Can Todd Akin still win?

His "legitimate rape" comments are ignorant and inflammatory -- but maybe not politically fatal

Topics: Opening Shot, Todd Akin, Legitimate rape,

Can Todd Akin still win?Todd Akin (Credit: YouTube/americanbridge21st)

The best measure of what an uphill reelection battle Claire McCaskill has faced this year is probably this: Her opponent’s matter-of-fact assertion in a television interview that most victims of “legitimate” rape are biologically incapable of getting pregnant from it probably elevates their race to toss-up status – at best.

There’s been one independent poll taken since Todd Akin scored an upset victory in Missouri’s Aug. 8 GOP Senate primary, and it put the six-term congressman 11 points ahead of McCaskill. That survey was released in the immediate wake of the primary, and even if you think it was an outlier, there was good reason to believe the basic proposition that Akin was ahead. After all, polling in the run-up to the primary had consistently shown every GOP candidate consistently leading McCaskill.

This is testament to the increasingly red tint of Missouri, a state that Bill Clinton carried twice in the 1990s but that swung back to the Republicans in 2000 and has stayed there since, even amid Barack Obama’s dominant national victory in 2008. This year, the state generally isn’t considered part of the White House battleground, which helps explain why McCaskill, who won her seat in the anti-Bush tide of 2006, is in such jeopardy.

For Democrats, the promise of Akin’s nomination was that he’d give them a fighting chance in a race that a generic Republican nominee would win with ease. Akin’s penchant for polarizing rhetoric that inflames the culture wars was already well-established, and explained why much of the Republican – and conservative – establishment stayed away from him during the primary. It’s also why McCaskill’s campaign mischievously waded into the GOP contest with ads designed to bait conservative voters into rallying around Akin.

You Might Also Like

Akin’s rape comment is exactly the sort of politically toxic outburst Democrats were hoping for. Already, he’s in damage control mode, putting out a statement late Sunday afternoon in which he claims he “misspoke” and that his words didn’t “reflect the deep empathy I hold for the thousands of women who are raped and abused every year.”

But he didn’t address the substance of his claim — that some sort of biological characteristic prevents most women who are raped from becoming pregnant – a theory that some other conservative politicians have previously voiced. Thus, the story will persist at least for the next few days, with reporters pressing Akin for more clarity and Democrats fanning the flames. It will also undoubtedly live on in Democratic ads this fall.

But will it be enough for McCaskill to defy the odds? This isn’t an easy question. In 2010, we saw several Akin-like Republican candidates cost the GOP Senate seats it otherwise would have won in Nevada, Delaware and Colorado. But Missouri is friendlier turf for Republican candidates than any of those states, all of which voted for Obama in 2008 and all of which could end up doing the same this year.

And of those three ’10 races, only one – in blue state Delaware, where Christine O’Donnell’s primary victory over Rep. Mike Castle was particularly devastating to her party’s chances – was a blowout. For all of the problems she had, Sharron Angle only lost to Harry Reid by 5 points in Nevada; and in Colorado, Ken Buck – who likened homosexuality to alcoholism a few weeks before the election – still came within a point of knocking off Michael Bennet.

In this sense, Akin’s theorizing comes with good and bad news for Democrats. The bad news is that it’s playing out in the middle of August; many voters aren’t paying attention, and the firestorm that Akin has incited may be largely forgotten in a month. The good news is that Akin just confirmed he’s as undisciplined a candidate as Democrats thought he’d be. So the odds of another flare-up like this – and another, and another, and another – are pretty good.

Steve Kornacki
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Michael Ohl/Museum fur Naturkunde

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Soul-Sucking Dementor Wasp

    Latin name: Ampulex dementor

    Truong Ngyuen

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    10,000th reptile species

    Latin name: Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi

    Jodi Rowley/Australian Museum

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Colour-changing thorny frogs

    Latin name: Gracixalus lumarius

    Judith L. Eger

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Long-fanged bat

    Latin name: Hypsugo dolichodon

    Neang Thy Moe/FFI

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Stealthy wolf snake

    Latin name: Lycodon zoosvictoriae

    Michael Janes

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Feathered coral

    Latin name: Ovabunda andamanensis

    Jerome Constant

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    World's second-longest insect

    Phryganistria heusii yentuensis

    Nantasak Pinkaew

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Slide 8

    Latin name: Sirindhornia spp

    Tim Johnson

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Slide 9

    Tylototriton shanorum

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>