Joan Walsh

Graveyard spiral

Did bad judgment or bad luck doom JFK Jr.?

  • more
    • All Share Services

He was reckless. He was henpecked. He risked his own life and the lives of loved ones because of his macho Kennedy arrogance. He was a dutiful brother-in-law who wanted to make sure his wife’s sister got shuttled to Martha’s Vineyard as promised.

In the days since John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane disappeared off Cape Cod Friday, there has been no end to speculation about what made him fly that night. The questions are vexing: Why would a novice pilot with an injured foot and a new plane at least partly controlled by foot pedals take off at night in hazy weather, to fly an over-water route to a tiny airport where he had never before landed at night by himself?

The details about why Kennedy flew that night and what caused his plane to crash may never be fully known. The National Transportation and Safety Board says it will be weeks before the plane wreckage is recovered, and it may never be. A full investigation could take up to a year.

But in advance of the investigation, several questions are emerging as crucial:

  • How much training and experience as a pilot did Kennedy have, and was he prepared to fly at night, over water?

  • How bad were conditions over Martha’s Vineyard Friday night, and what would it have taken to make the flight safely?

  • How much did Kennedy’s foot injury — he had a cast removed from his broken foot the day before the flight — compromise his capacity to fly the plane, which was at least partly controlled by foot pedals?

  • Did pressure from his wife force him to take a route he didn’t feel qualified to fly?

    This much is known about Kennedy’s last flight:

    Kennedy, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy and her sister Lauren Bessette arrived at Essex County Airport near Fairfield, N.J., where Kennedy kept his single-engine Piper Saratoga II plane, at dusk on Friday.

    Kyle Bailey, the New Jersey pilot who is believed to be the last person who saw the trio, was also planning a flight to Martha’s Vineyard, but he canceled his plans because of poor visibility. “The weather was very marginal, four to five miles visibility, extremely hazy,” Bailey told the Washington Post. “Over open water, you have reduced visibility anyway. With the haze, in the dark, you lose sight of the horizon. You don’t have landmarks.”

    After loading their baggage and taxiing, the Kennedys’ plane departed at 8:38 p.m. from runway 22. The plane made a 180-degree turn toward the northeast. According to radar data, the plane then climbed to 5,600 feet and continued easterly along the coast until it came to Westerly, R.I., at 9:26 p.m. After passing Westerly, Kennedy’s plane began its descent toward Martha’s Vineyard.

    At 9:40, the plane was about 17 miles from the airport at Martha’s Vineyard, and had descended to 2,200 feet, maintaining that altitude for 20 seconds. The last blip on the radar screens at Provincetown, Mass., and Cape Cod approach controls, where the plane was tracked, came 14 seconds later, at an altitude of 1,100 feet. In just 14 seconds, the plane dropped 1,100 feet, compared to the 400-500 feet per minute norm at that stage of landing. Then complete radar silence. No signs of distress. Eerie silence.

    Training and experience: “A pilot with less than 200 hours is considered
    low-time.”

    There are conflicting reports about just how much time Kennedy had logged
    in the cockpit. The Boston Globe reported Sunday that he had only
    registered 46 flight hours, quoting an unnamed FAA source, only six hours
    beyond the 40 required for a license. But other publications have credited
    Kennedy with roughly 100 hours of flying time — which would still mark him
    as a novice.

    While flying experts were reluctant to directly criticize Kennedy’s
    decision to fly that night, there was near-consensus that his novice status
    made such a flight a challenge. “Reasonable pilot judgment says that, if
    I’m a relatively new pilot and I don’t have a lot of night experience, and
    if it’s hazy and the visibility is not very good, then I would say, ‘This
    may be beyond my skill level,’” Warren Morningstar, spokesman for the
    Aircraft Owners and Pilot’s Association (AOPA), the world’s largest civil
    aviation organization, told Salon News.

    “A pilot with less than 200 hours of logged time is considered low-time and
    there’s a corresponding decrease in the number of accidents after pilots
    reach that level,” Morningstar said.

    Although Kennedy was technically certified to fly in the conditions he
    encountered Friday night, he did not have special training to read flight
    instruments, which could have helped him navigate at night over water. The
    instrument-rated license is often dubbed the “blind flying license,” with
    good reason.

    In a 1993 Atlantic Monthly article headlined “The Turn,” William Langewiesche
    explained the total disorientation that comes with night flying: “The
    inner ear, and with it the sense of balance, is neutralized by the motion
    of flight. The airplane could be momentarily upside down and passengers
    would not know.”

