Responses from a platoon of reporters, bloggers, commentators, academics and policy wonks on the meaning of Obama's victory.

Reuters/Kevin Lamarque
A man signs a message board dedicated to President-elect Barack Obama in front of Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Nov. 6, 2008.
Everyone agrees that Barack Obama’s election sent a powerful message to the country and the world, that it was and is a meaningful moment.
But what, exactly, does it mean?
I solicited a platoon of reporters, bloggers, commentators, academics and policy wonks on what they think it means, forcing them to winnow down their answers to a single sentence that begins with the same two words: “It means …”
Here are more than three dozen responses, sorted alphabetically. Some are funny, others serious; many are poignant, a few are edgy.
But all of them, I think, are pretty darn good. Here goes:
It means we can see the end of Nixonland from here.
– Spencer Ackerman, senior reporter, the Washington Independent
It means “hope” is not a four-letter word … but “Bush” is.
– Sean Aday, associate professor of media studies, George Washington University
It means you can run for office no matter your name.
– Kenneth Baer, Democratic speechwriter and principal, Baer Communication
It means the long national nightmare is over.
Dean Baker, economist, Center for Economic Policy Research
It means that after years of splintering divisiveness, we’re back in this together again.
– Jared Bernstein, economist, Economic Policy Institute
It means Americans are starting to realize that there’s nothing compassionate about conservatism.
– Brian Beutler, blogger, brianbeutler.com
It means the Union won, with unions.
– Lindsay Beyerstein, freelance journalist, majikthise.com
It means the era of conservatism is over.
– Michael Cohen, senior research fellow, New America Foundation
It means that this damned thing [conservatism] doesn’t work!
– Brian Cook, editor, In These Times (invoking Doc Brown)
It means the 9/11 era — of dealing with the world 9/11 created rather than using 9/11 as a political club — has finally begun.
– Brad DeLong, economics professor, UC-Berkeley
It means that James Cheney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman did not die in vain.
– Matthew Duss, research associate, Center for American Progress Action Fund
It means that my two sons will grow up in a country where everybody knows that an African-American can become president.
– Henry Farrell, assistant professor, George Washington University
It means the Democrats have two years to show they can govern through effective, progressive policymaking … tick, tick, tick.
– Tim Fernholz, writing fellow, the American Prospect
It means that, following the political equivalent of locusts, the plague, the trials of Job, and 40 years (more or less) in the wilderness, it is actually fun to be a Democrat again.
– Kathy Geier, the G Spot
It means the world is ready to follow if America is ready to lead.
– Mark Leon Goldberg, Undispatch.com
It means that we grabbed the steering wheel and pulled on the hand brake just before this bus called the U.S. of A. careened into the abyss.
– Jaana Goodrich, Echidne of the Snakes
It means that the Republican Party has to give up appeals to coded racism and accept the reality that United States is a multiethnic democracy.
– Jeet Heer, freelance journalist, Regina, Saskatchewan
It means that the conservative era is over, and a progressive one has a chance to begin.
– Michael Kazin, professor of history, Georgetown University
It means Barack Obama now has earned the additional challenge of showing that he’s not Bill Clinton, circa 1993, and that 2010 won’t be 1994.
– Ed Kilgore, managing editor, the Democratic Strategist
It means that the voters will punish incompetence, even at the cost of voting for intelligence and eloquence.
– Mark A.R. Kleiman, professor of public policy, UCLA
It means that the 9/11 era is over.
– Ezra Klein, senior editor, the American Prospect
It means the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.
– Joe Klein, columnist, Time
It means at least three Supreme Court justices who aren’t vetted by the religious right.
– Andrew Leonard, Salon
It means the end of the great national nightmare that began on April 12, 1861, when Americans began the long struggle to determine what an American is — that the hue of a citizen’s skin does not determine their value to themselves and their fellow citizens of this great experiment.
– Robert Mackey, historian and consultant, Washington, D.C.
It means that sometimes being “pro-America” means different things to voters than to politicians.
– Mike Madden, Salon
It means that I will see a Latino president and Supreme Court justice in my lifetime.
– Sylvia Manzano, political scientist, Texas A&M University
It means the North has won the Civil War.
– Harold Meyerson, Washington Post columnist and American Prospect editor at large
It means market fundamentalism no longer has a veto and it is now possible to build an economy with widely shared prosperity.
