So who cares about some old pipeline?”

“In the state of California, the average price of a gallon of gas is over $4,” Carlson continued, still trying to link a shortage caused by hackers to Biden’s policies. “A year ago, it was $2.70. … Why? This is the result of policy decisions made by the new administration. This is the Green New Deal. We’ve got it already. And if you love gas shortages and electricity blackouts and $80 plywood, this is the program for you.”

Former President Donald Trump even got in on the bashing, releasing a statement that trolled Biden’s son, Hunter. “If there were long and horrible gas lines like this under President Trump, the Fake News would make it a national outrage! Did Joe Biden put Hunter in charge of our energy, with all of his Burisma experience?” Trump stated in a Wednesday press release. “Even Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm is lost!” 

Other right-wing pundits got in on the blame game, as well. 

Donald Trump Jr., the self-appointed “General of the Meme Wars,” posted memes about the fuel shortage to Instagram, likening the long lines at gas stations to an innovative (and nonexistent) Biden political rally. 

“If it was a real Joe Rally, he could never get that many people there. Not even close,” Don Jr. added in a comment responding to the meme. 

Right-wing radio host Sebastian Gorka wasted no time this past week blaming the Biden administration, positing that the outage had occurred due to Russia “see[ing a weak America” under Biden, while posting his own gas station-related memes on Instagram. 

“You [Biden admin] think childcare infrastructure, but the pipeline that supplies 45% of the oil and gas to the eastern states of America, that’s not the concern of the U.S. government?” Gorka said during a somewhat illogical additionally riff during his Tuesday program. 

“This Is What Gas Stations Look Like in Biden’s America,” Fox News contributor Dan Bongino’s website captioned a video.

“It’s sad they are now realizing putting Biden in office was the biggest mistake this country has ever made. They miss having gas when Trump was President,” right-wing comedian Terrence Williams said on Twitter (referencing an ambiguous “they”). Dinesh D’Souza managed to combine homophobia with a fart joke in remarking, “I hear Northern Virginia is out of gas. I’m not feeling overly sympathetic. Bend over, Biden voters! Your best bet now might be to bring in Eric Swalwell and feed him lots of beans.” 

“The frenzy came after Colonial Pipeline discovered on May 7 it had been the victim of a cyberattack and ransomware, forcing the company to temporarily stop its pipeline operations,” PBS noted, in a somewhat more cogent explanation of the fuel shortage on Thursday. “After Colonial Pipeline came to a temporary halt this week, Americans began panic-buying gasoline, fueled by social media-driven fears the supply would run out.”

On Thursday, Biden told the American people on national television not to “panic” over the sudden shortage of fuel, and reassured them that the pipeline was now operating but it would take several days for supply to return to normal. “I want to be clear — we will not feel the effects at the pump immediately,” the president said. “This is not like flicking on a light switch. This pipeline is 5,500 miles long.”

Biden said he believes that over the coming weekend, we should see a “return to normalcy.” “Don’t panic,” he added. “I know seeing lines at the pumps or gas stations with no gas can be extremely stressful. But this is a temporary situation. Do not get more gas than you need in the next few days. … Panic buying will only slow the process.”

“Bizarre, shameful, and untrue”: Clinton comes to Biden’s defense after generals attack his health

Over 120 retired military generals and admirals penned an open letter questioning the legitimacy of President Biden’s win in the 2020 election and whether the president has the mental fitness required to perform his job.

“Without fair and honest elections that accurately reflect the ‘will of the people’ our Constitutional Republic is lost,” the signatories wrote, per their letter first obtained by Politico.  

“Election integrity demands insuring there is one legal vote cast and counted per citizen,” they continued. “Legal votes are identified by State Legislature’s approved controls using government IDs, verified signatures, etc. Today, many are calling such commonsense controls ‘racist’ in an attempt to avoid having fair and honest elections. Using racial terms to suppress proof of eligibility is itself a tyrannical intimidation tactic.”   

The signatories, which have declared themselves part of the Flag Officers 4 America – a group of retired military officers that have pledged “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” – include Army Brig. Gen. Don Bolduc, who is running for senate in New Hampshire; Army Lt. Gen. William Boykin, the former deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence for former President George W. Bush; Vice Adm. John Poindexter, the former national security adviser under President Ronald Reagan; and Army Maj. Gen. Joe Arbuckle, a Vietnam War veteran. 

“Under a Democrat Congress and the Current Administration,” they argued, “our Country has taken a hard left turn toward Socialism and a Marxist form of tyrannical government which must be countered now by electing congressional and presidential candidates who will always act to defend our Constitutional Republic.”

The cohort also took aim at President Biden’s fitness, saying his “mental and physical condition … cannot be ignored.”

They continued: “He must be able to quickly make accurate national security decisions involving life and limb anywhere, day or night. Recent Democrat leadership’s inquiries about nuclear code procedures sends a dangerous national security signal to nuclear armed adversaries, raising the question about who is in charge. We must always have an unquestionable chain of command.”

