The war over Dr. Laura

A gay activist boycott of the conservative radio host backfires when the religious right jumps in.

Topics: LGBT, First Amendment,

The war over Dr. Laura

On Tuesday, the titans of the religious right will meet in Washington for an annual summit of sorts to discuss how entertainment programming is harming American families. But this time, topping the agenda of the Christian Coalition, Focus on the Family, Concerned Women for America, the Family Research Council and the American Family Association will be the free speech rights of an orthodox Jew: Dr. Laura Schlessinger.

Conservative Christians are lining up behind the controversial talk-show host, calling her the latest victim of an “anti-family” crusade. Gay activists targeted Schlessinger for what they called anti-gay rhetoric — calling homosexuality a “biological error,” touting “reparative therapy” to make gays heterosexual and claiming gays are more likely than straights to be pedophiles — and in May they got Procter & Gamble to pull its pledge of advertising from her planned TV show.

Defending the wildly popular radio conservative who has more than 14 million listeners immediately became a cause for the religious right. “The television airwaves are rapidly embracing indoctrination, as honest debate is apparently no longer important,” the Rev. Jerry Falwell said as he jumped to Dr. Laura’s defense.

Of course there’s irony in members of the Christian right defending someone they think is going to hell. (“Yes, anyone needs to accept Jesus Christ to be saved,” says Focus on the Family spokesman Tom Minnery. “Even Dr. Laura.”) But that hasn’t stopped them from taking up her cause, and doing it mighty effectively. On May 22, Focus on the Family’s leader James Dobson jumped to her defense, telling his radio-show listeners (which Focus estimates at 3 million a week), “There must be pluralism in this country.” He admitted that Dr. Laura “does not claim to be a Christian — she’s Jewish — but she’s taken a strong stand for moral principles: the 10 Commandments and traditional parenthood and so on.”

Dobson then launched a broadside attack against Procter & Gamble for pulling its support from Dr. Laura’s shows, and urged listeners to call P&G to vent their outrage. “I wish they’d tell the soap maker they’re not going to buy their products.”



With that, the backlash officially began. Suddenly, what might have seemed like a savvy online protest of a planned TV show by gay activists had spawned much more powerful imitators — on the other side. And now P&G, which earned kudos from some liberals for distancing itself from Dr. Laura and her so-called gay-bashing, is promising Dobson and others it will keep ads for its products — from Pampers to Cover Girl to Clearasil — off not just Schlessinger’s show, but others that seem “inappropriate.” NBC’s “Law and Order” and MTV’s “Undressed” and “Tom Green Show” have come under attack, and others are sure to follow.

That’s probably not what Dr. Laura’s critics envisioned when they started their campaign against her. But free-speech absolutists will find the story a textbook case of what happens when “good” people try to crack down on “bad” ideas: Sooner or later, inevitably, their enemies use the same cudgel against them, and, perhaps, much more effectively.

Sitting at the center of it all is Dr. Laura, now on a three-week vacation after a tour to promote her new book, “Parenthood By Proxy: Don’t Have Them If You Won’t Raise Them.” After a clumsy public apology for some of her anti-gay remarks, which seemed to pin the blame on whiny accusers (“Regrettably, some of the words I’ve used have hurt some people, and I’m sorry for that”), she reversed course and went on the attack.

“The well-funded and well-connected homosexual activist movement has become the McCarthyism of the 21st century,” she wrote in her syndicated column, and she defended her more controversial comments on her book tour.

Her spokeswoman, Keven Bellows, says Dr. Laura’s feelings about homosexuality took a negative turn about two years ago for a very specific reason: her conversion to Orthodox Judaism.

“When she became religious, she subscribed to the tenets of traditional Judaism, and that says that homosexuality is beyond the pale of acceptable behavior,” Bellows says.

Careerwise, it might not have been the best time for Schlessinger to lurch to the right. Her daily call-in show was giving her credibility she surely could never have dreamed of before. She began regular appearances on TV, including “Larry King Live” and “Meet the Press,” not as a mere entertainer but as an expert of sorts. She appeared on “Meet the Press” during the Lewinsky scandal to address the state of morality in the country.