– Larry Mishel, Economic Policy Institute
It means America is not afraid!
– Dayo Olopade, reporter, the Root
It means there is more to America than is dreamt in Karl Rove’s philosophy.
– Harold Pollack, public health researcher and writer, University of Chicago
It means that the term “proud conservative” is now more toxic than “San Francisco liberal” ever was.
– Sarah Posner, columnist, the American Prospect
It means the Democrats have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make good on some bold promises.
– Eric Rauchway, professor of history, UC-Davis
It means national conversations about sexism and homophobia are up next.
– Alyssa Rosenberg, staff correspondent, Government Executive
It means, as a friend in Tbilisi, Georgia, said to me today, that our nation managed to “push the reset button,” and in one action, revived all the wonderful, idealistic overtones that go with the word “America.”
– Jeremy Rosner, Democratic pollster, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research
It means power even that seems at times absolute is ultimately fleeting.
– Laura Rozen, journalist, Mother Jones
It means, as ever, that America is capable of surprising itself — and the world.
– Tom Schaller, Salon
It means I can start watching State of the Union addresses and presidential news conferences once again, without feeling embarrassed.
– Gary Segura, political scientist, Stanford University
It means Barack Obama will be able to get a cab in New York anytime he wants.
– Adam Serwer, the American Prospect
It means that some right-wing entrepreneur will be on the market with the “Obama Countdown Clock” within the week.
– Walter Shapiro, Salon
It means that we can finally have someone represent the black community to mainstream America who isn’t Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or wearing a summertime fur coat and platinum chains.
– Jesse Taylor, founder and editor, Pandagon.net
It means sunset has arrived after Reagan’s morning in America, and it’s now the optimistic dawn of a bright new day.
– Mark Thoma, Economist’s View
It means the beginning of the end of a nightmare that began on Nov. 4, 1980.
– Jonathan Weiler, political scientist, UNC Chapel Hill
It means that principled, visionary domestic and foreign policy need not come at the expense of morality and justice.
– Patricia Weitsman, political scientist, Ohio University
Baseless Condi Rice speculation making a comeback
Updated: To celebrate its return, a brief history of this variety of pundit fantasy writing
Condoleezza Rice (Credit: Reuters)
[UPDATED BELOW] Joseph Curl, former White House correspondent for the Washington Times, is bringing me back to the good old days of 2006 in his latest opinion column for the conservative paper. It’s a breathless report that Condoleezza Rice will seek the vice presidency, and it’s a classic of the genre.
Any amateur can speculate that Chris Christie will enter the presidential race, or posit a Mike Bloomberg third-party run, or imagine Hillary Clinton launching a primary challenge against Barack Obama. After all, those three have actually won elections and expressed political ambitions. It takes a real pro to decide to build buzz around someone who not only hasn’t ever run for anything, but who’s never expressed a desire to run for anything.
Rice, the national security advisor in George W. Bush’s first presidential term and secretary of state in his second, is currently a professor at Stanford with the requisite right-wing think tank fellowship. She has not said or done anything “political” in years. But Curl has been hearing things!
America’s first black female secretary of state is quietly positioning herself to be the top choice of the eventual Republican presidential nominee, ready to deliver bona fide foreign-policy credentials lacking among the candidates. The 56-year-old has recently raised her profile, releasing her memoir in November and embarking on a monthlong book tour.
After 2 1/2 years as a professor at Stanford, Miss Rice is reportedly getting “antsy” to get back into the political game. “She’s ready to go,” said one top source.
Oh, a month-long tour in support of her book about her time in the Bush administration! She must be running for vice president, along with Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney and Scott McClellan and George W. Bush.
There’s more. (And not just the part where Curl calls Rice “a spicy Rice dish” and waxes fetishistic about “her guns” being “a match for those of our first lady Michelle Obama.”)
Plus, her selection would be a giant chess move to counter the expected replacement of Vice President Joseph R. Biden with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Sure, the White House denies and denies, but that should really make any political watcher more suspicious. One White House insider even told me that the position swap was the only reason Mrs. Clinton joined the administration in the first place.
