Dragonfly’s demise

Another progressive preschool bites the dust, leaving me and other parents livid and bereft.

Topics:

Dragonfly's demise

My mother rode a Harley 45. And so did her mother before her. In matching Motor Maids of America uniforms, on light blue bikes with broad tires and a kick-start “that sometimes kicked back,” they roared through the hills of rural Kentucky. Perhaps it is genetic that I now long for the challenge, the freedom, the risk that a motorcycle offers. But where do I put my kids?

It’s front and center for me right now, the issue of where I put my kids. My son’s preschool is closing this week. This is the second day-care center I’ve lost in three years, and will be the fourth to close in Berkeley, Calif., in the past year. Naturally, this comes during the last three months of my dissertation writing, so that, at a time when I am completing the hardest task of my decade of graduate school, the last hurdle before I can finally enter the workforce and leave grad student wages behind, I’m suddenly without child care, as are the parents of 32 other children.

I had opted for center care instead of a nanny (not that we could have afforded one) partly in reaction to my mother’s choices. Yep, my mom rode that motorcycle. She also graduated as one of four women in her class at the University of Chicago’s medical school, and has been a successful practicing cardiologist (notwithstanding a couple of battles with discrimination) all of my life. When she faced the question, “Where do I put my kids?” my mother chose well, and also got lucky. I was raised at home by a woman whom I hesitate even to call a nanny because she is really a second mother; and by a father who worked but was around a lot.

In choosing center care, I was trying to combine the best that I got from all three of my parents: I would get to perform the daily rituals of bath and dinner and diapers for my kids, get to be their primary anchor and, at the same time, get to ride the motorcycle — test my abilities in the broader world to see how and where I could do some good.

The first two aims have played out pretty well, but the third is a total bust. That motorcycle idles somewhere just beyond my reach.

The first time I faced a child-care crisis, I was angry at the school. Our daughter’s first preschool had a turnover of nine teachers over the course of a single year — an experience that dashed my hopes for one or two consistent and loving caretakers in her life. I wondered at the time, somewhat resentfully, “What was that school doing so badly wrong that it lost nine teachers in a year?”



The second crisis came as the family day-care center we chose fell apart. My perspective shifted a bit. This time, the caregiver had become a good friend, and I understood all the struggles she went through both to keep providing attentive care and to figure out how to meet the other demands and desires in her life — caring for her aging and ill father, wanting to have a child herself, needing, after teaching preschoolers so long and so well, some different challenges. This time, while scrambling to find new child care, I felt compassion.

Through the first two day-care situations, I got bit by bit more involved, trying to contribute what I could to keep these fragile universes afloat. With the third caregiver — a preschool — I ended up hip deep, and, in the wake of its demise, I’m downright livid. Through my involvement with this preschool, I have seen that nothing has changed: Neither women nor children are valued. Ultimately there is bone-crunching failure even for someone in my situation, a woman with all the advantages of education, money and strong female role models, in a marriage ostensibly committed to sharing the load both within and outside the home.

And I have glimpsed, at a deeper level, into the heart of a society in which a progressive child-care center cannot succeed, not even in “progressive” Berkeley. I have learned that systems designed to assist underprivileged families are instead setups for failure, and all the contemporary talk about diversity and community masks an almost universal willingness to allow children to suffer if achieving these reasonable goals requires any effort, expense or sacrifice from anyone.

We first joined Dragonfly preschool when our daughter was 3. We chose the school both because it had openings for the already tightknit group of kids from the defunct family day-care center and because of its play-based teaching and explicit commitment to social justice. The school was in the process of expanding, the director had secured grants from the city to improve the playground and the student population was genuinely diverse — we liked most of what we saw (except perhaps the tall chain-link fence that gave the place a bit of a prison look).

At the end of our first year there, the executive director quit, giving only two weeks’ notice. The board of directors, mostly parents, scrambled. They tapped one of the teachers to become interim director, a post she left after a couple of months; they appointed another interim director. I joined the board about six months into the year, just in time to help hire a permanent director. Of our extremely limited applicant pool, we picked the young guy with lots of enthusiasm and a clear rapport with kids — over the experienced but lackluster alternative candidate.

