Newt Gingrich
Why playing the sex card backfires
Anybody who thinks allegations of infidelity will harm a presidential contender doesn't know the American people
He's a cheater? Who cares? (Credit: ABC screen shot) First he was down and out — a has-been toting sexually tainted baggage. Then, with an unexpected resurgence, he turned into a viable contender, even showing a lead in the polls. Then came more ugly disclosures about his personal life and a sharp drop below the leading candidate. But surprise, surprise, his numbers begin to soar for the upcoming primary. Wait, hold everything; even more damaging accusations of sexual misconduct from an ex-wife hit the front pages. The media and politicians are outraged and assume that the public is as well. It’s a knockout blow, they forecast. But now they’re puzzled that his standing in the polls continues to rise, with some pundits saying he might win the South Carolina Republican primary. Finally, the results are in and, miracle of miracles, Newt Gingrich is the winner. Big time.
How did this happen? How did a man whose sexual peccadilloes rivaled those of so many others manage to sidestep severe political consequences? The answer is simple. The sex card doesn’t work anymore, particularly when indiscretions are old news and involve consenting adults. Voters of both parties want to hear about affairs of state, not of the bedroom. A look at the history of infidelity and sexual mores shows why this public shift in priorities has taken place.
Infidelity has risen steadily since the urbanization of societies. This tells us that straying is strongly tied to opportunity. In close-knit agricultural communities, comings and goings of everyone were pretty much an open book. It was tricky to keep infidelity secret. But as we know from literature and famous scandals, men managed to find ways around challenging obstacles. Not so for married women, who were confined to the home, exposing them to closer scrutiny.
That all changed with the Industrial Revolution, which moved families off the farms to anonymous settings in sprawling urban centers. The new work world away from home offered men wider opportunities for sexual liaisons. Women were still more socially restricted than men, but they too had more prospects for extramarital affairs even though their dalliances might be confined to the butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker.
Not surprisingly, early surveys showed much higher percentages of men than women committing infidelity. Before Alfred Kinsey’s groundbreaking studies of male and female sexuality in the 1950s the preponderance of male infidelity was explained by a prevailing myth: Males were hormonally wired for ravenous sexual arousal while women, with more subdued libidos, grudgingly submitted to male sexual demands.
The sexual revolution that exploded on the scene in the 1960s gave greater license for sexual expression — and awakened women to their equal, if not superior, status as sexual beings. Masters and Johnson and other pioneering researchers added to Kinsey’s findings, confirming the patterns of sexual arousal for men and women throughout the life cycle. These studies showed that males reach peak sexual arousal in their early 20s and, for most men, it remains at that level until about age 30 when physical sexual response begins a slow decline. In contrast, female sexual arousal capability peaks in the mid-30s and maintains that plateau through the 60s, showing only slight decline later. Emboldened by awakened sexuality, and greater freedom and independence, women would soon begin to play catch-up with men. But it would take another revolution to ratchet the numbers even higher.
Enter Betty Friedan and the feminist movement of the 1960s. As women began to assume the same work roles as men, the playing fields for infidelity began to equalize. Economic pressure turned more and more spouses into two-paycheck partners. The number of women in the workplace swelled, particularly in male-dominated professions like law, banking and financial management. Women whose contacts with men were once limited to butchers and bakers now found themselves in the company of male professionals and executives every day, often in a highly charged atmosphere that led all too easily to intimacy. As comedian Rodney Dangerfield lamented, “I asked my wife to have sex. She said, I already gave at the office.”
And indeed women were “playing around,” as the title of Linda Wolf’s popular book suggests. By 1977, a bestselling book based on research by Shere Hite was able to report that 75 percent of married women had cheated — exceeding the numbers that had ever been reported for their male counterparts. (Kinsey reported that by age 40, 50 percent of married men were unfaithful.) While Hite’s study is not the most reliable, because it surveyed a skewed sample of upscale sophisticated women, it surely pointed in the accurate upward direction.
More recent surveys say that 30 to 60 percent of married men and women have cheated. But the real rate of infidelity is most likely greater than reported. Even if a questionnaire is “anonymous,” many respondents are unwilling to admit cheating on their spouses. While we can’t be certain of the precise numbers, it’s evident that infidelity is widespread.
And let’s not forget that the advent of drugs to treat erectile dysfunction has given fresh meaning to the old Gene Autry cowboy song “Back in the Saddle Again.” The Viagra revolution has catapulted many older men off the bench and into the infidelity game. According to one report, “one out of ten women says her partner cheated on her for the first time after taking the drug.” Consider also our highly sexualized society. Some estimates say that Americans spend as much as $12 billion a year on pornography, which is “more than all combined revenues of all professional football, baseball and basketball franchises.” Forbes challenges those figures and comes up with a lower number – a mere $3.9 billion. Not exactly pocket change.
And there’s more. Add the “respectable” sex content on cable television shows that are exempt from network standards. And even some of today’s PG films would have been censored in previous eras. I recently watched a classic 1958 film — “The Lovers” — by famed French director Louis Malle and was shocked to learn it was considered so scandalous that it was banned in many countries and in communities throughout the U.S. What was so outrageous? A married woman has a one-night stand with an overnight guest at her country estate. She then runs off with him. In the only sex scene, in which the partners are mostly fully clothed, we catch a brief glimpse of Jeanne Moreau’s breasts. Cut those few seconds and the film would get an easy PG rating today, if not a B for boring or an S for silly.
