Mass shootings are actually bad for gun control advocates
The horrifying truth is that massacres are difficult to prevent. More common gun crimes are another story entirely
By Tom Jacobs, Pacific StandardTopics: Pacific Standard, NRA, Columbine, Aurora, Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting, Connecticut, Guns, Gun Violence, Life News
The tragic mass killings at that Connecticut school will undoubtedly spur renewed calls for gun control. According to one criminologist, that would be a welcome but somewhat ironic development, since mass school shootings seldom provide compelling evidence in favor of more restrictions on weapons.
The scholarly journal American Behavioral Scientist devoted two issues in 2009 to the 10th anniversary of the Columbine High School mass killings and what, if anything, we have learned from them. Gary Kleck, professor of criminology and criminal justice at Florida State University, contributed an essay in which he called mass school shootings “the worst possible case for gun control.”
Here’s his reasoning:
The following are important attributes of the “typical” school mass shooting, if one can speak of a typical scenario for such infrequent events. First, the crimes are premeditated. The killers plan the murders, and how they will carry them out, for days or weeks in advance, and sometimes even longer. This means they possess a persistent ongoing desire to acquire the tools of murder, not a transient short-term desire. Gun control measures that merely delay gun acquisition, such as waiting periods, are therefore irrelevant, as are those that merely place minor obstacles in a gun buyer’s way.
Second, the guns used in the shootings typically either already belonged to the shooters prior to their formulation of an intent to carry out a mass murder or were acquired by theft. Only the shooters at Columbine used guns obtained at gun shows, and even this was purely incidental—the killers could have legally acquired the same guns at gun stores. Restrictions on gun shows are therefore irrelevant, both to Columbine and other mass school shootings.
Furthermore, locking devices are irrelevant to blocking access to a shooter’s own gun, that is, one to which he has authorized access, and are relevant to the prevention of theft by would-be mass killers only to the extent that they can defeat the efforts of these strongly motivated thieves.
Third, the killers who seek to inflict large numbers of casualties typically use multiple guns, and often multiple magazines full of ammunition as well. Therefore, guns with large-capacity magazines were unnecessary to inflict even the very large numbers of wounds inflicted in these incidents without reloading. Controls on large-capacity magazines are therefore largely irrelevant to either preventing these incidents or reducing their victim counts.
Fourth, mass shootings, in or out of schools, take a long enough time to carry out that all of the shots fired could also have been fired had the shooters used slower firing guns. Thus, rapid-fire guns are not needed to inflict as many casualties as were inflicted. The significance of their high rate of fire is thus more potential than real. Controls on rapid-firing semiautomatic guns (which fire just one shot per trigger pull) are therefore largely irrelevant to either preventing these incidents or reducing the number of victims.
The terrible reality is that powerfully motivated and premeditated violence, especially that carried out by killers willing to die—by their own hands or those of the police—are among the hardest violent acts to prevent, regardless of what measures one might use to do so.
In retrospect, one can apply that same thinking to the Aurora, Colorado theater tragedy.
That doesn’t mean Keck is anti-gun control. Rather, he writes, “The irony is that some of the proposed gun control measures that would have been useless for preventing either Columbine or the other mass school shootings of the late 1990s might be perfectly reasonable measures for preventing ordinary gun violence.”
Keck argues it would be “perfectly reasonable, for the purpose of reducing ordinary gun violence, to extend background checks on gun purchasers to cover transactions between private parties, as well as those involving licensed dealers.
“This … could prevent casually motivated gun acquisition by convicted criminals and other high-risk persons who are less powerfully motivated than mass killers to get guns regardless of the obstacles. This in turn could make any violent acts later committed by these persons less lethal, helping to reduce the homicide rate.”
So, if you hear the argument “Gun control wouldn’t have prevented tragedies like the one in Connecticut,” the answer is: That’s probably true. But it would lessen the likelihood of a lot of other, smaller tragedies that receive less publicity, but still cause enormous pain.
Related Stories
-
Poll: Obesity's a crisis but we want our junk food
-
The Atlantic takes on the Atlantic's take on online dating
-
Progressives don't hold a monopoly on science
-
Rare San Francisco river otter stumps researchers
-
Tween booted off Facebook starts his own social network
-
British xenophobia on the rise
-
Study: Recessions can be hazardous to kids' health
-
No one wants to see your C-section!