After about six months of getting incomprehensible budget reports at our monthly board meetings, I became deeply worried about the school’s finances. I realized the director didn’t know what he was doing. Reluctantly (since I was in the middle of my dissertation research), I decided to try to figure out what was actually going on. I committed myself to devoting a few weeks to getting the school’s bookkeeping sorted out and properly set up.

Weeks of involvement became months, then more than a year, as one crisis after another rocked the school: A key teacher left; a few paying families withdrew, decimating our income; it came out that payroll taxes had been dramatically underpaid for the previous year, and the IRS was at our door. Some of the teachers weren’t really providing the care we wanted. A year after hiring him, we replaced the director with someone who actually had the abilities to run a program such as ours, and began yet another push to rebuild the school.

And our new director has turned the school around, in all the ways that I think really count. She has assembled a caring, talented and compatible staff. She has enrolled a group of families that are truly diverse and worked hard to open up lines of communication and understanding across race, culture and language, family structure and class. The kids are loved and challenged, guided and played with, and have formed deep friendships with one another. And she has forged a community that is just beginning, now, to believe in the importance of taking care of one another through hardship, across lines of class and privilege. The really, really hard work has begun to fall into place.

Why, then, are we closing?

One word: money. As it turns out, the financial mismanagement of the previous year was not an isolated situation, the product of an inexperienced director hired on the heels of a seriously botched transition. It was not really particular to this school’s history, except insofar as the school has maintained its commitment to low-income families. Rather, the financial disaster was the product of the fact that the numbers just don’t work, not for a day-care center committed to providing high-quality and affordable care to all kids.

These are the realities: Paying for child care is a stretch even for middle-class working families that can pay out of pocket. A year’s tuition can run up to $13,000. Even at these rates, teachers — the people providing the love, attention, patience and commitment, the people serving as surrogate parents to our children 40 hours a week — are getting paid $10 to $12 an hour and must live on that in the Bay Area.

The vaunted child-care subsidy programs (such as Calworks and Callearn in California), meant to support families getting off welfare by paying for child care while parents train and enter the workforce, turn out to be massive bureaucratic nightmares. During my entire year of doing the books for the school, I cannot recall a single Calworks check that paid in full and on time for child care the school had provided in the previous month.

And our landlord, the Berkeley Unified School District, an entity that one might think would actually have some interest in supporting high-quality early childhood education for kids soon to be entering the public schools, has charged nearly $3,000 per month in rent, rebuffed most efforts to renegotiate this amount and threatened to evict us for nonpayment — all for a space that has the warmth and light of an Army bunker.

I feel defeated. In my life, the school’s closure means some additional work, and may postpone my impending graduation. In the lives of the low-income families — who will be looking for child care at a bad time of year in a world where the best centers often don’t accept subsidized kids precisely because of the money issue — it may mean that parents lose jobs or drop out of school. And for the teachers, many of whom live paycheck to paycheck, homelessness is not an impossibility.

But what makes all of this feel even worse is how clearly it shows that, at the start of the 21st century, even in Berkeley, even when one has a husband and extended family who are long-standing supporters of women in the workforce, women and children don’t really count.

Throughout the time that I’ve worked at the school, sometimes putting my Ph.D. work on hold, I have found it challenging, infuriating, rewarding, meaningful and sometimes overwhelming. Friends would ask what I’d been up to, and if I said, “Volunteering at my kids’ preschool,” their response was “Oh.” If I said, instead, that I was “doing volunteer work at a small nonprofit,” they were impressed that I was working for some unspecified noble cause. The point was clear: Caring for children was beneath me, worthless, unimportant.

This society has made it utterly clear, through its recurring political debates about whether women “should” work or stay home with their kids, that caring for kids, and about kids, is women’s work. Even the progressive husbands of some of my progressive friends talk about getting child care so that she can work, not so that they can work. In my own home, for a few years, my own husband, when discussing evenings and weekends, would ask whose turn it was to “have to do child care,” rather than who would get to spend time with the kids and when.

