Like little stars.
You never forget your first glimpse of the Statue of Liberty. A towering
monument to freedom, democracy and the big-girl aesthetic, she looms over
New York Harbor, 225 tons of womanhood, 151 feet from toes to torch tip,
her head high and huge, her massive bosom outthrust to welcome the tired,
the poor, the huddled masses. For immigrants arriving on America’s shore,
the statue is the earth mother of international acceptance. For
macrophiles, she’s something else — the ultimate sex goddess.
Macrophilia — it’s one of those wonderful words that means exactly what
you think it means. “Macro” means big, “philios” means love. Put ‘em
together, whatta you got? A lover of bigness, a connoisseur of the
colossal. Simply put, male macrophiles — and almost all macros are men –
get turned on by giant women. Not merely statuesque women, not your
ordinary 6-feet-2-inches Daisy Fuentes-type Amazon. Don’t try pushing that
diminutive excuse for a woman at the discriminating macro. He loves only the
true giantess — or GTS, as macros say — the gal who goes, say, a hundred
feet in high heels.
But where, you ask, does one find oneself a hundred-foot GTS? Nowhere,
of course. And precisely because there are no real-life giantesses out
there stomping around the countryside, squashing SUVs like Matchbox cars,
macrophiles seeking to satisfy their giant-sized desire must rely instead
on the power of their own imaginations.
The Web is the playground where macros turn their imaginations loose to
frolic. Surfing the online GTS scene you’ll find giantesses galore — in
reality, photos of normal-size women manipulated to appear humongous. At
Shrunken Men at the Mercy of Giant Women you’ll see a GTS crushing a
wee little man under her shoe like a discarded cigarette butt. And over at
Feet you get one macro’s domination fantasy: four teensy men squished
between the toes of a giantess as she paints her poster-size toenails. The
variety of the macros’ online creation is outstripped only by its
Despite a tendency among macrophiles to clam up when approached by
size-neutral outsiders, I managed to crack the GTS cyber network and strike
up a conversation with one chatty macro in my quest to answer the burning
question: why giants?
“Seeing a giantess have her way with anything and everything is a
combination of a woman being ultimately powerful, sexual and completely
dominating all at the same time,” says Dave, creator of the Web site Giantess World.
Dave has been married for six years and says that his sexual relationship
with his regulation-size wife is “fantastic.” But fantasy-wise, his
preference runs toward mega giantesses — women who tip the tape at several
hundred feet. He favors GTS fantasy stories that
portray mega GTSes romping the globe in murderously big adventures. And whom
would Dave choose if he could transform any celebrity into a GTS? “I would
probably choose Pamela Anderson or Dolly Parton,” he says. “I’m a boob man.”
Darwin wrote, “If everyone were cast in the same mold, there would be no
such thing as beauty.” So, from the Darwinian perspective, you might say
that macros, in their longing for beauty, simply favor a bigger mold. But
what does it say about a man’s perception of women — and of himself –
when his ultimate fantasy is to be stomped to smithereens by some
redwood-size femme fatale?
“They’re playing out some old, unresolved psychological issue,” says Dr.
Helen Friedman, a clinical psychologist in St. Louis. “Maybe as a child
they felt overwhelmed by a dominant mother, or a sadistic mother. Maybe
they were abused. This [macrophilia] is not so much a fetish as a
disassociation from reality. It’s part of an internal world.” The macro’s
submersion in fantasy, she says, serves as a substitute for a more normalized approach
to sex. “Healthy sexuality is about personal intimacy,” Friedman says. “It’s about
feeling good about yourself in a way that expresses caring, and feeling a
connection to another person.”
Dave agrees that his fantasies are an escape, but he takes issue with the
perfunctory Freudian assessment. “Why is it that psychology always needs to
blame the parents for everything? My folks are French and Catholic, so they
were a little more strict than most of my peers’ families. But they were
definitely not abusive.”
In the wired world of macrophilia you find precious few females. For some
reason, women don’t swoon over King Kong-size men, and their aversion may
be more than a simple matter of taste. “We live in a patriarchal culture,” Friedman says. “Women already see men as larger and more powerful. They
don’t need to fantasize it.”
So where do guys get the jones for jumbo women? For Dave,
sexual awakening dates back to Liliput. Dave says, “I was turned on
by “Gulliver’s Travels” before I knew what the
birds and the bees were all about.” In the book there’s a scene in the land
of Brobdingnag where Gulliver gets intimate with one of the local
giantesses — the enticingly named Glumdaclitch. Dave read that scene for the first time in the sixth grade and says, “I’ve
fantasized about giantesses ever since.” Would Jonathan Swift flip his
periwig if he knew that his witty satire of English society was now serving
as the stuff of wet dreams for a slew of GTS-lovin’ horndogs?
For macrophile film buffs, a handful of options exist. From the 1958 cult
classic “Attack of the 50-Foot Woman” to Disney’s cornball caper “Honey, I
Shrunk the Kids,” Hollywood has fixated on giants in a big way. And when
you’re sitting in a theater, the nature of your physical relationship to
the actors on screen — the ratio of your size to theirs — is in itself a
macrophile’s dream. Slumped in your seat, you gape up at the
tragicomedy unfolding on screen and it’s as if those gigantically
beautiful people with the swimming pool-size eyes could lean out of the
picture and scoop you up in their very large hands.
Dave says that because the macro audience is basically invisible to Hollywood,
the onscreen GTS will remain captivating but rare. The appeal of the Internet,
conversely, is that macros can create their own outsize dramas. “That’s why
the Internet has been the media of choice for so many of us,” he says.
But Friedman sees a different reason why macrophiles — along with
cross-dressers, transsexuals and other alternative lifestylists — migrate
online. “The Internet provides comfort and privacy,” she says. “It’s a way
for them to get together and share information. It’s not the big coming
out, but it’s a first step.”
Disassociated from reality or not, there’s no denying the impressive scope of the
macro’s imagination. In a culture that often glorifies tininess and limp-noodle frailty
in women — think of Gwyneth Paltrow’s anemic scarecrow charms — the macro closes his eyes
to the puny pop idols du jour, and looks instead to the gargantuan giantess roaming
the landscape of his dreams. In a no-brainer world of prepackaged sexpots and
pay-per-view porn, the macrophile stands as one of a dying breed: the
true dreamer. To those critical of the dream, Dave shrugs: “Like any fetish, if you
don’t have it, you probably won’t get it.”
In other words: It’s a giant thing — you wouldn’t understand.
Jon Bowen is a frequent contributor to Salon.More Jon Bowen.
Like little stars.
World's best pie apple. Essential for Tarte Tatin. Has five prominent ribs.
So pretty. So early. So ephemeral. Tastes like strawberry candy (slightly).
My personal fave. Ultra-crisp. Graham cracker flavor. Should be famous. Isn't.
High flavored with notes of blood orange and allspice. Very rare.
Jefferson's favorite. The best all-purpose American apple.
New Hampshire's native son has a grizzled appearance and a strangely addictive curry flavor. Very, very rare.
Makes the best hard cider in America. Soon to be famous.
Freak seedling found in an Oregon field in the '60s has pink flesh and a fragrant strawberry snap. Makes a killer rose cider.
Ben Franklin's favorite. Queen Victoria's favorite. Only apple native to NYC.
Really does taste like pineapple.