The biofuel scramble for Brazil
If the foreign investment in the Brazilian ethanol industry constitutes a new "Great Game," who might end up the loser? A lesson from Afghanistan.
Topics: Afghanistan, Globalization, How the World Works, Brazil, Latin America, Politics News
In his blog devoted entirely to the topic of Brazilian ethanol, Henrique Oliveira wrote last Friday that the maneuvering of multiple foreign powers to grab a piece of Brazil’s biofuel pie reminds him of “the Great Game” of the 19th century, in which Britain and Russia strove for influence and control over the strategically important region of Central Asia.
It is hard not to draw an analogy with the fight for hegemony that took place in Asia between Tsarist Russia and the British Empire, from the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 to the beginning of World War I almost a century later.
The armies, spies, mercenaries, and agents provocateurs that played the game in Asia have now been replaced by investment bankers, consultants, and lawyers, at the service of governments and corporations, private and state-owned, vying for control over the most lucrative sectors not only of the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industry, but of other commodities as well. Iron ore, bauxite, orange juice, soy, corn, chicken, and beef, all of which have in Brazil a major producer, are at the top of the list.
For Oliveira, the injection of foreign investment generally seems to be a good thing — he is a gung-ho promoter of Brazilian ethanol as a model for how developing nations can bootstrap themselves into a position of influence and power in the global economy — even if there are some obstacles that need to be overcome.
Just as the players of the Great Game in nineteenth-century Asia had to deal with searing desert heat and blistering mountain cold, investors in the Brazilian sugar and ethanol industry have to contend with impossibly-complex tax structures (exercised at the national, state, and municipal level), a labyrinthine labor legislation calibrated to favor workers over capital (on account of the dire human rights record in Brazilian industry and agriculture in general), and a growing legion of NGOs and political agents that can, and often do, interfere with the conduction of business…
This is the first time I’ve ever seen blistering mountain cold equated with worker-friendly labor legislation, but that’s not my primary gripe with Oliveira’s Great Game analysis. To complete the analogy, one needs to consider what effect the power politics of Russia and Britain had on the countries that they sought to manipulate.
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




Koch Brother To Host A Fundraiser For Ken Cuccinelli
IRS Official Refuses To Testify During House Oversight Hearing
Comments
3 Comments