How does all this relate to Newt Gingrich’s victory in South Carolina? People who claim that errant sexual behavior should disqualify a candidate don’t really vote that position. Bill Clinton’s standing in the polls rose after it was disclosed he had an affair with an intern, even as Republicans sought to impeach him for lying about it. After revelations about Gingrich’s marriage, evangelical voters in South Carolina flocked to the serial polygamist candidate and abandoned the candidate who had been married to the same woman for four decades. Most people are also hypocritical when it comes to their own behavior. There’s a big gap between what people profess and what they actually do.
That should serve as a warning to politicians and the media tempted to play the infidelity sex card against a political foe. Don’t count on raising an enthusiastic hanging posse for cheaters. And if you think you will incite fundamentalists to throw the first stones, think again. The TV series “Desperate Housewives,” which elevates adultery to an Olympic sport, has a loyal following in the Bible Belt.
Bernard Starr is a psychologist and journalist. He is co-author of "The Starr –Weiner Report on Sex and Sexuality in the Mature Years" (McGraw Hill) and "Stalemates: The Truth About Extramarital Affairs" (New Horizon Press) More Bernard Starr.
Gingrich Inc: Out of business
Newt stayed in the race too long -- and now even his old private companies are struggling. Will Romney rescue him?
Newt Gingrich (Credit: Reuters/Benjamin Myers) When the House of Representatives censured Newt Gingrich in 1997 for ethics violations — the first time ever for a sitting Speaker in 200 years — the vote was 395 to 28, with 196 Republicans joining. “Newt has done some things that have embarrassed House Republicans and embarrassed the House,” said then-Rep. Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., who is now running for a Senate seat in Michigan. Gingrich resigned a year later, “in disgrace,” as Mitt Romney said in January.
Continue Reading CloseAlex Seitz-Wald is Salon's political reporter. Email him at aseitz-wald@salon.com, and follow him on Twitter @aseitzwald. More Alex Seitz-Wald.
SPIN METER: Rivals airbrush anti-Romney words
After the nastiness of the Republican primary race, former candidates have collective amnesia about Romney disses
FILE - In this Jan. 26, 2012 file photo, Republican presidential candidates, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney talk during a commercial break at the Republican presidential candidates debate in Jacksonville, Fla. Remember Gingrich calling Romney a liar? Michele Bachmann saying Romney's unelectable? Rick Santorum calling Romney "the worst Republican in the country" to run against Obama? They're hoping you don't. And acting like it never happened _ even though most of their words are just clicks away online. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)(Credit: AP) WASHINGTON (AP) — Remember Newt Gingrich calling Mitt Romney a liar? Michele Bachmann saying Romney’s unelectable? Rick Santorum calling Romney “the worst Republican in the country” to run against President Barack Obama?
They’re hoping you don’t. And acting like it never happened (even though most of their words are just clicks away online.)
One by one — with the exception of holdout Ron Paul — the GOP also-rans have coughed up endorsements of their onetime rival. And as they do, they’re pulling rhetorical backflips to distance themselves from their former harsh assessments of Romney.
Continue Reading CloseGoodnight, sweet Newt
The rise and fall, rise and fall, and rise and fall of the Gingrich 2012 campaign
(Credit: AP/David Duprey) Today is another fine day for Newt Gingrich, although not his best. After months of neglect, he’ll get the political media to pay attention to him for a final 10 or so minutes. “All of us have an obligation, I think,” he said in Tuesday’s video announcing his announcement of his resignation today, which he first announced last week, “to do everything we can to defeat Barack Obama.” For Gingrich, this typically would mean attacking Mitt Romney. But Newt seems serious about dropping out this time, as shameful as that is for the erstwhile “definer of civilization,” as he called himself in some early-1990s doodles.
Continue Reading CloseJim Newell has covered politics for Wonkette and Gawker and is a contributor to the Guardian. More Jim Newell.
How much gasoline is a GOP primary voter worth?
Gas prices have barely budged compared to the cost of buying votes in the GOP primaries
Republican presidential candidate former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks at his primary night election rally with wife Callista on Tuesday, March 13, 2012, in Birmingham, Ala. (Credit: AP/Butch Dill) The rising price of gas has become a pressing political concern, with Republicans hammering President Obama for not finding some way to bring prices down. Newt Gingrich has promised to bring the cost of gas down to $2.50, using space technology borrowed from native Martians at our Lunar Trading Post, and he has forced his followers to carry large totems featuring “gas pump” icons.
But as gas prices have soared since the beginning of the year, the cost of a Republican primary vote has plummeted. A few months ago, campaigns were spending a fortune in ad buys and organizations in the small early states. In Iowa, Mitt Romney and the PACs affiliated with his campaign spent around $144 for each vote received. By Florida that number was down to $19. On Super Tuesday, only $2.89 was spent by each campaign for each vote cast nationwide.
Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene.
Will Newt give up if he starts losing the Old South?
He can't keep this up forever, right?
Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. Speaker of the House Newt "Rocket Man" Gingrich is seen during a campaign event in Manchester, New Hampshire December 21, 2011. (Credit: Jessica Rinaldi / Reuters) Newt Gingrich’s “path to the nomination” is basically a Billy-from-The Family Circus-style dotted line through his rich fantasy life, but he’s remaining in the race for the time being, because he performs well in the Old South, where likely nominee Mitt Romney does not. There is also a weird casino billionaire who keeps funding his campaign, maybe in part because he thinks it aids Mitt Romney by hurting Rick Santorum.
Well, Newt Gingrich remaining in the race might be hurting Rick Santorum, but by no means would Rick Santorum be winning if Gingrich wasn’t around. Give Santorum all of Gingrich’s delegates, he’s still losing to Mitt Romney. More realistically, as Nate Silver wrote earlier this morning, no Newt would mean more delegates for Rick and Mitt.
Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene.
Page 1 of 55 in Newt Gingrich