No wonder all the mothers I know well are falling apart right now — we’re all hitting the wall. At best, we’re juggling parenting and jobs, negotiating relationships with partners and husbands, while trying — yet again — to find decent child care. Those of us with fewer resources confront, with Dragonfly’s closure, the loss of a point of stability in our kids’ lives as well as, perhaps, the specter of joblessness and homelessness.

We are stretched to the max, fighting hard battles on every front. We are tired; we are confused. We thought our marriages would be easier and our jobs more fulfilling; we believed, or hoped, that having eschewed the motorcycle for the minivan, we could find safe passage for our children in this country. We are aghast that even those of us with privilege can’t respect children — all children — enough to lend a hand up to those in need.

In the midst of my midlife crisis, I long for the indulgence of a bike and the open road. I long to seek out the things that make me, as an individual, feel alive. I long, as did my mother and her mother before her, to work hard, to do a job well and to know that I can offer my children not only emotional but also financial support. But who, during these moments, will help shelter and care for my kids?

Jennifer Miller's debut novel, "The Year of the Gadfly," is out now from Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Beautiful Darkness by Fabien Vehlmann & Kerascoët
    Kerascoët's lovely, delicate pen-and-watercolor art -- all intricate botanicals, big eyes and flowing hair -- gives this fairy story a deceptively pretty finish. You find out quickly, however, that these are the heartless and heedless fairies of folk legend, not the sentimental sprites beloved by the Victorians and Disney fans. A host of tiny hominid creatures must learn to survive in the forest after fleeing their former home -- a little girl who lies dead in the woods. The main character, Aurora, tries to organize the group into a community, but most of her cohort is too capricious, lazy and selfish to participate for long. There's no real moral to this story, which is refreshing in itself, beyond the perpetual lessons that life is hard and you have to be careful whom you trust. Never has ugly truth been given a prettier face.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Climate Changed: A Personal Journey Through the Science by Philippe Squarzoni
    Squarzoni is a French cartoonist who makes nonfiction graphic novels about contemporary issues and politics. While finishing up a book about France under Jacques Chirac, he realized that when it came to environmental policy, he didn't know what he was talking about. "Climate Changed" is the result of his efforts to understand what has been happening to the planet, a striking combination of memoir and data that ruminates on a notoriously elusive, difficult and even imponderable subject. Panels of talking heads dispensing information (or Squarzoni discussing the issues with his partner) are juxtaposed with detailed and meticulous yet lyrical scenes from the author's childhood, the countryside where he takes a holiday and a visit to New York. He uses his own unreachable past as a way to grasp the imminent transformation of the Earth. The result is both enlightening and unexpectedly moving.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Here by Richard McGuire
    A six-page version of this innovative work by a regular contributor to the New Yorker first appeared in RAW magazine 25 years ago. Each two-page spread depicts a single place, sometimes occupied by a corner of a room, over the course of 4 billion years. The oldest image is a blur of pink and purple gases; others depict hazmat-suited explorers from 300 years in the future. Inset images show the changing decor and inhabitants of the house throughout its existence: family photos, quarrels, kids in Halloween costumes, a woman reading a book, a cat walking across the floor. The cumulative effect is serene and ravishing, an intimation of the immensity of time and the wonder embodied in the humblest things.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Kill My Mother by Jules Feiffer
    The legendary Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist delivers his debut graphic novel at 85, a deliriously over-the-top blend of classic movie noir and melodrama that roams from chiaroscuro Bay City to Hollywood to a USO gig in the Pacific theater of World War II. There's a burnt-out drunk of a private eye, but the story is soon commandeered by a multigenerational collection of ferocious women, including a mysterious chanteuse who never speaks, a radio comedy writer who makes a childhood friend the butt of a hit series and a ruthless dame intent on making her whiny coward of a husband into a star. There are disguises, musical numbers and plenty of gunfights, but the drawing is the main attraction. Nobody convey's bodies in motion more thrillingly than Feiffer, whether they're dancing, running or duking it out. The kid has promise.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    The Motherless Oven by Rob Davis