    To obtain a pilot’s license, students must spend three hours flying in
    darkness, and have three hours of instrument training. But instrument
    flying “gives the pilot an extra set of eyes that virtually doubles his or
    her vision, safety and utility,” according to a course description for an
    instrument training course at American Flyers Flight School.

    Without instrument training, pilots say it would be href="/news/feature/1999/07/20/pilot/index.html">easy to get
    disoriented in weather conditions like those that surrounded Martha’s
    Vineyard Friday night — flying in haze, at night, over water.

    Conditions: “You couldn’t see Martha’s Vineyard.”

    According to the AOPA, weather-related accidents account for almost 30 percent of all fatal, pilot-related accidents in single-engine airplanes like Kennedy’s, and darkness significantly increases the likelihood of bad-weather mishaps.

    Air traffic controllers and witnesses said there was haze surrounding Martha’s Vineyard Friday night that diminished Kennedy’s visibility. Dr. Bob Arnot, chief medical correspondent for NBC and an experienced pilot, also was flying in the area Friday night. He said visibility was limited by haze as he passed about three miles south of the Vineyard just after 9 p.m. He had to rely on instruments to land at the nearby island of Nantucket, where he vacations.

    “It was just black,” Arnot said. “You couldn’t see Martha’s Vineyard.”

    Several pilots said they canceled flights that night. “I was planning on going to Martha’s Vineyard last night, too,” said Kyle Bailey, the pilot who saw Kennedy just before he took off. “But it was so hazy. I’m very cautious, though. And I’m not crazy about flying over water at night.”

    Joe Orlando, a pilot who also flies out of the Essex County Airport, told the Hackensack Record he decided not to fly that night either. “Visibility was at least three miles Friday night. But I don’t go unless it’s five,” said Orlando, who called Kennedy’s New Piper “the sports utility vehicle of the air.”

    After studying Friday night’s radar reports, investigators at the National Transportation Safety Board now believe that Kennedy’s plane went into what is known as a graveyard spiral, the most lethal of airplane spins. In a graveyard spiral, a plane locks into a tight turn, accelerating rapidly, with the nose of the plane pointed straight down.

    Though it is possible to recover from the spin, without the perspective of a horizon, a pilot may not even know he or she is in a graveyard spiral until it is too late. The spin can exert such pressure on the plane it can break up in midair.

    In a recent study commissioned by the University of Illinois, 20 students flew into simulated “instrument weather” — weather so bad that pilots are forced to rely on dials and meter readings to navigate. All 20 ended up in fatal spins. The average amount of time it took before their simulated crash was 178 seconds, or just under three minutes.

    “Flying at night in those conditions was probably not the best judgment,” flight instructor Jeff Broomall told the Canadian National Post.

    The injury: “With his broken foot, he had trouble with the pedals.”

    Kennedy broke his foot paragliding into a tree last month, and the break kept him from flying solo all summer long — until Friday night. Kyle Bailey, the New Jersey pilot who was the last to see Kennedy alive, noticed him limping as he got ready to make the flight Friday night.

    “He had at least one crutch. I saw him limping,” Bailey has told news outlets. “I told my family, ‘I can’t believe he’s going up in this weather.’” Questions about the condition of Kennedy’s foot have loomed large, because his Piper Saratoga had foot pedals. Just last Monday, Kennedy visited Toronto businessman Keith Stein, to discuss a possible investment in George magazine, and he was still in a cast and on crutches.

    “He flew with a co-pilot on this occasion because … he told me that with his broken foot, he had trouble with the pedals,” Stein told Reuters. According to some accounts Kennedy got the cast off on Thursday, and was cleared by doctors to fly.

    “He had a hard cast and was using crutches,” recalls another businessman who also met last month with Kennedy in New York to discuss a partnership with George magazine. “He was pretty pathetic on those crutches. I’m so sorry he made such a bad judgment call. I can’t believe a novice pilot would head out into the night and haze over the water without an instrument rating.”

    A recently broken foot could have restricted Kennedy’s range of motion, but no orthopedists would comment on that possibility without having examined him. Dr. Alan Gross, an orthopedic surgeon from Toronto known for his treatment of professional athletic injuries, told Salon News: “I can’t possibly comment on this fracture without actually examining it. It’s too contentious. You’re going into choppy waters here.”

    Some pilots dismiss the notion that a weakened foot would interfere with Kennedy’s flight performance, saying the foot pedals, or rudders, are rarely used, and don’t require much pressure anyway. But Valerie Flanagan, a spokeswoman for New Piper Aircraft, told Salon News, “With the airplane, of course, you need two feet to maneuver. How his [injury] interfered, I can’t say.”