Curl has so many inside scoops packed into this column! I had no idea that our first presidential running mate swap since Ford’s 1976 campaign was basically a foregone conclusion and not just a weird Beltway journalist fantasy! But yes, I can see why the still un-chosen GOP candidate would definitely be looking pretty closely at Rice — who’s been strongly making the case for her selection by not explicitly denying interest in the position — in case Obama replaces Biden with Clinton, which he will surely do.
The column gets worse (“Funny thing is, she is, unlike Barack Obama, an ‘American black’”) but that’s not really important. What’s important is exploring how someone like Condoleezza Rice ends up a perennial name on the fantasy ticket list.
Rice has been a subject of these columns since 2005, when she became Bush’s second secretary of state, and the White House tasked communications operative Jim Wilkinson — previously known best for inventing the false story of Jessica Lynch* — with getting Rice (and her boss) some much-needed positive press. Wilkinson did his job beautifully (remember when Rice’s knee-high boots were a topic of actual serious news coverage for weeks?) and Rice began receiving the “rock star” treatment.
In the Washington Post, Glenn Kessler, author of the 2007 Rice bio “The Confidante,” summarized the exact moment of the birth of the presidential speculation:
In March 2005, before Rice sat for an interview with the Washington Times, Wilkinson slipped a note to the editorial page editor, Tony Blankley, suggesting that she be asked whether she would consider running for president. It was an audacious proposal — she had been secretary for only six weeks — but such speculation would bolster Rice’s image as a leader. (Wilkinson and Blankley said they do not recall the incident, but others present said they saw Wilkinson’s note.)
Oh, the Washington Times.
Shortly thereafter, Dick Morris wrote a book claiming — nay, insisting — that 2008 would be “Condi vs. Hillary.”
As Iraq descended into a violent civil war in 2006, Rice-for-president buzz bizarrely grew. There was enough of a false grass-roots movement for a paint-by-numbers AP trend piece with a silly nickname and everything. Tim Russert asked her point blank. As always, she said no in no uncertain terms.
Then, of course, everyone began to speculate that she’d be McCain’s running mate. Robert Novak claimed as much on Fox. Dan Senor said she was pushing for the pick on some Sunday show. Hendrik Hertzberg wrote a Talk of the Town piece on the subject! McCain and Rice both finally denied “reports” that she was angling for the spot on the ticket.
Now, I guess, it’s time to start up the rumor mill anew.
But before you put pen to paper on that column about how a Gingrich-Rice ticket would surely win moderate women in Ohio, consider this: In addition to the fact that she’s always denied wanting the job, and in addition to the fact that she was an unmitigated failure in the Bush administration, downplaying terrorism as a priority prior to 9/11 and selling the public on the Iraq invasion with untruths, Condi Rice is pro-choice.
*Update: Jon Krakauer recently rescinded his claim that Wilkinson, then a communications aide to General Tommy Franks, was responsible for the initial false Washington Post report on Lynch’s apparent heroics before her capture. Though Wilkinson was obviously involved in the PR campaign surrounding Lynch’s rescue and return to the U.S., he apparently isn’t responsible for falsifying her actions or leaking that false story to the press.
Breitbart shock: Obama was in same place at same time as New Black Panthers
Right-wingers once again try to connect the president to a fringe group of laughable conservative boogeymen
Members of the New Black Panther Party, including, Divine Allah, left, arrive for funeral services for 13-year-old shooting victim, Tamrah Leonard, at the Friendship Baptist Church in Trenton, N.J., Saturday, June 13, 2009. (Credit: AP/Mike Derer)
Andrew Breitbart’s loud, dumb BigGovernment site has a loud, dumb story about how Barack Obama “appeared and marched with the New Black Panther Party in 2007.” The occasion was the 42nd anniversary of the march from Selma, Alabama, and in addition to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Al Sharpton were also there, along with dozens of civil rights era luminaries and thousands of other people because it was a massive annual celebration and not actually an Obama campaign event.
The New Black Panther Party is a cartoonish fringe group of a couple guys who play “’60s radical” dress-up and say mean things about whitey for Fox cameras in order to scare old white people. They have been explicitly rejected by the old Black Panther Party. For some reason, various conservatives have dedicated themselves to proving that this weird, marginal group of Nation of Islam cast-offs is somehow supported by or deeply connected to the Democratic Party and the Obama administration in particular, because, you know, Eric Holder and Barack Obama, those are two guys who very obviously share the values of extremist anti-white proponents of racial separation.
