James O'Keefe

James O’Keefe defends “sex boat” prank by saying it wouldn’t have been that gross

The conservative activist says he only would've "seduced" CNN's Abbie Boudreau if she really wanted him to

  • more
    • All Share Services

James O'Keefe defends James O'Keefe

Conservative provocateur James O’Keefe hasn’t done much worth crowing about since he took down ACORN with misleadingly edited secret videotapes. He was feted as a right-wing celebrity. He got arrested for trying to sneak into a senator’s office under false pretenses. And then he had his attempted prank of a CNN reporter backfire when the reporter backed out after discovering that he planned to lure her onto a boat and “seduce” her. O’Keefe has responded, finally, to this last embarrassment. Unsurprisingly, he has no regrets, and the liberal media is the real guilty party.

O’Keefe’s defense — posted, of course, on Andrew Breitbart’s “Big Government” — rests on us believing that the prank-outlining document obtained by CNN was a draft that O’Keefe did not plan on actually following. He says ideas for stunts are sent to him all the time (like a fancy Hollywood producer!) and sometimes he approves of the idea behind a prank without endorsing everything about it.

As you can imagine in our line of work, we get lots of leads, ideas, schemes and “punked” style plans sent to us all the time. If you were to roam through my personal emails there are many outrageous plans, some parts of which I may approve of in principal with an “I like it” in an email thread. But I may well object to a host of things about the plan, though I like the objective.

When the CNN idea was pitched to me, I’ll admit that I liked the basic absurdity of meeting Abbie Boudreau on a boat and the idea of counter-seduction satire executed in a tame, humorous, non-threatening manner. After all, as all liberal reporters do, she was trying to “seduce” (a metaphor) me so she could get more for her story. It would be fun, I thought, to turn the tables in jest. However, I was repulsed by the over-the-top language and symbolism that was suggested in the memo that was sent to me, and never considered that for a moment.

The gross document in question wasn’t submitted by a fan. It was drafted by Ben Wetmore, with whom O’Keefe has worked for years. O’Keefe has called Wetmore his mentor. O’Keefe and his attempted phone-tampering buddies crashed at Wetmore’s Louisiana house the month of the Landrieu office incident.

The rest of O’Keefe’s defense lies in still not understanding why unwanted “seduction,” on a boat, under false pretenses, while being secretly filmed, might not just be considered harmless fun.

In my version, the reporter was never going to be placed in a threatening situation. She would have had to consent before being filmed and she was not going to be faux “seduced” unless she wanted to be. If a CNN reporter would be willing to engage in such a folly, it might even be more newsworthy than Rick Sanchez’s firing. (CNN also has Elliot Spitzer on payroll. He’s done more outrageous things than anything I’ve ever gotten in my in-box).

The sexually explicit document CNN is now “reporting” on was never going to be implemented as written. She saw how I was dressed that day, with my usual blazer and collared shirt. In the document she reported as being “authentic,” I was supposed to have been dressed with my chest exposed, slicked backed hair, with gold chains. That ought to have been a red flag the document was not a reflection of my true intentions. Ms. Boudreau was never going to be put in the bizarre situations outlined in the document CNN reported. There were no mirrors, sex tapes, blindfolds, fuzzy handcuffs, posters of naked women, or music. Sorry, you were not going to see my face saying the words “Bubble Headed Beach Blonde who comes on at 5” into a video camera. Those are Don Henley lyrics – and we know, thanks to Chuck DeVore, how much Henley loathes parody.

Not seduced unless she wanted to be! I mean, his “prank” as described here makes even less sense as a “political” act than the plan Wetmore wrote. He was going to lure her onto a regular boat with nothing outrageous or unusual about it, dressed conservatively, get her consent to film her, and then only “pretend” to “seduce” her if he somehow determined that she would be into that?