But thanks to her adoption of Orthodox Judaism, she became a fairly persistent critic of homosexuality, in particular gay marriage (publicly endorsing California’s Proposition 22, which effectively bans same-sex marriages). She also began touting reparative therapy for gays, which holds that they can become straight through some combination of prayer and psychotherapy.

Her claim that pedophilia is more common among gay men than straights has gotten Dr. Laura in the most trouble. Bellows tries to say that her boss’s comments on pedophilia have been taken out of context. “Of course the vast majority of pedophiles are heterosexual, she knows that,” Bellows says. Then she repeats the charge.

“All she said was that gay men are more likely to be pedophiles, and I think that’s true,” she says.

Why does she think it’s true? “Most of what we know about the gay population,” Bellows explains, “is from the audience, a number of whom are gay.”

And they’re telling Dr. Laura that they are pedophiles? “Well, we’re not talking 8-year-olds,” she says. When asked, then, how old she thinks boys are that gay men are having sex with, she replies, “Oh, I don’t know, 14 maybe, or 15.”

“Trust me,” she says later. “These radical gay activists don’t want to talk about pedophilia.”

A chorus of gay critics started sounding alarms in Washington and in Hollywood last year. David Lee, one of the creators of “Frasier” and also a gay man, penned an episode last year about a horrible, hypocritical and sociopathic “Dr. Nora.” Nude pictures taken of the good doctor about 20 years before appeared all over the Internet. Stories circulated about Schlessinger’s bitter separation from her mother (true) and the dissolution of her own marriage (also true).

But her audience just kept growing, and last year, despite the howls of some gay activists, Dr. Laura took the typical (and frequently disastrous) turn for a successful radio star by inking a deal to launch her own TV show with Paramount.

Though concerned, mainstream gay political organizations moved cautiously. The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) met with Paramount to discuss its worries, and on Feb. 15 they issued a joint statement, describing the meeting as “a positive exchange of differing perspectives” and saying “the dialogue with Paramount executives is expected to continue.”

That wasn’t enough for John Aravosis, a Washington writer and Internet political consultant. A frenetic former Senate aide to Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, Aravosis has boundless energy, particularly when the subject is the woman he’s learned to love to hate. Two days after the GLAAD/Paramount release, he sent out an e-mail alert to friends and others on an e-mail list about gay politics that he maintains. The subject line stated simply “Stop Dr. Laura.” Within a month, Aravosis launched his Web site of the same name from his studio, and started directing people to advertisers identified as prospective sponsors in the show.

That included P&G. And to the surprise of many politics and entertainment mavens, the pressure seemed to work. On May 15, P&G announced that it would not advertise on the new TV show out of respect for the “diversity of views” of its customers.

The victory for gay activists was brief. P&G’s decision galvanized their enemies on the right, and the fallout continues.

After Dobson launched his attack on P&G in May, company representatives flew to Focus on the Family headquarters June 2 to “discuss our policies,” P&G’s Gretchen Briscoe told Salon.

Once in the Colorado Springs, Colo., compound, P&G officials settled in with Dobson for a brief screening of three shows that featured the company’s ads: MTV’s “The Tom Green Show” and “Unzipped” and an episode of NBC’s “Law & Order.” It was advertising that Focus spokesman Tom Minnery said “concerned us.”

The “Law & Order” episode featured a negative portrait of evangelicals who practiced “reparative therapy,” which attempts to rewire gays into straights (a type of therapy heavily supported by both the religious right and Dr. Laura). “That’s a direct slap at us,” says Minnery.

The offending “Tom Green” clip featured one of his running gags of him playing outrageous pranks on his parents. In the clip Dobson showed P&G, Green unveiled a statue in his parents’ front yard featuring a “very graphic portrayal,” says Minnery, “of his own parents naked and engaged in intercourse.”

“Undressed,” a sort of low-budget soap opera for 20-somethings, was singled out for a “lesbian shower scene,” Minnery says, and another scene that shows a woman giving her partner “the most graphic description of heterosexual oral intercourse that I’ve ever seen.”

The P&G execs refused to bow to Focus’ pressure regarding “Law and Order,” which happens to be an Emmy-award winning show with high ratings. “We still will advertise on ‘Law & Order,’” Briscoe says.

