Obama should be annoyed by the “professional left”
But that doesn't make it politically smart for his spokesman to say so!
Topics: White House, Barack Obama, Media Criticism
If nothing else, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs’ recent attack on the White House’s liberal critics demonstrates why frankness often backfires in politics. Speaking with a reporter from the Hill, Gibbs lampooned President Obama’s Democratic detractors in unfortunately sharp terms. His remarks sounded more like something a White House loyalist might say after hours in a bar than in a formal interview.
When he hears Democratic purists compare Obama to George W. Bush, Gibbs complained, “Those people ought to be drug tested.” People who accuse the administration of cutting too many deals with so-called centrists on issues like healthcare “wouldn’t be satisfied if Dennis Kucinich was president.”
The Cleveland congressman and two-time failed presidential candidate pretty much defines the Democrats’ left boundary. Praised by such luminaries as Ralph Nader and Gore Vidal, he won no primaries in 2004 or 2008. But what does Gibbs gain by lampooning him?
There’s more in the same vein. Critics on what Gibbs called “the professional left,” he maintained, will only be “satisfied when we have Canadian health care and we’ve eliminated the Pentagon. That’s not reality.”
Concise, memorable and all too true. I’ve long referred to the perfectionist wing of the Democratic Party as the “anti-gravity left” — educated idealists who confuse the American electorate with the inhabitants of such enlightened precincts as Berkeley, Calif., or Northampton, Mass. They’re living examples of the aphorism Bill Clinton borrowed from Voltaire about letting the perfect become the enemy of the good.
According to the Hill, the “White House, constantly under fire from expected enemies on the right, has been frustrated by nightly attacks on cable news shows catering to the left, where Obama and top lieutenants like Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel have been excoriated for … moving to the middle and bargaining on health care reform, as well as the financial regulatory overhaul and even the $787 billion economic stimulus package, which some liberals said should have been larger.”
On cue, professional lefty Jane Hamsher at Firedoglake.com showed her mettle by immediately excoriating the White House for cutting “sweetheart deals with the pharmaceutical industry in exchange for political patronage. … The problem is not that he’s fighting corporate America and losing. The problem is that all too often, it’s obvious that he’s fighting for the other side.”
Arkansas Times columnist Gene Lyons is a National Magazine Award winner and co-author of "The Hunting of the President" (St. Martin's Press, 2000). You can e-mail Lyons at eugenelyons2@yahoo.com. More Gene Lyons.



Comments
175 Comments