During the 2020 campaign trail, former President Trump routinely referred to Biden as “Sleepy Joe” and “Slow Joe,” alluding to Biden’s various public gaffes, which some speculated were due to a stutter. It goes without saying that Trump himself was a purveyor of a great many gaffes during that time as well. 

Earlier this month, the president’s personal physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, affirmed that Biden was in good health for his age and is “fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency.”

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton took to Twitter to call the letter “bizarre, shameful, and untrue.”

The letter also regurgitated timeworn conservative talking points about security at the border and the military prowess of China. “Establishing cooperative relations with the Chinese Communist Party emboldens them to continue progress toward world domination, militarily, economically, politically and technologically,” it read. “We must impose more sanctions and restrictions to impede their world domination goal and protect America’s interests.” 

On immigration, the ex-military officials went on to write: “Illegals are flooding our Country bringing high economic costs, crime, lowering wages, and illegal voting in some states. We must reestablish border controls and continue building the wall while supporting our dedicated border control personnel. Sovereign nations must have controlled borders.”

The letter sounded alarms amongst military experts, as well as officials in the Biden administration, according to Politico, considering those in the military are instructed to remain as apolitical as possible. 

“We’ve seen isolated statements from retired generals and admirals like McChrystal or McRaven, but this statement is the first full-blown partisan attack from a large group of retired officers that is not explicitly tied to an election or specific issue,” Jim Golby, a senior fellow at the Clements Center for National Security at The University of Texas at Austin, told Politico.  

“I think it hurts the military and by extension it hurts the country,” echoed retired Adm. Mike Mullen. 

The letter comes amid a national effort led by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to root out right-wing extremism within the ranks of the military. In late April, it was reported that at least 52 active or retired military, law enforcement, or government service employees were connected to the violent breach of the Capitol on January 6. 

The nourishing joy of simmered whole chicken

I’ve found in this time of — ahem — concentrated home cooking that I often wander into ingredient or method obsessions and stay there, either ’til I wring them dry or they work themselves into my permanent cooking arsenal. Perhaps the most gratifying, fragrantly pleasing success story to come of this compulsive behavior was my rediscovery of simmering whole chickens

It began some months back when I felt under the weather (remember when that phrase wasn’t terrifying?), and the only dinner that remotely appealed to me was chicken soup. I took the whole chicken I’d intended to roast and plopped it into my biggest dutch oven with some peppercorns, turmeric and a veritable garden of wilting aromatics: a quartered sprouting onion, a couple of halved limp carrots and celery stalks and a big handful of sagging parsley stems. The smugness that I hadn’t wasted the veg drawer’s sad remains set in just as the soothing, home-cooked aroma of chicken soup filled the house. I strained the soup and finished it with cubed potatoes and eggy noodles in the spirit of Mom’s version — which, by the way, comes with a guarantee that everything will be OK. 

RELATED: Let’s griddle every sandwich, from ham and cheese to peanut butter and honey

More importantly, that restorative Sunday meal became the creative springboard for weeks of simple future dinners I could vary based on what I had around or whatever flavor profiles I was obsessing over. One night, I flavored the broth with a parmesan cheese rind and finished the soup with diced root vegetables, cannellini beans and a blob of basil-parsley pesto. To make it taste like the restaurant soup I’ve been missing on another Sunday, I added sautéed leeks and mushrooms finished with a splash of wine and cream. With the recent arrival of spring weather, I gave it a Greek spin with tons of lemon, minced dill and orzo (recipe below). One of my favorite variations (adapted from Cynthia Chen McTernan’s “A Common Table” cookbook), involves adding big hunks of ginger and rough chopped scallions to the simmering liquid, then serving the soup with homemade noodles and a dribble of soy sauce and chili crisp. 

All this flavor zhushing almost always requires a second pan or pot, but don’t let that deter you. Anyway, you deserve a good zhush. 

manoella_buffara
Simmered chicken with homemade noodles and chili crisp. (Photo courtesy Maggie Hennessy)

You’ll also find that this method is generous beyond its initial application. Not only will you have homemade broth leftover — which, from the moment you taste it, will ruin you forever for boxed chicken stock. You’ll also have days’ worth of leftover chicken with its infinite uses. Re-simmer it in jarred salsa and broth, and pile it on corn tortillas for taco night. Heat it in BBQ sauce thinned with water, and heap it on a toasted bun with crunchy slaw. Stir it into fried rice, or mix it with curry-tinted mayo, raisins and minced celery for that glorious throwback: chicken salad. 

Simmered chicken’s final, albeit inedible, gift is the comforting aromas that tend to linger in your kitchen until at least the following day, in case you still need reminding that everything will be OK.

Before you start cooking . . . a quick note on simmering, which sometimes feels like a glib directive in recipes. Simmering occurs within the 185- to 200-degree range. (Poaching falls just below this realm in the service of delicate items like eggs and fish.) “Fine Cooking” breaks simmering into three categories: a fine simmer — characterized by a scarce amount of small bubbles surfacing every two to three seconds; a simmer — identified by small, constant bubbles rising to the surface (my preferred temp here); and a vigorous simmer — just below a boil, characterized by more constant bubbles surfacing and giving off frequent wisps of steam. 

