Has Syria crossed the chemical weapon “red line”?
Reports of Assad's nerve gas bombs have U.S. officials "concerned," but why the focus on chemical warfare?
Topics: Syria, Chemical weapons, Terrorism, Nerve gas, Leon Panetta, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Bashar al-Assad, Middle East, Turkey, Free Syrian Army, Civil War, Red line, News
U.S. officials reported that Syria’s government is preparing nerve gas bombs and would use chemical weapons against its own people. According to an NBC report, “The [Syrian] military has loaded the precursor chemicals for sarin, a deadly nerve gas, into aerial bombs that could be dropped onto the Syrian people from dozens of fighter-bombers, the officials said.”
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta followed up the reports Thursday, noting “we are very concerned that as the opposition advances particularly on Damascus that the regime might very well consider the use of chemical weapons.”
Chemical weapons have for the U.S. been an expressed “red line” in regards to Syria. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated previously that should Assad deploy chemical weapons against his people, “suffice to say we are certainly planning to take action.”
But what sort of “action” is yet unspecified. Furthermore there are lingering questions as to why the U.S. has focused on chemical weapons in particular.
Syrian government officials have already denied U.S. reports about nerve gas bombs. “Syria stresses again, for the tenth, the hundredth time, that if we had such weapons, they would not be used against its people. We would not commit suicide,” said the Assad regime’s deputy foreign minister Faisal Maqdad. “We fear there is a conspiracy to provide a pretext for any subsequent interventions in Syria by these countries that are increasing pressure on Syria,” he had.
NATO has moved forward with its plan to place Patriot missiles and troops along Syria’s border with Turkey to protect against potential attacks, but the AP suggested that the limited scope of the operation “reflects the low appetite in Western capitals for direct military intervention in the civil war.”
Natasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email nlennard@salon.com. More Natasha Lennard.





Comments
6 Comments