“Zero Dark Thirty’s” torture debate
Critics and columnists argue over the interrogation techniques in the Osama bin Laden manhunt drama
Topics: Zero Dark Thirty, ZDT, Torture, Osama Bin Laden, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Entertainment News
The same weekend that Kathryn Bigelow’s Osama bin Laden manhunt docudrama, “Zero Dark Thirty,” dazzled movie critics, columnists attacked the movie for its depiction of torture. Specifically, the New Yorker’s Dexter Filkins notes that the movie, intended to be historically accurate, incorrectly highlighted torture as the key to Osama bin Laden’s capture; the Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald went so far as to say the film “glorifies” torture, saying that the film “propagandizes the public to favorably view clear war crimes by the US government, based on pure falsehoods.”
Critics are now defending the film, triggering a politically tinged fact-versus-fiction “truthiness” debate that will be sure to run long after the movie debuts Dec. 19.
Writer and critic Matt Singer fires back:
ZERO DARK THIRTY does not include scenes of torture to glorify torture. It includes scenes of torture because the U.S. tortured people.
— Matt Singer (@mattsinger) December 10, 2012
From Scott Tobias, A.V. Club Film Editor:
I don't want to be too glib about ZD30. It's likely people will object to it on the torture issue. But it's complicated. See it first!
— Scott Tobias (@scott_tobias) December 10, 2012
@juvie_cinephile Exactly. Good point.
— Scott Tobias (@scott_tobias) December 10, 2012
EW columnist Mark Harris challenges Greenwald:
@ggreenwald @froomkin Where torture is placed in the film's chronology and how it's depicted is more of a gray area than you may imagine.
— Mark Harris (@MarkHarrisNYC) December 10, 2012
Prachi Gupta is an Assistant News Editor for Salon, focusing on pop culture. Follow her on Twitter at @prachigu or email her at pgupta@salon.com. More Prachi Gupta.


Comments
7 Comments