***

A nod to the lemony Greek chicken soup Avgolemono (without the eggs), the slow-cooked flavors of the chicken and broth get a jolt of springtime brightness from lemon juice and a heap of grassy fresh dill. 

Recipe: Simmered Chicken with Orzo and Lemon

Serves 3-4

Ingredients:

  • 1 whole 3- or 4-lb. chicken (humanely raised, please, and thawed 3 days in fridge if purchased frozen)
  • 2 stalks celery, roughly chopped
  • 2 carrots, roughly chopped
  • 1 medium onion, quartered
  • 3 garlic cloves (still in their jackets is fine)
  • 6 parsley stems with leaves
  • 1 sprig thyme (or 1/2 teaspoon dried thyme)
  • 1 teaspoon salt, plus more as needed
  • 10 whole peppercorns
  • 2 lemons, divided
  • 1 bunch fresh dill, chopped and divided
  • Cracked fresh pepper, as needed
  • 1 1/2 cups dried orzo
  • 1/2 lb. fresh baby spinach leaves (aka one 8-oz. bag)
  • Good quality extra virgin olive oil, for drizzling

Method:

Place the chicken, celery, carrots, onion, garlic, parsley, thyme, salt and peppercorns in a large pot with a tight-fitting lid. Add enough cold water to just submerge the chicken. 

Cover the pot and bring to a boil; reduce the heat to a simmer (small, constant bubbles) and cook for about 45 minutes, or until an instant-read thermometer registers 165-degrees Farenheit when inserted into the thickest parts of the thigh and breast. Remove the chicken, and set on a large cutting board to cool slightly. Strain out the aromatics and discard, reserving about 4 cups of broth. Pour remaining broth into an airtight container, and store in the fridge up to 5 days or in the freezer for up to a few months. (Note: If you plan to store the broth, you’ll want to cool it to below 40 degrees before refrigerating or freezing, especially if it’s a large amount. To do this, fill a large container or clean sink with ice and a small amount of water, place the pot of strained broth inside, stirring frequently to hasten cooling). 

With a sharp knife, remove the white and dark chicken meat from the carcass. Chop or shred about 2 cups of meat into bite-size pieces and reserve, placing the rest in an airtight container in the fridge for up to 5 days. Discard the carcass. (Note: If so inclined, you can also submerge the carcass in cold water and boil for 45 minutes to an hour to make a second, weak batch of stock.)

In a separate dutch oven or large saucepan, add the reserved 4 cups chicken stock, the juice of one lemon, about half the dill and salt and pepper to taste. Cover and bring to a simmer. Add the orzo, and cook for 8 to 10 minutes or until al dente, stirring frequently to prevent sticking. When just done, reduce the heat to low, and stir in the reserved chopped chicken and a handful of spinach at a time until it’s just wilted. Squeeze in the juice of half the second lemon, most of the remaining dill (save 1 or 2 teaspoons for garnish) and a good drizzle of olive oil. Check the seasoning again, and adjust with salt, pepper and lemon, if desired. Cut the remaining lemon half into wedges. 

Divide the soup among 3 or 4 bowls; sprinkle with the last of the dill, and drizzle with olive oil. Serve with a lemon wedge.

 

More by this author:

The joy of a 5-minute pickle sandwich

Big Little Recipe has the smallest-possible ingredient list and big everything else: flavor, creativity, wow factor. That means five ingredients or fewer — not including water, salt, black pepper, and certain fats (like oil and butter), since we’re guessing you have those covered. Psst, did you hear we’re coming out with a cookbook? We’re coming out with a cookbook!

* * *

In the before times, I was a lunch planner. Which is to say, more organized (OK, uptight) than a dinner planner, albeit not as much as a breakfast planner, or even a snack planner, though I’m not even sure if these exist.

I made soup on Sundays. I portioned it into pint containers. I labeled the pint containers. I froze the pint containers in my deep freezer. My deep freezer that I bought specifically for making pint containers of soup.

Then, at the start of each week, I pulled a medley of soups (chickpea noodle! cashew tomato! tahini spinach!) from the freezer to thaw in the fridge. I packed a new flavor each morning, toted it on the train, strolled it to our office, and microwaved it in the team kitchen as soon as noon struck.

I’m not like that anymore. Not even a little bit.


Photo by Julia Gartland. Prop stylist: Veronica Olson. Food stylist: Anna Billingskog.

No, now I’m the sort of person who realizes it’s 1:56 p.m. at the same time that I realize I have a meeting in four minutes. But how? So I sprint to the blender (to the blender!), throw in a half-ripe banana, some crushed ice, peanut butter, and oat milk. And I gulp it down while on no-video, no-audio, partly out of respect for my coworkers, but mostly for my dignity.

And honestly? None of this makes any sense. I eliminated two-plus hours of commuting (on a good day — because NJ Transit is nothing if not unpredictable) and somehow ended up with less time to make lunch. Has time lost all meaning?

I’m going to go with yes. That’s OK. That’s fine. That’s where this pickle sandwich comes in. It’s cheesy, it’s mustardy, it’s glorious. Almost as easy as blending a banana. And infinitely more satisfying.

