Bonds, Clemens must be forgiven
We don't really know what steroids do. So stars like Clemens and Bonds should join baseball's Hall of Fame today
Topics: Sports, Baseball, Hall of Fame, steroids, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Editor's Picks, News
With the cloud of steroids shrouding the candidacies of Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and others, baseball writers might not elect anyone to the Hall of Fame for only the second time in four decades. (Credit: AP)The members of the Baseball Hall of Fame’s class of 2013 will be announced around noon today. Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens are among those new to the ballot this year, but I’m guessing that no one will make it this year — because baseball writers are divided on nearly every issue surrounding eligibility, including what those issues should be.
The major issue, of course, is steroids, a subject on which everyone has an opinion but scarcely anyone has any hard facts. Except for a handful of players, we can’t be certain who actually took steroids. We can’t agree on whether taking steroids really constitutes cheating – if there weren’t any rules against taking a certain substance, many feel, how can you actually say someone cheated? Or so some arguments go.
We don’t even agree on what actually constitutes steroids. The truth of the matter is that very few of the sportswriters weighing in on the subject really know much about them. We lump all performance enhancing drugs under the heading of “steroids” in an effort to sweep them aside and brand them as evil; after years of reading about them, I am still not sure why human growth hormones are bad or why they’re banned. (I know there’s a rational answer to a question I have often asked, namely if HGH heals injuries faster, why is it wrong to use it? But no one has yet given me an answer I can understand.)
Most important, at least to the Hall of Fame discussion, we’re not even sure how or if performance enhancing drugs enhance performance. Yes, I know, everyone has a story about a sprinter or a minor league pitcher who got a big boost from injecting themselves with something, but I’ve been studying the effects of PEDs on baseball for years now, and I have no clear sense that steroids – no, let me be accurate here and say PEDs – really had much impact at all on baseball. At least, no impact that can’t also be explained by changes in tactics, strategy, equipment, rule changes and bandbox ballparks. In fact, most of the claims that have been made about PED effects dissolve under scrutiny.
Except for Barry Bonds, whom I may as well deal with right now. Bonds is a case unto himself. I know of no other baseball player, indeed, no other professional athlete, who, after age 35, suddenly became better than his 25-year-old self. And Bonds didn’t simply get better between the age of 35 and 40, he became the greatest player in baseball history – stronger, faster, just plain better than this young self in every way. No one even remotely fits in Barry Bonds’ category.
Allen Barra's next book is "Mickey and Willie -- The Parallel Lives of Baseball's Golden Age," from Crown. More Allen Barra.




Comments
59 Comments