Powerball’s dark side
Tonight's lottery is up to $500 million. Guess whose money is going into the pot?
By Natasha LennardTopics: Jackpot, Powerball, Lottery, Poverty, Inequality, Economics, $500 million, Business News, News
A customer buys three Powerball tickets at a local supermarket in Hialeah, Fla.,Tuesday (Credit: AP) “What we sell is dreams,” Colorado’s State Lottery director Abel Tapia told USA Today.
Today, Tapia is right — the dream market is booming before tonight’s Powerball lottery which has a jackpot of more than $500 million, the largest ever.
Powerball, which is sold in 42 states,Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Virgin Islands, has not had a winner in two months, rolling over the prize money and culminating in a ticket-buying frenzy today. Americans across the country who do not regularly play the lottery are shelling out for a one-in-175 million chance at Romney riches.
On days like this, when the promise of mega winnings turns the lottery into a news story, it seems its least pernicious. Local and national papers are flush with cheerful tales of comfortable, middle class Americans waiting in long gas station lines to buy a handful of tickets, joining offices pools and spinning cliched yarns about retiring in luxury on a desert island.
“Kathy Rose knew she was in trouble when she woke up at 3 a.m. Tuesday, fantasizing about the celebration that will ensue when her office wins tonight’s $500 million Powerball jackpot,” the Kansas City Star reported Wednesday of one local mayor and health clinic worker — one character in a list of today’s excitable dream buyers.
But this is not the day-to-day, week-to-week business of lottery games which rely on poverty, habit and desperation. Studies of lottery ticket sales in North Carolina, South Carolina, California, Texas and Connecticut found that per capita lottery sales are consistently higher in the poorest counties and tickets are more likely to be purchased by unemployed individuals.
Statistics from South Carolina highlight the lottery’s reliance on low earners: people in households earning under $40,000 made up 54 percent of frequent players, while constituting only 28 percent of the state’s population. Meanwhile, a PBS report earlier this year showed that, for America’s very poorest, the lottery is a heavy expenditure: Households that earn at most $13,000 a year spend 9 percent of their money on lottery tickets.
“Lotteries set off a vicious cycle that not only exploits low-income individuals’ desires to escape poverty but also directly prevents them from improving upon their financial situations,” a 2008 study by Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business noted. The study, aligning with national statistics, found that people who felt poor were found to buy double the number of lottery tickets.
“Some poor people see playing the lottery as their best opportunity for improving their financial situations, albeit wrongly so,” said the study’s lead author Emily Haisley.
In support of modern lotteries, many point out that they function like a voluntary tax, with money from ticket sales filling holes in government deficits and funding education programs and charitable efforts. But these are regressive taxes on poverty; tickets not only cost relatively more for a poor person than a rich person, but lower-income individuals are also consistently the majority of volunteers for this tax.
Much of the lottery’s appeal is pure chance and randomness — an ostensible great equalizer, when the ticket of an unemployed homeless person has the same odds of winning as that of a millionaire. But as Gordon Giles pointed out in Philosophy Now, in this way, the lottery should by no more celebrated than was the Poll Tax, which provoked mass riots across Britain when introduced by Margaret Thatcher in 1990: “While it may be that every purchaser has an equal chance, the lottery is susceptible to the same charge made against the Poll Tax – that it treated people equally, but for doing so, was not fair. What was despised in that context is now affirmed willingly. The Poll Tax was seen as making the poor pay for the rich, but the same could be said of the Lottery, particularly because ticket sales are highest among the lower paid.”
There risks, of course, with a debate over whether the lottery is “good” or “bad” a cheap paternalism and responses to it that are cheaper still. If individuals choose to spend their money on lottery tickets — even in cases where it seems a bad use of scant resources — whose place is it to tell them to do otherwise? But to focus on consumer choice (to condemn or support it) would be to miss the basic point: This business of dreams, while almost exclusively framed by the media on jackpot days like today as a frivolous moment of national excitement, is undergirded by poverty — it relies on it and does nothing to ameliorate the conditions that make poverty a reality.
Natasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email nlennard@salon.com. More Natasha Lennard.
Related Stories
-
Coming eventually: Print your own organs
-
It's time to focus on jobs
-
Economy added 155,000 jobs in December
-
America's credit system is broken
-
ADP report shows gain of 215,000 jobs
-
The real way to fix the deficit: Stop coddling the rich
-
Robots don't destroy jobs!
