Harry Potter: How it couldn’t have ended
Journalist Greg Palast claims J.K. Rowling had a surprising idea for her series' conclusion. We don't buy it
Topics: Harry Potter, Books, Entertainment News
In this film publicity image released by Warner Bros. Pictures, from left, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe are shown in a scene from "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2." (AP Photo/Warner Bros. Pictures, Jaap Buitendijk)(Credit: AP)According to Greg Palast — an American journalist who says he and J.K. Rowling became “buds” when they “shared the bestseller list” in England “years ago” — J.K. Rowling considered ending the Harry Potter series in what one could reasonably term a highly unlikely fashion. New York magazine was quick to pick up on Palast’s relevant blog post yesterday.
At gregpalast.com, Rowling’s “bud” writes:
Jo knows that I found the conclusion of her series a sorry let-down, a second-rate “Show Down at the OK Corral” for Wizards. In my opinion (and she does not at all agree), Jo was too distracted by a concern for how the ending would play on film. I bugged her about it until she told me the “other” endings. … No, Jo wouldn’t show me typed copies, but she told me a couple of “I could have done this” endings. One of them knocked me over, and I have to share it.
Share it he does (with, unsurprisingly, a couple of caveats, e.g.: “If you want to say that I didn’t get her voice and story details exactly, keep in mind that I’m working from mental notes”).
Excuses aside, there are more than a couple of problems with the narrative Palast presents. In this version, Voldemort doesn’t die; instead, he reverts to childhood, and is joined by ghost-versions of his mother and father who “put their reassuring arms around their son to protect him” from a curse that could obliterate his soul. Instead of being destroyed, all three are then “forever entombed” in a statue that Harry — when, later, he becomes Hogwarts headmaster — keeps on the Hogwarts grounds.
Here’s one fundamental discordance: It’s unlikely that Voldemort’s parents would try to protect him the way they do here (or at least, I don’t think both of them would). First of all, Merope Gaunt and Tom Riddle — the ill-fated couple whose offspring would eventually terrorize the wizarding world — didn’t even have a good relationship themselves; they came together, or so Dumbledore hypothesizes to Harry in Book 6, because of magic performed by Voldemort’s mother (who was, incidentally, far from a “beautiful maid”), and separated when the enchantment wore off.
Continue Reading CloseEmma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich. More Emma Mustich.

Comments
12 Comments