SALON

“The Language War” by Robin Tolmach Lakoff

From hate speech laws to the battle over Native American sports team names, a linguist shows why we're so worked up about the power of words.

Topics: Books,

“Political correctness” and hate speech; Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas; speculation about the “real” Hillary Clinton; the O.J. Simpson trial; ebonics; and the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr scandal: These national soap operas all pass Robin Tolmach Lakoff’s “Undue Attention Test,” but it’s not because Americans are shallow and prurient. Rather, Lakoff says in “The Language War,” we studied these stories for clues about our “insoluble difficulties with race and gender.”

Lakoff is a professor of linguistics whose comparison of men’s and women’s speech patterns was popularized in Deborah Tannen’s bestseller “You Just Don’t Understand.” In “The Language War,” Lakoff takes it to the people herself, writing more as a lefty pundit and media critic than a linguist. She argues that both minorities and women are battling the white men in power for “control of the narrative” and of language itself. The stories that pass the Undue Attention Test, she says, all involved a struggle over “which group … gets to make meaning for us all — to create and define our culture.”

The evidence Lakoff presents that the battle for cultural control is a contest over language is rarely real-world turf lost or gained. Instead, she points to the defensive posturing by defenders of the status quo, uncovering the fear of a black, female, gay planet embedded in conservative rhetoric. But Lakoff herself falls into the the same “gotcha” tone that she decries in what’s been called the “Argument Culture,” the increasingly mean, contentious public discourse born of the language war. For example, she opens her skillful debunking of a George Will column with this: “A thorough analysis of the sophistries of Will’s argument would take us beyond the millennium.” Then she disses him for “sneering.”

Lakoff’s best in her own field: Linguistics offers a fresh take on some played-out stories and reanimates those middle-aged warriors feminism and the fight against racism. Even sympathetic listeners tune out overused terms like “patriarchy” and “the Other.” Lakoff’s use of linguistic terminology and concepts revives the old struggles for equality, like a Moby re-mix of a ’60s anthem that’s been beaten into background noise by boomer radio. “In every language,” Lakoff explains, “some linguistic forms are said to be ‘marked,’ their correlates ‘unmarked.’” Unmarked forms are generic, the standard; marked forms are some variation on that standard. For example, in English, present tense is unmarked, future and past are marked. Masculine is unmarked (mankind, policeman, freshman); feminine is marked (actress, waitress, coed). For the unmarked, dominant members of society, Lakoff argues, “your attributes are invisible, as your role in making things the way they are is not noticeable.”

In the chapter on the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings, Lakoff uncovers some linguistic tricks for holding that power. Cowed by Thomas’ brilliant (ab)use of the term “lynching,” the Judiciary Committee subtly bullied Anita Hill toward their foregone conclusion. They allowed Thomas an average of 1.386 seconds of “gap length” after the end of his answer and their next question; they gave Hill 1.046 seconds. “Temporal space is metaphorically equivalent to physical space: You ‘give space’ to those you respect; you crowd in on people … you wish to intimidate.” Lakoff also notes that questions addressed to Hill more often included “tags,” ending in “is that correct?” or “didn’t you?” Among its other uses, “a tag emphasizes the power of the questioner to force a response.”

The book could use more of this type of analysis and less rehashing of familiar points: The Simpson and Lewinsky scandals in particular have been so picked over by the media that we’ve already read plenty about Johnnie Cochran’s preacher cadences and Clinton’s definitions of “sex” and “is.” Nor have these scandals affected our daily lives. A book about political power should have focused more on stories like the Hill-Thomas hearings, which rippled into public life: Sexual harassment has been named, codified and made punishable.

In Lakoff’s disussion of the p.c. debates, she points again and again to examples of misplaced rage: White guys who’d never expressed a political sentiment in their lives suddenly were bewailing the injustice of having to say “Asian”; non-sports fans fiercely defended team names like the Braves and the Redskins. Through the 1990s, new terms to enable bullying and racism seemed to pop up every day, among them “victim art” and “special interests.” Lakoff’s claim that much is at stake is bolstered by this seemingly endless parade of squabbles. Above all, “The Language War” is a depressing reminder of just how mean-spirited the 1990s were.

Virginia Vitzthum is a writer living in New York.

Next Article

Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

The week in 10 pics

close X
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 11
  • Lisa Montgomery embraces her nephew Thursday after a tornado tore apart her home in Cleburne, Texas. The twister killed six people and destroyed entire swaths of the North Texas town.
    Credit: AP/LM Otero

  • Jack McMahon, the defense attorney for abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, speaks outside the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia Tuesday. His client was convicted of killing three babies in his clinic, and will serve multiple life sentences.
    Credit: AP/Matt Rourke

  • A photo taken Monday captures Vice President Joe Biden's response to a Milwaukee second-grader's innovative proposal to end America's epidemic of gun violence. This guy!
    Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher

  • Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., flanked by a grouper-eyed Michele Bachmann, addresses the IRS' admission that it targeted Tea Party groups in advance of the 2012 election. In an op-ed for CNN Thursday, the Kentucky senator slammed the president for his faux outrage.
    Credit: AP/Molly Riley

  • Ousted IRS chief Steven Miller is sworn in on Capitol Hill Friday. Miller testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on the extra scrutiny the agency gave conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
    Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite

  • Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday. Holder is under fire, among other things, for the Justice Department's gathering of phone records at the Associated Press.
    Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster

  • O.J. Simpson sits during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, Nev., Thursday. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison for armed robbery and kidnapping, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial.
    Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid

  • Major Tom to ground control: On Sunday astronaut Chris Hadfield recorded the first music video from space, a cover of David Bowie's "Space Oddity."
    Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield

  • When it rains it pours. President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference Thursday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, inexplicably inspiring an #umbrellagate Twitter meme.
    Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin

  • A smoke plume rises high above a road block at the intersection of County A and Ross Road east of Solon Springs, Wis., Tuesday. No injuries were reported, but the the wildfire caused evacuations across northwestern Wisconsin.
    Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin

  • Recent Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Thumbnails
  • Fullscreen
  • 1 of 11

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>