***

Recipe: Bless This Pickle Sandwich

Prep time: 5 minutes
Makes: 1 sandwich

Ingredients:

  • 1 tablespoon minced half-sour pickle
  • 1 tablespoon mayonnaise
  • 1 teaspoon grainy Dijon mustard
  • 1/2 teaspoon pickle brine
  • 2 slices seedy bread, lightly toasted
  • 1 half-sour pickle, thinly sliced lengthwise
  • 2 layers sliced sharp white cheddar

Directions:

  1. Combine the minced pickle, mayo, mustard, and brine in a bowl. Try it, then adjust the ratio to taste. Spread half of the sauce on each slice of bread. Add the pickles to one slice, top with the cheese, then close the sandwich. Slice in half on the diagonal.

Joe Manchin’s folly: Republicans don’t want bipartisanship — they want power

One of the big questions that still seems to befuddle the media is “how in the world did the Republican Party get so crazy that they would embrace the Big Lie?”

The knee-jerk assumption is that Donald Trump, with his crude declaration back in 2016 that he would only accept the results of the election if he won brought this level of electoral lunacy to the GOP. While it’s true that believing (or pretending to believe) that Donald Trump is incapable of losing an election has become a litmus test for party membership, the anti-democratic machinations that are happening all over the country are not new at all. In fact, the party’s ongoing, meritless, insistence that undocumented immigrants are voting by the millions and that voter fraud is rampant among Democratic voters is why it was so easy for Donald Trump to persuade his rabid following that it happened to him.

You can go back many decades to find examples of disenfranchisement of Black people and immigrants, but as I wrote a while back, the modern conservative movement’s push to restrict voting really took off after the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s successful program to register voters in urban America. The Democrats fought back and passed major voting rights legislation which President George H.W. Bush promptly vetoed. That was the “motor voter bill” which required that states effectively register any citizen over 18 when they obtain or renew a driver’s license. It also allowed registration by mail and tasked government offices with voter registration duties. The Republicans howled like banshees, as usual, charging the Democrats with trying to expand their own ranks —as if Republicans don’t get driver’s licenses too — when President Bill Clinton signed the bill as one of his earliest actions upon taking office in February 1993. They haven’t stopped screaming about phantom “voter fraud” in the 30 years since.

And they didn’t just scream about it. Republicans took action on the state level, winning an early battle when George W. Bush managed to eke out a disputed victory after his brother, Governor Jeb Bush, purged the Florida voter rolls of many eligible voters in numbers that could have made the difference with such a razor-thin margin of victory. Year after year, Republicans have pounded the message to their base that the only way Democrats win is by cheating. (The irony that the two politicians most credibly accused of cheating are none other than GOP leaders Richard Nixon and Donald Trump cannot be overstated.)

The 2000 election must have reinforced their belief that Democratic vote suppression and disenfranchisement was a winning strategy because Republicans immediately set about using the federal government to get the job done. First, they embarked on a mission to “root out” voter fraud but after five years of trying they just couldn’t come up with goods. That’s because there really isn’t any to speak of. They even deployed the Department of Justice to create phony accusations of voter fraud and it was only because a handful of Republican U.S. Attorneys refused to go along (and were subsequently fired) that the facts came out and the Attorney General had to resign.

But the federal government wasn’t really a big player in this program. It was the think tanks and interest group organizations, backed by big money, that did the heavy lifting in the states. One of the Koch Brothers’ organizations, the American Legislative Exchange Council, which creates so-called “model legislation” for lockstep right-wing state legislatures to easily enact without having to even understand what they’re doing, was heavily involved in various vote suppression schemes over the past couple of decades. Anti-immigrant operatives, like former Kansas secretary of state Kris Kobach, networked all over the country providing Republican politicians with templates of vote suppression bills. (You may remember Kobach was later tapped by Trump to prove that millions of non-citizens had voted in 2016, giving Hillary Clinton a popular vote victory, but he was unable to do it and slunk off back to Kansas where he keeps running for office and losing.)

A few weeks ago, Salon’s Igor Derysh took a deep dive into all of this noting that the rise in activity in this sector of right-wing activism had taken off in the wake of Trump’s loss. He listed groups that are involved in selling Trump’s lie that he won the election, from faith-based groups like The Family Research Council and the Susan B Anthony List to Freedomworks and the Tea Party Patriots, all of which were focusing their full attention on keeping the delusion going. Derysh homes in on the motive for many of them to do so:

Frank Cannon, senior strategist for the Susan B. Anthony List and American Principles Project, told The New York Times that conservative activists quickly realized that the only way they could keep donations rolling in is by making the effort to restrict voting access the “center of gravity in the party.”

Leave it to right-wingers to find a way to make a profit from The Big Lie. No wonder they love Donald Trump so much.

