Lori Leibovich
Whose family values?
The elections may be all about "families," but families don't build schools, provide health care or make the streets safe
“Family” has become perhaps the most used buzzword of this year’s presidential campaign. In their debate last night, both Al Gore and Jack Kemp repeatedly focused on the impact various policies would have on “families.” The near-obsession both parties have with the buzzword stems from the politically potent use made by Republicans beginning in the late 1980s of the term “family values.” Determined not to be on the wrong side of the issue any more, Democrats have attempted to become more-family-than-thou; for example, the Congressional Democrats’ recent manifesto is entitled the “Families First Agenda.”
How real are these various invocations? Will they solve social problems like violence, drugs and teen pregnancy, as the family values crusaders aver? Or are they mere nostalgia for a fantasy of American life that never actually existed? We talked with Judith Stacey, a sociologist at the University of California at Davis and author of the recently-published “In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age” (Beacon Press).
How did “family” and “family values” become the major political buzzwords of the ’90s?
I don’t know. But it’s a sad commentary on our political process that they did because the words don’t mean very much.
You say that the so-called pro-family movement was an important part of Ronald Reagan’s constituency, and of the anti-abortion movement, the Moral Majority and the right wing Christian movements. Then it began to spread across the political spectrum and entered the rhetoric of not just the Republican but the Democratic party as well. “Family values” have become a centrist message.
Yes. And that’s what motivated me to write this book. Dan Quayle was responsible for making family values a crucial part of the 1992 election — especially in his attack of Murphy Brown. But very soon after, articles appeared using the term in positive way. For example, the Atlantic Monthly cover story in April 1993 proclaimed “Dan Quayle was Right.” It became a centrist campaign when its advocates, like those in Atlantic Monthly, began to base its claims on social science rather than religion. Still, when people use the term, they mean values they associate with 1950s family life. The phrase is just two words that some people think sound good together.
In your book you talk about America’s nostalgia for the days of Ozzie and Harriet. How long did the Ozzie and Harriet paradigm actually exist?
It existed for about 20 years, in the 1950s and 1960s, when a majority of men were able to make a bread-winning wage, and even a man with relatively little education could afford to support a wife and children. That changed in the ’70s with the decline in real wages, and people began falling off the track. There are other reasons why the Ozzie and Harriet model didn’t last — a lot of people found it very stultifying, a lot of social problems were swept under the rug.
In your book you emphasize the importance of “social values” rather than “family values.”
My view is that it does “take a village” to raise a family — certainly up to any decent level. Families can’t build their own schools, provide for their own health care or guarantee safe streets. It’s social values that provide people with work that pays a decent living wage, a strong commitment to public education and access to health care.
How do you view the Clinton administration’s family agenda?
Some things have been absolutely horrendous, like the welfare bill. Clinton has done a few window-dressing things. The Family Medical Leave Act was a step in the right direction, but it’s a joke compared with the family leave provided by every other post-industrial society. The act doesn’t provide paid leave, which means that only the wealthy can take advantage of it.
Clinton also signed the Defense of Marriage Act. You say in the book that making gay marriage legal would strengthen families. But clearly the public isn’t ready to sanction it.
The Defense of Marriage Act is a scandal and a disgrace. But I truly believe that in the long run we are likely to see same-sex marriage legalized in many states, if not all of them. It’s hardly surprising that most people are opposed to same-sex marriage. But there is also a liberalization of attitudes about homosexuality in general. I think this issue will pan out a lot like abortion. There will be hard core opponents and hard core supporters and the rest of the population will have a lot angst around the issue but won’t necessarily want to limit other people’s rights.
You write that other countries — especially Scandinavia — have been much more willing to embrace a broad vision of “family,” resulting in fewer social problems there.
The biggest difference between here and Scandinavia is that instead of moralizing about issues, they provide economic and social support to people regardless of what their family structure looks like. Single parenthood doesn’t mean poverty because you have a strong welfare state. There is hardly any teen pregnancy, sex education is widely available and abortion and contraception are free. Then again, Scandinavian society is much smaller and more homogeneous.
In the book you mention the Promise Keepers — an evangelical brotherhood that urges men to put faith in God and to honor the traditional role as a father, husband and breadwinner.