-
Hundreds arrested in child pornography probe
-
Internet-connected devices now outnumber people in the U.S.
-
College debt is completely out of control
-
Arizona is trying to ruin Twitter
-
1 in 24 drivers admit nodding off behind the wheel
-
America's credit system is broken
-
The ever-changing ideologies of Jane Roe
-
Marijuana smoothie, anyone?
-
Highway of the future is seriously smart
-
Study: Alzheimer's linked to brain changes at birth
-
Indian police charge 5 in New Delhi gang rape
-
How fracking is corroding small-town America
-
Study: You're probably going to break your New Year's resolution
Featured Slide Shows
What To Read Awards: Top 10 Books of 2012 slide show
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 10
- Previous
- Next
-
10. "The Guardians" by Sarah Manguso: "Though Sarah Manguso’s 'The Guardians' is specifically about losing a dear friend to suicide, she pries open her intelligent heart to describe our strange, sad modern lives. I think about the small resonating moments of Manguso’s narrative every day." -- M. Rebekah Otto, The Rumpus
-
9. "Beautiful Ruins" by Jess Walter: "'Beautiful Ruins' leads my list because it's set on the coast of Italy in 1962 and Richard Burton makes an entirely convincing cameo appearance. What more could you want?" -- Maureen Corrigan, NPR's "Fresh Air"
-
8. "Arcadia" by Lauren Groff: "'Arcadia' captures our painful nostalgia for an idyllic past we never really had." -- Ron Charles, Washington Post
-
7. "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn: "When a young wife disappears on the morning of her fifth wedding anniversary, her husband becomes the automatic suspect in this compulsively readable thriller, which is as rich with sardonic humor and social satire as it is unexpected plot twists." -- Marjorie Kehe, Christian Science Monitor
-
6. "How Should a Person Be" by Sheila Heti: "There was a reason this book was so talked about, and it’s because Heti has tapped into something great." -- Jason Diamond, Vol. 1 Brooklyn
-
4. TIE "NW" by Zadie Smith and "Far From the Tree" by Andrew Solomon: "Zadie Smith’s 'NW' is going to enter the canon for the sheer audacity of the book’s project." -- Roxane Gay, New York Times "'Far From the Tree' by Andrew Solomon is, to my mind, a life-changing book, one that's capable of overturning long-standing ideas of identity, family and love." -- Laura Miller, Salon
-
3. "Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk" by Ben Fountain: "'Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk' says a lot about where we are today," says Marjorie Kehe of the Christian Science Monitor. "Pretty much the whole point of that novel," adds Time's Lev Grossman.
-
2. "Bring Up the Bodies" by Hilary Mantel: "Even more accomplished than the preceding novel in this sequence, 'Wolf Hall,' Mantel's new installment in the fictionalized life of Thomas Cromwell -- master secretary and chief fixer to Henry VIII -- is a high-wire act, a feat of novelistic derring-do." -- Laura Miller, Salon
-
1. "Behind the Beautiful Forevers" by Katherine Boo: "Like the most remarkable literary nonfiction, it reads with the bite of a novel and opens up a corner of the world that most of us know absolutely nothing about. It stuck with me all year." -- Eric Banks, president of the National Book Critics Circle
-
Recent Slide Shows
-
What To Read Awards: Top 10 Books of 2012 slide show
-
Blue Glow TV Awards: Top 10 Shows of the Year
-
The Week in Pictures
-
The Week in Pictures
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 10
- Previous
- Next
-
The Week in Pictures
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Meet this season's 10 TV scene-stealers and scene-killers
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Great graphic novels from 2012
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Gladwell, Franco, Patti Smith: These books changed me
-
Was I right? Six new TV series reassessed
-
Salon's Sexiest Men of 2012
-
Cinema's 11 most memorable LGBT villains
-
The Week in Pictures
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Sandy, the day after
-
Transit in trauma
-
Sandy's shocking aftermath
-
The best storms in cinematic history
-
Chris Christie reports in casual-wear
-
Lou Reed's been terrible for years!
-
The Week in Pictures
-
Susan Isaacs loves a rogue: Here are her nine favorites
-
The Week in Pictures
Related Videos
More Related Stories
Pacific Standard is a bimonthly print and daily online magazine that highlights the best thinking in the social sciences, technology, health, and policy, and grounds those ideas in real stories—entertaining, accessible, urgent. We are of the West, but not strictly about the West.




Comments
11 Comments