O’Keefe accomplice Izzy Santa seemed to think — on the day of the planned punking — that O’Keefe’s boat was full of strawberries and champagne, and that the plan was to creep Boudreau out. There’s no point to getting her on the boat and filming her if you’re not going to be gross. Even if O’Keefe found elements of Wetmore’s idiotic script objectionable, the idea behind it remains the same.

(As for O’Keefe’s dress: Even if he was in his usual uniform of blazer and collared shirt that day, history suggests that footage of O’Keefe in the “funnier” get-up — perhaps surrounded by “funnier” decor on the “sex boat” — would have ended up in the completed video.)

The rest of O’Keefe’s post can be summarized thusly: ACORN liberal bias Planned Parenthood ACORN Charlie Rangel ACORN.

Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

James O’Keefe violates election law to prove liberals violate election law

Notorious hidden camera clown commits voter fraud in New Hampshire

  • more
    • All Share Services

James O'Keefe violates election law to prove liberals violate election lawJames O'Keefe (Credit: AP/Bill Haber)

James O’Keefe (remember him? weird guy who’s always filming himself doing unethical and occasionally illegal things in order to somehow prove that liberals do unethical and illegal things?) has broken the law again, in his never-ending quest to prove that liberals have no respect for the rule of law. The conservative filmmaker and master of disguise attempted to commit voter fraud in the New Hampshire primaries.

“Voter fraud” is a right-wing obsession used to justify restrictive ballot access-limiting measures that are actually designed to suppress turnout among people who tend to vote for Democrats. It does not and cannot exist in anything approaching a large enough scale to affect an election, and even isolated incidents of fraud prove difficult for right-wingers to dredge up to prove that their concerns have merit. Dozens of people have spent years tirelessly attempting to prove that organized “voter fraud” is a real thing and all they have ever managed to prove is that sometimes lazy volunteers make fake registration forms, sometimes former felons mistakenly vote despite being disenfranchised, and sometimes people double-vote. There is nothing remotely resembling coordinated voter fraud, carried out with the intention of stealing an election, taking place anywhere in the United States. Those who sincerely believe that there is are deluded, though most of the people who constantly crow about it don’t sincerely believe in it; they just want to make it harder for blacks and Latinos and poor people to vote.

So O’Keefe, whose modus operandi is “create the corruption you wish to see in the world,” tried to get some ballots in New Hampshire using the names of recently deceased people. And it might’ve worked in a couple of places. Though not all the places. At one polling place his partner was stopped by a kindly old poll worker, and then he ran away.

O’Keefe has pretty clearly violated the law and TPM reports that a federal prosecutor is reviewing his video. But at least he finally proved that voter fraud is a very real threat, and one that could lead to upward of a couple of phony ballots being cast in a statewide primary election, depending on how many registered voters died quite recently. As we all know, once you prove that something is hypothetically possible, it is a factual certainty that ACORN has done it.

And now O’Keefe might finally get that felony conviction that he avoided last time. Fingers crossed.

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Thanks to you!

The people we're most grateful to have around this year

  • more
    • All Share Services

Thanks to you!Clockwise from upper left: Elizabeth Warren, Wael Ghonim, Diane Ravitch and Ray Lewis

Admittedly, I spend a lot of time grousing and naysaying. Today, though, we put that negativity briefly aside, as we celebrate a day of thoughtful reflection, and a night without a GOP presidential debate. I thought it appropriate, on the occasion of Thanksgiving, to thank some of the people who’ve worked to make the country and the world a better place over the least 12 months.

Thanks to Wall Street Occupier Jesse LaGreca, who didn’t only show up the Fox reporter sent to embarrass occupiers, but also managed to get the OWS message across on a Sunday political chat show, which is essentially unheard of. So thanks to you, for bringing up economic justice to the ancient panel of crusty establishmentarians on “Meet on Press.”

Thanks to Scott Olsen, the Iraq vet and victim of brutal police overreaction at Occupy Oakland, for showing the many forms that fighting for one’s country can take. We’re especially thankful that he’s recovering from the coma induced by a tear gas canister fired directly at his head, and is well enough to give public statements.

