See? See why I get hysterical?!?

Research shows that subtle sexism is more damaging to women's self-esteem than glaring examples.

Topics: Broadsheet, Love and Sex,

One of the most irritating side effects of being a self-identified feminist is constantly being told that instances of sexism I point out aren’t really there, and that I’m “just looking for things to get pissed off about.” (Actually, plenty of them drop in my lap without my ever having to look.) The problem is, most sexism isn’t “Iron my shirt!” blatant. Most of it can be explained away, however poorly, by something else. They wouldn’t mind hiring a woman — just not any of the women who applied! They don’t want to punish women for having sex — they’re just trying to protect the wee unborn babies! He doesn’t think all women are trollops and c***s — just his own wife! That sort of thing. Usually, whether a given action or statement is sexist is open to interpretation, and if your interpretation is, “Hell, yes, that was sexist,” you can bet someone will soon come along and explain that you’re hysterically overreacting. Just like a woman.

But the problem with dismissing all but the most obvious examples of sexism is, those aren’t even the ones that really hurt. A study by Leiden University doctoral candidate Sezgin Cihangir recently confirmed what many women have learned the hard way: Glaring sexism is easy to brush off, but the more ambiguous forms are the ones that nibble away at your self-esteem. To conduct his study, Cihangir set up mock job interviews, during which women were asked sexist questions. After the interviews, all of the candidates were rejected — but half were told it was because they’d given the wrong answers, and the other half were told it was because they were women.



Those in the latter group were able to take the rejection in stride, knowing the blame lay with the chauvinistic jerks who’d interviewed them. But the other women, says Cihangar, “looked for the reason for their rejection in themselves, which resulted in a low self-image and poorer performance in tests such as IQ tests.” See how it works? Blaming oneself for other people’s sexism leads to poor performance, which leads to more chauvinistic jerks thinking women can’t compete: A perfect Ouroboros of suck for the ladies. That’s why some of us put so much effort into calling out the subtle stuff where we see it, in case you were wondering. We’re not looking for reasons to get pissed off — we’re trying to help other women get pissed off at the people who really deserve it instead of themselves.

Kate Harding is the co-author of "Lessons From the Fatosphere: Quit Dieting and Declare a Truce With Your Body" and has been a regular contributor to Salon's Broadsheet.

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>