The Washington Post invites Donald Trump to the Correspondents’ Dinner

Why everyone should be embarrassed (as always) by the DC press corps' annual party

Topics: Donald Trump, War Room, Media Criticism, Washington, D.C., Washington Post,

The Washington Post invites Donald Trump to the Correspondents' DinnerDonald Trump arrives before the 83rd Academy Awards on Sunday, Feb. 27, 2011, in the Hollywood section of Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Matt Sayles)(Credit: Matt Sayles)

It’s almost time for the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner, that annual party where Washington, D.C., media outlets desperately compete for attention from celebrities and flatter the people they are supposed to be “covering.” While the event is self-evidently gross and depressing, many D.C. lifers treat the event like their Oscars: a night in the spotlight.

Except that while the Oscars are how the show business industry rewards itself for its work, the WHCD has nothing, at all, to do with the product produced by the people putting on the show. If it was about rewarding good journalism, celebrities wouldn’t show up! (Politicians certainly wouldn’t show up, because good journalism usually makes politicians look bad.)

Something called “the White House Correspondents’ Dinner” might sound like a celebration for the people who cover the White House, but there are generally very few working reporters sitting at the tables purchased by the newspapers and magazines that they work for. Instead, the publishers invite terribly famous people to sit at those very expensive tables, because celebrities really do not get enough opportunities to dress up nice and go to parties. (All of this is Michael Kinsley’s fault, I think?) (CORRECTION: I meant Michael Kelly, who invited Donna Rice in 1988. I am mortified! And I apologize.)

This year, the Washington Post has invited Mr. Donald Trump, the famous pretend presidential candidate and rabid birther. Yes, the major newspaper of America’s capital city has invited Donald Trump to prom. Why would the Washington Post, as an institution, officially align themselves with a living freak show currently spending his every waking minute espousing idiotic fringe conspiracy theories?

Maybe the invitation was extended before Trump went full-birther, but even before he went full-birther he was still a ridiculous fraud, a national embarrassment with multiple bankruptcies and an awful television show to his name. They knew what they were getting into.

Is there anything Trump could say or do that would cause the Post to rescind the invitation? If they’re worried that that would be a bigger public relations nightmare than simply keeping the invitation in place and hoping he doesn’t embarrass them further, then I hope they learned their lesson about inviting celebrities to the stupid annual fancy dress gala dinner. (They didn’t. Nothing will ever teach most of these organizations that message.)

The WHCD doesn’t “prove” that the Washington press is too compromised by fealty to power to do their job effectively — it doesn’t prove that because the fact that elite Washingtonians are members of the Washington elite is self-evident — but it does make our press corps look very silly. A roomful of media people fawning over a movie star and Henry Kissinger in equal measure is just embarrassing for everyone involved.

So maybe Donald Trump is the perfect person for the Washington Post to have invited to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. He is where so many strands of contemporary political media — the normalization of the extreme right-wing fringe and the celebritization of politics and the rise of “endless horse-race campaign coverage” as “news” — all merge into one ridiculous gimmick.

The New York Times, to its credit, began sitting out the dinner in 2007, a decision that seems wiser and wiser every year. (This has been characterized as a “boycott,” but it is really more like “avoiding a bad scene.”)

The New Yorker has invited Jon Hamm, Zach Galifianakis and the Coen brothers, which actually sounds like a table I’d enjoy sitting at. (Call me, Mr. Remnick!)

Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at and follow him on Twitter @pareene

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>