-
4 painful lessons from the "fiscal cliff"
-
Dow rises for fourth straight year
-
10 states set for minimum wage hike
-
Obama: An agreement is "within sight"
-
Prepare for the mini-cliffs: Wind and dairy on the brink
-
Zynga slashes games and jobs in effort to regroup
-
What if we go over the fiscal cliff?
-
Report: Obama to propose compromise package to avoid cliff
-
Equity crowdfunding waits on the SEC
-
Republicans just don't care what the nation thinks
-
Private equity investor: "We didn't build that"
-
Android surge shakes Apple
-
U.S. gas sales declining
-
Bernie Madoff doesn't like what he sees in the markets
Featured Slide Shows
What To Read Awards: Top 10 Books of 2012 slide show
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 10
- Previous
- Next
-
10. "The Guardians" by Sarah Manguso: "Though Sarah Manguso’s 'The Guardians' is specifically about losing a dear friend to suicide, she pries open her intelligent heart to describe our strange, sad modern lives. I think about the small resonating moments of Manguso’s narrative every day." -- M. Rebekah Otto, The Rumpus
-
9. "Beautiful Ruins" by Jess Walter: "'Beautiful Ruins' leads my list because it's set on the coast of Italy in 1962 and Richard Burton makes an entirely convincing cameo appearance. What more could you want?" -- Maureen Corrigan, NPR's "Fresh Air"
-
8. "Arcadia" by Lauren Groff: "'Arcadia' captures our painful nostalgia for an idyllic past we never really had." -- Ron Charles, Washington Post
-
7. "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn: "When a young wife disappears on the morning of her fifth wedding anniversary, her husband becomes the automatic suspect in this compulsively readable thriller, which is as rich with sardonic humor and social satire as it is unexpected plot twists." -- Marjorie Kehe, Christian Science Monitor
-
6. "How Should a Person Be" by Sheila Heti: "There was a reason this book was so talked about, and it’s because Heti has tapped into something great." -- Jason Diamond, Vol. 1 Brooklyn
-
4. TIE "NW" by Zadie Smith and "Far From the Tree" by Andrew Solomon: "Zadie Smith’s 'NW' is going to enter the canon for the sheer audacity of the book’s project." -- Roxane Gay, New York Times "'Far From the Tree' by Andrew Solomon is, to my mind, a life-changing book, one that's capable of overturning long-standing ideas of identity, family and love." -- Laura Miller, Salon
-
3. "Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk" by Ben Fountain: "'Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk' says a lot about where we are today," says Marjorie Kehe of the Christian Science Monitor. "Pretty much the whole point of that novel," adds Time's Lev Grossman.
-
2. "Bring Up the Bodies" by Hilary Mantel: "Even more accomplished than the preceding novel in this sequence, 'Wolf Hall,' Mantel's new installment in the fictionalized life of Thomas Cromwell -- master secretary and chief fixer to Henry VIII -- is a high-wire act, a feat of novelistic derring-do." -- Laura Miller, Salon
-
1. "Behind the Beautiful Forevers" by Katherine Boo: "Like the most remarkable literary nonfiction, it reads with the bite of a novel and opens up a corner of the world that most of us know absolutely nothing about. It stuck with me all year." -- Eric Banks, president of the National Book Critics Circle
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
What To Read Awards: Top 10 Books of 2012 slide show
-
Blue Glow TV Awards: Top 10 Shows of the Year
-
The Week in Pictures
-
The Week in Pictures
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 10
- Previous
- Next
-
The Week in Pictures
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Meet this season's 10 TV scene-stealers and scene-killers
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Great graphic novels from 2012
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Gladwell, Franco, Patti Smith: These books changed me
-
Was I right? Six new TV series reassessed
-
Salon's Sexiest Men of 2012
-
Cinema's 11 most memorable LGBT villains
-
The Week in Pictures
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Sandy, the day after
-
Transit in trauma
-
Sandy's shocking aftermath
-
The best storms in cinematic history
-
Chris Christie reports in casual-wear
-
Lou Reed's been terrible for years!
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Susan Isaacs loves a rogue: Here are her nine favorites
-
The Week in Pictures
Related Videos
More Related Stories
Most Read
From Around the Web
Obama the master strategist: How conservatives see the fiscal cliff deal
Google's big antitrust victory: What the FTC's decision means for you
Today in business: 5 things you need to know
The single dumbest gun-control measure ever proposed
The Accidental Congressman: Can a good man survive in Washington?


Comments
15 Comments