Derysh also noted that The Heritage Foundation and ALEC were working together on this project, creating some of that “model legislation” for Republican-led states to enact as quickly as possible. On Thursday, Mother Jones published a leaked video of Jessica Anderson, the executive director of Heritage Action for America, giving big money donors an update on their progress:

“Iowa is the first state that we got to work in, and we did it quickly and we did it quietly,” she said. “We helped draft the bills. We made sure activists were calling the state legislators, getting support, showing up at their public hearings, giving testimony … little fanfare. Honestly, nobody even noticed. My team looked at each other and we’re like, ‘It can’t be that easy.'”

Heritage is busily doing that dirty work all over the country, notably in swing states like Georgia and Arizona. Meanwhile, the Democrats are counting on the federal government and the courts to mitigate the worst of the damage these bills are going to create.

This week Senator Joe Manchin, D-WV, threw cold water on the prospects for passage of the “For the People Act” the voting rights bill that just made it out of committee on a party-line vote. He fatuously insists that voter protection bills aren’t legitimate if they aren’t passed on a bipartisan basis which essentially means no vote protection bills can pass since the entire Republican Party is determined to prevent as many Democrats from voting as possible.

Still, Manchin did come out in favor of requiring “pre-clearance” of any changes to voting laws by the Justice Department in all 50 states which is actually more radical than any provision in the For the People Act or the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act which is also in the hopper. The chances that he can get 10 Republicans on board, which is what it would take to break the filibuster, is nil but it appears he wants to try.

So we are still in that place of waiting to see if the inevitable betrayal by Manchin’s GOP buddies will make him understand that the weapon of the filibuster is being used to destroy the country. I wouldn’t get my hopes up. 

Whales face new and emerging threats

Humans and whales have a complex relationship.

We’ve hunted whales for food for centuries, celebrated them in our art and culture, admired their familial relationships and songs, and even worshipped them as gods.

But at the same time, we’ve overhunted multiple whale species to the brink of extinction, overfished their prey, poisoned their bodies and habitats, and scarred or killed them with our oceanic vessels.

While we’ve made great strides on many of those fronts, there’s still a lot to do and many reasons to worry. Here are some of them, followed by an archive of related stories from The Revelator:

1. We’re Still Discovering What’s Out There — and What’s Not

You’d think a large species like a whale would be easy to find.

Think again.

Several new cetacean species have been discovered in the past few years, most recently the rarely seen Rice’s whale in the Gulf of Mexico. Previously thought to be a subspecies of the Bryde’s whale, the newly recognized species was identified just in time. Scientists estimate that fewer than 100 Rice’s whales remain — perhaps as few as 60 — and say the species is critically endangered.

Similarly, it’s often hard to realize what we’re losing in the vast expanses of the ocean. In part that’s because whales are hard to count — especially dead ones. While many whale carcasses wash up on beaches, most sink to the bottom of the ocean or are consumed by scavengers. That presents a challenge to understanding how many whales are being killed or, if we do find a body, how they died. This has important conservation implications. For example, recent research suggests we’re undercounting the deaths of critically endangered North Atlantic right whales by 64% — and that’s one of the world’s most heavily monitored whale species, which all too often die after being struck by shipping vessels.

Speaking of which…

2. Ships vs. Whales

Globalization means more and more gigantic shipping vessels traversing the globe every day, where they can cross into whale feeding grounds or through migratory routes.

And when a ship strikes a whale, it’s not the ship that loses.

Most recently, necropsies revealed that at least two gray whales found deadnear San Francisco Bay had been injured by ships, while an injured humpback whale was observed near Vancouver. Similar stories play out regularly around the globe.

And it’s not just big ships. Fishing vessels of all sizes pose threats, either directly or through lost fishing gear. This April a research drone captured footage of a baby gray whale entangled in fishing line, dragging a buoy behind it.

3. Climate Change Comes Calling

Warming oceans pose multiple threats to whales, some of which relate once again to the shipping industry. In recent years the industry has rushed to newly ice-free waters in the Arctic, bringing with them noise, pollution and other harmful changes.

Additional threats from climate change continue to emerge, and exactly what’s happening isn’t always clear. One recent study found that a population of bowhead whales failed to make its annual autumn migrationaway from solid ice in the Bering Sea, but the reason remains undiscovered. One theory is that warming waters could have resulted in an increase in their food supply. Another theory suggests changing temperatures could have allowed more killer whales to block the bowheads’ migration.

Similarly, climate change has resulted in decreased herring abundance in Quebec’s Gulf of St. Lawrence, and this loss of food has resulted in fewer humpback whale pregnancies coming to term.

Meanwhile, there’s a big reason to protect whales from climate change: their very existence helps protect us from climate change. Their feces help feed phytoplankton, which photosynthesize and absorb carbon dioxide before dying, sinking to the bottom of the ocean and sequestering that world-changing greenhouse gas. Whale bodies, similarly, also store an enormous amount of carbon that can be sequestered when they die.

4. Plastic: A Painful Threat

When whales accidentally consume plastic waste that they find floating in the ocean, the results can be deadly — either immediately or over time.

All too often, investigations into the cause of whale deaths find plastic to blame. One of the most recent examples occurred in Bangladesh, where two dead whales washed up near a resort town in April. “Primarily we think the two have died from consuming plastic and polluted objects,” Jahirul Islam, executive director of Marine Life Alliance, told AFP.

