Usury: Back and better than ever

The Wall Street bankers moaning about the high cost of credit ought to spend some time at the nearest payday loan center

Topics: Globalization, How the World Works,

Wall Street’s jitters continued Tuesday, as investors continued to worry that the “easy money” era is over. While there is some hope that the turbulence in the credit markets is a temporary phenomenon that might straighten itself out in a couple of months, there appears to be widespread fear that the days when one could cheaply purchase insurance against a bank default or other financial disaster are over. Suddenly, investors looking to borrow a few billion dollars or so for a leveraged buyout are facing sticker shock.

Maybe some of these newly chastened investment bankers should have spent some time over the last couple of years standing in line at their local payday loan center. They might have a better sense for what it’s like to have to pay through the nose to get some spending money. Then again, it’s unlikely that there are any payday loan centers near the neighborhoods in which investment bankers live, because usury is generally only at home among the poor.

That’s right, usury. The word has an archaic, Old Testament edge to it. But it’s very much alive in the United States today, provided you need a couple of hundred bucks instead of a couple of billion.

Usury laws just aren’t what they used to be. Let’s cut straight to the chase:

From “Usury Law, Payday Loans, and Statutory Slight of Hand: An Empirical Analysis of American Credit Pricing Limits,” by Christopher L. Peterson, a law professor at the University of Florida:

In virtually every measurable way usury law has become much more lax since 1965. In 1965 every state in the union had a usury limit on consumer loans. Today nine states have completely deregulated interest rates within their borders. In 1965 banks were bound to comply with all state usury laws. Today banks are free to charge whatever interest rate they choose within the loose and changing tolerances chosen by banking regulators for their safety and soundness guidelines. In 1965 no state had law either explicitly or implicitly authorizing prices with an annual percentage rate of over 300 percent. Today, at least 36 states have law allowing lenders to charge over 300 percent. In 1965 usury laws were drafted with sufficient rigidity that 45 states held actual allowed annual percentage rates to 60 percent or under. In 2007 the number of states accomplishing this has fallen to only seven.



Other fun facts:

  • “The best available nationwide estimate suggests that the average payday loan borrower repays $793.00 for a $325.00 loan.”
  • “Between 2000 and 2004 alone, the number of payday lender locations more than doubled from 10,000 to 22,000.”

“Lax” seems a mild choice of words to describe government sanction of usury. But there is an unmistakable undercurrent of anger running through Peterson’s study, and it’s not hard to understand why. For thousands of years, the practice of usury has generated moral opprobrium. Charging those who are least able to pay the highest rates of interest is patently uncivilized.

Perhaps that’s why almost none of the states that have loosened their usury limits are willing to admit it. Peterson’s unique contribution to the academic literature on usury in the United States is the creation of a data point he calls “salience distortion.” Salience distortion measures the difference between the actual price a lender can charge for a loan, in terms of an annualized percentage rate, and the most salient numerical figure in the statute describing that fee. Typically the statute will limit a lender to charging, say 15 percent of the value of the loan, glossing over the fact that a payday loan is typically meant to be paid back in only two weeks.

Peterson’s conclusion:

Every state that has legalized triple digit APR consumer loans to the working poor uses a small, misleading number in their legal text to do so. This suggests that political leaders understand what many traditional neo-liberal economists apparently do not. In the real world how a value is described can be much more important than the value itself. Many state legislatures use small, innocuous numbers in usury law because they are attempting to minimize the public and media outcry over their decision to legalize triple digit interest rate loans.”

Just for fun, imagine the outcry if a big New York bank tried to charge triple digit interest rates on a loan to a private equity player like Blackstone or KKR. After the smoke cleared from the wreckage on Wall Street, someone might do something crazy, like pass a law making the unconscionable illegal.

(Thanks to Credit Slips, a group blog written by six academics who focus on credit and bankruptcy issues, for the link to Peterson’s paper.)

Andrew Leonard

Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.

    Domino's

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.

    Arby's/Facebook

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.

    KFC

    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    Pizzagamechangers.com

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.

    7-Eleven

    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>