The deadly new stats on abortion bans

Global study reconfirms: Limits on the procedure don't lower its rate -- only its safety

Topics: Abortion, Broadsheet,

So do you want the good news, or the bad news? OK-, first good: According to a major just-released report (PDF) from the Guttmacher Institute, increased use of contraception has helped decrease unintended pregnancy worldwide. (Globally, the percentage of married and of sexually active single women of childbearing age with access to contraception has increased from 54 percent in 1990 to 63 percent in 2003.) Abortions, ergo, are down as well, from an estimated 45.5 million procedures in 1995 to 41.6 million in 2003. In Eastern Europe, where a decade ago abortion was commonly, and infamously, used to limit or space births, the abortion rate was so high it threw off the curve. Now, abortion in that region has dropped by a whopping 50 percent, thanks to the wider availability of actual birth control.

But. To put a not-so-fine point on it, when we say abortions are down, we mean certain abortions are down. The estimated number of unsafe abortions actually “changed little” during the same period, says the study. Ditto the rate of unsafe abortion: from 15 in 1,000 to … 14 in 1,000. Yes, that’s the bad news. In fact, the study found (again), abortion occurs at about the same rate in places where it’s legal and in places where it’s restricted.

In other words: Bans do nothing. Except kill women. (Making their success rate, and irony factor, analogous to that of a virginity pledge.) Specifically: About 70,000 women die each year of complications from unsafe abortion, an estimate that — should it sound familiar — has hardly changed in 10 years. An estimated 8 million women per year experience complications requiring medical treatment. (Only 5 million receive that treatment. Even when quality post-abortion care is available, the study says, “distance, cost and the stigma often associated with Abortion can discourage women from seeking treatment.”) Another new Guttmacher study also found that “the costs of treating medical complications from unsafe abortion constitute a significant financial burden on public health care systems in the developing world.” (Treating complications from unsafe abortion costs Africa and Latin America alone up to $280 million each year.)

You Might Also Like

Let’s put it this way: Because of death — wholly preventable death — by unsafe abortion, an estimated quarter million children grow up without a mother. “Restrictive abortion laws are an unacceptable infringement of women’s human rights and of medical ethics,” says the study. “Eliminating unsafe abortion and providing access to safe abortion would reduce ill health, death and lost years of productivity among women, and avert the financial burden of treating related health complications. Achieving these goals would lead to enormous individual and societal benefits — for women, their families and countries as a whole.” File all that under What More Data Could You Possibly Need? (Or, depending on your mood, under “How Dare You Call Abortion a ‘Convenience’”?)

“The progress made during the past decade in increasing contraceptive use and reducing the need for abortion is fundamentally good news — the world is moving in the right direction,” added Sharon Camp, president and CEO of the Guttmacher Institute, in a statement. “And yet, we still have two widely disparate realities. In almost all developed countries, abortion is safe and legal. But in much of the developing world, abortion remains highly restricted, and unsafe abortion is common and continues to damage women’s health and threaten their survival.”

Eighty-six percent of reproductive-age women in the developing world live under highly restrictive abortion laws, according to the study.

(And in the U.S., 87 percent of counties, as we know, have no abortion provider. Yet the number of abortions here is among the highest in the developed world, according to the study. Guttmacher blames this in part on inconsistencies in, cough cough, insurance coverage of contraceptives.)

So there’s much to be done both at home and abroad. “The findings are an urgent call to action for governments around the world, including the United States, which is well-positioned to be a leader in helping prevent unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions worldwide,” study co-author Gilda Sedgh, ScD, told Broadsheet. “The Obama administration has already reprioritized international family planning assistance by removing funding restrictions — i.e., the Global Gag Rule and funding for UNFPA. The administration and Congress have also proposed funding increases for international family planning services despite the tough fiscal environment.”

The findings also support increasing foreign aid to international family planning programs and reexamining restrictive policies such as the 1973 Helms Amendment, which is like the Hyde Amendment with a Eurail pass. (The Helms bars the U.S. from paying for safe abortion services overseas.)

