Tim Geithner is a sore loser

The Treasury secretary has "reservations" about Obama's bank reform plan. Maybe he should think about a new job

Topics: Timothy Geithner, Wall Street, How the World Works, Paul Volcker,

The question of who is running the White House economic policy shop has been answered: It sure isn’t Tim Geithner, the Treasury secretary.

Citing anonymous sources, Reuters is reporting that Geithner has “reservations” about President Obama’s “Wall Street crackdown.”

Geithner is concerned that the proposed limits on big banks’ trading and size could impact U.S. firms’ global competitiveness, the sources said, speaking anonymously because Geithner has not spoken publicly about his reservations.

He also has concerns that the limits do not necessarily get at the heart of the problems and excesses that fueled the recent financial meltdown, the sources said.

What can we tell from this pusillanimous attempt to undermine Obama’s biggest regulatory initiative within hours of its unveiling? Simple: There was a big fight over the direction of regulatory reform policy at the White House, and Geithner lost. A good soldier would shut up and do his best to get in line — certainly, as Geithner’s superior, Obama has been unstinting in his defense of the Treasury secretary, and at no small cost to his own standing with progressives. But instead, we get sour grapes comments about “global competitiveness” — standard conservative boilerplate when free-market ideologues argue against any kind of regulation that might put a crimp on private enterprise.

At great cost to my own credibility with Salon readers, I’ve defended Tim Geithner for a lot longer than I should have. I thought he did a reasonably good job stabilizing the financial sector at a time when panic reigned supreme. I thought he had as a good a handle as anyone on the danger that unregulated derivatives trading posed to the overall financial system — dating all the way back to the first post of mine that mentioned his name, way back in 2006. But at this point, he’s worn out his welcome.

One should still be cautious. Maybe these leaks are the work of people within the administration who are looking to embarrass Geithner. Or maybe, although I’ll admit this is unlikely, he’s pulling some kind of jujitsu move to give Obama cover with the left (See, if Geithner doesn’t like it, it must be good policy). But I don’t think so. If the Reuters story is true, Geithner has made it clear where his allegiances lie — with Wall Street. It’s time for him to go. Paul Volcker looked pretty full of energy Thursday morning, and he did a pretty good job as Federal Reserve chairman way back when. Maybe we should get a chance to see how he does as Treasury secretary.

Andrew Leonard

Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>