The women of Shouts and Murmurs

It turns out that for the past three years, they haven't existed.

Topics: Broadsheet, Love and Sex,

I’ve got a confession: On the occasions when I read the New Yorker, I often flip directly to Shouts and Murmurs. (One can only embark on so many 7,000-word rambling pieces of narrative journalism before needing a laugh.) But the problem is, the vast majority of the time, Shouts and Murmurs is not funny. Like, not even a little bit. I can tell the pieces are supposed to be funny, in the way that McSweeney’s is often supposed to be amusing — but yet, they’re not. This confuses me. There is hardly a writer in the United States who would not be thrilled to have a piece in the New Yorker. Many writers would give the New Yorker their work for free just to have it published. Hell, I’d guess there are even people out there who would pay for the privilege. So wouldn’t you think that with all those people and pieces to choose from, the New Yorker’s editors would be able to select Shouts and Murmurs submissions that actually made people laugh?

I bring this up because we just found a link to a blog post from the World’s Fair in which the author takes a break from his academic pursuits to examine the male-female breakdown of Shouts and Murmurs authors. (The post is arguably more amusing than most S&M columns.) His conclusion: “Out of the 133 authors of features under the Shouts and Murmurs banner (in the modern, post-1992 era), 17 have been women. That’s 12.782%.” To put it another way, men are represented in the section at a rate 8 times that of women.

What’s more, there has not been a woman author of Shouts and Murmurs for over three years. The last one was in 2004. Again, this is irritating in and of itself. (Um, hello, couldn’t you at least get Nora Ephron?) But then you look at the stuff they’re running, and it’s like, dude. It doesn’t matter if you think women are less funny than men if the stuff you’re running isn’t funny to begin with. Check out this one from Aug. 27. It’s about what some guy would do if he won the lotto. I’d quote from it, except there’s nothing funny to quote. It ends with something about fishing. Ha.

You Might Also Like

I’m particularly annoyed about this because I just looked back at some previous Broadsheet posts about humor and the overall gender breakdown of writers at places like the New Yorker (click, for example, here, here, here or here), and stumbled across a reference to this gem, an essay by Christopher Hitchens about why women are not funny. Not because of cultural conditioning or anything, but because of our wombs. There is nothing funny, asserts Hitchens, about childbirth. And therefore, there is nothing funny about women.

I would argue that actually, there is funny stuff about childbirth. And it is quite likely that there is funny stuff about fishing, too, though I have yet to read an essay by an angler that has reduced me to hysterics. But hey. That’s probably because I have a uterus. Putting aside the bigger, very irritating assertion that having breasts means you cannot also make people laugh (which is especially confusing since, last time I checked, boobs themselves are very funny), my real question is this: If you, oh editors of the New Yorker, are running pieces by men that are not funny to begin with, why not give some women a shot? Worst case scenario: You’ll end up with a Shouts and Murmurs page that’s just as unfunny as … a Shouts and Murmurs page. And if it was better? It’d be the talk of the town.

Catherine Price is a freelance journalist and author of "101 Places Not to See Before You Die". She also runs a legally themed clothing shop called Illegal Briefs.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 8
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Sonic

    7 ways Americans have defiled the hot dog

    Sonic's Bacon Double Cheddar Croissant Dog

    Sonic calls this a "gourmet twist" on a classic. I am not so, so fancy, but I know that sprinkling bacon and cheddar cheese onto a tube of pork is not gourmet, even if you have made a bun out of something that is theoretically French.

    Krispy Kreme

    7 ways Americans have defiled the hot dog

    Krispy Kreme's Doughnut Dog

    This stupid thing is a hotdog in a glazed doughnut bun, topped with bacon and raspberry jelly. It is only available at Delaware's Frawley Stadium, thank god.

    KFC

    7 ways Americans have defiled the hot dog

    KFC's Double Down Dog

    This creation is notable for its fried chicken bun and ability to hastily kill your dreams.

    Pizza Hut

    7 ways Americans have defiled the hot dog

    Pizza Hut's Hot Dog Bites Pizza

    Pizza Hut basically just glued pigs-in-blankets to the crust of its normal pizza. This actually sounds good, and I blame America for brainwashing me into feeling that.

    Carl's Jr.

    7 ways Americans have defiled the hot dog

    Carl's Jr. Most American Thick Burger

    This is a burger stuffed with potato chips and hot dogs. Choose a meat, America! How hard is it to just choose a meat?!

    Tokyo Dog

    7 ways Americans have defiled the hot dog

    Tokyo Dog's Juuni Ban

    A food truck in Seattle called Tokyo Dog created this thing, which is notable for its distinction as the Guinness Book of World Records' most expensive hot dog at $169. It is a smoked cheese bratwurst, covered in butter Teriyaki grilled onions, Maitake mushrooms, Wagyu beef, foie gras, black truffles, caviar and Japanese mayo in a brioche bun. Just calm down, Tokyo Dog. Calm down.

    Interscope

    7 ways Americans have defiled the hot dog

    Limp Bizkit's "Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water"

    This album art should be illegal.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>