I was last with George about a couple of months ago and I was at his home with him. And he was … I mean, he’s … George has had a rough time. Apart from having had cancer in a couple of places, he’s also been attacked by a lunatic and nearly killed. And if it weren’t for his wife, he would have been dead. And now he’s had a recurrence of cancer. So … But he’s got an indomitable spirit. And he’s just hanging in there. He’s abroad at the moment. He’s … he’s been having treatment and he’s just taking it easy and hoping that the … the thing will go away. And I pray and hope that it will too.
He’s … he’s very philosophical, you know … I mean everybody’s got to die sometime. And I’m nearer that than most people because I’m so old! And George has been near it many times and so … And he’s been rescued many times. So … I guess he’s hoping that he’s going to be rescued again. And I think he will. But he knows perfectly well there’s a chance he may not be. And he’s accepting it quite … quite happily.
Neither Sir George nor Adam Sharp, his manager, saw anything unusual in the question — and certainly not in the answer he gave. Paul McCartney had given a similarly elliptical answer, though less detailed, when he had been interviewed on CNN’s “Larry King Live” program a few weeks earlier.
After the interview, Koch returned to the offices of WENN and the tape of his interview was transcribed in preparation for editing. It was then that Harrison’s health took a decided turn for the worse.
The agency’s news editor, James Desborough, took a look at the interview. Apparently without consulting his bosses or any other senior executives at the agency, he seems to have decided that the benign response offered by Sir George to the question about Harrison’s health might be the basis for a headline-grabbing story. After Desborough worked on it, a fabricated quote appeared in the story. Martin’s original quote read “he has an indomitable spirit”; the new quote contained the words “but he knows that he is going to die soon.” The rest of the story was filled out with suitably adjusted quotes from Sir George and repetition of speculation from unnamed sources about Harrison’s health.
Out of the 27 answers to the 27 questions asked by Koch during the interview, Desborough had selected just one. Out of the 2,169 words spoken by Sir George in the 40-minute interview, Desborough had extracted 105.
Now it was time to go to market. Desborough soon sold the piece to the Mail on Sunday, which received the story on Friday, July 20. At that point it consisted of just 365 words. The WENN story ended with the internal code (CK/WN/ES), CK being the initials of original interviewer Christian Koch. Desborough apparently did not add his initials.
When I spoke to Desborough about the story last week, all he had to say was: “George Martin is on tape. We got him.” USA Today reporter Ann Oldenburg contacted WENN the day after the Mail story broke and reported in the Tuesday, July 24, issue of USA Today: “A spokesman for chief executive Jonathan Ashby said that the Martin interview, which took place for 40-minutes on Wednesday, was on tape and ’100 percent nailed.’” WENN has thus far been unable to find any individual in its office who has confessed to giving that quote.
At the Mail on Sunday the story was assigned to writer Katie Nicholl. The “George Harrison is close to death” headline was followed up with a plethora of detail, some of it factual, much of it conjecture, spin and innuendo. Scattered through the piece were quotations from Desborough’s story.
Nicholl reengineered Sir George’s already much-cantilevered words to have the knight of the realm say the never-uttered words twice in her article, though the story she had received from WENN had only used the fabrication once: “He has an indomitable spirit but he knows that he is going to die soon.” Nicholl quoted Sir George more or less accurately as saying, “He has been near death many times and he’s been rescued many times as well,” then added the fabricated quote “but he knows that he is going to die soon and he’s accepting it perfectly happily.”
In what Nicholl claimed to me is “standard practice” in journalism, her story stated that the interview had been given to the paper directly. The paragraph with the first of the erroneous comments starts with the words “Sir George told the Mail on Sunday.”
When I asked why this was done when it was clearly wording that could mislead readers into having greater faith in the credibility of the story, Nicholl told me, “If we have an exclusive interview, we reserve the right to say that the person spoke to us.”
The article was larded with emotionally loaded phrases that were not based on any quote, just the writer’s ungrounded speculation. Phrases such as “Harrison has admitted”; “Harrison made the emotional confession that he does not have long to live”; “the star put on a brave face”; “Harrison is now facing up to the prospect of death.”
And then there were the anonymous “sources” claiming that he “lost half a lung in the operation.” And that unnamed “doctors at the clinic admitted.” And that “according to experts the long-term prognosis for Harrison is not good” — these experts being unnamed people who had not seen Harrison or his medical records.
And what of the opportunity for a reaction from Harrison’s representatives prior to printing this story? After all, the paper was announcing his imminent death to the world. A senior representative of the Mail on Sunday told me that he could not be quoted, so I cannot use the exact words. But the essence of the paper’s position is that it is not always possible to contact a celebrity on a weekend, and that’s the celebrity’s tough luck.
