The amazing Steve Ditko

Spider-Man's reclusive co-creator went into hiding decades ago, but his spirit continues to haunt the best of today's comics

Topics: Books,

The amazing Steve Ditko

Once you’ve seen Steve Ditko’s hands, it’s hard to forget them. Not the hands of the famously reclusive 77-year-old cartoonist himself — not many people have seen those. The hands he draws on his characters, though, are unmistakable: expressively gesticulating, fingers pointing in all directions, casting spells or shooting webs or passing judgment. Ditko’s never been as well-known as fellow comics pioneers Jack Kirby and Will Eisner. Insisting that his work speaks for itself, he’s refused to be photographed or interviewed since the early ’60s, and his prickly, loopy individualism has kept fame at bay. But he’s the ghost haunting the past 40 years of American comic books.

A cross-section of Ditko’s early- to mid-’60s work is reprinted in the new hardcover collection “Steve Ditko: Marvel Visionaries.” His artwork is often crude and unpretty on its surface: understated and flat, full of crabbed, ugly characters. It’s also impossible to shake. He’s a master of composition, body language and storytelling flow, and his best ideas have become part of the visual language of comics. The most famous is the look of Spider-Man, co-created by Ditko with writer Stan Lee in late 1962. Ditko drew the first 38 issues of “The Amazing Spider-Man,” the foundation on which every Spider-Man story since then has been built. He also created the famous blue-and-red costume — a brilliantly weird piece of design, featuring a totally covered-up face imprinted with spider webs, with two enormous white swooshes for eyes.

More importantly, though, Ditko devised the visual tone of Spider-Man comics: imperfect bodies perpetually moving through real space. Nobody ever looks especially healthy in his “Amazing Spider-Man.” Peter Parker, in or out of his costume, is a scrawny kid with insectoid body language (the specific poses Ditko drew him in were imitated successfully in both of the recent “Spider-Man” movies); Dr. Octopus is a sweaty creep with a terrible bowl haircut. Mary Jane Watson’s model-perfect face famously didn’t appear on-panel until Ditko had left the series and John Romita replaced him. When there’s sexual tension in Ditko’s “Spider-Man,” there always seems to be something repressed and curdled about it. (He shared a studio for years with bondage/fetish artist Eric Stanton and has claimed they didn’t collaborate, but Blake Bell, who’s writing a book about Ditko, has a Web site on which he points out some work credited to Stanton that’s clearly Ditko’s — look at those hands.)



The setting for Ditko’s “Spider-Man” is a hyper-real New York City, nothing but skyscrapers and water towers and docks. And its characters are always seen in choreographed motion: diving into upside-down springs, leaping, ducking, moving around each other. Every panel is a pregnant moment; you can sense the arc of each character’s movement from one image to the next. Stan Lee’s dialogue and captions are sometimes charmingly corny, sometimes just glib and annoying, but you don’t need them anyway: You can tell exactly what’s happening without reading a word. (Spider-Man’s mask eliminates his facial expressions, so Ditko makes him communicate everything with his body.)

“Steve Ditko: Marvel Visionaries” inevitably includes “The Amazing Spider-Man” Nos. 31 to 33, from 1965 and 1966, by which point Ditko was plotting the series entirely by himself. The pages of No. 33 in which Spider-Man lifts and crawls out from under an enormous piece of machinery in a flooding room are the comics’ equivalent of the Odessa Steps sequence from Sergei Eisenstein’s “Battleship Potemkin” — a scene so formally masterful that every subsequent cartoonist has internalized it, even those whose work has nothing to do with superhero stuff. (“Love and Rockets’” Jaime Hernandez includes a wickedly funny little homage to it in his graphic novel “Locas.”)

At the same time, Ditko was developing a very different visual style for his other major collaboration with Lee, the “Dr. Strange” stories about a “master of the mystic arts” that originally appeared in “Strange Tales.” (Five of them are reprinted in “Marvel Visionaries.”) “Spider-Man’s” characters struggled against the laws of physics in a stylized representation of the real world; “Dr. Strange’s” characters were freed from those laws and that world altogether, floating freely in other-dimensional space filled with curving, squiggling design elements. There are almost no right angles in Ditko’s “Dr. Strange” stories other than panel borders. Over and over, though, there are images of weirdly shaped portals through which even weirder planes of existence can be seen, and the implication is that the rectangles on the printed page act as the same sort of portal for the reader.

