Out of Touch
Reality check: The shameful Kardashian divorce
Kim Kardashian's wedding cost millions. The marriage lasted only 72 days. Those aren't the only outrageous numbers
(Credit: AP/Salon) The rumors weren’t so crazy after all. It turns out that Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries — whose August wedding was a black hole for money and media attention — really are done.
The Kardashians and their pervasive public narrative are fueled by nothing if not the power of conspicuous consumption. (Kim herself makes no secret of the fact that she’s a “business woman” — in fact, it’s first of the four adjectives she uses to describe herself on Twitter.) Here are 10 of the most shameful numbers related to the couple’s dizzyingly short-lived union:
$15,000-$20,000: Estimated value of Kim & Kris’s wedding cake. [New York Post]
$400,000: Total value of the champagne served at the wedding. [New York Post]
$2 million: Value of the wedding’s floral arrangements. [Styleite]
Nearly $3 million: Amount Kim & Kris received from People magazine for wedding- and engagement-related rights. [New York Post]
5 million: Number of people said to have watched E!’s four-hour wedding special. [THR]
$15 million+: Amount Kardashians were paid by E! for rights to air the wedding special. [New York Post]
$17.9 million: Total amount of money Kim & Kris are thought to have made from the wedding and related publicity. [The Week]
Nearly 1,000: Number of sources covering the story of Kim & Kris’s divorce late Monday afternoon, according to Google News.
87 days: Length of Kim & Kris’s engagement.
72 days: Amount of time between the wedding and Kim’s divorce filing.
Emma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich. More Emma Mustich.
Hospitals court the 1 percent — with lobster tails
The medical-care gap worsens, as hospitals invest in luxurious digs and fancy meals for the wealthy
(Credit: iStockphoto/jgroup) The U.S. Census Bureau has estimated that just over 16 percent of the population — nearly 50 million individuals — lacked health insurance in 2010. For people who are uninsured, the financial impact of a single illness or emergency room visit can be disastrous.
That’s one reason why the luxury services available at a number of hospitals across the country — lavishly detailed in a New York Times feature over the weekend — seem so misguided. While lesser mortals face sometimes hellish emergency room circumstances that they often can’t afford, wealthy patients can shell out thousands of dollars a night for “bed linens … by Frette, Italian purveyors of high-thread-count sheets to popes and princes” — not to mention “polished marble” bathrooms, multi-course menus and “Ciao Bella gelato … available on demand.”
Continue Reading CloseEmma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich. More Emma Mustich.
These are not 2011′s “most fascinating” people
From Simon Cowell to the Kardashians, Barbara Walters' tired list of insipid tabloid stars is remarkably irrelevant
(Credit: AP/Salon) You’d be excused for thinking Barbara Walters’ list of 2011′s “most fascinating people” is some sort of bizarre joke.
Her headliners include Donald Trump, Simon Cowell and the Kardashians — not to mention other pop-culture aristocrats like Katy Perry, Derek Jeter and Pippa Middleton. Walters’ trump card, the year’s single “most fascinating” figure, won’t be announced until Dec. 14. But on the basis of the stars whose names have been released, things aren’t looking particularly timely.
Continue Reading CloseEmma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich. More Emma Mustich.
The most absurd red carpet ever — at the airline gate
When airlines make top customers parade down a red carpet with their boarding pass, it merely embarrasses everyone
(Credit: Global X / CC BY 3.0/Salon) Airline travel is littered with indignities. Long lines, screaming children, cramped quarters, insane fees. Most ridiculous of all, however, are the tiny red carpets installed at boarding gates for “priority” passengers: the rich, the famous, the holders of frequent-flier cards.
What purpose do these gaudy, petty pieces of fabric — awash in a larger sea of airport gray — actually serve? It’s one thing to board priority passengers first; they have likely paid through the nose for that particular privilege. But is it really necessary to physically separate them from their flight mates, herding them into a distinct but adjacent line — and making them cross a brightly colored rug on their way out of the terminal?
Continue Reading CloseEmma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich. More Emma Mustich.
A $5,200 present for Beyoncé’s baby
Infant luxury? The sparkly "diamond bathtub" -- a gift from Kelly Rowland -- seems like a joke. It's not
(Credit: ABCNews) “Taking a bath is a luxuary [sic] nowadays,” writes designer Lori Gardner on the website for her showy Diamond Bathtub, a symbol of all that is over-the-top. And soon, the daughter of Beyoncé and Jay-Z will have one of her own.
“The Diamond Bathtub makes it easy to relax, unwind, and bask in the glow of a true indulgence” — allowing you to loosen up in the presence of more than 45,000 “precious imported crystals,” Gardner boasts. Sure, it might make some bathers nervous to “unwind” in a tub worth enough to feed a small army — but how could you say no to something that “brings new meaning to indulgent ‘me’ time reserved for leisurely soaking in the tub”? And what baby doesn’t need some me time after a long day of napping?
Continue Reading CloseEmma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich. More Emma Mustich.
Reese Witherspoon and the $3,820 handbag
The actress' accessory, made partly of python skin, horrifies PETA -- and is mind-bogglingly expensive
Inset: Reese Witherspoon (Credit: AP/Salon) “Most Americans can’t afford a $1,000 emergency expense,” a recent CNNMoney headline proclaimed. But according to RadarOnline, Reese Witherspoon has been spotted carrying a python-skin handbag worth nearly $4,000.
It’s not just the item’s price tag that’s raising eyebrows. A PETA spokeswoman expressed her frustration about the snakeskin accessory (the sale of which is illegal in California, where the star was spotted with her tote), telling the Mail Online: “No matter how much Reese paid for that bag, the animals paid a much higher price. … These days, it’s easy to have a look that kills without killing.”
Not only would fake snakeskin be more humane — it would also be a whole lot cheaper!
Seen something that’s Out Of Touch? Send us a tip: outoftouch@salon.com.
Emma Mustich is a Salon contributor. Follow her on Twitter: @emustich. More Emma Mustich.
Page 1 of 2 in Out of Touch