It might have been prudent to wait until the following Monday, July 23, and get a response from Harrison. The story, complete with reaction and any denial, could then have been placed in Tuesday’s Daily Mail without the fabric of the universe rupturing over the 48-hour delay. In any event, the decision to publish was made without reaching any representative of Harrison to seek his reaction. Nor did the paper seek a representative of Sir George to check the quote.
Within hours the damage was done. Beatles fans worldwide were stunned, Beatles Web sites and Internet newsgroups overflowed with postings and American TV stations flashed the news in bulletins throughout the day.
In England, Sir George awoke to discover the story and was mortified. According to Adam Sharp, Sir George immediately telephoned Harrison, who was very upset. At that point Sir George was baffled. The paper claimed that he had “told the Mail on Sunday” and yet he knew that he had had no contact with the newspaper. He told Harrison that he had not spoken with the paper and that he certainly had not told anyone that Harrison “knows that he is going to die soon.”
With neither Harrison nor Sir George being well equipped in the political game of war-room-style rapid response, the story festered without an official rebuttal all through Sunday. Sharp was away for the weekend in the north of England, but on Monday morning he returned calls to the media, including responding to ABC’s “Good Morning America,” which became the first program or network in the U.S. to broadcast a rebuttal.
Throughout the day Sharp contacted other media outlets and — at first unaware of the source of the manipulated quotes — continued to say that there was no basis at all for the story. Finally, he surmised the source of the fabrication and immediately called Koch at WENN. “I spoke to him and he broke down in tears,” said Sharp. “He told me that his boss had taken the tapes off him and manipulated the story without his consent.” Koch’s boss was WENN news editor James Desborough.
Meanwhile Harrison’s principal lawyer in London, Nick Valner of the legal firm Eversheds, issued a statement to Britain’s premier wire service, the Press Association, late on Monday afternoon. The statement said that Harrison and his wife, Olivia, were “disappointed and disgusted” by reports that referred to his “imminent demise.”
The reports were unsubstantiated, untrue, insensitive and uncalled for, especially as Mr. Harrison is active and feeling very well in spite of the health challenges he has had this year.
George Martin was quoted and has emphatically denied speaking to any newspaper.
The Mail on Sunday has continued to stand by its story. When I spoke with WENN at the end of the week, the agency was swift to cooperate, and immediately released the key evidence — the transcript of the full interview and the text of the story it subsequently sold to the Mail on Sunday. I was subsequently allowed to hear and make a copy of the Harrison sequence of the interview tape. I noticed the relaxed, conversational style of Sir George’s response. This was not a medical bulletin or indiscreet revelation. Just a carefully worded reply to a query, which emphasized Harrison’s general philosophy.
At this stage WENN had not noticed the insertion of the nine-word phrase into the story, but the agency was already displeased with the unauthorized actions of Desborough in manipulating a feature piece into an unpleasant tabloid story. After my brief exchange with Desborough in midweek, in which the editor curtly told me that the story was accurate, he left London on a previously booked vacation to the island of Ibiza off the Spanish coast. His employers have not yet been able to challenge him about his misdeeds.
I telephoned Nicholl at the Mail on Sunday. She reiterated that the paper stood by its story. She was absolutely confident of it. “We’ve got it on tape” she explained. I asked her about the use of the negative quote from Dr. Cavalli that no other newspaper had used. She didn’t claim to have secured that herself. She assumed that since it had been in the Daily Mail previously that “it must be correct.” I asked her why no one else had got that quote. “Probably because we got it exclusively” she said, though she made it clear that she had no personal knowledge of this. When I asked what efforts she had made to corroborate the story with representatives of Harrison or Sir George she suddenly clammed up. “I don’t want to be quoted in a newspaper piece, so this conversation is all off the record,” she said.
I told her that if she wished to go off the record from that point on that I would naturally accept that, but that it was not possible, or accepted journalistic practice, to go off the record retroactively. She informed me that she felt she must pass the matter to her news editor, Paul Field, who would phone me back in an hour or two. Thirty seconds later Field telephoned and identified himself and then went immediately off the record.
After talking to Field, I called back the paper and asked for its most senior executive. I was put through to Russell Forgham, the Mail on Sunday’s managing editor. He was polite but cautious. I asked him outright about the key matter and he was unequivocal. “The quotes from Sir George were on tape. We have heard the tapes and we stand by our story.” And so the story lies …
Friday, WENN confirmed that Desborough had resigned from his job in the morning. In a phone call, an executive at the news agency said, “James Desborough no longer works for the company. He has resigned is all I can say.”
Harrison is continuing to recover from his medical travails of the past few months, Sir George is a more wary man and a series of interviews that had been lined up with American media to promote his CD box set have been canceled by Adam Sharp.