Re-outing Charlie Crist

A new film about closeted gay Republicans attacks the media's hesitation about outing, but doesn't deliver any surprises of its own.

Topics: War Room, Charlie Crist, Florida Senate Race,

A movie premiering at the Tribeca Film Festival this week is bound to cause at least a little bit of outrage. That’s not surprising, considering it’s, well, called “Outrage,” and is a documentary made by a former aide in the Clinton White House about about closeted gay politicians.

I haven’t seen the film, but from what I’ve read, the promise that it will actually out some politicians seems to be overhyped. From the list compiled by the Los Angeles Times, it appears that most of the people targeted in the movie have been outed to one extent or another already.

The person most reviewers have been focusing on is Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who was recently married — his engagement was announced right around the time when speculation was mounting that he could be chosen as John McCain’s running mate. He was actually first outed back in 2006, by Bob Norman, a reporter for the New Times Broward-Palm Beach, who was also the first reporter to the story of former Rep. Mark Foley’s sexuality, in 2003.

That said, just because there’s not much news to the film doesn’t mean it’s not a important discussion worth having. The issue is one I’ve been thinking about since my earliest days on staff at Salon, when, in the wake of the Foley scandal, I wrote two articles (they’re available here and here) about a number of semi-closeted gay Republicans, the ethics of outing and the media’s attitude about it. Some people, like the makers of “Outrage,” follow what’s known as the “Barney Frank rule,” for its creator, openly gay Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass. In short, the guideline is that it’s acceptable to out those people who, from the closet, are working against what’s believed to be the interest of the LGBT community at large.

You can debate the propriety of that, and plenty of people do. But the double standard in the media about reporting on sexual orientation – same-sex relationships are treated as something that should be kept secret, but no such judgment is made about heterosexual relationships — is potentially harmful in many different ways.



First of all, it means that we don’t hear about the sexuality of some prominent people who are gay, from Foley to singer George Michael and many others, until there’s some scandal involved. That only reinforces the old stereotype of gay people as deviant. So does the feeling in the media that gay people should be especially protected from having their sexuality publicized. As Larry Gross, director of the School of Communication in USC’s Annenberg School, and the author of “Contested Closets: The Politics and Ethics of Outing,” told me back in 2006, “You can talk about certain things about heterosexual public figures where in the context of gay public figures you can’t talk about much milder things… I think the exaggerated concern over that reveals the distaste, the stigma and all that rather than the fact that this is such a delicate matter.”

And, in cases like Crist’s, it means that the media knows something its audience doesn’t, and is holding back information about people who are running for public office. When his engagement was announced, there was largely no discussion of what most every national political reporter was probably thinking. What there was instead was a sort of inside joke, which was easy to catch if you were in on the secret, but not obvious to most readers and viewers. MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, for example, could barely suppress an impish smile when talking about the news. It’s time to move past that in some form or another, and if the movie helps in that respect, then that’s a good thing — even if it’s not actually outing anyone itself.

Alex Koppelman is a staff writer for Salon.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.

    Domino's

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.

    Arby's/Facebook

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.

    KFC

    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    Pizzagamechangers.com

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.

    7-Eleven

    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>