Taking on the untouchables

John McCain's decision to attack the leaders of the religious right is refreshing because Republican leaders have too long been cowed into submission by these bigots.

Topics: Religion, Republican Party, Virginia, John McCain, R-Ariz.,

By daring to denounce the leaders of the right-wing Christian Coalition on their home turf in Virginia on Monday, John McCain has chosen to challenge the viability of a movement that has long seemed fearsomely zealous, wealthy and well-organized. But the maverick Arizonan and his aides appear to believe that Christian conservatism is no longer the asset to Republican candidates it once was, and has become a liability instead. Therefore, the McCain campaign believes it can rally moderates to administer a historic defeat to Pat Robertson in his own backyard on Tuesday.

Whether McCain’s brave gambit proves shrewd or suicidal will depend entirely on the turnout of primary voters. If his call to repudiate intolerance drives unusually high percentages of normally lethargic voters to the polls, he may score victories even in states where the religious right remains strong. If not, he will be overwhelmed by the reaction of outraged fundamentalists from Savannah to San Diego.

Certainly the followers of Robertson and his longtime rival Jerry Falwell have been dispirited since their hopes of driving President Clinton from office were thwarted in 1999. Their power in national elections has been declining steadily from the zenith of 1994, when the Christian Coalition and allied groups played a critical role in the Republican takeover of Congress. Extremists like Robertson remain highly influential within the party, however, and may well be motivated to renew their activism to meet the threat represented by McCain.

For the past decade Robertson’s legions have been trying with considerable success to take over the GOP. A favorite inside joke of the movement asks “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.” Now a presidential contender is telling them to put down their forks.

In his attack on the religious right as “divisive” and “un-American,” McCain seems to understand a nasty little secret — that the conservative fundamentalists are really a small minority, whose power waxes or wanes in inverse proportion to political participation by the secularized majority. Their electoral strategy has always been based on that realization, and has been executed most successfully in low-turnout contests for school boards, county commissions and party leadership posts.



That was the strategic vision of the early leaders of the Christian Coalition, as explained by them at closed conferences I attended in 1991 and 1992. In those days, the religious right was regarded by most of the media as virtually defunct following the demise of Falwell’s Moral Majority and the Jim Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart scandals. (The editor of the New Republic told me in 1992 that he wasn’t interested in an article about the Christian Coalition because they were “irrelevant.”)

Media pundits and Washington reporters, who have never really understood the religious right, tend to either underestimate or overestimate the movement’s power at various times. Historically, it has been both a conspiratorial, leadership-dominated faction and a broadly based religious counterculture, neither of which are easily penetrated by secular journalists. So when Falwell and Bakker fell, many analysts assumed that the movement itself was dead.

Yet at that very moment the religious right was growing rapidly again as a political force, under the tutelage of Robertson and his brilliant aides, Ralph Reed and Guy Rodgers. Lack of interest from the mainstream press didn’t bother them at all; to the contrary, they routinely barred reporters from their meetings.

Stealth was crucial for several reasons: The Christian Coalition was endangering its tax-exempt status by acting as an appendage of the Republican Party; the coalition’s organizers didn’t want their opponents to gain knowledge of their tactics; and they were saying things about their movement that they definitely didn’t want to see in print.

At one of those closed meetings, Guy Rodgers delivered a speech to coalition activists that exposed what is still a critical weakness of the religious right. As he explained with a smirk, they relied upon mobilizing a relatively small group of sympathetic voters in elections that most Americans simply ignore.

“In a presidential election, when more voters turn out than in any other election, only 15 percent of eligible voters actually determine the outcome. How can that be? Well, of all the adults 18 and over eligible to vote, only about 60 percent are registered … Of those registered to vote, in a good turnout, only half go to the polls. That means 30 percent of those eligible are actually voting. So 15 percent determines the outcome in a high-turnout election. In low-turnout elections … the percentage that determines who wins can be as low as 6 or 7 percent.”

Although Rodgers didn’t mention presidential primaries, those contests too often attract only a fraction of eligible and registered citizens. “Is this sinking in?” he asked. “We don’t have to persuade a majority of Americans to agree with us.” Most of them, he said, stay home and watch television.

There’s another side to that same scheme, however. When that passive American majority perceives the religious right as a threat to its own sovereignty — as happened during the impeachment struggle in 1998 and 1999 — the movement’s power shrivels. That was why they lost the culture war for which they had been spoiling from the moment that Bill Clinton was inaugurated.

And that is also why McCain, who voted to impeach the president and agrees with Robertson on almost every issue of consequence, now sees that his only chance to prosper is by defeating them again.

Joe Conason is the editor in chief of NationalMemo.com. To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 17
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    John Stanmeyer

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Container City: Shipping containers, indispensable tool of the globalized consumer economy, reflect the skyline in Singapore, one of the world’s busiest ports.

    Lu Guang

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Man Covering His Mouth: A shepherd by the Yellow River cannot stand the smell, Inner Mongolia, China

    Carolyn Cole/LATimes

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Angry Crowd: People jostle for food relief distribution following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti

    Darin Oswald/Idaho Statesman

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    “Black Friday” Shoppers: Aggressive bargain hunters push through the front doors of the Boise Towne Square mall as they are opened at 1 a.m. Friday, Nov. 24, 2007, Boise, Idaho, USA

    Google Earth/NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Suburban Sprawl: aerial view of landscape outside Miami, Florida, shows 13 golf courses amongst track homes on the edge of the Everglades.

    Garth Lentz

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Toxic Landscape: Aerial view of the tar sands region, where mining operations and tailings ponds are so vast they can be seen from outer space; Alberta, Canada

    Cotton Coulson/Keenpress

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Ice Waterfall: In both the Arctic and Antarctic regions, ice is retreating. Melting water on icecap, North East Land, Svalbard, Norway

    Yann Arthus-Bertrand

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Satellite Dishes: The rooftops of Aleppo, Syria, one of the world’s oldest cities, are covered with satellite dishes, linking residents to a globalized consumer culture.

    Stephanie Sinclair

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Child Brides: Tahani, 8, is seen with her husband Majed, 27, and her former classmate Ghada, 8, and her husband in Hajjah, Yemen, July 26, 2010.

    Mike Hedge

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Megalopolis: Shanghai, China, a sprawling megacity of 24 Million

    Google Earth/ 2014 Digital Globe

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Big Hole: The Mir Mine in Russia is the world’s largest diamond mine.

    Daniel Dancer

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Clear-cut: Industrial forestry degrading public lands, Willamette National Forest, Oregon

    Peter Essick

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Computer Dump: Massive quantities of waste from obsolete computers and other electronics are typically shipped to the developing world for sorting and/or disposal. Photo from Accra, Ghana.

    Daniel Beltra

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Oil Spill Fire: Aerial view of an oil fire following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil disaster, Gulf of Mexico

    Ian Wylie

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Slide 13

    Airplane Contrails: Globalized transportation networks, especially commercial aviation, are a major contributor of air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Photo of contrails in the west London sky over the River Thames, London, England.

    R.J. Sangosti/Denver Post

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Fire: More frequent and more intense wildfires (such as this one in Colorado, USA) are another consequence of a warming planet.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>