Salon Home
  • RSSfeed
  • Follow Artificial Intelligence
Topic

Artificial Intelligence

Wednesday, Oct 20, 1999 4:00 PM UTC1999-10-20T16:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Professor cyborg

If we want to stop machines from taking over, we better start becoming more like them.

Professor cyborg

“The Matrix,” last
summer’s sci-fi box-office smash, envisions a future in which artificially intelligent computers take over. Instead of programming the computers, humans become the slave race, serving as living batteries that provide energy for their former desktop tools.

What a bummer. But hey, that’s just Hollywood science fiction, right? Wrong, says Kevin Warwick, a professor at the department of cybernetics at the University of Reading in England — the British equivalent of the M.I.T. Media Lab — who has spent his career working on robotics, creating machine intelligence and, most controversially, building human-computer implants for use in his own body. Author of the recent computers-can-think book href="http://shop.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=2XI8F0LGEU&mscssid=XJ2LPKP5GQSH2NPR00JP42CB5RFD5PLC&srefer=&isbn=0737294140" target="new">“March of the Machines: Why the New Race of Robots Will Rule the World,” Warwick is the futurist
most likely to be quoted throughout British newspapers direly predicting that
computers may conquer the world within our lifetime. As he
himself describes his work, “It’s like creating science fiction.”

Continue Reading

Janelle Brown is a contributing writer for Salon.  More Janelle Brown

Tuesday, Feb 15, 2011 1:02 PM UTC2011-02-15T13:02:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Man, machine tied after one round of “Jeopardy!”

IBM's Watson supercomputer and former champ Brad Rutter are neck-and-neck after one round of play

TV Man vs Machine

In this undated publicity image released by Jeopardy Productions, Inc., host Alex Trebek, left, poses with contestants Ken Jennings, center, and Brad Rutter and a computer named Watson in Yorktown Heights, N.Y. On Monday, Feb. 14, 2011, "Jeopardy!" will begin airing two matches spread over three days between Jennings, Rutter and Watson, who was developed by IBM scientists. (AP Photo/Jeopardy Productions, Inc.) NO SALES (Credit: AP)

In the “Jeopardy!” battle of man vs. machine, man and machine were neck-and-neck on Monday.

Human player Brad Rutter and the supercomputer named Watson ended an initial round tied at $5,000. The other challenger, human Ken Jennings, was far behind with $2,000.

Rutter (the show’s all-time money-winner with $3.25 million) and Jennings (who has the longest winning streak at 74 games) are the most successful players in “Jeopardy!” history. Watson, named for IBM founder Thomas J. Watson, is powered by 10 racks of computer servers running the Linux operating system.

Continue Reading

  More Frazier Moore

Thursday, Jul 19, 2007 6:00 PM UTC2007-07-19T18:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Chinook, the unbeatable checkers-playing computer

Computer scientists have solved the game of checkers, showing that if two players play perfectly, the game will result in a draw. No human can beat their machine.

Scientists at the University of Alberta report that they’ve built an unbeatable checkers-playing computer. Their machine, Chinook, has solved checkers: It proves that if two players play perfectly, making no mistakes, the game of checkers will result in a draw.

The proof required analyzing 500 billion billion checkers positions — 5 x 1020 — a computational process that began in 1989 and has been running on hundreds of processors almost continuously since. Chinook now knows everything about checkers, the perfect response to any move, and the best that any human can do is drive Chinook to a draw. You can never win.

Continue Reading

Farhad Manjoo is a Salon staff writer and the author of True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society.   More Farhad Manjoo

Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:00 PM UTC2006-05-30T12:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

The perfect man

Design-your-own boyfriends lack that certain something. Until they don't. A short story.

The perfect man

Martin was a mouth breather. Jim lacked ambition. Rennie’s head was too big. Craig licked my face like a dog.

But Pritchard. Pritchard is everything I want. And I’m not going to apologize about the way I met him. Especially not to my friends still slugging it out on LovePlanet.com. I did LovePlanet. Seventy-four dates with sixty-two men. You know what I learned? People lie. Sylvester was fifty-five, not thirty-five. Jacob was an unemployed bartender with halitosis, not a financial planner with a beach house. I admit I lied about my weight. All women lie about their weight.

Continue Reading

Lauren McLaughlin ditched a movie career to write science fiction novels.  More Lauren McLaughlin

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 10:35 AM UTC2005-11-10T10:35:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

The Big Idea

Presenting the leading edge in science: Decoding the brain, stringing together the universe and arresting human aging.

The Big Idea

Decoding the brain

The neural code is the most important scientific problem you have (probably) never heard of.

Analogous to the software of a computer, the neural code is the set of rules or the syntax that transforms the electrical pulses emitted by brain cells into perceptions, memories and decisions. Knowledge of the neural code could give us almost unlimited power over our psyches, because we could monitor and manipulate brain cells with exquisite precision by speaking to them in their own private language. The neural code could also solve one of philosophy’s oldest conundrums, the mind-body problem. We may finally understand how this wrinkled lump of jelly in our skulls generates a unique self with a sense of personal identity and autonomy, a self that perceives, emotes, remembers, imagines, chooses, acts, creates.

Continue Reading

John Horgan is the Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, and the author of "The End of Science," "The Undiscovered Mind," and "Rational Mysticism." See his personal website at johnhorgan.org.  More John Horgan

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 10:30 AM UTC2005-11-10T10:30:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

The Big Idea: No more breakthroughs

We live in a period of explosive scientific progress. But admitting that science has limits may be our greatest achievement.

Life

Here’s another Big Idea: We will never solve the riddle of the cosmos, or our brains, or our mortality.

Most people find this notion absurd, and I understand why. We have all grown up in a period of explosive scientific progress, and so it is natural for us to assume that this progress will continue, possibly forever.

I became a science writer more than 20 years ago because I was a fervent believer in scientific progress. Science offers our best hope of understanding ourselves and our place in the universe; it can also help us create, if not a Utopia, then at least a much better world than the one we now inhabit. I also believed that science represents an “endless frontier,” as physicist Vannevar Bush, founder of the National Science Foundation, put it in a famous 1945 essay.

Continue Reading

John Horgan is the Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, and the author of "The End of Science," "The Undiscovered Mind," and "Rational Mysticism." See his personal website at johnhorgan.org.  More John Horgan

Page 1 of 3 in Artificial Intelligence

Other News