Neither “Tom Green” nor “Undressed,” though, received the rousing support “Law & Order” did; P&G promised never to advertise with them again. Briscoe says that while P&G will continue to advertise on MTV, both “The Tom Green Show” and “Undressed” had always been on P&G’s “off” list (which an MTV spokesperson confirmed Monday), meaning that MTV was not supposed to advertise their products during those shows.

P&G, according to Briscoe, is “one of the most conservative advertisers in the industry” — one that strictly regulates where its ads are placed. There are plenty of shows that P&G has explicit bans on, Briscoe says, including “The Jerry Springer Show,” “WWF Smackdown” and “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.”

“Every other show we review on an episode-by-episode basis,” Briscoe says. “Sometimes a network will just make a mistake.”

But Minnery says that wasn’t the excuse P&G gave them during the company’s Colorado visit. “When we showed them those clips they were embarrased, and promised it wouldn’t happen again,” he says. “Companies will say that their ads weren’t supposed to run on a certain program, but they never pay attention. That’s why we do, because if we don’t hold their feet to the fire, nobody will. And companies that advertise on these shows are going to hear from us.”

On Friday, Focus on the Family received a letter from Procter & Gamble’s global marketing officer, Bob Wheling, tail planted firmly between his legs. While standing behind its decision not to advertise on Dr. Laura’s show because of her “polarizing” effect on consumers, he did laud her as “an eloquent spokesperson for traditional values.”

“We think the majority of her advice is good and helpful, if not always compassionate,” Wheling wrote, but “our sole interest is in selling consumer products, and we have no interest in getting involved on either side of these difficult issues.”

The fact that his Dr. Laura boycott has galvanized the religious right doesn’t bother Aravosis, its sponsor. He’s not convinced that, as free-speech defenders claim, the best antiseptic for Dr. Laura’s anti-gay views is fresh air. He’s incensed that mainstream media interviewers have mostly given her a pass when it comes to the issue. “She was on the ‘Today Show’ and ‘Larry King Live,’” Aravosis says. “Did either Katie Couric or Larry King ask her about it? No.”

During his interview with Schlessinger on May 2, King gave her the typical friendly treatment (King: “You’re not against gays having jobs or the right to visit each other in the hospital?” Dr. Laura: “Against civil rights? Of course not.”) The next day, Couric didn’t even bring up the controversy with gays, though she did launch into her own mini-rant, challenging Dr. Laura’s belief on single-parenthood and working moms (generally speaking, both no-nos to the radio host).

“Can you make these rash generalizations?” Couric asked. “I mean, aren’t there crummy stay-at-home moms and aren’t there crummy working moms? … And what about giving children a role model of a mother or father that’s making a real contribution to society so they can say, ‘Wow, you know, I’m proud of my parent for being a social worker …’ Is there something to be said for that and role modeling for children in that way?”

According to a source at “Today,” “Dr. Laura put no limits on the interview, and I know there were some tougher questions in there about [her views on homosexuality]. But Katie” — a single career mom — “had questions she wanted to pursue for her own personal reasons.”

“There are a lot of people who have a reason to feel attacked by that woman,” says the “Today” source.

And yet, despite their recent alliance, Dr. Laura and the Christian right are strange bedfellows. The Family Research Council’s Robert Knight, senior adviser on cultural studies, still recalls the period when, as he says, “Dr. Laura was pro-gay.”

Knight and other conservative Christians admit they’ve never been comfortable with Dr. Laura’s famous reference to homosexuality as a “biological error.” While gays don’t like being called an “error,” the reference to biology suggests people are born gay, which most conservative Christian leaders dispute. “Once, she didn’t think homosexuals can change, and now she does,” Knight says.

Dr. Laura hasn’t exactly backtracked from her “biological error” statement, according to Bellows. “She thinks it’s possible that some people are gay from environmental factors, too,” Bellows says. “But she doesn’t know, she’s not an expert on homosexuality.”

At this point, nothing Schlessinger says can appease both her accusers and her defenders, so she seems to have decided to take a safer path: silence. Even Bellows admits the controversy might have muted the talk show’s usual discourse on homosexuality lately. “I don’t know if she’s avoided it, really, but she doesn’t really want to get into [the controversy] any more, either.”