Thanks to retired Police Capt. Ray Lewis, who participated in Occupy Wall Street in full uniform, and was arrested for his participation. As stories of police brutality spread, Lewis reminds us that most cops are fellow members of the 99 percent, working hard to stay afloat in an increasingly class-segregated nation. Most of them aren’t happy being seen as serving the interests of the oligarchy, and where there’s abuse, it’s generally the result of poor training and misguided priorities from the top, not the rank-and-file.

Thanks to Diane Ravitch, and other school reform critics like Dana Goldstein, for adding desperately needed perspective and balance to the school reform debate, a debate in which one side receives what could charitably be referred to as the lion’s share of favorable press coverage and philanthropic support. Their needling forces school reform advocates and foes alike to examine their assumptions and strengthen their arguments, and they sometimes end up causing even dilettante education policy gurus like Steven Brill to see that the seductive claims made by technocrat reformers tend to be overstated. Better, smarter policy debates are enough of a rarity that we should all be thankful for anyone who can manage to produce them.

Thanks to Wael Ghonim for putting aside his very good job with Google to put his life on the line for freedom and liberty for his people in Egypt. Lots of tech entrepreneurs and engineers talk of changing the world; few of them spend weeks in custody as political prisoners for their efforts. Wael Ghonim was instrumental in organizing the popular revolt that toppled a dictatorial regime,

Thanks to Nick Davies, who, along with Guardian investigative correspondent Amelia Hill and others at the Guardian, has been relentlessly exposing News Corps’s criminal news-gathering practices in the U.K. Reporting on the misdeeds of the powerful — and News Corp is hugely powerful, especially in Great Britain — is the best reporting there is, and the investigations and arrests that have resulted from Davies and Hill’s reporting will change the culture of the international media industry for the better. We’ll be especially thankful if News Corp shareholders force the giant conglomerate into more responsible corporate management.

Thanks to Elizabeth Warren for perfectly articulating the liberal ideal of the social contract. One good senator may be limited in how much she can achieve, but if she wins and inspires more like her to follow — and imitate her unapologetic rhetoric of fairness — we’ll have even more to be thankful for.

Thanks to Sree Sreenivasan, dean of the Columbia School of Journalism, for making a mockery of dishonest bully James O’Keefe. O’Keefe’s only power comes from other media outlets taking him seriously. In one hilarious video, Sreenivasan showed why O’Keefe’s a joke.

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Personhood pastor: Amendment would ban the pill

As a right-wing sting on Planned Parenthood fails, a supporter admits the extreme initiative targets birth control

  • more
    • All Share Services

Personhood pastor: Amendment would ban the pill (Credit: Reuters)

Her antiabortion compatriots call Lila Rose — a friend and disciple of James O’Keefe — the crusading Upton Sinclair of her generation. But her latest right-wing sting operation, an attempt to “expose” the truth about whether birth control pills will actually be banned if Mississippi passes a Personhood amendment next week, is pretty much a giant bust.

Planned Parenthood, Rose’s bête-noire, is involved in the official coalition to defeat Initiative 26, which would amend Mississippi’s constitution to grant full “personhood” to fertilized eggs. Mississippi being Mississippi, the official anti-26 campaign has focused on what it calls the amendment’s “unintended consequences” beyond banning abortion: criminalizing miscarriages deemed suspicious, severely limiting in-vitro fertilization and banning many popular forms of birth control.

Rose’s “sting” involves calling up the one Planned Parenthood in the state (which doesn’t even provide abortions) and asking the receptionist whether the birth control pill would be available after the November election. “OK, so far as we know, birth control will still be available,” the person answering the phone responds. The longer video includes calls to public health officials who also sound confused. “We all know this is not about birth control. This is about saving lives,” the narrator continues over an image of a fully developed fetus.

