Finally, a Hillary rumor that makes sense
The chatter about Clinton replacing Joe Biden in 2012 is nonsense. But 2016?
Topics: Hillary Rodham Clinton, War Room, 2012 Elections, Joe Biden, Politics News
FILE - In this Sept. 8, 2010 file photo, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington. With tempered optimism, Clinton is leaping back into Israeli-Palestinian negotiations that she says may be the last chance for peace.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)(Credit: AP)On Tuesday, Bob Woodward announced that a Hillary Clinton-Joe Biden job switch for 2012 was “on the table,” immediately triggering a fresh round of news stories, columns, blog posts and cable news segments on the subject.
There’s absolutely zero reason to believe, or even suspect, that there’s anything to what Woodward was saying (I’ve outlined the reasons before), but there’s really no point in getting too worked up about this: Hillary’s ambition (and the Hillary-Obama relationship) is just too irresistible a topic for the media; consider yourself sentenced to many more flare-ups like this between now and the 2012 Democratic convention (where Joe Biden, barring a scandal or some medical issue, will be renominated for a second term as vice-president by acclimation).
Still, this week’s round of stories did produce one item that sounds about right: Politico’s report today that Hillary’s old political team is thinking in terms of 2016, not 2012.
This has always made the most sense, ever since Hillary ended her presidential campaign in June 2008. She will turn 69 in October 2016 — younger than four of the eight most recent Republican presidential nominees. Age wouldn’t be an issue.
And while it’s ridiculously early to assess the Democratic field, it’s hard to imagine Hillary’s celebrity fading much between now and then, even if she were to step down as secretary of state after 2012. In 2008, she had the misfortune of running against a once-in-a-lifetime opponent whose personal story, oratory, history-making potential, and grass-roots army allowed him to compete on the same level as Hillary. More than likely, that won’t be the case in 2016. Think of how Hillary would have matched up against John Edwards, Mark Warner, Bill Richardson or any of the other second-tier ’08 contenders who were suffocated by Obama’s presence. To varying degrees, they all might have given her fits and won some primaries and caucuses, but it’s likely she would have emerged the winner. In ’16, she’d probably get to play the role she always thought she would in ’08.
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.




Advisers Urged Obama Early On To Release Comprehensive Benghazi Timeline
Democrats Let Sen. Patrick Leahy Stand Alone In Support Of Gay Couples
Virginia Republicans Aren't Flocking To Anti-Gay Lieutenant Governor Hopeful
Israeli Ambassador Says Kerry Will Do A Fine Job Getting Peace Negotiations Going
Comments
33 Comments