That’s not going to stop her advocates from turning it into a full-fledged campaign. Focus on the Family’s Minnery says that the “train has already left the station,” as far as Christian conservatives are concerned, and that they would continue to defend Dr. Laura and attack advertisers who advertise on shows they deem as anti-family.

And her critics have no plans to abandon their successful protest movement. “We didn’t start this. She started this,” says Aravosis, who says he and his partners are now considering offers of funding for their volunteer Web site. “The only way it’s going to end is if she wants forgiveness, but she needs to first seek forgiveness.” That’s a little tough to picture.

Besides, why should she? While controversy might have fortified her enemies, it’s done nothing but build the Dr. Laura brand, which, in the end, will likely give her the last laugh. Unlike Canada did this spring, no U.S. government regulatory agency is going to label her show “abusively discriminatory” and order stations to censor her when necessary. By summer’s end, some radio analysts believe, her talk-show audience will eclipse the industry’s giant, Rush Limbaugh.

“From a purely mercenary perspective, she’s at the top of her game,” says Michael Harrison, editor of Talkers magazine, the industry’s bible. “As long as they spell her name right, she’s going to be just fine.”

Kerry Lauerman

Kerry Lauerman is Salon's Editor in Chief. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Beautiful Darkness by Fabien Vehlmann & Kerascoët
    Kerascoët's lovely, delicate pen-and-watercolor art -- all intricate botanicals, big eyes and flowing hair -- gives this fairy story a deceptively pretty finish. You find out quickly, however, that these are the heartless and heedless fairies of folk legend, not the sentimental sprites beloved by the Victorians and Disney fans. A host of tiny hominid creatures must learn to survive in the forest after fleeing their former home -- a little girl who lies dead in the woods. The main character, Aurora, tries to organize the group into a community, but most of her cohort is too capricious, lazy and selfish to participate for long. There's no real moral to this story, which is refreshing in itself, beyond the perpetual lessons that life is hard and you have to be careful whom you trust. Never has ugly truth been given a prettier face.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Climate Changed: A Personal Journey Through the Science by Philippe Squarzoni
    Squarzoni is a French cartoonist who makes nonfiction graphic novels about contemporary issues and politics. While finishing up a book about France under Jacques Chirac, he realized that when it came to environmental policy, he didn't know what he was talking about. "Climate Changed" is the result of his efforts to understand what has been happening to the planet, a striking combination of memoir and data that ruminates on a notoriously elusive, difficult and even imponderable subject. Panels of talking heads dispensing information (or Squarzoni discussing the issues with his partner) are juxtaposed with detailed and meticulous yet lyrical scenes from the author's childhood, the countryside where he takes a holiday and a visit to New York. He uses his own unreachable past as a way to grasp the imminent transformation of the Earth. The result is both enlightening and unexpectedly moving.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Here by Richard McGuire
    A six-page version of this innovative work by a regular contributor to the New Yorker first appeared in RAW magazine 25 years ago. Each two-page spread depicts a single place, sometimes occupied by a corner of a room, over the course of 4 billion years. The oldest image is a blur of pink and purple gases; others depict hazmat-suited explorers from 300 years in the future. Inset images show the changing decor and inhabitants of the house throughout its existence: family photos, quarrels, kids in Halloween costumes, a woman reading a book, a cat walking across the floor. The cumulative effect is serene and ravishing, an intimation of the immensity of time and the wonder embodied in the humblest things.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Kill My Mother by Jules Feiffer
    The legendary Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist delivers his debut graphic novel at 85, a deliriously over-the-top blend of classic movie noir and melodrama that roams from chiaroscuro Bay City to Hollywood to a USO gig in the Pacific theater of World War II. There's a burnt-out drunk of a private eye, but the story is soon commandeered by a multigenerational collection of ferocious women, including a mysterious chanteuse who never speaks, a radio comedy writer who makes a childhood friend the butt of a hit series and a ruthless dame intent on making her whiny coward of a husband into a star. There are disguises, musical numbers and plenty of gunfights, but the drawing is the main attraction. Nobody convey's bodies in motion more thrillingly than Feiffer, whether they're dancing, running or duking it out. The kid has promise.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    The Motherless Oven by Rob Davis
