Public employee unions: The GOP’s new whipping boy

State employees are the "new privileged class," says governor whose last job was cutting taxes for billionaires

Topics: U.S. Economy, War Room, Education, The Labor Movement,

Public employee unions: The GOP's new whipping boyThousands of people, some holding signs, fill the street near the New Jersey Statehouse during a rally Saturday, May 22, 2010, in Trenton, N.J., to protest Gov. Chris Christie's proposed budget cuts. Organizers say members of public employee unions hope a show of force will sway the state's top politicians to fight Christie. Gov. Christie has called for workers to accept wage freezes, and he's pushed for them to contribute toward their health benefits. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)(Credit: AP)

You know what we love doing in recessions? Dishing out blame. Conservatives think the housing bubble was inflated by liberal legislation, community activists and, ultimately, irresponsible poor people. Liberals think the job was done by risk addicts on Wall Street. But now that we’re in the tank, state governors of both parties are coming to agree on whose fault their current budget problems are.

Politico ran a story yesterday about how state politicians are turning against organized labor. In particular, unions representing government employees are now public enemies, as far as a pack of governors with tough budget-cutting to do are concerned.

The argument is that public sector unionism has run out of control. Critics say that unions, with their immense political strength, have managed to browbeat politicians, especially Democrats, and extract pay, benefits and privileges that are burdensome to the state and costly in a variety of ways to the public interest. With state budgets everywhere in the tank thanks to the recession, officials see unions sitting on an ill-gotten pile of cash.

As Politico sums up, public employee unions are “the whipping boys for a new generation of governors who, thanks to a tanking economy and an assist from editorial boards, feel freer than ever to make political targets out of what was once a protected liberal class of teachers, cops, and other public servants.”

In California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is in a protracted battle with his state’s large public employees unions. He argues, “People understand that they have to lay off their workers or they don’t have the money for their family. What they don’t like is when there is a certain group that doesn’t like to make the sacrifices.” Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn, a Democrat, recently signed a bill to rein in pensions. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie got attention recently for an angry exchange with a teacher, caught on video. “You don’t have to [teach],” Christie berated. Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, a likely presidential candidate, thinks there’s a margin to be had in public opinion here too. “If you inform the public and workers in the private sector about the inflated benefits and compensation packages of public employees, and then you remind the taxpayers that they’re footing the bill for that — they get on the reform train pretty quickly.”



Look, I’ll grant that public employee unionism is a more complicated issue than private sector unionism. Money that doesn’t go to factory workers goes to the company. But money that doesn’t go to cops or teachers will be spent by the public in some other way. And it’s also been documented pretty abundantly now that some public sector unions — in particular, the teachers and the prison guards — have defended harmful policies that benefit them. While I’m not generally sympathetic to management strategies for keeping up labor discipline, keeping teachers on task and effective is another issue. Likewise, you know who loves California’s poisonous three strikes law? The prison guards. You can guess why.

So, no, public sector unions don’t deserve all the sympathy that their private sector counterparts do. (Unfortunately, public sector unions are almost all that’s left of the union movement.) There are some legitimate complaints here. At the same time, it’s a pretty gross spectacle, when politicians who’ve spent their whole careers chipping away at the public obligations of the wealthy decide that it’s the state-employed middle-class — teachers, cops, firefighters and nurses — that’s to blame for everything. Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels epitomizes the problem, with an are-you-kidding-me quote given to Politico:

We have a new privileged class in America. We used to think of government workers as underpaid public servants. Now they are better paid than the people who pay their salaries. It’s a part of a very large question the nation’s got to face. Who serves whom here? Is the public sector — as some of us have always thought — there to serve the rest of society? Or is it the other way around?

In 2008-2009, the average Indiana teacher made $47,602. To call a teacher making that amount a member of the “new privileged class” takes some chutzpah. Has Daniels not heard any of the news from Wall Street for the last year or so? Or how about that time when his party opposed the stimulus bill almost unanimously, even though it mitigated the budget pain he’s now complaining about? Worst of all, Daniels was the director of the budget office in the first-term Bush White House. That makes him the author of the most unequal tax cuts in modern U.S. history. And he thinks nurses and the people who work at the DMV have lately obtained unfair new privilege?

I understand that the expression here is “public servant,” but guys like Daniels appear to want to take it literally. But the fact that democratic governments serve the people doesn’t literally make public sector workers into servants. When Daniels said these workers are the “new privileged class,” he was speaking in relative terms: they’re more privileged then he wants them to be, and it’s inconvenient to him and the rich people he represents. In other words, they’re uppity. Likewise for Christie and the teacher he yelled at. “You don’t have to teach” is one thought ahead of, “Do you know how easily I can replace you?” That’s not exactly inspirational material for a Teach for America promotional brochure, is it?

Not everything public employees’ unions do is great. But state workers are not servants, and making middle-class salaries doesn’t rocket them up to “newly privileged” status, either. They are workers — workers with unique responsibilities, but with rights and dignity nonetheless. For the GOP (and even some Democrats) to turn on them as the featherbedding, dollar-bill-burning villains behind state budget crunches is dishonest and nasty, when the party has consistently blocked any attempt to raise revenue from the actual privileged class, as well as opposed new stimulus measures at the federal level to take this pressure off states. People on the left wing should speak honestly about issues where union interests are an obstacle, like reforming schools and prisons. But if they don’t honor some obligations to workers, then what good is having a left wing anyway?

Gabriel Winant is a graduate student in American history at Yale.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>