    Family pressures: “My wife insists.”

    Flying at night wasn’t Kennedy’s first choice. The Kennedy trip was scheduled for daylight hours, but had to be postponed when sister-in-law Lauren Bessette, a vice president at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, got held up at work and couldn’t leave early as planned. The party then hit traffic on the way to the airport, further delaying the trip and pushing it back until after dark. There has been speculation that the delay also caused Kennedy to take shortcuts as he ran through pre-flight checks, warming up the plane in a practice area, for instance, rather than on the runway.

    On Monday, the New York Post reported that Kennedy had been reluctant to fly into Martha’s Vineyard in the first place, but had been pressured to do so by his wife, Carolyn. Kennedy reportedly told C. David Heymann, the author of “A Woman Called Jackie,” whom he was recruiting to write for George, that “I don’t even want to go to Martha’s Vineyard. I’m flying my own plane … Unfortunately, I have to take my sister-in-law with us. She’s going to Martha’s Vineyard. My wife insists I take her there.

    “I don’t want to do that,” Kennedy reportedly told Heymann. “I said I’d rather fly straight to Hyannis … but my wife’s insisting.” Heymann told the Post that the complaints about his wife sounded “tongue-in-cheek … as though, ‘What can you do with a wife who has a bulldog tenacity.’”

    Kennedy’s last words to Heymann were: “This means I have to land twice. I’m really not that experienced a pilot.” Heymann did not return calls to Salon News.

  • Joan Walsh

    Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large.

    Daryl Lindsey is associate editor of Salon News and an Arthur Burns fellow. He currently lives in Berlin and writes for Salon and Die Welt.

    Anthony York is Salon's Washington correspondent.

    Jon Stewart wants release of bin Laden photos

    "We can only make decisions about war if we see what war actually is"

    • more
      • All Share Services

    Jon Stewart wants release of bin Laden photosJon Stewart on Wednesday night's "Daily Show"

    In a segment on last night’s “Daily Show,” Jon Stewart argued for the release of graphic photos of Osama bin Laden’s body, which President Obama yesterday announced would remain classified.

    “We’ve been fighting this war for nearly ten years … and we’ve seen nearly zero photographic evidence of it,” Stewart said. “We can only make decisions about war if we see what war actually is, and not as a video game where bodies quickly disappear, leaving behind a shiny gold coin.”

    Although his argument was serious, Stewart did end on a humorous note: “The White House announced today it officially decided to not release the bin Laden photo. Instead, to keep it a secret, they’re going to airdrop it into an affluent Pakistani suburb, so it won’t be found for years.”

    Salon’s Joan Walsh yesterday supported Obama’s decision not to release the death photos, arguing: “There’s absolutely no upside: The lunatic fringe will still doubt the evidence, and gruesome corpse photos run the risk of creating a backlash against bin Laden’s killing that doesn’t exist so far.” You can read her full piece here.

     

    The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
    Face/Off
    www.thedailyshow.com
    Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

     

    Continue Reading Close

    Emma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich.

    From the pundits: The finest speech of Obama’s presidency

    Healer-in-chief Barack Obama addressed the nation at the Tucson memorial. Here are a few key reactions

    • more
      • All Share Services

    From the pundits: The finest speech of Obama's presidencyPresident Barack Obama speaks at a memorial service for the victims of Saturday's shootings at McKale Center on the University of Arizona campus Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2011, in Tucson, Ariz. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)(Credit: AP)

    Speaking to a capacity crowd and reaching a grieving nation, Barack Obama sounded presidential last night at the Tucson memorial service at the University of Arizona. The speech — quickly and popularly identified as the best address Obama’s given since he was elected — ran long compared to those of past presidents like Bill Clinton or George W. Bush in times of national tragedy. But the pundits didn’t seem to mind one bit.

     Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post says Obama sounded like Obama again:

    Obama was invested: Unlike some of the Oval office speeches he has delivered where he seemed to be reading the text, Obama was clearly invested in this address — intellectually and emotionally. And, it showed. Obama spoke in the poetry he used so well in his 2008 campaign, not the prose that has, too often for his supporters, defined his presidency. That was especially true when Obama spoke of the Christina Taylor Green, the youngest victim of the tragedy; “I want us to live up to her expectations,” Obama said. “I want our democracy to be as good as she imagined it.”

    Cillizza’s colleague at the Post, E.J. Dionne, likens Obama to a preacher:

    President Obama spoke Wednesday night as the pastor in chief, not as a politician. His address in Tucson was highly personal, rooted in the biographies of the victims and in scripture, more about the country as a family than about government. It was neither therapeutic nor political and dealt only in passing with the roiling controversies that have divided left from right.