And remember that new whale species that was just discovered? One of the reasons we know the species exists is because a carcass washed up near the Florida Everglades in 2019. Scientists found that it was killed by a tiny, 2.5-inch piece of jagged plastic that lodged in its stomach and caused internal bleeding and necrosis.

Smaller plastic particles may also have health implications for whales in even the most remote locations. A study published in 2020 found that seven beluga whales harvested by Inuvialuit hunters all had plastic fibers and fragments in their digestive systems. All the particles were what’s considered microplastic, smaller than 5 millimeters in size. These may not be immediately fatal, but nearly half of the particles contained chemicals that could cause potential health problems, much like they could in humans. The risks whales may face from microplastics remains a field of active scientific investigation, with hundreds of papers published in just the past year.

Larger plastic waste, such as lost or discarded fishing lines and nets, poses an even bigger threat. “Imagine walking around with weights tied to your ankles,” researcher Greg Merrill recently wrote in New Security Beat. “Whales struggle to get untangled from large nets and they end up dragging this weight along with them, expending extra energy they need to migrate and raise their young. An increasingly common tragedy is when whales become so overburdened by the weight of the plastic debris they cannot surface to breathe and drown.”

5. Public Perception Still Lags

People generally love whales and support their conservation, but how much do they really know about whales and the threats the face?

Not much, it turns out.

A recent scientific survey found that the majority of people cared about legislation to protect whales, but at the same time they didn’t know much about various whale or cetacean species. The researchers found that people thought common species such as bottlenose dolphins needed the most protection, didn’t know about some of the most endangered species such as the vaquita, and believed more countries actively engaged in whaling than really do today.

Perhaps most strikingly, the survey presented people with the names of several fictional whale species (like the “pygmy short-finned whale”), which respondents said they believed needed protection more than real at-risk species.

This might not seem like a huge problem at first, but the future of whale conservation may rely once again upon grassroots efforts from caring citizens. As the researchers concluded, “A lack of awareness of the conservation status of whales and dolphins and continued whaling activities suggests that greater outreach to the public about the conservation status of whale and dolphin species is needed.”

* * *

Let’s build that public awareness: Here’s a selection of additional articles about the threats that whales and other cetaceans face — and what’s being done to protect them.

Songs Whales Sing: The Peculiar History of Commercial Whaling

Cargo Vessels Are Killing More Whales — and a New Effort Aims to Save Them

What Would It Take to Save Southern Resident Killer Whales From Extinction?

Killer Whales Face Killer Toxins

Offshore Wind Power Is Ready to Boom. Here’s What That Means for Wildlife

Want to Fight Climate Change? Start by Protecting These Endangered Species

5 Reasons to Rethink the Future of Dams

Are Forever Chemicals Harming Ocean Life?

A Dam Comes Down — and Tribes, Cities, Salmon and Orcas Could All Benefit

10 Things We’ve Learned a Decade After the Deepwater Horizon Disaster

5 Things You Should Know About the Earth’s Warming Ocean

A Gray Whale Washed Ashore in Alaska May Hold Clues to This Year’s Deadly Migration

The Unseen Threat: Noise in the Arctic Marine Environment

An Orca in Grief: Tahlequah’s Call to Arms

Something Fishy: Toxic Plastic Pollution Is Traveling Up the Food Chain

The Last Vaquitas: “I’ve Seen More Dead Than Alive”

How Did the Pandemic Affect Ocean Conservation?

Power outages are increasing. Can medical equipment users adapt?

For four decades, David Taylor has relied on a ventilator to breathe, the whoosh, whoosh of the machine part of the background metronome of daily life. Then, on the night of Feb. 14, an Arctic blast began to overwhelm the Texas power grid. The next morning, the electricity flickered out in the Fort Worth home that the 65-year-old shares with his mother.

David’s ventilator switched over at some point to a backup battery and kept running. A family member brought over a generator and spent several hours trying, unsuccessfully, to get it working in the sub-freezing air. By nightfall, the one-story house had gone around 12 hours without power, other than an hour or so when the lights briefly turned on, recalled David’s 89-year-old mother, Dorothy Taylor. The temperature inside had dropped to the low 50s. David, who has muscular dystrophy, remained in bed beneath a pile of blankets. Dorothy kept one eye on the clock, unsure how much longer her son’s backup battery would hold out. “I couldn’t wait ’til the last minute,” she said. “He would die within minutes.”

Across Texas, other families were facing similar dilemmas. The ambulance provider MedStar, which serves the greater Fort Worth area, fielded more than 50 calls — including Dorothy’s — from Feb. 15 to Feb. 17 involving patients with life-sustaining medical devices and no power. A San Antonio emergency room doctor, Ralph Riviello, told Undark that around 18 to 24 people showed up at his hospital during the crisis, desperate to recharge medical equipment. Near Houston, a 75-year-old man froze to death in his truck; his family believes he ventured out to get a spare oxygen tank from the vehicle after losing electricity at his home.

These are not just one-off tragedies. Some experts warn that complex home-based medical care is on a collision course with climate change, as severe weather events become more frequent nationwide.

