Fiction

Dude lit

Male writers are venturing into "Bridget Jones" and "Girls' Guide" territory, but can they bag the big game?

  • more
    • All Share Services

Dude lit

Sam the Cat and Other Stories
By Matthew Klam
Random House, 243 pages

The Sleepover Artist
By Thomas Beller
Norton, 296 pages

Venus Drive
By Sam Lipsyte
Open City Books, 160 pages

Never Mind Nirvana
By Mark Lindquist
Villard, 239 pages

In case you’re wondering what to expect from a book called “Sam the Cat and Other Stories,” the cover of Matthew Klam’s first book provides a helpful clue: It’s a photo of a guy’s crotch with the book’s title laid out to form an erect penis and the curve of a scrotum below. With its promise of daring but fizzy fun in a masculine package, the cover suggests that publishers, having exhausted the possibilities of “Bridget Jones”-style “chick lit,” have decided to give the guys a shot.

And, in fact, there are several books out this season that plow territory similar to Klam’s, including Thomas Beller’s “The Sleepover Artist,” Mark Lindquist’s “Never Mind Nirvana” and Sam Lipsyte’s “Venus Drive.” All, like “Sam the Cat,” concern white guys in their 20s and 30s; they’re often urban, and they’re usually single, with an unsettled quality to their lives. The characters vary in their class backgrounds and in the fanciness of their educations, but they all seem to feel emasculated by the girlified rituals of dating, relating and marrying, as well as by the difficulty of finding their place in the can-do, go-go boom economy.

But sadly for those who would like to see a revival of fiction about (and primarily for) men, these publishers’ efforts are doomed. Forget the attention-grabbing cover: Klam’s book is a perfect example of how and why most of the current crop of guy fiction fails to create compelling — or marketable — literary characters.

Since popular opinion often states that men (at least, or especially, the American variety) are basically inarticulate about their feelings, the job of the writer who takes them as a subject is to find something emotionally legible in their lack of apparent interest in their own deepest selves. This can produce, paradoxically, writing that’s far from shallow. Richard Ford, to give just one example, has turned the American male resistance to self-examination into a vital and resonant theme. And, of course, Hemingway at his best managed to convey a male inner life without actually getting in there and poking around too much. As he once said, his writing was like an iceberg, showing you only the visible tip, while the huge mass of emotions lay concealed beneath the surface.

But Klam and his fellow guy authors are writing characters who grew up in a post-therapy, post-Venus-and-Mars world. If they don’t talk about their feelings, at least they know they’re supposed to; “Issues I Dealt With in Therapy” is the title of one story by Klam. His stories are almost all written as first-person confessionals. In a revved-up everyday-guy language that at times feels exhilaratingly original, his narrators tell us how they feel about their girlfriends and wives, their sex lives, their jobs, their fathers. They talk about themselves a lot, often analyzing their own personalities with a surprising honesty: “I’ve been a certain way my whole life,” says the narrator of “Not This.” “Mr. Showcase, Mr. Jokey, Mr. Handshake. After a while, even I can’t stand it. I look down on people. I’ve got a short fuse. I piss on my friends.”

But what, exactly, does this self-knowledge serve? In story after story, it stops at the point where it might open out to new kinds of understanding about why a character has ended up where he is or about the choices facing him in the future. It’s the reverse of Hemingway and Ford: Instead of very little talking that manages to reveal a deep self, there’s a lot of talking about a very shallow self. Instead of the strong, silent type we get the smug, garrulous type.

The narrator of “Not This,” for example, doesn’t grow or change over the course of the story; he merely settles deeper into a defeatist slump over the fact that, after his latest quasi-violent outburst, his on-and-off girlfriend — “the best-looking, the smartest, the best dressed” he’s ever had — has left him for good. Klam’s characters don’t experience emotional transformation, and in this way the book subverts one of the basic components of fiction: The stories have no turning points, no real epiphanies. That in itself might be a kind of epiphany — I supposed the idea would be that much of life is really just the same old thing — but it’s not a particularly promising one, and it’s certainly not worthy of the seven story-length variations on it that “Sam the Cat” comprises.

Even more insidious is the sneaky suggestion in these stories that everyone is just like these characters, just as unwilling or unable to move on emotionally, to try out new ways of seeing themselves or of interacting with other people. Klam himself, in an interview in the Washington Post, lays out his small-minded credo as if it’s a universal truth: “One ought to be reflective,” he told the interviewer. “And what does it get you? It gets you nothin’. Ultimately, you know you’re neurotic. It’s better than being a drug addict, I guess.”