    Salon’s editor at large Joan Walsh touts the Americaness of the entire affair, citing a history of imperfection but a commitment to unity:

    There it was, folks, Saturday morning and again Wednesday night: our country, as good as it gets. Remember how great it looked and felt and sounded, when things inevitably get ugly again…

    Like it or not, that’s American history: we are imperfect, descended from people who took land from Indians and Mexicans and who held slaves, but also from people who fought for equal rights for everyone, and who, over time, managed to create laws and values and customs that (mostly) do that.

    Calling the speech “hopeful and positive,” the Atlantic’s James Fallows explains why it succeeded:

    The standard comparisons of the past four days have been to Ronald Reagan after the Challenger disaster and Bill Clinton after Oklahoma City. Tonight’s speech matched those as a demonstration of “head of state” presence, and far exceeded them as oratory — while being completely different in tone and nature. They, in retrospect, were mainly — and effectively — designed to note tragic loss. Obama turned this into a celebration — of the people who were killed, of the values they lived by, and of the way their example could bring out the better in all of us and in our country.

    The New York Times’ Gail Collins acknowledges the Obama-we’ve-been-waiting-for and asks for more from the president:

    Maybe President Obama was saving the magic for a time when we really needed it.

    We’ve been complaining for two years about the lack of music and passion in his big speeches. But if he’d moved the country when he was talking about health care or bailing out the auto industry, perhaps his words wouldn’t have been as powerful as they were when he was trying to lift the country up after the tragedy in Tucson.

    In case you missed it, here’s the full text of Obama’s speech. And here’s the video:

    Correction: A previous verson of this story stated that the speech took place at Arizona State University. The speech in fact took place at the University of Arizona.

    Continue Reading Close

    Adam Clark Estes blogs the news for Salon. Email him at ace@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @adamclarkestes

    Joan Walsh on “Ed Show”: Arizona’s racist law

    Salon's editor debates the state's disturbing new immigration policy. Plus, Kelsey Grammer's right-wing network

    • more
      • All Share Services

    Editor Joan Walsh made an appearance this afternoon on MSNBC’s “Ed Show,” where she vigorously debated the new Arizona immigration law with Republican strategist John Feehery. She went on to talk about Rahm Emanuel’s mayoral hopes and Kelsey Grammer’s right-wing TV channel, which launches this summer. Check out the clip below.

     

     

    “Daily Show” on blame game — and O’Reilly’s meltdown

    Stewart on Rush, Beck, Olber-Math-dow, and our favorite late-night crazy person

    • more
      • All Share Services

    “The Daily Show” waded into to the media blame game over recent acts of political violence last night, focusing on Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Olber-Matth-dow. He also took a fond look at Bill O’Reilly’s recent antics during his interview with Joan Walsh. Check it out. Also, check out this fine submission to our Remix O’Reilly contest. And submit your own!

    Continue Reading Close
    Kerry Lauerman

    Kerry Lauerman is Salon's Editor in Chief. Follow him on Twitter: @kerrylauerman.

    Fox’s Wallace: Armey insult “pretty funny”

    Fox News anchor Chris Wallace and radio host Mike Gallagher laugh about Dick Armey's attack on Salon editor in chief Joan Walsh.

    • more
      • All Share Services

    At least a couple of people think former House Majority Leader Dick Armey’s comments about Salon editor in chief were funny.

    If you’re just tuning in, last week, while on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” Armey told Walsh, “I am so damn glad that you could never be my wife, ’cause I surely wouldn’t have to listen to that prattle from you every day.”

    Later in the week, Think Progress notes, conservative radio host Mike Gallagher had Fox News’ Chris Wallace on his show, and the two discussed the remark. That conversation culminated with this exchange:

    GALLAGHER: Now, now, feminists are very angry that he said, “I’m glad you couldn’t be my wife.” I mean …

    WALLACE: It’s pretty funny actually.

    GALLAGHER: It’s hysterical. Do you know how many times a week I say, “thank God I don’t have to wake up next to her.” I mean some of these callers, these shrews that call.

    Audio of the discussion is below.

    Update: The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz had a very different take on the incident. Sunday, on “Reliable Sources,” his CNN show, Kurtz said, “Well, you know, it was really one step above, ‘Joan, you ignorant slut.’ And it bothers me that nobody pays a penalty for this. I’m sure he’ll be back on all the shows within a week or two.”

    Continue Reading Close

    Alex Koppelman is a staff writer for Salon.

    Page 1 of 6 in Joan Walsh