Why Obama should not pick Krugman for the Fed
The progressive Nobel Prize winner would set off some awesome fireworks, but never get confirmed
Topics: Ben Bernanke, How the World Works, Paul Krugman, Politics News
Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman gestures during his speech at a forum in Shanghai, China, May 12, 2009.
Although the global economic downturn was stabilizing, the stability was at a very low level, and a recovery was still very far ahead, Paul Krugman, Princeton Universitys Nobel Prize-winning economist, said at a forum in Shanghai Tuesday (May 12, 2009).(Imaginechina via AP Images) (Credit: Dycj - Imaginechina)Simon Johnson’s nomination of Paul Krugman as Federal Reserve chairman is a great idea, if only because the cantankerous Nobel Prize winner’s first appearance before a confirmation hearing would make riveting television. I would like nothing better than to watch Krugman face down the partisan questioning of Alabama’s Richard Shelby or Arizona’s Jon Kyl with the imperious rage we know so well from his columns and blog posts.
Krugman doesn’t suffer fools gladly, and there are a lot of fools on the Senate Banking and Finance Committee. It would be a match made in heaven. No more cautious equivocation, a la Geithner or Bernanke. No more quisling accommodation to Wall Street. Paul Krugman would take seriously the Fed’s responsibility to address unemployment, and would do everything in his power to push progressive goals.
Of course, that’s supposing he ever got past his confirmation hearing, which is a prospect that even he calls “crazy.” For a decade, Paul Krugman has been a unrepentant partisan warrior. He’s said many many very hurtful things about Republicans over the years. Nominating him would guarantee a Republican filibuster that might even garner a few Democratic votes — because Krugman is considerably to left of a significant number of Democratic senators.
Simon Johnson is a smart guy, but he’s dreaming if he thinks that Krugman would ever be confirmed in today’s political climate. So is there a case for doing it anyway, just for the filibuster fireworks? Is this where Obama should draw the line?
Johnson writes:
Would Krugman be opposed by the Republicans? Yes, potentially. And there could be quite a fight in the Senate — entirely of the Republicans making. But if they oppose his appointment — despite his qualifications and in the face of our weak economy — what signal would that send about their priorities?
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




State Roadblocks Could Complicate Marriage Momentum
House Democrats Dismiss Existence Of Obama Scandals
Comments
78 Comments