Why are so many modern action movies terrible?
A video essay blasts shaky camerawork and fast cutting, and urges filmmakers to get back to basics
Topics: Battle: Los Angeles, Film Salon, Viral Video, Movies, Entertainment News
A new video essay complains that films such as "Conan the Barbarian" abandon artful filmmaking for a mindless barrage of wild shots and cuts. “The only art here is the art of confusion.” That’s one of many corrosive lines from “Chaos Cinema: The Decline and Fall of Action Filmmaking,” a two-part video essay about the shaky camera and super-fast cutting that dominate so many modern action films and TV shows.
Written and edited by a young German film student named Matthias Stork, the piece gathers together a lot of the complaints that I’ve heard and read about contemporary action films into a sort of manifesto. The piece debuted earlier this week at Press Play, a video essay-driven blog that I founded. Stork created it as way to explain how action film style has changed from the more stately type seen in such films as “Bullitt,” ”Raiders of the Lost Ark” and “Die Hard” into something much faster, more frenetic and — Stork believes — sloppier and stupider.
This is an issue dear to my heart. Film Salon readers might recall that earlier this year I wrote a piece griping about “Battle Los Angeles,” an alien invasion epic that used a shaky camera and fast cutting so promiscuously (to capture routine dialogue scenes as well as shootouts) that I found it nauseating and amateurish. You can also see it used in the recent, very chaotic “Conan the Barbarian” remake, which makes John Milius’ 1982 original seem positively stately in comparision. The style has been around just long enough to be considered a bona fide mode, or a school, of filmmaking, one that could be seen in everything from “Black Hawk Down” and TV’s “24″ to “Inception” and “Taken.” And it does have its high-profile defenders, including Ignatiy Vishnevetsky, the cohost of the new “Roger Ebert Presents At The Movies,” who has written a number of pieces defending Chaos Cinema’s leading practitioners, including Michael Bay (the “Bad Boys” and “Transformers” movies) and Tony Scott (“Domino,” ”Unstoppable”). (Scott, Vishnevetsky wrote, “is uninterested in the distinctions created by edits, uninterested in the images individually. He is only interested in the movie as a surface, bubbling, boiling, sometimes dead calm, sometimes a hurricane.”)



Comments
50 Comments