How Bain Capital made us fat

Why private equity -- especially the firm that made Mitt Romney rich -- loves fast-food chains

Topics: Mitt Romney, Editor's Picks,

How Bain Capital made us fat (Credit: iStockphoto/liveslow/Salon)

Burger King’s Triple Whopper with cheese: 1,230 calories. Domino’s Philly Cheese Steak Pizza: 2,140 calories. The Outback Steakhouse Bloomin’ Onion: An incredible 2,210 calories. And to wash it all down: a Dunkin’ Donuts Mocha Almond Iced Latte: only 290 calories. You can have two!

What do all four of these culinary delights have in common, besides the clear and present danger they pose to your waistline and arteries?

The answer is Bain Capital, the private equity firm founded by the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney. As each of these fast food and restaurant chains has wended its torturous way from private to public ownership and back again, from leveraged buyout to merger to spinoff, Bain Capital has been intimately involved, orchestrating management changes, public offerings and, above all, huge profits.

Bain purchased Domino’s from its founder, Tom Monaghan, in 1998, and was part of one consortium that bought a controlling stake in Burger King in 2002, another group that bought Dunkin’ Donuts in 2005, and a third that purchased Bloomin’ Brands, Outback Steakhouse’s corporate parent, in 2006. But Bain Capital is far from the only investor group to crave junk food. The private equity industry in general adores multi-franchised purveyors of low-priced calorie bombs, here in the U.S. and all across the globe.

Bain Capital’s record as a pioneer in private equity wheeling and dealing, however, along with its special status as the launching pad for Mitt Romney, demands that the company gets special attention. An obese, wheezing, diabetic nation wants to know: Can we blame Bain Capital for making us fat?

There are many structural reasons why free-market capitalism as practiced in a democracy dominated by special interests has resulted in the creation of a fast-food paradise. Government subsidies that promote everything from the build-out of highways to the farming of corn helped paved the way to a junk-food utopia at every clover-leaf intersection. Political resistance to higher minimum wage laws and health and safety inspections also keeps operating costs cheap. But there is a special synergy between the private equity profit model and fast food chains that keeps the whole system going like a Frankenstein monster that can’t be stopped.

The basic private equity play works like this: Bain Capital, or the Carlyle Group, or whoever, borrows a ton of cash and buys a stake in a company that, for whatever reason, isn’t performing very well, or is somehow undervalued by public markets. But the problem with using debt to make a purchase is that you are then immediately saddled with the irritating obligation to regularly come up with significant sums of cash just to cover your debt payments. Fast food chains — or any chain made up of thousands and thousands of franchises — are attractive because even in bad times they are generating plenty of cash. Access to that cash is the key to successfully orchestrating a leveraged buyout. Bain borrows a few billion dollars, swoops in on the vulnerable target, makes whatever changes it deems necessary to spruce up the company — selling assets, laying off workers, introducing the Triple Whopper – while covering its debt payments with the cash generated by daily operations.

The result: It’s very difficult for fast-food chains to die, no matter how badly they are run. If they start to sputter, they automatically become an attractive buyout target for someone with access to the capital necessary to do an overhaul. The process can be repeated ad infinitum, as the saga of Burger King, which is now gearing up for its second IPO in the last decade, amply illustrates. Like the McDonald’s burger that’s supposedly incapable of rotting, once a fast-food chain reaches a big enough size, it’s well-nigh immortal: There’s always going to be someone who sees potential value in the undying corpse.

The same is not true, it should go without saying, for your typical struggling mom-and-pop diner or locally sourced, all-organic fine dining eatery. If they can’t generate the cash to pay the bills, they are done, and the private equity moguls will not be interested in coming to the rescue.

Bain’s various investments in fast food do not all fit in exactly the same box. When Mitt Romney personally signed the check to buy Domino’s in 1998, the pizza company wasn’t in trouble. But if you want proof that quality does not coincide with profits, Domino’s example is instructive. The deal worked out fantastically for Bain. According to the Boston Globe, Bain extracted cash from Domino’s “in several chunks including: a 2003 refinancing of the company’s debt, a 2004 initial public stock offering, and an $897 million ‘monster dividend’ paid to Bain and other investors in 2007.”

But by the time Bain got out of Domino’s in 2010, Domino’s pizza was regularly placing last in taste tests when compared to its major competitors. That Philly Cheese Steak Pizza (introduced in 2003) just wasn’t doing the trick.

Burger King’s recent corporate history, however, offers the most delicious (if fattening) example of how a big fast food chain cannot sink, no matter how many icebergs it hits. In 2002, a coalition of Bain Capital, Goldman Sachs and TPG Capital purchased Burger King from the huge liquor conglomerate Diageo for about $1.5 billion. New management closed around 1,200 ailing franchises, and according to one study, revitalized sales by reducing customer wait time and staff turnover. Management also cooked up a plan to target the so-called super-fan — young men who could be counted on to load up at their neighborhood Burger King multiple times a week. Thus, the Triple Whopper and the Enormous Omelet Sandwich (730 calories).

In 2006, the investors exited successfully with a Burger King IPO. But then came the recession, which hit Burger King harder than its primary rivals, McDonald’s and Wendy’s. Even super-fans, apparently, have their limits when they are unemployed. But not to worry: In 2010, a group of Brazilian billionaires, 3G Capital, paid $4 billion to take Burger King private again. And now plans are afoot for another IPO. Maybe this time, the new Burger King Bacon Sundae will prove to be the draw that keeps customers coming.

The physical universe may frown upon perpetual motion schemes, but fast food chains appear to have found a way to scoff at entropy and death. In 2011 alone, private equity investors with around $500 billion to spend kept merger and acquisition activity in the restaurant industry hopping.