In the typical Klam story, a crucial piece of self-knowledge hovers just out of the narrator’s reach. Usually, it’s something that, if he said it out loud, might lead him to a new understanding of himself or of why his life is the way it is. It might even lead him to make some changes. But Klam’s narrators don’t change anything; for all their masculine talk, they are essentially passive and spineless, constantly flummoxed by the hand the world deals them.

“Linda’s Daddy’s Loaded” is a representative story in this vein. Its married, SUV-driving suburban-guy narrator recounts a visit from his wife’s obnoxious father, whose gifts of money the couple has used to purchase an “awesome lifestyle”; the insecure and depressed Linda has “retired.” The father arrives, spewing insults and condescension, and Linda teeters on the verge of a breakdown. The narrator is so stressed by it all that he makes a nasty remark to Linda, which he later regrets: “I think of that mean thing I said to Linda — what was that all about?” But when Linda’s father promises to hook him up with a fancier job than the one he’s got, he takes him up on it.

The story, which presents us with what looks like a slow-motion family train wreck in the making, does register the narrator’s ambivalence, but it ends on an up note, as he reassures himself, and us, that it will all work out OK: “We’re going to be happy more than not, Linda and me. Even when it backfires, you don’t necessarily hate someone for that long.”

Is Klam being ironic? I don’t think so. A riff like this one conveys a sort of quasi-ironic realism — it captures something of how life is often experienced: Our best relationships are more or less filled with conflicting emotions. But Klam’s stance also seems designed to hide the fact that as an author he has nothing transformative to say. He can’t seem to imagine that there might be an alternative way for his characters to see themselves.

That the narrator of “Linda’s Daddy’s Loaded” is a bafflement even to himself seems to be one of Klam’s central points, but the story has no point of view on the colossal — you might even say tragic — self-delusion at its heart: This guy has sold himself to his sleazy, tyrannical father-in-law. Like the narrator of “Not This,” he seems to have chosen his beautiful but emotionally damaged wife as though she were a prom date: “The second I met Linda, I knew she was the one,” he says. “She was way better looking than anyone I’d ever dated before.” In other words, he has been led by his dick, but neither he nor his dick is getting the last laugh.

This guy, in short, is not the captain of his own fate. Maybe he and Linda will be “happy more than not,” maybe not, but surely there will be grim consequences to the passivity, bad judgment and denial that’s gotten him to this point. Klam seems compelled to protect his characters from the most difficult kinds of self-knowledge, and the result is that they read as interchangeable examples of a type — the well-meaning but clueless regular guy — rather than as complex human beings facing their individual destinies. He’s too easy on them; he’s an author who pulls the bandages off his characters’ wounds, then holds them up for Mommy to kiss.

Part of the deal when an author presents unformed characters is that we may develop affection for them, but we also have to not like them a little — they have to not like themselves a little — or they will never grow. From Emma Woodhouse to Holden Caulfield, that’s a literary principle that’s apparently lost on Klam. His characters are dying for us to like them. And while they may say they hate certain aspects of themselves, what they really don’t like is the trouble they get into because of those traits. Klam tries to get away with this literary sleight of hand by ending many of his stories in the false glow of a narrow escape from the sort of situation that is bound to recur, since we’ve seen no evidence of newly developed insight or self-knowledge.

Thomas Beller’s “The Sleepover Artist” is a similar exercise in self-knowledge that goes nowhere. Like much current dude literature, this collection of linked short stories harbors a deep suspicion of the urge to improve things. Even in grade school, Alex Fader, the central character, has noticed and begun to be bothered by this feminine trait: “His mother was always, as far as he could tell, trying to make things nice,” says Beller’s narrator. “It was tiring.”

At first, this theme seems like a clever salvo in the gender wars. It’s true, of course, that manic self-monitoring and a fussbudgety drive toward personal betterment can be soul-depleting habits. But as Beller walks us through a decade or so of Alex’s relationships, always paying impeccable attention to the nuances of Alex’s feelings (except for a few forays into the points of view of Alex’s girlfriends, in which Beller reveals to us their feelings … about Alex), it begins to seem as if Alex’s stance against forced self-improvement is a convenient mask for his inertia.

