Larry Summers: Playing both sides on unemployment?
Conservatives claim Obama's economic advisor was against the welfare state before he was for it
Topics: Unemployment, How the World Works, Larry Summers, Politics News
White House Director of National Economic Council Larry Summers listens to a question from the audience after delivering the keynote address at the Future of Global Finance conference at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business in Washington, in this September 18, 2009 file photo. Blunt, brash, brainy and occasionally self-mocking. Larry Summers, the White House economic adviser, is all of these things. In a career spanning academia, government and finance, he has rubbed some people the wrong way and infuriated others. To match SPECIAL REPORT - SUMMERS REUTERS/Hyungwon Kang (UNITED STATES - Tags: BUSINESS POLITICS HEADSHOT)(Credit: © Hyungwon Kang / Reuters)Every single time HTWW considers the issue of whether unemployment benefits cause unemployment, a reader writes in with a big gotcha intended to put me in my place. Yesterday was no exception.
A great study done on this subject, by a notable economist, found: “prominent findings in labor economics is that unemployment insurance and welfare payments are a major contributor to unemployment, and therefore should be scaled back.”
By the way, that study is from Lawrence Summers who is the Director for the White House National Economics Council.
That’s the same Larry Summers, as the Wall Street Journal loves to point out, who now endorses extending unemployment benefits.
So what’s going on here? Yes, it is true that more that more than 20 years ago, Summers co-authored papers that found that unemployment insurance and welfare payments increased the unemployment rate and the length of time unemployed workers spent receiving benefits. Summers is forthright about this in an essay he wrote about unemployment for the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Even more alarming, from a progressive point of his view, was his conclusion that union organizing also hiked the unemployment rate.
But in that very same essay he includes an enormous caveat that has tremendous relevance to our current situation:
There is no question that some long-term unemployment is caused by government intervention and unions that interfere with the supply of labor. It is, however, a great mistake (made by some conservative economists) to attribute most unemployment to government interventions in the economy or to any lack of desire to work on the part of the unemployed. Unemployment was a serious economic problem in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries prior to the welfare state and widespread unionization. Unemployment then, as now, was closely linked to general macroeconomic conditions. The Great Depression, when unemployment in the United States reached 25 percent, is the classic example of the damage that collapses in credit can do. Since then, most economists have agreed that cyclical fluctuations in unemployment are caused by changes in the demand for labor, not by changes in workers’ desires to work, and that unemployment in recessions is involuntary.
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




Fox News Involvement May Spark Republican Outrage Over DOJ Media Spying
Liberal Super PAC Had Secret Bain Ties
Obama Went Off Script To Address Gay Grads Directly At Morehouse College
President Obama Addresses Gay College Grads During Morehouse Commencement Ceremony
Comments
9 Comments