There are some signs that, spurred by customer demand and the pressure exerted by the up-and-coming “fast casual” restaurant sector, the big chains are beginning to move toward healthier menus. Dunkin’ Donuts, for example, announced it was dumping trans fats as early as 2007. But the bigger a chain is, and the tougher the competition, the more it will always be forced to scrimp on ingredient quality to keep prices low, and the more important it will be to keep pushing the addictively fattening bottom-line profit-makers: the fries and the shakes and the triple-cheese layered pizzas. We are a nation in love with our Bloomin’ Onions. The crazy thing is, the nature of the private equity beast is that even when the fast food dinosaurs are begging for extinction, they’ll always be offered a second chance.

Can we blame Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital for perpetuating this state of affairs? It might not be totally fair, but there’s at least a little bit of truth to it. Providing the capital necessary to keep Burger King and Domino’s and Dunkin’ Donuts going strong has added more than a few pounds to the collective scales. But if we’re going to assign blame, then perhaps we should also give some credit. Mitt Romney, after all, is the first politician in the United States to deliver universal care to his constituents. So even as Bain fattens ‘em up, Mitt made sure they can get coverage for whatever ill health ultimately ensues.

Andrew Leonard

Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 14
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Pilot"

    One of our first exposures to uncomfortable “Girls” sex comes early, in the pilot episode, when Hannah and Adam “get feisty” (a phrase Hannah hates) on the couch. The pair is about to go at it doggy-style when Adam nearly inserts his penis in “the wrong hole,” and after Hannah corrects him, she awkwardly explains her lack of desire to have anal sex in too many words. “Hey, let’s play the quiet game,” Adam says, thrusting. And so the romance begins.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Elijah, "It's About Time"

    In an act of “betrayal” that messes up each of their relationships with Hannah, Marnie and Elijah open Season 2 with some more couch sex, which is almost unbearable to watch. Elijah, who is trying to explore the “hetero side” of his bisexuality, can’t maintain his erection, and the entire affair ends in very uncomfortable silence.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Charlie, "Vagina Panic"

    Poor Charlie. While he and Marnie have their fair share of uncomfortable sex over the course of their relationship, one of the saddest moments (aside from Marnie breaking up with him during intercourse) is when Marnie encourages him to penetrate her from behind so she doesn’t have to look at him. “This feels so good,” Charlie says. “We have to go slow.” Poor sucker.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and camp friend Matt, "Hannah's Diary"

    We’d be remiss not to mention Shoshanna’s effort to lose her virginity to an old camp friend, who tells her how “weird” it is that he “loves to eat pussy” moments before she admits she’s never “done it” before. At least it paves the way for the uncomfortable sex we later get to watch her have with Ray?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Hard Being Easy"

    On the heels of trying (unsuccessfully) to determine the status of her early relationship with Adam, Hannah walks by her future boyfriend’s bedroom to find him masturbating alone, in one of the strangest scenes of the first season. As Adam jerks off and refuses to let Hannah participate beyond telling him how much she likes watching, we see some serious (and odd) character development ... which ends with Hannah taking a hundred-dollar bill from Adam’s wallet, for cab fare and pizza (as well as her services).

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Booth Jonathan, "Bad Friend"

    Oh, Booth Jonathan -- the little man who “knows how to do things.” After he turns Marnie on enough to make her masturbate in the bathroom at the gallery where she works, Booth finally seals the deal in a mortifying and nearly painful to watch sex scene that tells us pretty much everything we need to know about how much Marnie is willing to fake it.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Tad and Loreen, "The Return"

    The only sex scene in the series not to feature one of the main characters, Hannah’s parents’ showertime anniversary celebration is easily one of the most cringe-worthy moments of the show’s first season. Even Hannah’s mother, Loreen, observes how embarrassing the situation is, which ends with her husband, Tad, slipping out of the shower and falling naked and unconscious on the bathroom floor.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and the pharmacist, "The Return"

    Tad and Loreen aren’t the only ones to get some during Hannah’s first season trip home to Michigan. The show’s protagonist finds herself in bed with a former high school classmate, who doesn’t exactly enjoy it when Hannah puts one of her fingers near his anus. “I’m tight like a baby, right?” Hannah asks at one point. Time to press pause.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Role-Play"

    While it’s not quite a full-on, all-out sex scene, Hannah and Adam’s attempt at role play in Season 3 is certainly an intimate encounter to behold (or not). Hannah dons a blond wig and gets a little too into her role, giving a melodramatic performance that ends with a passerby punching Adam in the face. So there’s that.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Shoshanna and Ray, "Together"

    As Shoshanna and Ray near the end of their relationship, we can see their sexual chemistry getting worse and worse. It’s no more evident than when Ray is penetrating a clothed and visibly horrified Shoshanna from behind, who ends the encounter by asking if her partner will just “get out of me.”

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Frank, "Video Games"

    Hannah, Jessa’s 19-year-old stepbrother, a graveyard and too much chatting. Need we say more about how uncomfortable this sex is to watch?

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Marnie and Desi, "Iowa"

    Who gets her butt motorboated? Is this a real thing? Aside from the questionable logistics and reality of Marnie and Desi’s analingus scene, there’s also the awkward moment when Marnie confuses her partner’s declaration of love for licking her butthole with love for her. Oh, Marnie.

    13 of "Girls'" most cringeworthy sex scenes

    Hannah and Adam, "Vagina Panic"

    There is too much in this scene to dissect: fantasies of an 11-year-old girl with a Cabbage Patch lunchbox, excessive references to that little girl as a “slut” and Adam ripping off a condom to ejaculate on Hannah’s chest. No wonder it ends with Hannah saying she almost came.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>