Ralph Lauren owns up to Photoshop disaster

The designer admits the egregious digital slimming of a model was the company's fault -- just a bit too late

Topics: Broadsheet, Health,

Ralph Lauren owns up to Photoshop disaster

If you were starting to get all excited about magazines vowing to use “normal” size models, or designers sending plus-size women out on the runway, or size-12 Crystal Renn getting high-fashion work that would normally go to a much thinner model, you need only visit the blog Photoshop Disasters for a reality check regarding just how bad things remain. The digital slimming and elongating (not to mention disfiguring) of already tall and thin models continues apace.

Recently, Photoshop Disasters highlighted a Ralph Lauren ad in which a model was reduced to the point where, as the blogger pointed out, her head was bigger than her pelvis. Xeni Jardin reproduced the image in a post at Boing Boing with the brilliant title “Ralph Lauren opens new outlet store in the Uncanny Valley” — only to be slapped with a DMCA takedown notice from Lauren’s lawyers, claiming copyright infringement. (It almost certainly wasn’t; fair use allows for the reproduction of an image for comment or criticism.) Boing Boing editor Cory Doctorow then wrote a post explaining:

One of the things that makes [Boing Boing's ISP] Priority Colo so awesome is that they don’t automatically act on DMCA takedowns. Instead, they pass them on to us and we talk about whether they pass the giggle-test.

This one doesn’t.

So, instead of responding to their legal threat by suppressing our criticism of their marketing images, we’re gonna mock them.



And mock they did. Later, Mark Frauenfelder considered the possibility that the Photoshop job was a malicious prank Lauren and company never approved, but still wondered, “If the photo was manipulated after it appeared in the advertisement, why didn’t Ralph Lauren’s law firm make mention of that in their silly DMCA takedown notice?”

Because that wasn’t the case, as it turns out. On Thursday, Polo Ralph Lauren released a statement saying, “For over 42 years we have built a brand based on quality and integrity. After further investigation, we have learned that we are responsible for the poor imaging and retouching that resulted in a very distorted image of a woman’s body. We have addressed the problem and going forward will take every precaution to ensure that the caliber of our artwork represents our brand appropriately.”

Eh, I’ll give ‘em a few golf claps for that, I guess — only for being just savvy enough to recognize that they lost the P.R. war and needed a new strategy. It fascinates me to see how quickly corporations do or do not catch on to how word of mouth works in the age of social media, and/or how counterproductive it can be to bully bloggers to shut up, rather than simply admitting a mistake. If Polo Ralph Lauren had issued that statement immediately, it actually would have balanced out the negative impression that ad gave me of its company, because I can easily see how something like that could go out into the world without higher-ups’ knowledge — but I certainly cannot see how anyone could ignore or attempt to justify it once it’s pointed out. Instead, the company’s first response was an old-fashioned attempt to shut down criticism, cover up the major goof, and hope few people ever heard about it and the rest would forget. That’s not how it works these days, when ordinary consumers finally have a potentially enormous platform for publicly airing grievances, and Polo Ralph Lauren’s failure to recognize that change has damaged the brand’s image in my mind a lot more than the disastrous Photoshop job did. 

Kate Harding is the co-author of "Lessons From the Fatosphere: Quit Dieting and Declare a Truce With Your Body" and has been a regular contributor to Salon's Broadsheet.

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.

    Domino's

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.

    Arby's/Facebook

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.

    KFC

    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    Pizzagamechangers.com

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.

    7-Eleven

    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>