Except it is also about birth control, as I learned firsthand when I was in Mississippi recently. One of the local doctors most closely associated with the Yes on 26 movement, Beverly McMillan, told me unequivocally that the IUD and the morning-after pill would be banned, and has written that she “painfully agree[s] that birth control pills do in fact cause abortions.” Another doctor, Freda Bush, who has gone on television to claim that contraception wouldn’t be banned, wouldn’t give a straight answer about which contraceptives would be banned, claiming she wasn’t an authority. She herself already refuses to prescribe the highly effective IUD out of the fear that it would block a fertilized egg – in her mind, an “abortion.”

But on the Diane Rehm show Monday, pro-Personhood pastor Walter Hoye was even clearer, saying, “Any birth control that ends the life of that human being will be impacted by this measure.” Asked, “What about the birth control pill?” Hoyes paused and said, “That falls into the same category.” No wonder rank-and-file healthcare employees aren’t sure: Not only has the amendment not even been voted on yet, its supporters can’t get their own message straight. 

The video also makes much of the anti-26 Mississippi for Healthy Families being “not even from Mississippi” because it’s received funding from Planned Parenthood affiliates outside the state. But as the sleuths at the grass-roots anti-26 efforts noticed, one-third of that funding was in-kind contributions, for a total of under $100,000 in cash from Planned Parenthood. Meanwhile, the total amount of cash the Yes on 26 campaign got from the Colorado-based Personhood USA, according to its filings with the secretary of state: over $300,000. Meanwhile, both Hoye and Rose are based in California, not quite the Mississippi heartland.

Continue Reading Close
Irin Carmon

Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com.

James O’Keefe’s boring Occupy Wall Street exposé

The conservative prankster's latest effort is something less than incendiary VIDEO

  • more
    • All Share Services

James O'Keefe's boring Occupy Wall Street exposé

Puckish conservative prankster James O’Keefe may have ditched his pimp outfit for a suit and tie, but he’s still out there, searching for the truth. We wrote on Monday how the (ethically challengeddocumentarian — who in the past has shaken up NPR’s leadership and brought ACORN to its knees — was conspicuously lurking around Zuccotti Park, and seemed to be working on a video about Occupy Wall Street. Well, that video has finally surfaced, and, boy … it’s actually pretty boring!

Viewers of the clip will see Mr. O’Keefe — feigning the appearance of a Wall Street banker — as he tries to converse with the hoi polloi. One protester rambles on about a “Constitutional World Federation.” Another chats about Amalgamated Bank. And a third gave O’Keefe a piece of cake! What will those dastardly liberals think of next?

Continue Reading Close

Did James O’Keefe violate his probation at OWS?

The conservative prankster showed up at the Wall St. protests today -- but he might not have gotten permission

  • more
    • All Share Services

Did James O'Keefe violate his probation at OWS? James O'Keefe at the Wall St. protests on Monday. (Credit: Stephanie Keith)

Conservative activist James O’Keefe caused a commotion in the blogosphere this afternoon when reports began to circulate that he had made a surprise appearance at the Occupy Wall Street protests. Photo and video evidence soon followed. Only one problem: He might not have had permission.

O’Keefe, who has nabbed headlines with high-profile video stings against NPR, ACORN and other left-leaning targets, was arrested in 2010 for attempting to tamper with phones in the New Orleans office of Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu. Three years of probation were a condition of his sentence. Since then, every trip the activist takes outside of New Jersey (where he resides with his parents) has had to be cleared by a judge.

Per Talking Points Memo:

[A]ccording to court records, a judge never approved his trip across the Hudson River and out of the state of New Jersey, where he lives with his parents. A judge has regularly approved all of his trips since hepleaded guilty to entering U.S. property under false pretenses back in May 2010 and received three years probation.

Ryan Girdusky, a spokesman for O’Keefe told TPM that O’Keefe got permission to make the trip from his probation officer.

A message posted earlier this evening on O’Keefe’s Twitter feed reads: “Can’t take your calls, journalists. Busy producing a video.”

Continue Reading Close

Page 1 of 7 in James O'Keefe