Who believes in the American dream?

The right says we can't afford it, but progressives have a chance to save the country

Topics: Income inequality, Occupy Wall Street, ,

Who believes in the American dream? (Credit: iStockphoto/leungchopan/alvarez/Juanmonino/jlmatt)

This year’s Equity Summit 11 is organized around the notion that racial and economic equity is the best growth model for the increasingly diverse, and increasingly unequal, U.S. I joined a panel on the topic today with HUD Secretary Shawn Donovan, the Harlem Children Zone’s Geoffrey Canada, Antonio Gonzalez of the William C. Velasquez Institute and Manuel Pastor of the University of Southern California. Pastor shared research showing that both countries as well as American metropolitan areas with the least inequality and gaps between rich and poor are growing faster than those with the starkest gaps.

I made the point that I’m happy our side is talking about economic growth today, we’re not just talking about redistributing hardship or scarcity, which has been our unfortunate situation since the economy began to sputter, especially for working- and middle-class people, in the 1970s. We’ve got to be the people talking about growth and prosperity and opportunity, for everyone, because right now it feels like the right has given up on the idea of America: We can’t afford it. In his new book, Pat Buchanan confesses that he doesn’t think we’re going to make it, especially with the country’s white majority set to lose that majority status in roughly the year 2042.  So we’ve got to show him he’s wrong.

But we know that equity is a strong growth model, because we already proved it, back when the government took steps to create the middle class, and the pathways for upward mobility that we think of as the American dream. It was a relatively brief period in time, but it existed. On the eve of the Great Depression, we had historic income inequality (which was only matched in 2007, on the eve of the Wall Street crash) and for a long time people drew the conclusion that radical economic inequality was dangerous, for everyone. From 1947 through 1973, we had tax policies that flattened income inequality. It was a political decision. The incomes of people at the bottom and in the middle grew faster than the incomes at the top.

That progressive tax policy brought in the public resources to pay for the scaffolding of the American dream: the GI Bill that encouraged education and housing for veterans coming home from war; massive investment in public education and in higher education; new programs to  make home loans more widely available, new road construction to get out to the suburbs where those new homes were going up like crazy. But most people don’t think of any of that as government help; they believe they built their success all by themselves. This is a dangerous American myth progressives have to debunk. People don’t know they had help.

Another big problem: People don’t know that the help (that they don’t believe they got) mainly helped white people. But it did. Going back to the New Deal, few if any new programs contained non-discrimination clauses; many openly excluded people who weren’t white. As the great American middle class grew and left the cities, banks redlined minority neighborhoods while restrictive covenants kept people who weren’t white out of the suburbs. (Geoff Canada made the great point that when parkways were built from New York to Long Island where we both grew up, the overpasses were intentionally built too low to accommodate buses.) So we’ve got two big problems when we talk about racial and economic inequities: Too many people think, I didn’t have any help climbing into the middle class, so predictably, they reject the idea that they got things that African-Americans and Latinos didn’t get. It makes a kind of sense: If I didn’t get help, how can you say you didn’t get something I don’t even think I got!

Then something else happened that complicated the work of progressives. When government got more visible with its equity agenda, with the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act, the Economic Opportunity Act and the Great Society, things seemed to fall apart. The economy, for a lot of different reasons, began to sputter, and social unrest over the Vietnam War and our too little, too late civil rights agenda spread. Because government was suddenly doing a lot, some people concluded government had to be the problem. Correlation isn’t cause, but people didn’t get that. Democrats were running government during this time of social unrest when the economy began to contract, and we’ve been living with the results to today. There was also a lot of worry that government was helping the wrong people; the white working class in particular was very worried about their tax dollars going to people who didn’t deserve them. They thought of government aid recipients as slackers and moochers.

But do you know what happened in Ohio last night? What’s been happening in Wisconsin all year? Some people who were worried about slackers and moochers, who maybe even voted for Republican Govs. John Kasich in Ohio and Scott Walker in Wisconsin, realized that when the modern GOP talks about slackers and moochers, “Hey, they’re talking about me!” Yes, they’re talking about cops and firefighters and nurses and teachers and emergency workers and classroom aides. Having beaten back private sector unions, helping to decimate the middle class, now the forces of wealth are turning to the public sector. And they’re turning to Social Security and Medicare; our elderly are about to become slackers and moochers, too. People are finally waking up.

Although the conference is particularly focused on the exclusion of low-income people of color, it’s worth noting that the white poverty rate has doubled in the last 10 years, as has unemployment for white people. New census figures show poverty spreading to white suburbs and exurbs. I’m certainly not arguing for a special focus on “white poverty,” but the rise in white poverty can create allies, in a movement for equity, that might not have existed 10 years ago. We see it already in the Occupy Wall Street movement: As I’ve said before, “We are the 99 percent” has become the new e pluribus unum. We’re finally figuring out that we’re really all in this together.

There are more than 2,000 people from all over the country here talking about all of these topics. I’m going to hang out with them and skip the Republican debate tonight. I feel lucky to be able to do that.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 17
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    John Stanmeyer

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Container City: Shipping containers, indispensable tool of the globalized consumer economy, reflect the skyline in Singapore, one of the world’s busiest ports.

    Lu Guang

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Man Covering His Mouth: A shepherd by the Yellow River cannot stand the smell, Inner Mongolia, China

    Carolyn Cole/LATimes

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Angry Crowd: People jostle for food relief distribution following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti

    Darin Oswald/Idaho Statesman

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    “Black Friday” Shoppers: Aggressive bargain hunters push through the front doors of the Boise Towne Square mall as they are opened at 1 a.m. Friday, Nov. 24, 2007, Boise, Idaho, USA

    Google Earth/NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Suburban Sprawl: aerial view of landscape outside Miami, Florida, shows 13 golf courses amongst track homes on the edge of the Everglades.

    Garth Lentz

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Toxic Landscape: Aerial view of the tar sands region, where mining operations and tailings ponds are so vast they can be seen from outer space; Alberta, Canada

    Cotton Coulson/Keenpress

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Ice Waterfall: In both the Arctic and Antarctic regions, ice is retreating. Melting water on icecap, North East Land, Svalbard, Norway

    Yann Arthus-Bertrand

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Satellite Dishes: The rooftops of Aleppo, Syria, one of the world’s oldest cities, are covered with satellite dishes, linking residents to a globalized consumer culture.

    Stephanie Sinclair

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Child Brides: Tahani, 8, is seen with her husband Majed, 27, and her former classmate Ghada, 8, and her husband in Hajjah, Yemen, July 26, 2010.

    Mike Hedge

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Megalopolis: Shanghai, China, a sprawling megacity of 24 Million

    Google Earth/ 2014 Digital Globe

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Big Hole: The Mir Mine in Russia is the world’s largest diamond mine.

    Daniel Dancer

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Clear-cut: Industrial forestry degrading public lands, Willamette National Forest, Oregon

    Peter Essick

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Computer Dump: Massive quantities of waste from obsolete computers and other electronics are typically shipped to the developing world for sorting and/or disposal. Photo from Accra, Ghana.

    Daniel Beltra

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Oil Spill Fire: Aerial view of an oil fire following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil disaster, Gulf of Mexico

    Ian Wylie

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Slide 13

    Airplane Contrails: Globalized transportation networks, especially commercial aviation, are a major contributor of air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Photo of contrails in the west London sky over the River Thames, London, England.

    R.J. Sangosti/Denver Post

    Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot

    Fire: More frequent and more intense wildfires (such as this one in Colorado, USA) are another consequence of a warming planet.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>