It’s hardly compelling literary material, Alex’s journey toward the recognition that to live well requires figuring out when it’s time to change. The final scene of “The Sleepover Artist” has him, now 30ish, talking to his mother about a battle raging in her co-op apartment building over the installation of new windows. “Some changes are worth resisting,” she says, and when Alex asks which ones she answers, “You’ll have to find out for yourself.” That’s the end of the book; it would have been more trenchant as a beginning.

It’s not that it’s impossible to do interesting things with the emotional paralysis of men in their 20s and 30s who feel simultaneously jerked around and abandoned by their culture. Sam Lipsyte’s “Venus Drive” is a more cogent treatment of this same theme, in part because, unlike Klam and Beller, Lipsyte manages to write in the first person while subtly directing our attention outside his characters’ heads, to the forces around them that shape their predicaments. Lipsyte is most impressive as a stylist — these stories are written in a wonderfully allusive, refracted language — but he also looks head-on at the quandaries of people who understand their destructive patterns but don’t want to change them.

Lipsyte is aware that part of the reason life continually defeats his characters is that they shy away from hard truths about themselves. His people tend to be losers and outcasts — guys with drug problems, guys who can barely hold down a job, guys who spend a lot of time at peep shows — and yet his stories lack the defeatism and easy self-reassurance of Klam’s and Beller’s.

Often, Lipsyte’s characters’ very strategies for evading self-examination slyly serve as a way to be honest about their lives. In “Less Tar,” for example, the narrator explains why he didn’t quit smoking when he was in drug rehab: “You have to keep something between yourself and the truth of yourself or you’re dead, was how I figured it. Still do.” This is a character who knows his own depths, loath as he is to spend time hanging out with them. He’s not asking us to feel sorry for him or believe the lies he tells himself.

Still, even Lipsyte’s stories give the impression that emotional stasis has become a point of honor for dude fiction. It’s as if to try to change for the better would be to give in to women — which leaves male characters waging a petty and self-defeating battle indeed. Over on the girls’ fiction side, by contrast, the relentless drive for self-improvement is practically a plot requirement. It’s no coincidence that Helen Fielding’s sequel to “Bridget Jones’ Diary” is an outright satire of the self-help genre, while Melissa Bank’s bestselling “The Girls’ Guide to Hunting and Fishing” presents itself as a sendup of and rebuttal to self-help books.

These books satirize self-help, however, only in the most gentle, conservative ways. “Girls’ Guide,” for example, merely substitutes a different kind of getting-a-guy advice for the retro model hawked in books like “The Rules.” Bridget and Jane (the heroine of “Girls’ Guide”), like the kind of girl who spends her free time reading about them, often seem to be on a mission to fix themselves and improve their lives (though it’s debatable whether they actually do change in substantive ways). And there we have the secret to these books’ success, if not as literature, then at least as moneymakers: Bridget herself would undoubtedly buy “Bridget Jones’ Diary”; Jane would be first in line to purchase “The Girls’ Guide.” These characters, in fact, are often depicted reading. There’s a self-perpetuating cycle at work: There are people out there who not only identify with Bridget (and Jane) but also buy books. The urge toward self-improvement, after all, has always been bound up in the act of reading.

Would a character in a dude lit book ever read a dude lit book? It’s doubtful. Even the relatively genteel Alex Fader, I suspect, would read magazines but not novels, especially since Beller’s made his alter-ego a budding filmmaker. (If he were a fiction writer, he’d naturally need to be constantly sizing up his rival novelists; reading would then be attractive as a competitive outlet.)

Perhaps the death knell of the nascent genre sounds on the very first page of Mark Lindquist’s “Never Mind Nirvana,” which in its determined lightheartedness comes closest of these four books to “Bridget Jones’ Diary.” Pete Tyler, having just turned 36, is sitting at home assaying a copy of that bible of male disaffection, Richard Ford’s “The Sportswriter”:

After a few minutes Pete becomes restless. He wants to at least finish a chapter, but he thumbs forward and determines there are 17 pages left, too many. He abandons Mr. Ford for the company of Johnny Walker.

Maria Russo has been a writer and editor at The Los Angeles Times, The New York Observer and Salon, and is a regular contributor to the New York Times Book Review.