    This is a weird one, but in the nervy surreal way that word-playful novels like "A Clockwork Orange" or "Ulysses" are weird. The main character, a teenage schoolboy named Scarper Lee, lives in a world where it rains knives and people make their own parents, contraptions that can be anything from a tiny figurine stashable in a pocket to biomorphic boiler-like entities that seem to have escaped from Dr. Seuss' nightmares. Their homes are crammed with gadgets they call gods and instead of TV they watch a hulu-hoop-size wheel of repeating images that changes with the day of the week. They also know their own "death day," and Scarper's is coming up fast. Maybe that's why he runs off with the new girl at school, a real troublemaker, and the obscurely dysfunctional Castro, whose mother is a cageful of talking parakeets. A solid towline of teenage angst holds this manically inventive vision together, and proves that some graphic novels can rival the text-only kind at their own game.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    NOBROW 9: It's Oh So Quiet
    For each issue, the anthology magazine put out by this adventurous U.K.-based publisher of independent graphic design, illustration and comics gives 45 artists a four-color palette and a theme. In the ninth issue, the theme is silence, and the results are magnificent and full of surprises. The comics, each told in images only, range from atmospheric to trippy to jokey to melancholy to epic to creepy. But the two-page illustrations are even more powerful, even if it's not always easy to see how they pertain to the overall concept of silence. Well, except perhaps for the fact that so many of them left me utterly dumbstruck with visual delight.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Over Easy by Mimi Pond
    When Pond was a broke art student in the 1970s, she took a job at a neighborhood breakfast spot in Oakland, a place with good food, splendid coffee and an endlessly entertaining crew of short-order cooks, waitresses, dishwashers and regular customers. This graphic memoir, influenced by the work of Pond's friend, Alison Bechdel, captures the funky ethos of the time, when hippies, punks and disco aficionados mingled in a Bay Area at the height of its eccentricity. The staff of the Imperial Cafe were forever swapping wisecracks and hopping in and out of each other's beds, which makes them more or less like every restaurant team in history. There's an intoxicating esprit de corps to a well-run everyday joint like the Imperial Cafe, and never has the delight in being part of it been more winningly portrayed.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    The Shadow Hero by Gene Luen Yang and Sonny Liew
    You don't have to be a superhero fan to be utterly charmed by Yang and Liew's revival of a little-known character created in the 1940s by the cartoonist Chu Hing. This version of the Green Turtle, however, is rich in characterization, comedy and luscious period detail from the Chinatown of "San Incendio" (a ringer for San Francisco). Hank, son of a mild-mannered grocer, would like to follow in his father's footsteps, but his restless mother (the book's best character and drawn with masterful nuance by Liew) has other ideas after her thrilling encounter with a superhero. Yang's story effortlessly folds pathos into humor without stooping to either slapstick or cheap "darkness." This is that rare tribute that far surpasses the thing it celebrates.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Shoplifter by Michael Cho
    Corinna Park, former English major, works, unhappily, in a Toronto advertising agency. When the dissatisfaction of the past five years begins to oppress her, she lets off steam by pilfering magazines from a local convenience store. Cho's moody character study is as much about city life as it is about Corinna. He depicts her falling asleep in front of the TV in her condo, brooding on the subway, roaming the crowded streets after a budding romance goes awry. Like a great short story, this is a simple tale of a young woman figuring out how to get her life back, but if feels as if it contains so much of contemporary existence -- its comforts, its loneliness, its self-deceptions -- suspended in wintery amber.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Through the Woods by Emily Carroll
    This collection of archetypal horror, fairy and ghost stories, all about young girls, comes lushly decked in Carroll's inky black, snowy white and blood-scarlet art. A young bride hears her predecessor's bones singing from under the floorboards, two friends make the mistake of pretending to summon the spirits of the dead, a family of orphaned siblings disappears one by one into the winter nights. Carroll's color-saturated images can be jagged, ornate and gruesome, but she also knows how to chill with absence, shadows and a single staring eye. Literary readers who cherish the work of Kelly Link or the late Angela Carter's collection, "The Bloody Chamber," will adore the violent beauty on these pages.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>