    This is a weird one, but in the nervy surreal way that word-playful novels like "A Clockwork Orange" or "Ulysses" are weird. The main character, a teenage schoolboy named Scarper Lee, lives in a world where it rains knives and people make their own parents, contraptions that can be anything from a tiny figurine stashable in a pocket to biomorphic boiler-like entities that seem to have escaped from Dr. Seuss' nightmares. Their homes are crammed with gadgets they call gods and instead of TV they watch a hulu-hoop-size wheel of repeating images that changes with the day of the week. They also know their own "death day," and Scarper's is coming up fast. Maybe that's why he runs off with the new girl at school, a real troublemaker, and the obscurely dysfunctional Castro, whose mother is a cageful of talking parakeets. A solid towline of teenage angst holds this manically inventive vision together, and proves that some graphic novels can rival the text-only kind at their own game.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    NOBROW 9: It's Oh So Quiet
    For each issue, the anthology magazine put out by this adventurous U.K.-based publisher of independent graphic design, illustration and comics gives 45 artists a four-color palette and a theme. In the ninth issue, the theme is silence, and the results are magnificent and full of surprises. The comics, each told in images only, range from atmospheric to trippy to jokey to melancholy to epic to creepy. But the two-page illustrations are even more powerful, even if it's not always easy to see how they pertain to the overall concept of silence. Well, except perhaps for the fact that so many of them left me utterly dumbstruck with visual delight.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Over Easy by Mimi Pond
    When Pond was a broke art student in the 1970s, she took a job at a neighborhood breakfast spot in Oakland, a place with good food, splendid coffee and an endlessly entertaining crew of short-order cooks, waitresses, dishwashers and regular customers. This graphic memoir, influenced by the work of Pond's friend, Alison Bechdel, captures the funky ethos of the time, when hippies, punks and disco aficionados mingled in a Bay Area at the height of its eccentricity. The staff of the Imperial Cafe were forever swapping wisecracks and hopping in and out of each other's beds, which makes them more or less like every restaurant team in history. There's an intoxicating esprit de corps to a well-run everyday joint like the Imperial Cafe, and never has the delight in being part of it been more winningly portrayed.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    The Shadow Hero by Gene Luen Yang and Sonny Liew
    You don't have to be a superhero fan to be utterly charmed by Yang and Liew's revival of a little-known character created in the 1940s by the cartoonist Chu Hing. This version of the Green Turtle, however, is rich in characterization, comedy and luscious period detail from the Chinatown of "San Incendio" (a ringer for San Francisco). Hank, son of a mild-mannered grocer, would like to follow in his father's footsteps, but his restless mother (the book's best character and drawn with masterful nuance by Liew) has other ideas after her thrilling encounter with a superhero. Yang's story effortlessly folds pathos into humor without stooping to either slapstick or cheap "darkness." This is that rare tribute that far surpasses the thing it celebrates.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Shoplifter by Michael Cho
    Corinna Park, former English major, works, unhappily, in a Toronto advertising agency. When the dissatisfaction of the past five years begins to oppress her, she lets off steam by pilfering magazines from a local convenience store. Cho's moody character study is as much about city life as it is about Corinna. He depicts her falling asleep in front of the TV in her condo, brooding on the subway, roaming the crowded streets after a budding romance goes awry. Like a great short story, this is a simple tale of a young woman figuring out how to get her life back, but if feels as if it contains so much of contemporary existence -- its comforts, its loneliness, its self-deceptions -- suspended in wintery amber.

    Ten spectacular graphic novels from 2014

    Through the Woods by Emily Carroll
    This collection of archetypal horror, fairy and ghost stories, all about young girls, comes lushly decked in Carroll's inky black, snowy white and blood-scarlet art. A young bride hears her predecessor's bones singing from under the floorboards, two friends make the mistake of pretending to summon the spirits of the dead, a family of orphaned siblings disappears one by one into the winter nights. Carroll's color-saturated images can be jagged, ornate and gruesome, but she also knows how to chill with absence, shadows and a single staring eye. Literary readers who cherish the work of Kelly Link or the late Angela Carter's collection, "The Bloody Chamber," will adore the violent beauty on these pages.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>