So Breitbart “proves” something or other about the essential anti-white racistness of the Obama campaign by noting that members of the inane New Black Panther Party were spotted by cameras near Obama, at various times, and also NBPP head Malik Zulu Shabazz spoke at the event.
(Brietbart goes on to publish two pictures of the event despite the photographer withholding permission, because “The First Amendment allows photographs of such enormous public importance to see the light of day.” Good luck with that argument in court?)
Andrew C. McCarthy gleefully endorses Breitbart’s story in a breathless post at the National Review’s The Corner:
This is a shocking story, and a breathtaking indictment of the mainstream media which went out of its way to avoid vetting Obama as a candidate — and to make sure anyone who tried to do due diligence got no sunshine. A candidate who chose to appeared in the company of, say, the KKK, would have provoked relentlessly hostile media coverage and, in short order, have been marginalized as disqualified to hold responsible elective office.
If only the media had reported that some fringe weirdos also participated in this event that both Democratic candidates and thousands of other people participated in, and then the fringe weirdos sort of followed Obama around for a while. That would’ve opened America’s eyes! (I mean the media besides NPR, which did report that the NBPP was there.)
Here’s the bit of this sad, desperate reach that is the saddest and most desperate: “Andrew further reminds us that, in March 2008, the Obama campaign website posted an endorsement of Obama by the New Black Panther Party.” Whoa, did they really? Shocking if true! It is, of course, not true. It was a user-generated blog post on the Obama campaign site that the campaign removed as soon as they became aware of its existence. Because websites do not “post” things to themselves, generally, McCarthy’s statement can’t even be charitably described as technically accurate. It’s just a lie.
A random stupid incorrect Breitbart smear is worth paying attention to only to the extent that the smear threatens to bubble up to the more reputable conservative press, or Fox, or Republican elected officials. The McCarthy endorsement means keep an eye on this one!
Palins give free publicity to book bashing Palins
Joe McGinniss' "The Rogue" gets a big marketing boost from its subject's classic (and predictable) overreaction
Sarah Palin
Here, according to the National Enquirer, are the shocking revelations in Joe McGinniss’ new book about Sarah Palin, “The Rogue”:
- She has done drugs.
- She had sex with a basketball player before she married Todd.
- She is mean and petty.
- She is a bad mother.
- She had an affair after she married Todd.
There is also, obviously, some stuff about Trig’s birth, but I have not yet read the book, so I couldn’t tell you how far down the rabbit hole that goes.
Here’s my reaction to those revelations: Sarah Palin is a person! She’s done drugs and pissed people off and slept with people, like 90 percent of American humans. If Sarah Palin was smart she’d dismiss the book with a chuckle, say nobody’s perfect, laugh off the “gossip,” and move on.
Sarah Palin might not be smart.
The Palins always prefer grand self-pitying martyrdom to quiet dignity, of course, which is why picking on them can be so profitable: They will always respond, and always help you drum up more publicity for your Palin-attacking venture. Instead of depriving the book of oxygen, they launched a multimedia attack on Joe McGinniss before he’d finished the first draft, and what they accomplished was … giving him more material and ensuring that even more breathless anticipation awaited the book’s release.
Now that the book’s rollout is underway, the Palins might as well get paid for their marketing efforts. Todd Palin angrily denounced it, again accusing McGinniss of having a “creepy obsession” with Sarah Palin. Oooh, it’s so creeeepy to write an unauthorized biography of a prominent public figure, right?
How bad did the Palins allowed themselves to be trolled? Sarah Palin’s people released a statement on behalf of Brad Hanson, Todd Palin’s former business partner, with whom Sarah Palin is alleged to have carried on an extramarital affair, some years back. The statement is a blanket denial, but what does having the supposed beau directly address the press accomplish, exactly? It just drives more interest in the book’s salacious, shocking revelations about the secret life of Sarah Palin. This guy, of all guys, should be kept out of it.
I am sure that Todd and everyone else is very personally pissed off that McGinniss went to Wasilla, talked to a bunch of people who hate them, and published a book full of stories about how bad and awful they are, but blowing up publicly just sends the message that there’s stuff in the book worth getting worked up about.
Will “Joe the Plumber” run for Congress?
And if so, how many minutes will it take for him to say something embarrassing to a reporter? Ten?
