A fake Bill Clinton headache

No, he didn’t just discover a new, retroactive way to undermine Obama

Topics: War Room,

A fake Bill Clinton headacheBill Clinton (Credit: Reuters/Chip East)

A line that Bill Clinton used two years ago is being revived today with the idea that it supposedly steps all over Barack Obama’s message. There’s actually nothing to it, though.

At issue is a speech Clinton delivered in 2010 at the same Cleveland venue where Obama will later today present his main economic argument for another term as president. What supposedly makes this awkward is that in his ’10 remarks, Clinton said:

“The Democrats are saying something like this: ‘We found a big hole that we did not dig. We didn’t get it filled in 21 months, but at least we quit digging. Give us two more years. If it doesn’t work, vote us out.’”

And now here we are two years later, the hole is still imposing, and Obama has the gall to ask for four more years? It’s almost as if Clinton has stumbled on a new, retroactive way of making Obama’s political life miserable. Unless you consider the context.

Clinton made the speech during a September ’10 campaign swing through Ohio on behalf of then-Gov. Ted Strickland and Lee Fisher, who was running for the U.S. Senate. During that trip and in other appearances that fall, Clinton continually pressed the theme that Democrats had inherited an epic mess from the GOP and needed more time to fix it. For instance, at a Cincinnati rally with Fisher, he used a football analogy:

“In 2008, we threw out a management team that had a 2-14 record in the last season. And now this team of which Lee’s opponent was one of the leaders is coming back and saying, ‘Look, we gave them 21 whole months to fix this mess we dug, and they have not won the Super Bowl, they’re only 8-8; so what you should do is hire a 2-14 team to get back in there.’”

The key point here is that Clinton was asking voters not just to give Obama two more years (they had no choice but to do that), but also to give Democrats two more years of congressional control, to allow the party to continue implementing its agenda. As you’re probably aware, voters ended up ignoring this plea and installing a Republican House, which has pretty much made it impossible for Obama and Democrats to do anything substantive to boost the economy these past two years – like, say, pass a jobs bill that economists widely agree would increase growth and cut unemployment.



Clinton actually spelled out his argument in greater detail in a “Daily Show” appearance that same month:

Give us two more years. And if we don’t produce results, you can throw us all out then. You’ll have another chance – I understand why you’re mad. You’re right to be mad. But give us a chance to make this work. They were in control of the Congress for a very long time, and they had the White House for eight years, and they had the White House and Congress for six years. Don’t throw us out after only two years of having the White House and Congress with a far bigger problem than they ever faced.

In isolation, Clinton’s ’10 words may sound damning today. But they were rendered inoperative by the 2010 midterms. I’ve been happy to acknowledge when the former president has undermined the current one in the past, but that’s not the case here at all. His ’10 remarks had everything to do with that year’s election, and have nothing to do with this year’s.

Steve Kornacki

Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>