“Lost”: Caught in the maze of questions
The final season of the island thriller unravels in our clutches. So why can't we look away?
Topics: Lost, I Like to Watch, Television, Entertainment News
How did a character-driven drama with metaphysical undertones and a sociopolitical allegory at its core slowly devolve into a maze of dead ends and lingering questions? And how is it that every question posed on “Lost” (9 p.m. Tuesdays on ABC) is answered with another question?
These are the questions, questions, questions that haunt us when Tuesday night’s second episode of the final season of “Lost” begins – yes – with even more questions: How did Sayid come back to life? “What happened to me?” he asks, and then “Who are these people? What do they want?”
“It’s the Others, dude,” Hurley answers. “They caught us … again.”
Oh dear. It’s the Others (again), and they caught us (again). And just in case the repetitive nature of this show is, ahem, lost on you, the entire episode seems to be made up of nothing but questions.
“Who are you? Why are you holding us here?”
“I just lied to him, didn’t I?”
“So did they tell you why they burnt me with a hot poker?”
“Who do you care about, Kate?”
“So, what happened to your handcuffs?”
“Why are they after you? What did you do?”
Of course, after the discovery of the hatch or Charles Widmore’s evil corporation or the Dharma Initiative’s disturbing experiment, things really had to get simpler. Blaming misguided scientific experiments or some corporation? Maybe in 2005, but these days that stuff is beyond played. It’s the bread and butter of “Fringe” and, Christ, “Eureka!” and probably five or six shows on Nickelodeon and ABC Family, for that matter. No, far better just to scrap all of that and go back to the one thing that everyone scoffed at in the very beginning: the smoke monster!
And by the smoke monster, of course, we mean a pure, simple force of evil, now embodied in the dead, eeeeevil Locke. So even as the questions fly about, we’re just biding time, because all of the various folds that made this show intriguing – character studies, well-scripted flashbacks, unpredictable power struggles, retro eeriness that conjured up the Milgram obedience experiment – all of these things are flattened out into Good vs. Evil. In fact, everything about the current course of events feels like a retread of a really bad Indiana Jones movie (“Indy, cover your heart!”).
Heather Havrilesky is a regular contributor to the New York Times Magazine, The Awl and Bookforum, and is the author of the memoir "Disaster Preparedness." You can also follow her on Twitter at @hhavrilesky. More Heather Havrilesky.




Comments
40 Comments