50 shades of Shutterstock

Slide show: Everyone's favorite light-bondage bestseller illustrated by inexplicable stock photography SLIDE SHOW

  • more
    • All Share Services

50 shades of Shutterstock

View the slide show

This week, for roughly the millionth time, E.L. James’ romance-bondage trilogy “50 Shades” nabs the No. 1, 2 and 3 spots on the New York Times bestseller lists. We don’t get it either. Every page of that book, which famously began as “Twilight” fan fiction, elicits a sigh of confusion and weird secondary embarrassment. The question is: Who would read this? (The answer is: Apparently everyone.) It’s the same baffled, helpless feeling we get when we sort through stock photos on a daily basis. Stock photos – which have been the subject of recent outstanding Internet satire – are used by this site, and many others, to illustrate our flood of content. Many are plain and simple, but a good portion are flat-out mind-blowing. Why did anyone think that photo was a good idea? It only made sense to join these forces. And so, we present to you passages from the most head-scratching bestseller of our time, illustrated with the assistance of inexplicable stock photography.

View the slide show

Megaphone by Natalie Bakopoulos

Miracles happen, even in an Athens crippled by a garbage strike, to a young mother unsure of her ability to love

  • more
    • All Share Services

Megaphone by Natalie Bakopoulos (Credit: iStockphoto/caracterdesign)

It’s the third week of the garbage strike and Athens has begun to smell. Bright-colored trash bags fill the curbs and alleyways, and we have learned to step over the rubbish and avoid the blocks that had become unnavigable. We know which stretches are particularly foul — a stretch along Mavili Square, or the entire top end of Monastiraki. Odos Athinas is a sea of trash, and Omonia is ghastly but we don’t go there anyway. May has gone from unseasonably cool to raging hot, and the garbage seems to be melting. In front of the museum it’s like yet another installation project. When I arrive each morning I want to wretch.

My 5-year-old son, Alekos, sits on the balcony of our apartment. Visible from there are pine trees and details of other people’s lives, audible are the sounds of morning, the birds above and voices below. Evenings, Alekos lies on the divan on the balcony in his pajamas, watching the moon. He is obsessed with it, and his father made him a playlist of all the Greek songs that mention it. When he was smaller he’d stare at the moon until he fell asleep.

This morning, though, Alekos lies flat on the ground, peering down through the slats of the railing, staring at the trash. Next to him is his iPad ­– a gift from his father, and yes, I know, but his father doesn’t live with us and what can you do?­ — and now he favors bad pop music like the older kids at school. So I’m surprised this morning when I hear the sounds of Elmo counting. He’s embarrassed by this favorite YouTube clip­­ – it’s for babies, he says ­­­­– but it comforts him. The tension these days is overwhelming.

Alekos looks up when he sees me, furrows his brow, and tells me if he were a deputy like his father, he’d force everyone to clean up the garbage. “And to make a new government,” he says.

I tell him that would be nice.

“At least I can fly,” he says. He is wearing the Spider-Man costume my sister brought him from the States.

I tell him Spider-Man jumps and leaps and sticks to things. He doesn’t fly. “Besides,” I quickly add, thinking of all the balconies around us. “You’re not Spider-Man.” Even I have wondered what it might be like to jump from one to the next. I smooth his light hair, which is growing long. “You need a haircut,” I say.

I hold out two polos, one white, one blue, so he feels he has a choice. He pulls the blue shirt over the costume, and I hope that his teachers aren’t too upset by this because I am too exhausted to argue with him.

Outside, the trash has piled up, and Alekos can’t get into the car from the curb. I tell him I’ll pull the car up so he can get in without pushing his way through the refuse. He wrinkles his nose at the smell. But when I get to the driver’s side, Alekos is no longer standing there.

Instead he is floating 12 feet above the curb, his Spider-Man-clad arms stretched out like wings.

Alekos,” is all I can say, “get down.” He swoops over to me, hovering just above my reach, and finally glides gracefully to my feet as if he has been practicing this move for months. Bending down to face him and gripping the straps of his backpack, I have the panicked feeling that if I let go he will fly away.

“How long has this been going on?” I whisper. “Tell me.”

One old man walks past us with his hands behind his back and says nothing. He barely notices us. Across the street a woman hurries along in heels, yelling into her phone. No one else is around.

Alekos shrugs, aloof, and looks away with those dark eyes, almost black, like his father’s. “I tried to tell you.”

“Does Babas know about this?” I ask, suddenly sure his father would keep this from me, just the way he failed to mention his girlfriend was staying the night, reading Alekos bedtime stories when he stayed there. Oh, the flying? I thought you knew?