“Our findings demonstrate that restricting access to safe abortion does not reduce the number of abortions performed, but rather increases the number of complications and deaths that women suffer as a result of the induced abortions they procure. U.S. policies are more likely to succeed in preserving the health of women if they are aimed at ensuring that safe services are available,” said Sedgh.

We also need to ask: How safe is “safe”? What kind of access do women have to abortion worldwide? We know well that here, states throw up cruel, specious roadblocks that severely limit access to a legal medical procedure — one that becomes less safe as it is delayed. Likewise, in countries such as India and South Africa, the study notes, abortion is broadly available, but “access to services provided by qualified personnel is uneven.”

This study is a reminder — one we should hardly need — that global maternal health is global health. Even, literally, the health of the planet. A recent editorial in the Lancet  queried why so few countries have realized the role that contraceptives and family planning — as population control — could play in limiting the effects of global warming.

All the more reason — as if more were required — to keep these people out of, well, everything.

Award-winning journalist Lynn Harris is author of the comic novel "Death by Chick Lit" and co-creator of She also writes for the New York Times, Glamour, and many others.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Martyna Blaszczyk/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 1

    Pond de l'Archeveche - hundreds thousands of padlocks locked to a bridge by random couples, as a symbol of their eternal love. After another iconic Pont des Arts bridge was cleared of the padlocks in 2010 (as a safety measure), people started to place their love symbols on this one. Today both of the bridges are full of love locks again.

    Anders Andersson/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 2

    A bird's view of tulip fields near Voorhout in the Netherlands, photographed with a drone in April 2015.

    Aashit Desai/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 3

    Angalamman Festival is celebrated every year in a small town called Kaveripattinam in Tamil Nadu. Devotees, numbering in tens of thousands, converge in this town the day after Maha Shivratri to worship the deity Angalamman, meaning 'The Guardian God'. During the festival some of the worshippers paint their faces that personifies Goddess Kali. Other indulge in the ritual of piercing iron rods throughout their cheeks.

    Allan Gichigi/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 4

    Kit Mikai is a natural rock formation about 40m high found in Western Kenya. She goes up the rocks regularly to meditate. Kit Mikai, Kenya

    Chris Ludlow/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 5

    On a weekend trip to buffalo from Toronto we made a pit stop at Niagara Falls on the Canadian side. I took this shot with my nexus 5 smartphone. I was randomly shooting the falls themselves from different viewpoints when I happened to get a pretty lucky and interesting shot of this lone seagull on patrol over the falls. I didn't even realize I had captured it in the shot until I went back through the photos a few days later

    Jassen T./National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 6

    Incredibly beautiful and extremely remote. Koehn Lake, Mojave Desert, California. Aerial Image.

    Howard Singleton/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 7

    Lucky timing! The oxpecker was originally sitting on hippo's head. I could see the hippo was going into a huge yawn (threat display?) and the oxpecker had to vacate it's perch. When I snapped the pic, the oxpecker appeared on the verge of being inhaled and was perfectly positioned between the massive gaping jaws of the hippo. The oxpecker also appears to be screeching in terror and back-pedaling to avoid being a snack!

    Abrar Mohsin/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 8

    The Yetis of Nepal - The Aghoris as they are called are marked by colorful body paint and clothes

    Madeline Crowley/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 9

    Taken from a zodiac raft on a painfully cold, rainy day

    Ian Bird/National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest

    National Geographic Traveler Photo Contest Entries

    Slide 10

    This wave is situated right near the CBD of Sydney. Some describe it as the most dangerous wave in Australia, due to it breaking on barnacle covered rocks only a few feet deep and only ten metres from the cliff face. If you fall off you could find yourself in a life and death situation. This photo was taken 300 feet directly above the wave from a helicopter, just as the surfer is pulling into the lip of the barrel.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>