Who were the Democrats who voted against “fiscal cliff” deal?
The "fiscal cliff" bill, which split House Republican leadership, also saw opposition from Dems in both chambers
Topics: Democrats, Fiscal cliff, Budget Showdown, John Boehner, Barack Obama, Editor's Picks, Politics News
Though the deal to avoid the “fiscal cliff” passed with overwhelming Democratic support, there were those in both the House and the Senate who were disappointed with the legislation that Congress ultimately pushed through.
In the House, 172 Democrats voted for the bill, with 16 who opposed it. Of the 16, nine lean more liberal, including Rep. Peter DeFazio, Ore., who explained:
While the Senate plan included an extension of unemployment insurance that will save benefits for over 29,000 Oregonians and an essential ‘doc-fix’ that will continue payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients, this ‘deal’ hinders our ability to deal meaningfully with the deficit and burgeoning debt and puts in jeopardy Social Security and Medicare in the coming confrontation over the debt limit.
Jim Moran, Va., also more liberal, argued that the bill just paves the way for three more showdowns over the budget:
Unfortunately the bill before us today is wholly inadequate. It leaves our country with three more “fiscal cliffs” to negotiate over the next three months. There’s no clarity as to how we preserve the full faith and credit of the U.S. by raising the statutory debt limit, the economically devastating sequester is delayed two months but remains in full effect, and there’s no direction as to how we will fund the government for the remainder of the year when the continuing resolution runs out in March.
Of the more conservative House Dems who voted against the bill, Jim Cooper, Tenn., said his opposition was because the deal offered “No real spending cuts. No real deficit reduction. No acknowledgement of America’s out-of-control national debt.”
Mike McIntyre, N.C., took similar issue with the bill. “1) It will add almost $4 trillion to the nation’s debt; 2) It delays spending cuts; and 3) It does not provide for comprehensive tax reform that can help our small businesses create jobs,” McIntyre said in a statement.
Continue Reading CloseJillian Rayfield is an Assistant News Editor for Salon, focusing on politics. Follow her on Twitter at @jillrayfield or email her at jrayfield@salon.com. More Jillian Rayfield.



Comments
10 Comments