While it’s difficult to attribute a single weather event like the Texas Arctic blast to climate change, these crises have become more frequent in recent years as the planet warms, highlighting the need to protect such vulnerable individuals, said Sue Anne Bell, an assistant professor at the University of Michigan who studies the health effects of disasters. “Thinking that you’ve had your once in a 100-year storm — that’s not a reality anymore,” she said.

At the same time that climate change has fueled a rise in severe events, the power grid is aging. By the 2000s, there were 10 times more major power outages reported each year compared with the 1980s and early 1990s, according to an analysis of data from 1984 to 2012 by the nonprofit news organization Climate Central. They were mostly driven by severe weather, though changes in data collection likely contributed as well.

David Taylor and his mother Dorothy, who is his caregiver, in their Fort Worth, Texas home. David has relied on a ventilator to breathe for 40 years.

A car battery serves as a backup power supply for David’s ventilator, which he must use at all times. Without it, “he would die within minutes,” said Dorothy.

“We have climate change coming, which is going to throw at us more of these curve balls, more of these unexpected events that can impact the infrastructure,” said Joan Casey, an environmental epidemiologist at Columbia University who has studied the health impact of power outages.

Casey is among a cadre of researchers, environmentalists, and physicians who are trying to draw attention to the growing threat of power outages for people with medical devices. They propose more research and data collection to better identify how many Americans face this risk, as well as to document the medical complications and deaths that result. Along with highlighting the need to update and weatherize the existing power grid, they suggest a range of public health strategies, including routine text alerts warning vulnerable individuals that power might be disrupted. And, in place of generators — which can be difficult and dangerous to use — they call for the adoption of battery storage that automatically kicks in when the lights go out.

But for now, individuals like David and Dorothy Taylor are left fretting in the dark.

That cold February night, Dorothy was unsure how much life remained in the ventilator’s backup battery. But she was not taking any chances. At around 9 p.m., she called the paramedics.

* * *

Over the past several decades, Americans have increasingly benefited from in-home technology, which can extend lifespans and enable more people to stay in their own homes. But the expanding array of such devices — including home oxygen machines, medication nebulizers, home dialysis, infusion pumps, and electric wheelchairs — all depend on a reliable power supply.

Federal officials collect and map where the 2.6 million people on Medicare with these medical devices live, providing the information as a tool for public health and emergency preparedness efforts through its emPOWER Program. It’s unknown how many non-Medicare recipients also rely on this equipment, but data indicate that overall usage is increasing, Casey said. She was involved with a study published earlier this year in the journal Epidemiology which found that rentals of oxygen equipment had nearly tripled from 2008 to 2018, based on data from more than 243,000 Kaiser Permanente patients.

In Texas, the February outages were so widespread that the solution was not as simple as going to a nearby home to plug in, said Riviello, who chairs the department of emergency medicine at the Long School of Medicine at UT Health San Antonio. “There are a lot more people living at home with medical assistive devices that are being maintained because of these devices,” he said. “And I don’t know that they always think of the ‘What if’ situations.'”

Some research has documented the danger of power outages for this population. One study of the 2003 power blackout in the northeastern United States found that 23 of 255 patients coming into a New York City hospital during a 24-hour period reported a medical device failure.

Shao Lin, a University at Albany physician-researcher who studies the health effects of extreme weather events, more recently assessed whether power outages affected hospitalizations among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), who may require oxygen machines and other devices to help them breathe. Lin and her colleagues compared hospitalizations in New York state when the power was out with normal days. They estimated that, on days without power, 23 percent of hospital admissions for COPD patients could be linked to the loss of electricity.

When patients require oxygen, they don’t have the luxury of time, she said: “They have to go the ED [emergency department] or otherwise they die, right? The people die.”

In Texas, a blast of Arctic air, paired with chronic failures to weatherize the power grid, led to outages that rolled on for days. Slightly more than two-thirds of Texans lost power at some point from Feb. 14 to 20 — outages that averaged a total of 42 hours, according to a University of Houston survey conducted online with 1,500 residents.

Once the power is out, and medical devices are failing, the next stop is often a nearby hospital.

The need for oxygen drove most of the 50-plus calls that MedStar responded to in the greater Fort Worth area, according to brief dispatch notes the ambulance service shared with Undark. “No power, trouble breathing, no O2,” reads one note, using an abbreviation for oxygen. “No power out of oxygen can barely breathe,” records another. There were a few other power-related calls: “Asthma attack, no inhaler and no power to use nebulizer.”

After Dorothy called MedStar, she said, “they came immediately.” The ambulance couldn’t make it up the steep snowy driveway, instead parking at the bottom and carrying David down, said Tim Gattis, one of the paramedics that day. “There’s like six of us hanging onto the cot,” he said, “as we’re sliding down the hill trying to get back to the ambulance with him.”

On a March afternoon, Dorothy and David gathered around the kitchen table to revisit that scary, frigid February night. David, who has difficulty speaking but can mouth some words that his mother understands, sat in a wheelchair at one end. Dorothy described staying with her son in the hospital overnight, trying to doze on a straight-backed chair with no arms. “I don’t leave him,” she said.