“No,” Alekos says.

“Just at home, OK?” I say. I don’t want to alarm him, but I want to be firm.

He digs in his backpack and tells me he saw his father on the news that morning. This is one reason I don’t like him to watch television at all. For the rest of the drive, we’re quiet.

“I know I’m not Spider-Man,” he says finally, when we arrive.

“OK,” I say. “Do you fly at school?” I ask.

“No.” He looks at me in the rearview mirror, completely incredulous. “Nobody does.”

He gets out of the car and hurries off to meet some other kids, who admire his Spider-Man arms as if they are tattooed. I wait for him to turn around and wave but he doesn’t, and for a moment it seems his feet levitate off the ground. But maybe I am imagining it; he walks in, one foot after the other, like everyone else. I park at the metro station and take the train into the city center, turning up the ringer on my phone.

I call his father three times but get his voice mail. I text him to call me. He texts me an hour later — Ola kala? — and I trip over a split-open trash bag, as if these sidewalks weren’t already treacherous enough. I answer, Yes, everything’s fine. This will have to wait until we are face to face, which is not often.

We met when I was teaching art classes on Paros one summer. I soon got pregnant, and we didn’t get married, but I stayed in Greece. I think he still resents me for not marrying him. To be honest, I can’t even remember my reasons. It all seems like another lifetime, decades ago, when Athens felt proud and vibrant those few years after the Olympics.

A few more messages come from him but I’m busy and don’t answer. Then, when I’m outside the museum, finishing my installation, he shows up.

“You don’t call me three times in a row with no message,” he says, frustrated. “You barely call me at all, unless the kid is on fire.”

No, not fire, I think.

He surveys my project, one giant megaphone outside the  museum, the size of a kiosk, with cameras inside that will film street activity and project it onto a screen inside. Tiny figurines in various stages of undress shoot out from the megaphone, suspended by invisible wire. I’ve compiled old Greek footage of both celebrations and protests, which will air inside the museum, and the outdoor footage will be superimposed on those old clips. I wonder if anyone is inside now, watching us, or what we’re matched with: a hectic street scene, a political rally, a brilliant August moon?

“I like it,” he says, in English, in that supportive tone he uses when he doesn’t know what to say about my work but wants to convey he approves.

“Oh, stop it,” I say.

“And with the garbage,” he says. “A nice touch.”

And the two of us laugh, the first time we have laughed together in a long time, since before the elections, since before the crisis, probably not since Alekos was an infant and we marveled at every smile and uttered “word.” Suddenly I think I should have thought to make those tiny figures children, with wings. I wonder why I didn’t think of it before, why it always takes the manifestation of something so crazy to make me realize something so simple.

“Let me take you for a coffee,” he says, “or something stronger? We can sit outside, where it’s quiet.” The trash stench is so bad that everyone sits inside, smoking.

“You have time for that?” I ask, knowing he doesn’t. I can hear his phone buzzing in his pocket. “I should keep working.”

One night, right before these last elections, he came to pick Alekos up and he kissed me when Alekos went to grab his toys. “Not yet,” I said. My attempt at self-preservation while the rest of the country implodes. It’s hard enough just to be friends.

“OK,” he said then. “We’ll get there, one day.”

Now, I lean into him a moment. Together we survey what I’ve made. I want to tell him, Our son can fly. I want to tell him, Stay.

“Are we there yet,” he says quietly, distantly, not as question but statement, and he rests his chin on my head and looks out into the street: the sleepy shops, the political posters pasted over the boarded-up kiosks, the hot afternoon sun beating down on it all. “Are we?”

And then my phone is ringing­­ — it’s the school office — and I know of course what has happened. I imagine Alekos flying around his classroom like an angry bee, out into the schoolyard, beyond the trash, beyond the protests and our land in limbo. Or maybe he is more relaxed, gliding effortlessly the way I fly in my dreams, his superhero costume and sandy hair glowing in the afternoon sun, until he finds us here, his parents who don’t know where we are or where we’re going, and taking us up with him, catapulting us into the vast unknown. Our images would flicker on the screen inside, soaring above that old footage of our shattered, magnificent city.

Continue Reading Close

Natalie Bakopoulos's first novel, "The Green Shore," will be published by Simon & Schuster in June 2012. Her work has appeared in Tin House, Ninth Letter, Granta Online, and The O. Henry Prize Stories 2010, and she is a contributing editor for the online journal Fiction Writers Review.

