Santorum calls sharia “existential threat” to U.S.

Likely 2012 hopeful also offers his take on what sharia actually means

Topics: 2012 Elections, War Room, Islam,

Santorum calls sharia "existential threat" to U.S.Possible 2012 Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania talks about the budget with students at New England College, Thursday, April 14, 2011 in Henniker, N.H. Republicans eyeing the White House assailed President Barack Obama's deficit-reduction proposal and cast him as a tax-raising liberal who is failing to lead a nation on the brink of fiscal catastrophe. (AP Photo/Jim Cole)(Credit: AP)

In his big foreign policy speech yesterday, Rick Santorum declared that “sharia and its violent iteration jihadism” pose an “existential threat” to the United States. That’s standard fare from Santorum, but a more interesting moment came in the Q&A after the speech, when the former Pennsylvania senator was asked to elaborate.

That’s when Santorum did what so many Republican lawmakers are unable to do, which is to offer an explanation of what, in his view, sharia actually means.

The question came from the Daily Caller’s Chris Moody:

MOODY: You mentioned that sharia law is an existential threat to the United States. There seems to be some confusion among the general public on how to define sharia law. How do you define it and can you point to some instances within the United States [where] it’s taking over?

SANTORUM: If you look at an instance where it’s taking over, you have already in the financial sector sharia-compliant finance. [That's] where funds and people who are doing investments are deferring to people put up by groups — some of which are, let’s put it this way, suspect — as the authority as to what these funds can be invested in in a sharia-compliant way. Investment houses and others, banks, are paying in some cases less-than-reputable people a lot of money to give their blessing for their types of investments. That’s a problem. That’s a way of … depending on what they’re investing in and who they’re paying to give their blessing could be ways in which resources go to places that I’m not too sure are necessarily in our national security interests.

Here’s a primer on the Islamic finance Santorum is talking about. It often involves mundane matters like mortgages structured in a way to take interest — seen by many Muslims as prohibited — out of the equation.

Santorum continued:

You also have situations where you you have movements in this country to cordon off and create family courts or other types of laws where Muslims are only held account to religious law as opposed to the civil laws in this country. That has gone on as we know extensively in Europe, but it’s coming here and it is actually being advocated for in this country. So there are concrete examples of how that is occurring in America today. I would argue clearly — I’m not making the argument that America is by any way in the lead on this. The bigger problems and the more notable cases are clearly in places where the higher concentration of Muslims exists and that’s clearly in Western Europe and not here.

Santorum did not offer any of those “concrete examples” of some kind of sharia advocacy movement in America. He was then asked again to define sharia:

Sharia is a code, a civil code — both how the government is to operate [and] things as mundane as personal hygiene, religious practices. It is made up of various texts — not just the Quran — that is a code by which Muslims have to live.

Based on previous reporting, that’s not a bad definition of sharia. Though Santorum missed the crucial fact that there are many, widely varying forms and interpretations of sharia. And less clear is why Santorum believes sharia — by his own definition — poses an existential threat to America.

Here’s the exchange:

Justin Elliott is a reporter for ProPublica. You can follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Burger King Japan

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Burger King's black cheeseburger: Made with squid ink and bamboo charcoal, arguably a symbol of meat's destructive effect on the planet. Only available in Japan.

    Elite Daily/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    McDonald's Black Burger: Because the laws of competition say that once Burger King introduces a black cheeseburger, it's only a matter of time before McDonald's follows suit. You still don't have to eat it.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Domino's Specialty Chicken: It's like regular pizza, except instead of a crust, there's fried chicken. The company's marketing officer calls it "one of the most creative, innovative menu items we have ever had” -- brain power put to good use.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    Arby's Meat Mountain: The viral off-menu product containing eight different types of meat that, on second read, was probably engineered by Arby's all along. Horrific, regardless.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    KFC'S ZINGER DOUBLE DOWN KING: A sandwich made by adding a burger patty to the infamous chicken-instead-of-buns creation can only be described using all caps. NO BUN ALL MEAT. Only available in South Korea.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Waffle Taco: It took two years for Taco Bell to develop this waffle folded in the shape of a taco, the stand-out star of its new breakfast menu.

    Michele Parente/Twitter

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Krispy Kreme Triple Cheeseburger: Only attendees at the San Diego County Fair were given the opportunity to taste the official version of this donut-hamburger-heart attack combo. The rest of America has reasonable odds of not dropping dead tomorrow.

    Taco Bell

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Taco Bell's Quesarito: A burrito wrapped in a quesadilla inside an enigma. Quarantined to one store in Oklahoma City.

    2014's fast food atrocities

    Boston Pizza's Pizza Cake: The people's choice winner of a Canadian pizza chain's contest whose real aim, we'd imagine, is to prove that there's no such thing as "too far." Currently in development.


    2014's fast food atrocities

    7-Eleven's Doritos Loaded: "For something decadent and artificial by design," wrote one impassioned reviewer, "it only tasted of the latter."

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>