For each person who needs potentially life-saving help, there are ripple effects of strain on the health system and the broader community, Bell said.

“It’s that individual, it’s his family, maybe his neighbors, maybe a person’s primary care provider,” she said. “It’s the emergency department physician.”

* * *

Some physicians and other clinicians advise people with medical devices to have an emergency plan if the power fails. But that’s easier said than done, said Casey. “Poorer people might not have somewhere else to go, might not have the money to purchase a generator, to have a backup power supply,” she said.

“So I also see this as an environmental justice issue, moving forward,” she added.

Clinicians may also suggest that these patients sign up for a registry, a list that municipalities or utilities compile of customers who use electricity for medical devices. In principle, registries allow officials to prioritize outreach and response to such individuals in the event of a power outage. They are also intended to prevent utilities from shutting off power if a person falls behind on paying their electric bill.

Still, these registries have been subject to renewed scrutiny as more people are impacted by power outages, said Marriele Mango, a project director at Clean Energy Group, a nonprofit advocacy organization in Vermont. 

“A fraction of the people who qualify for these registries are registering,” she said, citing various reasons, including language barriers and confusion about eligibility. Moreover, even if someone is listed on a registry, they may not receive advance notice of an outage, she said, citing media coverage showing that Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) failed to notify some device users in 2019 when it shut off power to a large swathe of California as a wildfire prevention measure.

Casey, Mango, and other experts have proposed new research and programs that might help address the issue. One strategy, Casey said, would be to use location data from the emPOWER system and other mapping efforts to develop a text alert system to warn people when their power might go out. Another possible strategy, according to Casey, is for hospitals to set up a charging area onsite to allow patients with life-sustaining devices to get power without filling up the emergency room.

In 2020, leading into the wildfire season, PG&E launched a program to get free backup portable batteries to lower-income residents who depend on medical equipment. But these portable batteries can only last so long; David’s was projected to provide power for just eight hours.

Mango and Casey are co-authors on a recent paper, published in the journal Futures, which looks at a longer-term approach — the installation of battery storage either in someone’s home or at a community gathering area. The technology, which stores power onsite in case the electrical grid goes down, provides a more reliable power supply than portable batteries. It’s designed to kick in automatically in the event of an outage, operating independently from the grid. When the battery storage system is paired with solar panels, as long as solar is available, Mango said, it can potentially keep recharging the battery.

These battery storage units are still quite costly, although prices are declining, Mango said. A product review of one of the existing devices, the Tesla Powerwall, shows costs of $9,600 to $15,600, including installation. Some programs may help bring the cost down for residents with medical devices, such as incentives offered by the California Public Utilities Commission.

Battery storage is a cleaner option than diesel generators, and it doesn’t pose the risk of inadvertent carbon monoxide poisoning that generators do, Mango said. Generators can also be difficult to operate or refuel, particularly for older or frail individuals. And, during power crises, people scrambling to buy and operate these generators can run into life-threatening trouble. “They’ve never had to do it before,” Mango said.

When Dorothy was unsure how much longer David’s backup battery would last, she called MedStar and “they came immediately,” she said. When the ambulance couldn’t make it up their steep, snowy driveway, several paramedics carried David down the slippery hill on a cot.

David has muscular dystrophy and uses a wheelchair, which is also equipped with a ventilator. He has difficulty speaking but can mouth some words that his mother understands.

Inside his home, David Taylor’s ventilator is always hooked up to a backup battery that sits on the floor. It was projected to provide power for just eight hours.

One funding mechanism would be for Medicare to classify in-home battery storage as durable medical equipment. Then a physician could simply prescribe the battery along with the device itself, Mango said. “It would be a huge step in the right direction to be able to get that in the hands of folks.”

Casey is dubious that providing and paying for battery storage on an individual basis is feasible, though, given the price tag and the risk that lower-income and other populations would fall through the cracks. “It’s a Band-Aid sort of situation rather than solving the problem,” she said. Establishing central charging stations backed up by battery storage in communities would reach broader groups, she said, and could offer other medical support amid a weather-related power crisis.

But who, Casey asked, should be responsible for these stations? For instance, should a large health system like Kaiser Permanente establish charging stations to help patients in their communities?

“That’s starting to go way outside the hospital walls,” she said. “It’s hard for me to say that they should. But we need to figure out who’s responsible here. Because right now no one is, and that’s clearly not working.”

Dorothy Taylor said that her home, where she’s lived for nearly 50 years, is listed on her utility’s registry, a step that required physician paperwork to document her son’s medical condition. But that did not keep the electricity humming as large sections of the state went dark.

Since the February storm, Taylor has considered installing a generator. But it would be expensive, she said, and outages are rare, at least historically. “That’s happened one time in the 47 years we’ve been living on this hill,” she said. “So what do you do?”

* * *

Charlotte Huff is a Texas-based journalist who writes about the intersection of medicine, money, and ethics. Her work has appeared in Kaiser Health News, Slate, STAT, and Texas Monthly, among other publications.

All visuals by Rodger Mallison for Undark.

This article was originally published on Undark. Read the original article.