I’m worried about this movement because of its covert, right-wing political agenda. But there are some very positive things in some of the messages they distribute to men, like instilling a sense of self-worth and encouraging men to take responsibility for themselves, as well as for their families. The Promise Keepers also promote racial reconciliation — although they are an overwhelmingly white movement, they at least address racial issues, unlike the typical right wing.
K-Mart
“He’s a cult figure. Like Che Guevara.”
– Ann Borstad, 18, from Norway, emerging from a bookstore in Prague wearing a T-shirt that reads: “Kafka didn’t have much fun either.”
“Kafka today means business rather than something that touches the soul. I’m sorry about that.”
– Lenka Hybkova, 20, a drama student in Prague, who refuses to wear a Kafka T-shirt.
(From “Kafka Is a Symbol of Prague Today; Also, He’s a T-Shirt. Stuff Invoking His Name Sells To Gloom Lovers, Books Move Rather Less Briskly,” from Thursday’s Wall Street Journal.)
Our family’s recovery
When the grandmother the girls called "the human Barbie doll" died in the World Trade Center, they were buried in grief. But Brianna and Shannon, and their parents, Jay and Louise, refuse to let the past rule them.
For months after her grandmother died, Shannon Yaskulka doodled incessantly, drawing swirls and curlicues on any piece of paper she could find. Confused by what the drawings meant, her parents, Jay and Louise, brought them to Shannon’s pediatrician, who showed them to a psychologist. “The psychologist said it looked like smoke,” says Jay. Presumably Shannon was copying the plumes from the World Trade Center that she had glimpsed on television on Sept. 11, 2001, when the 3-year-old turned to her father and said, “Daddy, that’s where Grandma works.”
Continue Reading CloseWhat else we’re reading
"Sesame Street" gets girlie, Andi Zeisler defends young feminists, and "Girls Gone Wild" founder Joe Francis humiliates a female reporter.
New York Times: The newest addition to the mostly male “Sesame Street” cast is Abby Cadabby, a girlie-girl with magical powers. (Priceless quote: “If Cookie Monster was a female character,” Carol-Lynn Parente, executive producer of the show, told the Times, “she’d be accused of being anorexic or bulimic. There are a lot of things that come attached to female characters.”)
Continue Reading CloseMore middle-aged men are single … and OK about it
The latest article in the New York Times' series on gender looks at why marriage rates among men without college degrees are declining
In the fourth article in its fascinating series “The New Gender Divide,” the New York Times looks at why marriage rates among men without higher education are declining at a significant clip.
The reasons for the decline vary and include greater economic independence for women, and the increase in the number of couples who live together without getting married. The Times interviewed men who are afraid to commit, men who fear divorce, and one 41-year-old who says he’d love to have a family but he just hasn’t met the right woman.
Continue Reading CloseSuffragist’s home bought by anti-choice group
A member of Feminists for Life buys the birthplace of Susan B. Anthony.
A Broadsheet reader forwarded us an email she received from Feminists For Life — “I got on their mailing list to monitor their activities after it was revealed that Supreme Court Justice Roberts’ wife has been actively involved with them,” she assures us — announcing the purchase of the Adams, Mass. birthplace of suffragist Susan B. Anthony by a member of its organization.
“While Feminists for Life of America will not own the house, the pro-life feminist organization will manage and care for the birthplace,” according to the press release. “FFLs national office will remain in the Washington, D.C., area. A panel of experts will be assembled to determine the best use for the dwelling. Others who care about Susan B. Anthony will be provided a means to contribute ideas.”
Continue Reading CloseDon’t date him, girl!
A new Web site allows women to post warnings about the sleazy guys they've dated. But it is fair to the men?
People magazine (subscription only) has a short article this week about a self-explanatory Web site called DontDateHimGirl.com. The 8-month-old site, which allows women to dis guys who have done them wrong, is making news because — didn’t we see this coming? — it is being sued for defamation by one of the men who appear on it.
Thirty-eight-year-old Pittsburgh attorney Todd Hollis, who is accused on the site of being messy, unfaithful, a deadbeat dad, possibly gay, and suffering from herpes, has sued DontDateHimGirl.com’s creator, Tasha Joseph, because she has refused to take down several posts about him, which Hollis insists are filled with lies.
Continue Reading ClosePage 1 of 35 in Lori Leibovich