“Joe the Plumber,” a man named Sam who is not a plumber, may run for Congress. Joe, a briefly famous desperate attempt by the John McCain campaign to paint Barack Obama as an enemy of the working man, is mulling a run against Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, who’s been in the House since 1983. Joe told Yahoo’s “The Ticket” his thoughts on the potential campaign:
“I’m not ruling anything out,” Wurzelbacher told The Ticket in an interview Thursday. He added that he thought it was an “interesting idea” and that people have been asking him to run for office since he confronted Obama four years ago. He’s spent much of his time since then on the speaker’s circuit, he said, encouraging others to run for office.
“I like the idea of it — just regular Americans running. If a regular guy runs, right away the media’s going to attack him,” Wurzelbacher said. “What kind of education does he have? What does he know about this? My answer to that is, regular Americans aren’t experts, but dammit, look where the experts have gotten us. Maybe we need some regular guys in there. That’s what I’ve been doing the past two and a half years, just encouraging regular Americans to run. Tell the liberal media to go to hell and I don’t care what you guys say about me, I’m going to try to fix this country.”
Man, I hate it when people condescend to regular Americans! Especially when people like Joe the Plumber condescend to “regular Americans.” Regular Americans don’t have publicity agents, Joe!
The local Republican Party is begging Mr. The Plumber to enter the race, because while running against a 30-year veteran is usually a pointless task, a pseudo-celebrity candidate can at least make a game of it. Kaptur won with 60 percent of the vote in 2010 and 74 percent in 2008, though there’s a chance redistricting could make her vulnerable. (Kaptur also introduced a bill restoring Glass-Steagall! So basically I like her.)
Local Republicans say there’s about a 90 percent chance Joe will enter the race, at which point once again he will be asked questions on camera and he will say embarrassing things, like he did last time.
But as dumb and small-minded and tiresome as Joe the Plumber is, there’s no reason why he couldn’t be a congressman. Ben Quayle is!
Sheriff Joe: Birther?
Arizona's "toughest" lawman tells some kooks that he'll investigate the president's birth certificate
Joe Arpaio
Sheriff Joe Arpaio might be a birther, now. A quasi-birther, at least. WorldNetDaily “broke” the “news” that Arizona’s most civil rights-disregarding lawman “has agreed to examine evidence challenging the validity of Barack Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate in a determination of the president’s eligibility for the 2012 election ballot.” Which certainly sounds like a very good use of the resources of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, right? There is even a picture of Arpaio with Jerome Corsi, author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate,” a book whose title question was answered twice before publication:
Arpaio told the tea-party leaders that he expects political pressure, but he pointed out that as the chief law enforcement officer of Maricopa County, he’s taken an oath to respond to citizens who approach him about enforcing the law.
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Justin Griffin confirmed to WND that Arpaio is “waiting to receive all the documentation and all the investigative material from Dr. Jerry Corsi, and then he will look into the matter and compare it to the Arizona revised statutes.”
Ha. Ha ha ha. He picked a great time to join this particular conspiracy theory, months after the president released his original birth certificate, to complement the first, perfectly legally valid one he released years ago. In August of 2011 you really have to be a colossal moron to still believe that the president’s birthplace and presidential eligibility are seriously in doubt. So kudos, Sheriff Joe, for either being a colossal moron or being too scared of a small minority of colossal morons to actually say the truth, which is that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, which is at this point better documented than Arpaio’s own citizenship status. (He looks kinda French, to me.) Even Governor Jan Brewer is smart enough to reject birtherism, and she can barely form sentences.
Arpaio “clarified” his stand by… confirming that he’s looking into it.
“What I have agreed to do, contrary to some published media reports, is simply look at the evidence these people have assembled and examine whether it is within my jurisdiction to investigate the document’s authenticity,” Arpaio said in a written statement Friday.
In the time it took you to write that statement, Sheriff Joe, you could’ve concluded the investigation. With one Google search!
Page 1 of 602 in 2008 Elections
The Internet makes magic disappear
The case for a global currency
Bridging the Irish-Italian divide
Paul Gauguin’s Polynesian “paradise”
Taking sex out of the city
“Walking Dead” creator: Get ready for breakneck pace
Female soldiers fight the brass ceiling
Catholic tribalism and the contraceptive flap
Salman Rushdie fears nothing
The two Americas clash at CPAC 

