Salon Home
Topic

Abortion

Monday, Oct 25, 1999 4:00 PM UTC1999-10-25T16:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Life of restraint

I have a restraining order on my ex. But he has a grip on my life.

Topics:,

My marriage ended like a watermelon dropped a hundred stories to unyielding pavement below. The day I left, I was pregnant. It occurred to me that I must escape. I must not have this child. I was already a mother to another child, from another union. I did not believe that this man had what it takes to be a father. I did not have it in me to be the single mother of two.

Despite the brevity of the union (less than a year), I had been confused
almost the entire time and frightened for months. It was confusion I did not
anticipate, though I should have, because I married a stranger I met on the
Internet. I’d let him woo me, allowed myself to fall for an online character I
so much wished to be real. But certain things did not jibe.

He claimed he was a recovered alcoholic who had mastered moderation. Yet I watched him devour entire bottles of wine. He popped pills, too. Yes, prescribed, but also addictive. He swore he wasn’t hooked. I thought he was. His mother seemed to agree when I called her, distraught, one day. But she said that actually his drinking was a bigger concern. Apparently she knew more than I did.

Continue Reading

Spike Gillespie is an on-line columnist and the author of "All the Wrong Men and One Perfect Boy."  More Spike Gillespie

Monday, Feb 13, 2012 7:00 PM UTC2012-02-13T19:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s alternative abortion history

The Supreme Court justice reflects on her legacy -- and the little-known case she wishes had preceded Roe v. Wade

US Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at Columbia Law School, February 10, 2012.

US Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at Columbia Law School, February 10, 2012.  (Credit: Eileen Barroso)

Last Friday, some of the most distinguished scholars and litigants working on gender and the law gathered to honor a foremother and inspiration, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as Columbia University Law School marked the 40th anniversary of Ginsburg becoming the first tenured female professor there.

But there was another 40th anniversary as well, one less-known, but very much on Ginsburg’s mind. It has been 40 years since she filed a brief before the Supreme Court for a case she wishes had established the abortion right instead of Roe v. Wade.

Continue Reading

Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com.  More Irin Carmon

Friday, Feb 3, 2012 11:00 PM UTC2012-02-03T23:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Komen victim of “bullying,” sad abortion foe says

Someone make an "It Gets Better" video for poor Kathryn Jean Lopez of the National Review

A very serious anti-bullying message from Kathryn Jean Lopez

A very serious anti-bullying message from Kathryn Jean Lopez

Poor Kathryn Jean Lopez, the National Review Online’s resident delicate flower, anti-feminist traditional Catholic, and enemy of all homosexualists and abortionists. She was so delighted when Susan G. Komen for the Cure announced that it would no longer be sending grant money to Planned Parenthood to fund breast cancer screenings and mammogram referrals, because it meant that her side had “won” a battle in the war against women’s health providers that perform abortions and provide contraception.

Continue Reading
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon. Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene  More Alex Pareene

Thursday, Feb 2, 2012 4:40 PM UTC2012-02-02T16:40:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

I’m pro-life and I support Planned Parenthood

I want the abortion rate to plummet, but abstinence-only sex ed and reversing Roe v. Wade will do just the opposite

A "Stand Up for Women's Health" rally in Washington April 7, 2011.

A "Stand Up for Women's Health" rally in Washington April 7, 2011.  (Credit: Joshua Roberts / Reuters)

This originally appeared on John Saveland's Open Salon blog.

Can we have the term “pro-life” back, if everyone else is just going to misuse it?

I’m pro-life because I value all human life. I value the lives of every person living in my country. I value the lives of children living in poverty, and victims of AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria in the Third World. I value the lives of criminals on death row, homeless living in the streets, and soldiers serving our country abroad.

I also value the nascent human life of the unborn.

So why aren’t I trying to defund Planned Parenthood, calling abortion doctors “murderers,” and petitioning the federal government to overturn Roe vs. Wade?

Continue Reading

  More John Saveland

Wednesday, Feb 1, 2012 1:38 AM UTC2012-02-01T01:38:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

The fight against cancer — and abortion?

The Susan G. Komen Foundation says its decision to defund Planned Parenthood isn't political. Does anyone buy it?

komen_pp

Topics:

When news broke Tuesday afternoon that the Susan G. Komen Foundation had halted funding for breast cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood, outrage over what seemed a politically motivated move began percolating on Twitter. Soon enough, both “Planned Parenthood” and “Komen” were trending topics.

Continue Reading
Tracy Clark-Flory

Tracy Clark-Flory is a staff writer at Salon. Follow @tracyclarkflory on Twitter.  More Tracy Clark-Flory

Monday, Jan 23, 2012 10:00 AM UTC2012-01-23T10:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T

Disorder in the court

A law gets batted between judges with wildly different worldviews -- and personalities

Two Texas judges face off on the ultrasound decision

 (Credit: iStockphoto_cunfek)

Topics:

Is it unconstitutional to force Texas women to have transvaginal ultrasounds, listen to the fetal heartbeat or discuss fetal development before having an abortion? It depends on the judge you ask.

As it happens, the two federal judges who have formally weighed in don’t just have very different ideas of a woman’s constitutional rights in this context — they also seem to hate each other. And they were both appointed by Republicans.

On Friday, Austin district court Judge Sam Sparks heard arguments for a permanent injunction on the law, about which he’s already expressed serious legal reservations with a preliminary injunction. Whatever he decides next will then go before Edith Jones, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, who has shown no inclination to agree with him about the state’s role in regulating uteruses.

Continue Reading

Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com.  More Irin Carmon

Page 1 of 124 in Abortion

Other News