The year of adjustments
Other nations rose, markets fell, and Obama was forced into a reactive role
Topics: Obama's First Year, Barack Obama
The first year of the Obama administration was largely reactive. The new president and his team spent their time cleaning up the extraordinary messes left for them — the financial crisis, the Great Recession, Guantánamo, exploding deficits, Iraq, deteriorating Afghanistan and Pakistan — and attempting to tackle problems left unaddressed for far too long — climate change and energy policy, healthcare reform, immigration reform.
In that regard the agenda of President Obama’s first year was determined to a great degree by the Bush administration’s strategic reaction to a global political and economic environment that has passed now. While President Obama cannot escape the governing inheritance left to him, he can do more to discard the outdated vision and rhetorical framework that came along too, and begin to offer a much more compelling, modern and Obama-ish take on the challenges ahead and how we must meet them.
At the core of this new vision must be a strategic response to the most significant transformation taking place in the world today, what Fareed Zakaria has called the “rise of the rest.” The 20 years of liberalization and globalization that has followed the collapse of communism has brought, with extraordinary rapidity, dozens of countries and billions of people into the modern world. Their growing geopolitical and economic might is creating a radically different global environment than America faced in the 20th century, and arguably even five to 10 years ago when the Bush administration made the strategic choices Obama is wrestling with today.
The true scope of this transformation is only really becoming apparent now, and it leaves our new president with the historic opportunity, and tremendous responsibility, to craft a comprehensive strategic response to this global “new politics” of the 21st century. It will also allow him to extricate himself from the anachronistic rhetorical framework suited for another day and another president.
At the core of this new strategy might be three main governing priorities:
Challenge America to raise its game: The global economy of the 21st century will be much more competitive for our companies, workers and capital than the century just past. If America is to maintain its standard of living in the face of what will be extraordinary competition coming from China, India, Brazil, Mexico and many other countries, we will have to raise our game, try harder, invest smarter, accelerate innovation, lessen our exposure to foreign energy sources, modernize our healthcare system, continuously upgrade our skills and radically improve our public schools.


Comments
0 Comments