Almost by Chris Pavone

She never thought of herself as ambitious, until motherhood and career collided in one horrifying hospital ride

  • more
    • All Share Services

Almost by Chris Pavone (Credit: iStockphoto/caracterdesign)

It’s just before dawn when Isabel puts the final page down on the fat stack of paper that sits on the rumpled bedspread, next to an overflowing crystal ashtray and a crumpled soft-pack of cigarettes. She’d tried Wellbutrin and Xanax; she’d used patches and gum. In the end, the only thing that made her quit smoking was being pregnant.

But then, after everything, she couldn’t help but start up again. At first it was just a single cigarette per day, or two. Then it became a few, and within months she was back to full-throttle. Over the past couple of years, she’s tried to quit a few times, but not seriously. She anticipates — she accepts — failure. Because she doesn’t want to quit, not really. She wants instead to try, and fail.

Isabel picks up the manuscript with both hands, flips it over, and uses her thumbs to align the pages. She takes a deep breath, lets out a long sigh.

Another night lying in bed, working. She’d fallen asleep at 11, then woke sometime after 2, her mind unquiet. But it wasn’t until 3 that she admitted she was awake. She then picked up a manuscript and a pencil, and started working, page after page, all through the desperate hours. Vaguely reminiscent of those days when Nicky was an infant, in the middle of the night, sleep-deprived, awake in a dormant world. The small hours when a blanket of quiet smothers the city, but through the moth-eaten holes there’s the occasional lowing of a railroad in New Jersey, the distant Dopplered wail of an ambulance siren. Then the inevitable thump of the newspaper on the doormat, the end of the idea of night, even though it’s still dark out.

She stares across the room, off into the black nothingness of the picture window on the opposite wall, its severe surface barely softened by the half-drawn shades, an aggressive void invading the serene cocoon of her bedroom. The room is barely lit by a small bullet-shaped reading sconce mounted over the headboard, aiming a beam of light directly at the top of her head, creating a halo in the reflection in the window. An angel. Except she’s not.

Isabel shuffles into the dark hall, flips the light switch. She turns on the kitchen lights, and the coffee — switched from auto-on, which is set to start brewing an hour from now, to on — and the small television on the counter. Filling the lonely apartment with humming electronic life.

The coffee machine hisses and sputters, big plops falling into the tempered glass. She watches the contraption’s clock, changing from 5:48 to 5:49. Grabs the plastic handle of the carafe and fills the mug with hot, viscous, bitter, bracing caffeination. She takes a small sip, then a larger one.

She walks down the hall, lined with the photographs that she’d unearthed four years ago, when she was moving out of her matrimonial apartment, into this single-woman space in a new neighborhood, far from the painful memories of her home — of her life — downtown, where she’d been running into too many mothers, often with their children. Women she’d known from the playgrounds and the toy stores and the mommy-and-me music classes, from the gyms and grocers and coffee shops, from preschool drop-off and the waiting room at the pediatrician’s. All those other little children growing older, getting bigger.

So she’d bought herself a one-bedroom in an uptown full-service building, the type of apartment that a woman chooses when she reconciles herself that she’s not going to be living with another human being, probably forever. That she’s making her loneliness comfortable. Palliative care.

She lined this nice new hallway with framed photos. There she is, herself, a smiling little toddler. And with her mother on the first day of second grade. At college graduation with her two best friends. There are her grandparents, at the final family reunion before they both died, within weeks of each other. Isabel in a big white dress, aglow, in the middle of the panoramic-lens group shot. A much smaller print, lying in a hospital bed, beaming at Nicky in her arms, tiny and red and angry in his swaddling blanket and blue cap. A grainy shot of herself onstage in a little black dress, accepting an award, beaming again, but not as wide. Some joys aren’t as joyous as others.

It was more than possible — it was inevitable — to blame herself, her ambition, even though she’d never thought of herself as especially ambitious. But everyone has important moments, in any job, at any level of ambition. In the Supreme Court or a fourth-grade classroom, on an assembly line or a fishing boat, there are crucial days.

For Isabel the literary agent, this day was dominated by an auction she was running for a hotly anticipated second novel, whose author needed a lot of hand-holding, and whose bidders kept increasing their offers every half-hour, from mid-five figures to high-sixes in the course of the day. This lucrative 9-to-6 was followed by a 7 o’clock black-tie that included an honor for, and an interminable speech by, a different author of hers. So this frantic day, it featured a wardrobe change. And the evening portion was just as important work as the daytime; just because there was liquor and food and fancy dress didn’t mean it wasn’t work.