Dr. Strange supposedly lives in New York City, too, but virtually all we see of it is his Greenwich Village townhouse, as curvy and un-New York-like as one of Rudolf Steiner’s Goetheanum buildings. Every few panels there’s a new psychedelic explosion; Strange’s nemesis is Dormammu, a “dweller in the realm of darkness,” whose head is an indistinct, striated red shape with holes where its eyes and mouth should be, surrounded by billowing yellow flames. If “Spider-Man” was, at its core, a vehicle for exploring the relationship between power and personal responsibility, “Dr. Strange” was, whether or not Ditko and Lee acknowledged it, a vehicle for talking about drug culture.

Sixties hipsters thought that Ditko’s urban realism and trippy visions meant that he was one of them. They couldn’t have been much more wrong. Around the time that Ditko fell out with Marvel Comics in 1966, he became fascinated with Ayn Rand and objectivism, and his work started to take on a severe and increasingly strident right-wing tone. He spent a few years working for the small company Charlton Comics, where his most significant creation was the Question: a hero in a suit, hat and tie, with no face — just a blank pink blot — and a ruthless contempt for moral relativism. At a subsequent stint with DC Comics, he created the Hawk and the Dove (a pair of superhero brothers, whose personalities were exactly what you’d guess) and the Creeper (a yellow-skinned, green-haired, red-maned, screeching maniac).

And then, by the end of the ’60s, Ditko retreated into the world of the small press — fanzines and self-published comics — where he could write and draw whatever he pleased. Comics like “Mr. A” and “Avenging World” became his venue to rant semi-intelligibly about objectivism, how there’s no middle ground or gray area in morality, and so on. He spent most of the next 30 years creating Rand-inspired comics that are beautifully designed and composed but almost unreadable; they’re explicitly didactic, but so heavy-handed that it’s impossible to imagine them swaying anyone’s opinions. (Ditko continued to draw hundreds of pages a year through the ’90s but hasn’t published any new work since 2000.)

After 1970, he occasionally returned to mainstream comics, but his only major new creation was a bizarre and short-lived mid-’70s series, “Shade the Changing Man.” (It was ahead of its time; revived in 1990 by writer Peter Milligan without Ditko, it ran for six years.) “Marvel Visionaries” leaps from 1966 to two stories originally published in 1980, one from 1988, and one from 1992, in which Ditko’s phoning it in, barely bothering with even basic anatomy and perspective.

By then, though, Ditko’s fingerprints were all over the comics world. Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ landmark “Watchmen” is, in some sense, one long tribute to Ditko, from its nine-panel grid to the character of Rorschach, whose appearance and inflexible morality are directly inspired by the Question and Mr. A. Before Todd McFarlane created his hugely popular horror comic “Spawn,” he made his name with work on “Spider-Man” that was a slicked-up variation on Ditko’s style. Peter Bagge (“Hate”) wrote and drew a Ditko parody a few years ago, “The Megalomaniacal Spider-Man,” in which Peter Parker becomes obsessed with objectivism. And near the end of Neil Gaiman and Andy Kubert’s recent graphic novel “1602,” there’s a scene in which we briefly see another dimension — an image that’s directly lifted from (and credited to) a 40-year-old Ditko “Dr. Strange” story, since there’s no way anyone else could have captured that otherworldliness better.

Most of what’s in Ditko’s “Marvel Visionaries” volume are stories that have been reprinted to death already, fine as some of them are. But it also includes some remarkable, long-unseen material: 10 short horror, suspense and science fiction stories he collaborated on with Lee for anthology comics like “Tales to Astonish” and “Amazing Adult Fantasy” between 1961 and 1963. Lee knew how to spur Ditko to do his best work, and these corny twist-ending tales are drawn with the single-minded force of nightmares. The artwork is largely close-up shots of distressed characters, with little or no background, which makes the world they inhabit seem as suffocatingly tiny as the scope of the stories themselves. “Help!” opens with an image of a man clasping his ears as he’s surrounded by seven screaming disembodied mouths; “Those Who Change” begins with a gigantic close-up of a huge-eyed reptile’s head beginning to emerge from prehistoric ooze. The blunt alienation of these early pieces is still shocking now, and the way Ditko draws the characters’ hands alone tells the stories almost as much as Lee’s words.

Douglas Wolk’s writing on comics and graphic novels will appear the first Friday of each month in Salon Books.

Douglas Wolk is the author of "Reading Comics."

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>