Squeezing workers
The latest economic numbers are hard to be optimistic about, especially since the Bush administration's solutions are likely to further increase corporate profits, not jobs and wages.
Topics: John F. Kerry, D-Mass., Unemployment, Federal Reserve, Inflation, Alan Greenspan
Let me start by reminding you what I wrote in my Salon column just last month:
“The outlook, therefore, isn’t for another noninflationary boom. It’s for stagflation — the combination of low performance and rising prices some of us dimly remember from the Vietnam War.”
Let me also remind you that last March, when the United States had its first month of good job growth in a while, I labeled the ensuing media frenzy “a fit of ejaculatio praecox.” Since which time, we’ve heard not a line of doubt from the business press. “The economy is strong and getting stronger,” said President Bush, and like good soldiers, the commentariat fell in line.
But today we have news that is hard to avoid. Newly revised data are out from that exciting, inspiring, fantastic first quarter.
Real economic growth did not accelerate to 4.4 percent from the 4.1 percent pace of the fourth quarter of 2003, as first thought. Instead, the growth rate fell, to 3.9 percent. Meanwhile, inflation rose faster than predicted. The inflation rate was 3.5 percent for gross domestic purchases, as opposed to the previously estimated 3.3 percent. The chain price deflator (a commonly used measure of inflation) was up to 2.9 percent from 2.6 percent, and core inflation (excluding food and energy) was up to 2 percent from 1.7 percent.
Forecasters were caught flatfooted by these revisions. They had expected the growth rate to be unchanged at 4.4 percent — not rising inflation.
Why is this happening? The most important reason is the effect of increasing demand on imports. Imports came in high, partly as an enduring consequence of outsourcing and the loss of domestic competitiveness during the Bush slump. With a falling dollar and a rising price for fuel, imports are also more expensive, putting a double whammy on the trade deficit.
Moreover, it was spending on nondurable goods (including gas) that was up — by almost 7 percent — while spending on durable goods actually declined. This is not a good sign.
Why the surprise? It lies partly in the incurable optimism of members of the business press. They want growth and rising markets. They believe in the psychological power of their own voices. But they have no underlying theory beyond the idea that psychology matters and that optimism leads to growth. Doubters therefore get squelched. Our voices are dissonant, and our arguments are, well, just a bit too difficult. But when bad things happen, we are not surprised.
James K. Galbraith organized a conference on the “Crisis in the Eurozone” at the University of Texas at Austin on November 3-4. Papers and presentations can be found at http://tinyurl.com/3kut4k5, along with a video archive of the full meeting. More James K. Galbraith.



Comments
0 Comments