Joe Conason’s Journal

Only Gore responds to a senator's racist smear, as other Democrats -- led by the morally deaf and politically dumb Tom Daschle -- keep quiet.

Topics:

Gore’s moral victory
Al Gore proved his moral courage yesterday. He didn’t hesitate to say that he opposed Trent Lott’s racist speech, that Lott had to withdraw those remarks, and that if Lott failed to do so, the Senate should censure the Republican leader. Having endured so many venomous attacks from a press that is openly biased against him and would surely relish another chance to sting him, Gore spoke out fearlessly. (It is also a triumph for him over his tormentors in the press. With some honorable exceptions, they waited too long to speak up against Lott’s nostalgia for the barbarism of his political forebears.)

I wish Gore’s former colleagues in the Senate had displayed equal bravery. Unfortunately, he didn’t have any competition for this laurel.

The silence on both sides of the aisle was appalling — if not quite as bad as Tom Daschle’s decision to break it by making excuses for Lott (who has issued a dishonest, mealy-mouthed “apology”). In a fashion entirely different from the Mississippian, Daschle has earned a permanent vacation from leadership. This episode was the final affront from a well-meaning but incompetent and pusillanimous man who doesn’t know how to defend himself or his party, let alone fight back for the principles he is supposed to uphold.

It was truly sickening to hear the Democratic leader shield his adversary from criticism. Worse yet, he did so two days after black voters in Louisiana saved his candidate Mary Landrieu from defeat, which is more than Daschle did for any Democrat this year. Unbelievably, he complained about Rush Limbaugh but defended Trent Lott. Presumably he didn’t want to upset their negotiations over committee assignments, or some such bureaucratic priority.

Now we know that Daschle is morally deaf. He’s also too dumb to learn from experience. Why doesn’t he understand that putting Republicans on the defensive is also the way to win? That’s what the Republicans have done to him, over and over again. That’s why he’s the minority leader now. When Democrats demote Daschle, we will know that they want to be in the majority again and have a clue about getting there.



Sadly, nobody in Daschle’s caucus had the guts to protest, either. The Senate’s pretenders to leadership and presidential stature — Kerry, Lieberman, Edwards, Dodd, Feinstein, Boxer, Bayh, Clinton, Harkin, Kennedy (!)  either said nothing of consequence or nothing at all. And where was the Republican leader’s nemesis John McCain? Along with Lott, they are all losers today.

Many readers wrote in to suggest (quite strongly) that I should endorse Gore because he alone measured up to my final sentence yesterday. I did write that the candidate who confronts Lott is the one who “should be running for president.” And five hours later, Gore did exactly that. But while I don’t conceal my political preferences, I don’t “endorse” candidates. Anyway, what I say matters far less than what you, dear readers, think and say and do. By doing the right thing, Gore energized his supporters and won new friends. And he deserves them.

[9:37 a.m. PST, Dec. 10, 2002]

For your regular Joe, bookmark this link. To send an e-mail, click here.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>