Public bathroom dilemma: Paper or air?

How we dry our hands has more of an impact than you might imagine.

Topics: Environment, Global Warming, Al Gore, The Good Life, Science,

Public bathroom dilemma: Paper or air?

On a recent Saturday visit to the local mall, several simultaneously flushing toilets and the piped-in sounds of Kenny G were the soundtrack to my latest environmental dilemma. There I was in the public restroom, my hands dripping from a trip to the sink, momentarily paralyzed by a perennial environmental quandary: Should I dry my hands with a paper towel or use the air hand dryer? A sign emblazoned on the dryer professed: “Dryers help protect the environment. They save trees from being used for paper towels. They eliminate paper towel waste.” But then the dryer also sucks down electricity. What would Al Gore do?

I realize this may sound ridiculous. What is one or two paper towels or 30 seconds of hot air compared to the emissions belched from cars stacked on I-84? But consider the following: So far this year Americans have used 1.8 million tons of paper towels and tissue, according to the American Forest & Paper Association, an industry group. There are approximately 3 million hand dryers installed in the country and most run for 30 seconds around 100 times a day, according to World Dryer Corp., one of the country’s leading manufacturers. That’s 5.7 million kilowatt-hours of electricity used every day — enough power to run an estimated 197,000 homes a day.

“While this one little decision doesn’t seem like a big deal, it’s worthwhile to evaluate our modern consumer life,” says Michael Kadish of TerraPass, which sells carbon-emission offsets. “How we bag our groceries, what kinds of light bulbs we use, whether we use paper coffee cups or bring our own — all these things have real effects in terms of climate change. These individual choices really add up.”

He has a point. Imagine all the sports stadium bathrooms, strewn with paper towels during halftime, the movie theater restrooms abuzz with the sound of an active hand dryer, the hundreds of thousands of office buildings and restaurants with people pouring in and out of bathrooms all day, and suddenly you are faced with a real environmental predicament.



What’s the greenest way to dry your hands? Existing studies that look at the issue of paper towels versus hand dryers have been funded by either the paper or hand dryer industry, with results that predictably back up the claim of whoever paid for the research. So the Climate Conservancy, a nonprofit group started by Stanford University climate scientists, which aims to help consumers determine the greenhouse gas emissions associated with products, helped me crunch some numbers. Its calculations look not just at carbon dioxide, but the other five gases, identified by the Kyoto Protocol, that contribute to global warming (methane, nitrous oxide, perfluorocarbon, hydrofluorocarbon and sulfur hexafluoride) to get what is called a CO2 equivalence.

Folks at the Conservancy considered the life cycle of the paper towel. They measured how much carbon it takes to produce, transport and dispose of a paper towel. They found that using one paper towel drains the equivalent of one ounce of greenhouse gases, while hitting the button once on the World Dryer 2,300-watt model accounts for less than half an ounce. Think of it this way: One ounce of greenhouse gas emissions — or one paper towel — is equivalent to driving one-sixteenth of a mile in an average car.

While the dryer wins the race, we need a point of clarification for the much maligned paper towel. Paper towels are made primarily from wood chips, the leavings from logs milled for home building, or recycled paper, says Mark Lewis of the University of Washington’s paper science and engineering program. It’s not as if fresh trees are cut down to become paper towels. Furthermore, leading manufacturers, like Georgia Pacific and Kimberly Clark, increasingly use up to 100 percent recycled fiber from the United States. The Climate Conservancy did not include recycled paper in its calculation, so it’s possible the energy consumed by the paper towel could be slightly less than it figured.

Also, hand dryers in places like the Pacific Northwest — where hydropower, not coal, is the major producer of energy — produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions than the Conservancy’s calculations. The trade journal Environmental Building News has long touted dryers as superior to paper towels; the headquarters of the U.S. Green Building Council, for instance, uses Excel Dryers, an energy-efficient dryer, exclusively in its Washington, D.C., office restrooms.

However, the word has yet to catch on. Portland’s Ecotrust building is the country’s first restored historic building to receive a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification. Yet inside you won’t find hand dryers. One of the nation’s largest environmental groups, which I promised would go unnamed, uses paper towels in its offices. Even at the vegan restaurant down the street, where I thought for sure I’d find a hand dryer, there was nothing but towels, overflowing in the trash.

Anyway, the hand dryer would seem to be the wise choice. But hold on. There’s something else to consider. The average temperature of air that flows from a warm air dryer is insufficient to kill most bacteria, according to a 1998 study by Britain’s University of Westminster. The study finds that paper towels removed 58 percent of the bacteria from people’s hands. Air dryers, meanwhile, increase the numbers of all sorts of bacteria by 255 percent! That’s because the dryers either suck up germs and then spew them back out, or people don’t spend the necessary time under the heat to kill the germs. (For the record, I didn’t even consider those cloth hand towel machines that you still sometimes see. Not only are they usually jammed, they are disgusting, coated with what I can only guess are layers of untold germs.)

So in a way, the bathroom dilemma remains. Faced with doing something for the sake of the planet versus the sake of my health, I quickly stop worrying about melting polar ice caps. There is, of course, always a third option — I can wipe my wet hands on my jeans.

Rebecca Clarren writes from Portland, Ore.

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.

    Domino's

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.

    Arby's/Facebook

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.

    KFC

    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    Pizzagamechangers.com

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.

    7-Eleven

    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>