The nanny called a couple times during Isabel’s 16 hours at work, worrying that Nicky’s cold or flu or whatever was getting worse. Dave was away on a business trip, and Isabel didn’t want Lupe to be the one to go to the doctor with Nicky; the nanny’s English would be generously described as weak, and sometimes that mattered. So Isabel made an appointment for first thing the next morning. Anyone would’ve done the same thing.

Isabel returned home after midnight, exhausted. She thanked Lupe and sent her home in a taxi, and let her cocktail dress fall to the floor, and collapsed into bed.

She was awakened at dawn by the screaming. Nicky was burning up, 106. She rushed downstairs with the boy in her arms, and ran around the block, panting and desperate, until she found a taxi.  “Don’t worry, Sweetie,” she said. “We’ll be at the doctor’s in a minute.” The hospital was only a mile away.

The taxi peeled away from the curb, the eerie blue light washing over the dingy white garbage trucks, the Mexican kids swabbing down the sidewalks in front of all-night delis, the street-cart vendors positioning their pastries in front of office buildings, the joggers with reflective stripes down their shorts, the normal business of a city’s day starting, coming to life.

“Are we there yet?” Nicky asked, as he had so many times. From the back seat of the shiny SUV that was cleaned every week by the guys in the garage, on their way out to the weekend house in East Hampton, back when her life looked like something to be envied. He had said it on the way to visit Dave’s parents in Oyster Bay, or hers upstate in the Hudson Valley. While heading to Vermont, for a ski weekend; to Cape Cod, to visit friends; to the Bronx Zoo and the Brooklyn Aquarium, Yankee Stadium and Citi Field. It was something the little boy asked, all the time.

But this was the last time.

In the back of the moldy-smelling taxi she pushed the fever-damp hair off her son’s hot forehead. “Nearly,” she said. He shut his eyes, and then slipped silently into a coma, there on the slippery silver vinyl seat of the taxi.

An hour later, Nicky was dead. A supervirus, said the young doctor, who had been up all night, up for who knows how long, working; he was tired and frustrated, and perhaps not as tactful as he could’ve been.

At the end of the hall Isabel stops at the spotlit photograph, a small black-and-white in the center of a vast expanse of stark white matting. A little boy, her baby, laughing on a rocky beach, running out of gentle surf, holding a little toy hammer. Isabel reaches her hand to her lips, plants a kiss on her fingers, and transfers the kiss to the little boy. As she does every morning.

There was, the doctor added, almost nothing she could’ve done. Almost.

Continue Reading Close

Memorial Day fiction: Are we there yet?

Salon exclusive: At the start of the summer fiction season, new stories from Chris Pavone and Natalie Bakopoulos

  • more
    • All Share Services

Memorial Day fiction: Are we there yet? (Credit: iStockphoto/caracterdesign)

“Are we there yet?”

It’s a dreaded sentence. When it’s spoken by an anxious child from the back seat, it’s enough to make stressed-out parents wish they’d never taken a family vacation in the first place. And even if it’s delivered as a sing-songy punch line, from an impatient partner or spouse on a long road trip, it’s an irritating eye-roller of a joke.

So this Memorial Day weekend — the unofficial start of the summer vacation season, and therefore the summer fiction season — we asked two novelists to reclaim the sentence in a new and adult context. For our latest fiction project, there was only one simple rule: Each story had to include the line “Are we there yet?” in a fresh and surprising way.

Our authors are two people you should be taking to the beach with you this summer. Chris Pavone is the author of “The Expats,” the New York Times best-selling thriller with more satisfying twists than the Pacific Coast Highway. Natalie Bakopoulos is the author of “The Green Shore,” one of 2012′s most anticipated debut novels, a beautiful family drama that is set during another Greek crisis — the 1967 military coup.

To read the stories, just follow the links below:

“Megaphone” by Natalie Bakopoulos

“Almost” by Chris Pavone

Continue Reading Close

David Daley is the senior culture editor of Salon.

“Frankenstein” remixed

This masterful new adaptation of Mary Shelley's classic novel may be the best interactive fiction yet

  • more
    • All Share Services

This originally appeared on The Chimerist, a site devoted to the intersection of art, stories, and technology.

