Greed fatigue and MF Global

Speculators who lost $1.6 billion for their customers get big bonuses. So what else is new?

Topics: Jon Corzine, MF Global, Wall Street,

Greed fatigue and MF GlobalMF Global executives Jon Corzine, Bradley Abelow and Henri Steenkamp.(Credit: AP/Susan Walsh)

When word of the obscene bonuses being doled out to top executives of Jon Corzine’s failed MF Global went public the other day, I expected white-hot fury. A major brokerage had gone belly-up, $1.6 billion had simply “vanished,” and the people responsible for the mess are about to be enriched. But except for isolated pockets of outrage like congressional fist-shaking and a Minnesota farmer protest — victims demanding that the money go to them and not to the fat cats who ran the company into the ground — reaction has been subdued.

Call it Wall Street greed fatigue. You say there is a group of devious men (and they are usually men) who lost or stole the money from a large group of trusting and trustworthy people and then enriched themselves for their atrocious behavior? And we’re supposed to be surprised? As a news story, the MF Global bonuses is familiar. The headline “Vultures Flourish in the Great Recession” reeks of 2009. Besides, what can you do about it?  Not a single executive responsible for the crash of 2008 has gone to jail or even visibly suffered. After a while the story gets tiresome.

Whatever the cause of Greed Fatigue, its  prevalence today is a shame because MF Global, headed by former New Jersey Sen. Corzine, may well have engaged in criminal conduct. The rewarding of their irresponsible behavior with bonuses ought to get free-market types and Republicans fired up alongside the usual progressive Wall Street-bashers. Perhaps the fact that Corzine is a liberal Democrat may encourage right-wingers to overcome their Greed Fatigue. We can only hope. The MF Global fiasco is not only the best example I can find of how the culture of greed has survived in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. It’s also an example of crony capitalism at its most pernicious.

To understand the MF Global story, you’ve got to explore a bit why the firm went belly-up last October, and why we even know in advance that these bonuses are going to be paid. Unless they are publicly traded companies, Wall Street trading firms don’t disclose to a soul how much they pay their top people, and only do so after the fact.

MF Global used to be known as Man Financial, and it had a reasonably good reputation. It did a humdrum business placing commodities trades for fund managers, as well as farmers, grain dealers and others whose livelihoods depend on the vagaries of commodity prices. To protect themselves, many of them hedge by trading in derivatives. That’s the “Dr. Jekyl” side of the commodities and derivatives business, a conventional business that performs a useful function for corporations engaged in real commerce. The “Mr. Hyde” side of the business — the adventurous speculation for personal profit -- was represented by the trading that MF Global and the Wall Street banks do for themselves. When speculators start imagining huge profits, caution has a way of being thrown out the window, as happened in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis. It happened again to MF Global — in spades.

In the case of MF Global, the problem was simple competence. The firm  traded complex financial instruments called “repurchase agreements.” Despite the presence of CEO Corzine, who made a fortune at Goldman Sachs before going into politics, the firm somehow “misplaced” over $1.2 billion from 36,000 customer accounts. To make matters worse, MF Global actually dipped into the customer funds that remained — to the tune of $700 million — to make up for the shortfall. That’s like a lawyer stealing client funds.

The usual congressional inquisition followed.  It was more of a circus than usual, because top MF Global officials said they didn’t know where all that $1.2 billion went. (The number was later put at $1.6 billion, a huge chunk of the $6.9 billion in customer cash.) MF Global execs were called before a congressional committee in December: Corzine, president and chief operating officer Bradley Abelow and chief financial officer Henri Steenkamp. They got the usual tongue-lashing. Addressing Steenkamp,  Sen. Mike Johannes, a Nebraska Republican, fumed, “You’re dancing around with me.” The other two were similarly chastised, and rightly so.

What seems to have happened is simple: The traders at MF Global screwed up, and stole money from customers to make up for the losses. It’s hard to think of any other possible explanation.

MF Global wound up in bankruptcy court.  That is how we know that bonuses may actually be paid to the same people who were roasted in Congress. Former FBI director Louis Freeh, the bankruptcy trustee, indicated that he was planning to pay bonuses to Abelow, Steenkamp and Laurie R. Ferber, general counsel. The amount of the bonuses has not been determined yet, but the Wall Street Journal reported that the three execs, and 20 other MF Global employees, will get bonuses “if they hit specified targets such as increasing the value of MF Global’s estate for creditors.”

What makes this outrageous is not just the obvious horror, which is that money is going to two executives, Abelow and Steenkamp, who were not only in charge at the time of the mess, but stonewalled Congress about the money, and presumably have some explaining to do in both the criminal and numerous civil inquiries being conducted into the MF Global collapse. Also shocking is that this charade is being played out in bankruptcy court, which has a broad mandate to prevent anyone involved in a bankruptcy from being unjustly enriched. Freeh, as the former federal judge that he is, surely should have known that paying out bonuses to the top execs of the company reeks to high heaven, and has the odor of crony capitalism at its worst.

It’s not an “excess compensation” issue. It’s not left versus right or Wall Street bashing at work here. It’s the way bankruptcy courts are supposed to work. That’s why, for instance, the trustee in the Robert Madoff liquidation, Irving Picard, has caused such a ruckus with his “clawback” suits against investors who cashed out of the Madoff funds. The aim is to treat all victims fairly.

But here, in the MF Global mess, you have top officials of a company that “misplaced” customer money getting paid to help clean up the mess that they created. Their reward, at the most, should be leniency from regulatory or law enforcement sanctions — not bonuses. But that apparently hasn’t dawned on the MF Global trustee.

It’s not clear that the MF Global perps will ever be prosecuted. A criminal inquiry is underway by the Justice Department, although that seems to be headed nowhere — perhaps because of fear that prosecuting Corzine will hurt Obama, as Joe Nocera suggests.  I suspect that the same kind of double standard is also at work in this bonus fiasco, in which Corzine’s cronies (though not Corzine himself) stand to benefit.

Another way of looking at this is that the bonus culture is so ingrained on Wall Street that nothing, I mean absolutely nothing, will keep these dudes from getting their bonuses. Not failure, not stonewalling Congress. Nothing. Not even when they are in bankruptcy, when the sword of Damocles is supposedly hanging over their heads. Not even with the feds conducting a criminal investigation. Doesn’t matter. They get their bonuses. And the rest of us get Greed Fatigue.

It’s possible that the outcry, muted as it has been, will be sufficient that the bankruptcy judge will nix the bonuses, or allow them to be paid only to employees who had no role in the collapse of the firm. I wonder if it might be better to pay the bonuses to all of them. Then they can be a kind of living monument to the mind-set that got us into the mess that is continuing to burden the economy.

Gary Weiss is a journalist and the author of "Ayn Rand Nation: The Hidden Struggle for America's Soul," to be published by St. Martin's Press on February 28, 2012. Follow him on Twitter @gary_weiss.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>