Whatever interactive fiction is (and we’re still figuring that out) it suffers from all the problems of traditional fiction and then some. The vast majority of novels and short stories aren’t much good, but when a branching fiction — along the lines of the old “Choose Your Own Adventure” children’s books — fails to engage, the first impulse is to blame the form rather than the content. Let “Frankenstein,” just released by Inkle Studios and Profile Books, serve as a reproach to that reflex. The app is a creative, subtle and sensitive adaptation of Mary Shelley’s classic novella, and it has singlehandedly renewed this critic’s hopes for interactive fiction.

What this “Frankenstein” isn’t is a replication of the source text with the addition of a lot of digital doohickeys like sound effects and illustrations that animate when tapped. The app is all about the text, even if it is beautifully framed by period art and anatomical illustrations. The reader is presented with a screenful of narration and then offered one or more responses to it. The preferred response, when tapped, delivers up another screen of text. (In an absurdly pleasing visual touch, these appear as sheets of paper fasted together by straight pins.) According to the press materials, the reader’s responses will shape the way the narrative is presented, although not to the degree of substantively changing the plot.

This is an important point. The pleasure of storytelling lies in the dynamic between the surprising and the inevitable. The reader wants to feel the story is going somewhere, that its events follow from each other in meaningful, but not too obvious ways. When a story can go anywhere, it feels meaningless. In Mary Shelley’s novella, which is saturated with the Western tradition of the tragedy, Viktor Frankenstein’s character is such that he must create a monster, and the monster’s body is such that he can never belong among human beings however much he yearns to. A “Frankenstein” that ended with either misfit finding a comfortable place in the world would be a travesty.

But that doesn’t mean the reader doesn’t long for the story to unfold otherwise; that’s the nature of tragedy. The great insight that writer Dave Morris brings to this adaptation of the novel is that while a reader cannot significantly change the outcome of the story, the interactive element can change the shading and flavor of the tale. It can be mournful and reflective or action-packed. The creature and his creator can show greater or lesser ambivalence about their own behaviors. The ambiguity of both figures is baked into Mary Shelley’s novella, and while Morris has nearly doubled the word count of the original, this mostly amounts to playing up or down what’s already there.

Morris — a novelist who has written graphic novels, games and, yes, Choose-Your-Own-Adventure stories for kids — has changed the original text in other ways, as well. (Let’s take a moment here to point out to all future narrative app developers that hiring a real writer who actually knows what he or she is doing is totally worth it.) He’s moved the setting to revolutionary France, a choice that shows shrewd understanding of the idealistic political climate that affected Shelley’s thinking; the new Republic is its own kind of Frankenstein’s monster. He’s also eliminated much of the 19th-century framing of the tale and converted it into two present-tense narrations. One is Frankenstein’s dialogue with either himself or a (possibly imaginary) companion. The other is a second-person account of the monster’s first weeks of life as it spies on a family of dispossessed French nobility and has the chance to observe the loving relationships it can never enjoy itself.

Morris presents the reader with choices I’ve not encountered in other interactive fictions. Is humanity mostly good, or mostly evil? Does the most recent development make you (the monster) feel hope or despair? Is the revolution the dawn of a brave new world or a descent into chaos and barbarity? While I’m usually skeptical that present-tense narration increases the “immediacy” of a story, in this case, it really does work, particularly in the sections concerning the monster. Depending on your own outlook, you may urge him to keep trying to connect with humanity, or promptly forward him on to homicidal rage.

In either case, the narrative is shaped not by the reader deciding to turn left or right, to go down into the cellar or to get out of the house — the usual actions offered on the choose-your-own menu. Instead, the options have more to do with personality and interpretation, beliefs and ideas. As a result of the reader’s choices, the characters seem more like him- or herself, with a concurrent ratcheting up of emotional investment. To my surprise, I found myself more moved by this adaptation of the Shelley novel than I have been by the source text. (Although the app does include the original if you want to compare and contrast.) This is the only interactive fiction I’ve ever read with that quintessential, old-fashioned readerly avidity: the hunger to know what happens next. Of course, I already knew, but that didn’t matter at all.

Continue Reading Close
Laura Miller

Laura Miller is a senior writer for Salon. She is the author of "The Magician's Book: A Skeptic's Adventures in Narnia" and has a Web site, magiciansbook.com.

Page 1 of 130 in Fiction